logo
Oil price volatility concern as North Sea job losses mount

Oil price volatility concern as North Sea job losses mount

'I think it is true when the Prime Minister says energy security is national security,' he said, adding: 'Over 40% of our energy demand was imported last year and I think in an uncertain world, you know that's the wrong place to be.'
The reliance on imports leaves the UK vulnerable to a disruption to supplies, reckons Mr Whitehouse. He claims the country is depriving itself of huge amounts of economic value that are enjoyed instead by countries it buys oil and gas from. Imports may result in an increase in emissions compared to UK sources when related production and transport operations are taken into account.
'If we do it here in the UK that protects jobs, puts real value into our economy and we deliver that with a lower carbon footprint so I think the case for having home-grown oil and gas is compelling,' said Mr Whitehouse.
READ MORE:
As Chevron closes Aberdeen office, what now for North Sea jobs?
Scale of SNP Government climate change failings underlined by experts
Israeli-owned firm takes control of UK's biggest gas field
The oil and gas industry veteran noted that an expert report for OEUK published in June found that up to 7.5 billion barrels of oil and gas could still be produced from UK waters. The figure is around 3.2 bn barrels higher than current government estimates.
OEUK has highlighted the fact that the Climate Change Committee, which advises the Government, has forecast that in a scenario where the UK meets all its climate targets on time homes and businesses will still use between 13 and 15 billion barrels of oil and gas.
The potential additional 3bn barrels production that OEUK thinks is possible could be worth £165 billion to the UK economy in total and support thousands of jobs.
Under Mr Whitehouse's leadership OEUK will focus much of its effort on campaigning for cuts in oil and gas taxes as the Government prepares to publish the results of a review of the fiscal regime.
North Sea firms complain the tax burden has increased significantly since the windfall tax was introduced by the former Conservative Government in 2022. The rate of the energy profits levy has been increased since then, most recently by the Labour Government in the Budget in October.
While the tax was imposed after oil and gas firms posted bumper profits, Mr Whitehouse claimed it has caused lots of damage.
He said one way of highlighting that would be that fact that in 2019 the former Oil and Gas Authority predicted that over 6bn barrels of oil and gas would be produced from the UK North Sea between 2025 and 2050, with over 10bn possible. That compares with the successor North Sea Transition Authority's forecast of around 3.5bn.
'The underlying geology in the North Sea hasn't changed but the environment and the uncertainty has and the windfall tax has played an important role in that, it is deterring investment' claimed Mr Whitehouse. 'As we look forward to the second half of the year we are seeing a rapid drop off in terms of rig activity in the North Sea.'
OEUK chief executive David Whitehouse claims oil and gas firms can play a key role in the development of renewables assets off Scotland (Image: OEUK)
The Government has come under pressure to bring forward the date for the ending of the windfall tax to 2026 from 2030. Chancellor Rachel Reeves gave no ground when she published the results of the key Comprehensive Spending Review in June.
However, Mr Whitehouse hopes that OEUK could still win concessions.
'The Treasury has some very thoughtful mechanisms which mean that in the event that prices spike the tax on the sector would increase,' he observed.
There are details to be considered but OEUK wants the successor regime to be implemented in 2026.
Mr Whitehouse is confident that the resulting boost to activity would allow the Government to recover more revenue than it lost as a result of easing the tax burden.
He noted: 'In a regime where you're paying high tax that is causing investment not to happen … that does reduce your economic growth actually, it also ultimately reduces your tax receipts.'
OEUK welcomed the results of the review of the field development consenting process the Government published this month – although energy minister Ed Miliband's plans to stop issuing exploration licences for new areas is a cause for concern.
The consenting review was launched after a Scottish court ruled the Conservative Government was wrong to approve plans for the controversial Rosebank development off Shetland - because the assessment process failed to take into account the emissions that would result from use of the oil concerned.
Under the Government's plans firms will be required to submit environmental impact assessments in respect of proposed field developments that do consider such emissions.
'We welcome that the guidance has come out, it is an important step to projects moving forward,' said Mr Whitehouse.
The regulatory change could have positive implications for the planned Rosebank, Jackdaw and Cambo developments, all of which are opposed by environmentalists.
READ MORE: North Sea jobs cull looms after blockbuster oil and gas deals
Mr Whitehouse hammered home claims that the UK needs to ensure that it has a strong oil and gas supply chain if it is to make the most of the potential of low carbon energy generation and carbon capture and storage technology to support the net zero drive.
Oil and gas firms have the expertise required to develop offshore facilities such as windfarms and some have shown they are willing to invest directly in developments.
OEUK's membership includes firms that are active in renewable energy generation, hydrogen production and carbon capture and storage. It evolved out of the former Oil and Gas UK.
'If we manage the opportunity right and in a pragmatic way, which is support for oil and gas while we still use it then we see significant opportunities, particularly floating wind, carbon capture,' Mr Whitehouse said.
'I think there's huge opportunities for Scotland the wider UK … not just storing emissions from UK industry but storing them from Europe.'
In June the UK Government confirmed it would provide £200m funding for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project, which will involve capturing industrial emissions and transporting them for storage in depleted North Sea reservoirs. It also announced £500m funding for UK hydrogen projects and a £1bn offshore wind supply chain initiative.
Mr Whitehouse said OEUK very much welcomed the announcements concerned, which should help to generate momentum in the low carbon sector.
However, noting that the number of jobs created in the sector so far has remained lower than expected, he cautioned: 'It is good to have ambition. It is good to set targets. But for those targets we need to make sure that they become real, that … people can feel that there are genuine delivery plans that sit underneath them.'
The prize could be huge if politicians and industry play their parts effectively. That will require people to recognise that the UK will need oil and gas and the related supply chain for years as it builds out the low carbon generating systems it is hoped will eventually meet its energy requirements.
Noting that 90,000 jobs are supported by the oil and gas sector, Mr Whitehouse appeared optimistic about the future despite the concern about the geopolitical outlook.
'I think over the coming decades, I would like to see that integrated energy sector significantly increasing the number of highly skilled, well-paid jobs,' he said. However, the prediction came with the caveat that 'it's that integration that I think is going to be the path to success'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestine Action to make Court of Appeal bid at evening hearing over terror ban
Palestine Action to make Court of Appeal bid at evening hearing over terror ban

