logo
Opinion: How A Japanese Anime Became Indonesia's Surprise Protest Symbol

Opinion: How A Japanese Anime Became Indonesia's Surprise Protest Symbol

NDTV2 days ago
A Japanese anime has unexpectedly become a symbol of resistance in Indonesia, as young people lean into popular culture to speak out against corruption and ineffective governance. The viral protests come as space for dissent in the world's third-largest democracy shrinks.
Young Indonesians are using the nation's 80th independence anniversary on Aug. 17 to mark their dissatisfaction with President Prabowo Subianto's government. Elected in 2024, he still enjoys enviable approval ratings, but disenchantment with his administration is growing in the archipelago once heralded as the poster child of democratic transformation in Southeast Asia. In the last decade though, that progress has stalled.
Frustration with the system gave rise to nation-wide demonstrations in February, known as Indonesia Gelap, or Dark Indonesia. Students marched against a variety of issues, such as the role of the military in government, corruption, nepotism and Prabowo's well-intentioned but heavily-criticized free-meal program.
But on a recent trip to Jakarta I observed an interesting phenomenon - black flags with a symbol from the popular Japanese anime One Piece. The Jolly Roger , the fictional skull and crossbones with a straw hat, first started popping up on the back of trucks and vehicles, and then on doorways and flagpoles across Indonesia. The trend began, according to some social media observers, after Prabowo called for citizens to fly the national red-and-white flag ahead of this weekend's independence celebrations.
The choice of One Piece's Jolly Roger isn't accidental. It's a classic tale of good versus evil, following the travels of Monkey D. Luffy and fellow Straw Hat Pirates who are fighting a draconian regime. The parallels aren't lost on young Indonesians.
Compared to their peers in the region, they're among the most concerned about a widening income gap, job prospects and graft, according to a recent survey by the Singapore-based ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute. Freedom House ranks Indonesia only party free, citing systemic corruption and the politicized use of defamation and blasphemy laws.
This isn't the future students and activists fought for during the country's painful transition to democracy from military rule in 1998. At the time, they took to the streets, demanding the end of former president and dictator Suharto's three-decade rule. I spent my formative years in autocratic Indonesia, witnessing that transformation. Suharto eventually stepped down, and the nation became a democracy, with an active civil society and media. Losing these hard-won freedoms would mean those struggles were fought in vain.
Optimists about Indonesia's post-authoritarian era have many successes to point to. It has enjoyed relatively smooth handovers of power, regular election cycles and a flourishing of public debate. It is Southeast Asia's largest-economy, and occupies a strategic position in the Indo-Pacific. Home to rich natural resources, it's a pivotal player in the rivalry between the US and China.
The democratic backsliding now threatens its international reputation.
The erosion of rights didn't start with Prabowo, but it has intensified. Former President Joko Widodo's tenure was marked by a declining civil rights landscape and diminishing press freedoms, even though he was initially viewed as a champion of democracy.
There have been more setbacks in the last two years. Controversial rulings by the Constitutional Court in favor of the political elite, revisions to the military law expanding the role of the armed forces, and a weak opposition have meant that accountability is almost non-existent. Public criticism is dismissed rather than addressed, as Hangga Fathana, a lecturer at the Universitas Islam Indonesia, notes for the Australian Institute of International Affairs.
Rather than acknowledging concerns, the president mocked his critics, alleging the rallies were politically motivated, and unrooted in reality. This represents a new form of crushing protests - not with violent repression, but with narrative control and strategic indifference, Hangga adds, making it difficult for activists to push for change.
Dissent now feels futile or dangerous, young people have told me, a reason why the movement behind the One Piece anime resonates. The art of using symbols to get political messages across isn't new. From Winnie the Pooh, who social media users deemed had a likeness to President Xi Jinping, to the Hunger Games' three-finger salute in Thailand and Myanmar, to the use of Pepe the Frog in Hong Kong protests, popular culture has always seeped into Asian political life.
Memetic imagery is a language of rebellion for the digital age. It's difficult to suppress and visually sticky. When authorities try to crack down, claiming, as some Indonesian officials have, claiming that holding the One Piece flag carries criminal repercussions, this only makes them more appealing.
But symbolism can only go so far. Rights groups and opposition parties must continue to push for legal safeguards on freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and student activism. As public demonstrations are increasingly being met with arbitrary arrests, civil society groups will need to be creative to raise awareness about the erosion of rights.
When the space for dissent is disappearing, even a cryptic cartoon flag can feel revolutionary. It's a telling state of affairs in a nation that has fought for its democracy so fiercely.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State was once sold for $7.2 million - Why Alaska matters in Trump-Putin talks? Russian legacy, wartime history, and Cold War strategy in focus
State was once sold for $7.2 million - Why Alaska matters in Trump-Putin talks? Russian legacy, wartime history, and Cold War strategy in focus

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

State was once sold for $7.2 million - Why Alaska matters in Trump-Putin talks? Russian legacy, wartime history, and Cold War strategy in focus

File photo of US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin When US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin meet in Alaska on Friday, the summit will unfold against a backdrop of centuries of history between the two nations and a state that has long been at the frontlines of international tensions. Alaska's Russian roots Russian fur traders arrived in Alaska in the early 18th century, establishing hubs in Sitka and Kodiak Island. Though the Russian population never exceeded 400 settlers, their presence left lasting marks: the oldest building in Anchorage is a Russian Orthodox church, and many Alaska Natives bear Russian surnames. Russian settlers coerced locals into harvesting sea otters for pelts, while missionaries baptized an estimated 18,000 Alaska Natives. By 1867, depleted resources and post-Crimean War finances led Czar Alexander II to sell Alaska to the United States for $7.2 million -- a move derided as 'Seward's Folly' until gold was discovered decades later. Strategic importance in war and peace Alaska proved its strategic value during World War II when Japanese forces captured Attu Island, the only battle on North American soil. During the Cold War, US leaders feared Soviet attacks via the North Pole, prompting radar and missile installations, while military construction shaped roads and communities that later facilitated oil development and the trans-Alaska pipeline. Recent Pentagon warnings about Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic have seen US troops deployed to remote Aleutian islands, highlighting Alaska's ongoing strategic relevance. A long history of high-profile visits Alaska has hosted a range of world leaders. Japanese Emperor Hirohito stopped in Anchorage in 1971; President Reagan met Pope John Paul II in Fairbanks in 1984. Barack Obama visited in 2015, becoming the first sitting US president north of the Arctic Circle. More recently, Chinese President Xi Jinping toured Anchorage in 2017, and US-China talks resumed there in 2021. Criticism of the summit location Some Alaskans question the symbolism of hosting Putin in the state, especially following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The Anchorage Assembly suspended its sister city relationship with Magadan, while the Juneau Assembly expressed concern to Vladivostok. Activist group Stand Up Alaska has organized protests ahead of the summit. Experts suggest that the location could send unintended messages. Nigel Gould-Davies, former British ambassador to Belarus, warned that Putin might use Alaska's history to argue territorial claims, 'It's easy to imagine Putin making the argument…'We gave you Alaska. Why can't Ukraine give us a part of its territory?'' Alaska, with its Russian heritage, strategic significance, and history of high-stakes diplomacy, now plays host to yet another chapter in US-Russia relations, one that blends history, geography, and modern geopolitics in equal measure.