North Wales Chronicle

time34 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Palestine Action to make Court of Appeal bid at evening hearing over terror ban

Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. The move was to come into force at midnight after High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain refused Ms Ammori's bid for a temporary block. But lawyers on behalf of the group will now bring their case to the Court of Appeal in a bid to challenge the decision at a hearing due to begin at 8pm on Friday. At a short, urgent preliminary appeal hearing, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr asked Raza Husain KC, representing Ms Ammori: 'If this matter is going ahead, you need a decision from us by then, do you?' Mr Husain replied: 'Indeed.' Baroness Carr, sitting with Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis, said the hearing would last an hour, refusing a bid to extend it to 90 minutes. She said: 'We're less than five hours away, we've got to make our minds up on what we've got.' The head of the judiciary in England and Wales added: 'Both sides, if there was any prospect of an appeal, ought to have had all of these matters well in hand, if you were going to come to the Court of Appeal and ask for a decision by midnight. 'We are here now. We will do our best.' In his decision refusing the temporary block, Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Shortly after the decision was handed down, Ms Ammori said that she would be 'seeking an urgent appeal to try to prevent a dystopian nightmare of the Government's making'. She added: 'The Home Secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect. 'Hundreds of thousands of people across the country have expressed support for Palestine Action by joining our mailing list, following and sharing our social media content and signing petitions, and many, including iconic figures like Sally Rooney, say they will continue to declare 'we are all Palestine Action' and speak out against this preposterous proscription, demonstrating how utterly unworkable it will be.'

Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes
Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes

Rhyl Journal

time34 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes

The Chancellor warned there would be 'costs to what happened', as she faced questions about how she would cover a shortfall left by the Downing Street climbdown on planned cuts to disability benefits. The Government saw off the threat of a major Commons defeat over the legislation on Tuesday, after shelving plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, with economists warning that tax rises are now likely to plug a gap left by the concessions to rebels. The fallout threatens to cause lasting damage to morale in Labour ranks, with some MPs calling for a reset in relations between the parliamentary party and the leadership before fractures widen. Images of the Chancellor crying in the Commons on Wednesday also spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, though a Treasury spokesman said the tears were the result of a personal matter and Downing Street said she would remain in post. In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, Ms Reeves said she had never considered resigning, adding: 'I didn't work that hard to then quit.' She said she had gone to Prime Minister's Questions because she 'thought that was the right thing to do' but that 'in retrospect, I probably wished I hadn't gone in… (on) a tough day in the office'. Ms Reeves added: 'It's been damaging. 'I'm not going to deny that, but I think where we are now, with a review led by (disability minister) Stephen Timms, who is obviously incredibly respected and has a huge amount of experience, that's the route we're taking now.' Asked whether she would rule out tax rises now, she said to do so would be 'irresponsible' but warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Reeves is said to have already told ministers that the decision to water down the welfare package means taxes will rise in the autumn. The Times reported she had warned Cabinet on Tuesday that the increases in her first budget, which included a £24 billion hike to employer national insurance, were 'painful' but 'the low-hanging fruit'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the Government is still committed to welfare reform, but ministers will now wait for the conclusions of the Timms review before implementing changes to Pip.

Some consequences of Palestine Action ban ‘overstated', says High Court judge
Some consequences of Palestine Action ban ‘overstated', says High Court judge

Glasgow Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Some consequences of Palestine Action ban ‘overstated', says High Court judge

Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation, before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain refused to grant the temporary block, finding there was a 'strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'. Lawyers for Palestine Action will now make a last-minute bid at the Court of Appeal to challenge this decision, as the ban is expected to come into force at midnight. In a 26-page judgment, Mr Justice Chamberlain said that 'some of the consequences feared by the claimant and others who have given evidence are overstated' if the temporary block was refused, but a later challenge against the ban succeeded. He continued: 'It will remain lawful for the claimant and other persons who were members of Palestine Action prior to proscription to continue to express their opposition to Israel's actions in Gaza and elsewhere, including by drawing attention to what they regard as Israel's genocide and other serious violations of international law. 'They will remain legally entitled to do so in private conversations, in print, on social media and at protests.' He added: 'It follows that it is hyperbole to talk of the claimant or others being 'gagged' in this respect, as the claimant has alleged. 'They could not incur criminal liability based on their past association with a group which was not proscribed at the time. 'That said, there is no doubt that there will be serious consequences if the order comes into effect immediately and interim relief is refused.' The judge later said that if people choose to continue to express support for Palestine Action post-proscription, they may face criminal consequences, adding: 'This, however, is the intended effect of the order. It is how it achieves its aim of disrupting the activities of the proscribed organisation.' The proposal to ban the group was approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. At the High Court hearing on Friday, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, asked the court to suspend the 'ill-considered' and 'authoritarian abuse of statutory power' until a hearing in the wider legal challenge, due around July 21. The hearing later in July is expected to deal with whether Ms Ammori can bring a High Court challenge over the planned proscription. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the banning of the group, adding it could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Following the High Court's decision on Friday, Ms Ammori said: 'The Home Secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect. 'Hundreds of thousands of people across the country have expressed support for Palestine Action by joining our mailing list, following and sharing our social media content and signing petitions, and many, including iconic figures like Sally Rooney, say they will continue to declare 'we are all Palestine Action' and speak out against this preposterous proscription, demonstrating how utterly unworkable it will be.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store