Why an Anime Flag is Threatening the Indonesian Government  Vantage with Palki Sharma
Why an Anime Flag is Threatening the Indonesian Government  Vantage with Palki Sharma

First Post

time4 hours ago

  • First Post

Why an Anime Flag is Threatening the Indonesian Government Vantage with Palki Sharma

Why an Anime Flag is Threatening the Indonesian Government | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G As Indonesia prepares to celebrate its 80th Independence Day on August 17, a surprising symbol of resistance is sweeping across the nation- the pirate flag from One Piece. What started as a pop culture reference has become a bold act of defiance against President Prabowo Subianto's increasingly militarised government. See More

China Is Playing the Long Game on Trade. It's Working
China Is Playing the Long Game on Trade. It's Working

NDTV

time8 hours ago

  • NDTV

China Is Playing the Long Game on Trade. It's Working

President Donald Trump's trade war was meant to rebalance global power in America's favor. Instead, China is playing the long game, enduring short-term economic pain to shape any eventual deal to its advantage. The strategy appears to be working - for now. On Monday, Washington granted Beijing another 90-day reprieve, extending a pause on tariffs through Nov. 10. China announced it would do the same. Markets welcomed the move, which offered some relief after months of tension. The delay will give President Xi Jinping's policymakers more time to plan their next move. Time is Xi's ally. So far, the clearest outcome of each round of talks has been a commitment to meet again. Despite Trump's insistence that China has taken significant steps to improve their trade relationship, Beijing has made no consequential concessions on any of his key concerns. (China has offered some small compromises, none on the scale of American demands.) The extension has come at a delicate time for the economy, which is plagued by sluggish domestic demand and a slowdown in the property sector. Bloomberg Economics says that China is among the few major nations without a clear timeline or terms for a deal, while others have struck agreements to secure lower tariffs. Even with this reprieve, it notes, Beijing faces average US tariffs of 40% - almost 25 percentage points above the global average. This will hurt prospects for Chinese citizens, who have enjoyed more than three decades of near double-digit growth. The economy expanded by 5.2% in April-June from a year earlier - enviable by global standards - but anxieties among the once-thriving middle class over the future for their children are rising. Youth unemployment remains stubbornly high, with joblessness at 14.5% in June. That figure has improved in recent months, but analysts point to significant challenges: More than 12 million university students are set to graduate with hopes of joining the workforce. Still, China is betting that despite these economic costs, it can fight this trade war to the end. Politically, Beijing is preparing the population for a long battle. State media editorials in recent months have lauded a Mao-era philosophy as a possible strategy to counter American pressure. They reference the former Chinese leader's 1938 essay On Protracted War, which laid out his approach to combating the invading Japanese between 1937 and 1945. During a series of lectures in May and June 1938, Mao spoke of how the "contest of strength is not only a contest of military and economic power, but also a contest of human power and morale." Scholars say the idea was to alert his fellow citizens that the war would be long and grueling, but could be won through endurance and unity. Despite millions of Chinese dead, Mao refused to yield. The conflict only ended after Japan surrendered in World War II in 1945. (Mao's civil war with the Nationalists lasted another four years.) Xi appears to be heeding his predecessor's counsel: Patience, at all costs - with the aim of shifting the odds in Beijing's favor. Domestically, Xi has the levers of the Chinese state at his disposal to help him craft a now well-worn narrative that the West is keeping China down. The trade war has fueled those views, which play well with an already disgruntled citizenry. Internationally, Trump is doing much of the work for him. In contrast to Washington's chaos on everything from trade to international students' university admissions, Beijing is presenting itself as a champion of multilateralism - notwithstanding that it's also trying to reshape the world order to its advantage. China is happy to keep the talks going, but is unlikely to make any concessions, as William Yang, the International Crisis Group's senior North East Asia analyst, says in a note. "China believes momentum is on its side because Trump has a stronger desire to sign a deal with Beijing so that he can claim victory and secure a summit with Xi in the fall." But Washington's economic leverage is gradually eroding, as China pushes ahead with its strategy of self-reliance. Beijing wants to reduce dependence on US markets, and deepen control over critical supply chains, as a report from the RAND thinktank notes. China on Monday urged local firms to avoid using Nvidia Corp.'s H20 processors, especially in government projects, following a White House directive requiring it and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. to pay 15% of Chinese AI chip sales to Washington. As Mao wrote, "final victory will not come about without human action." Trump may tout his successes in bringing China's economy to heel. By betting on time and resilience, Beijing is showing it's willing to wait for the win. (This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store