Iran to hold nuclear talks with European powers on Friday
The talks scheduled for Friday come after foreign ministers of the three nations as well as the European Union's foreign policy chief, held their first call on Thursday with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi since Israel and the US attacked Iranian nuclear facilities a month ago.
The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 nuclear deal reached with Iran - from which the US withdrew in 2018 - that lifted sanctions on the Middle Eastern country in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme.
They have said they would restore UN sanctions on Tehran via the "snapback mechanism" by the end of August if nuclear talks that were ongoing between Iran and the US before the Israel-Iran air war do not resume or fail to produce concrete results.
"If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly, and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they lack absolutely [any] moral and legal ground," Araqchi said earlier in the week.
The snapback mechanism can be used to restore UN sanctions before the UN Security Council resolution enshrining the deal expires on October 18.
Prior to the Israel-Iran war, Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman but faced major stumbling blocks such as uranium enrichment in Iran, which Western powers want to bring down to zero to minimise any risk of weaponisation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defends decision to support military aid for Israel
US Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has come under fire for defending her decision to support a bill which will see more military aid go to Israel's Iron Dome air defence system. The New York lawmaker voted against an amendment by Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene last week that sought to block $500m in Congress' annual defence spending bill for Israel's Iron Dome programme. Fellow Democrats Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar had supported Taylor Greene's amendment, which eventually lost in a 422-6 vote. In a post on X on Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez claimed that Green's amendment did "nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza". "What it does do is cut off defensive Iron Dome capacities while allowing the actual bombs killing Palestinians to continue," she said. "I have long stated that I do not believe that adding to the death count of innocent victims to this war is constructive to its end. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "That is a simple and clear difference of opinion that has long been established. I remain focused on cutting the flow of US munitions that are being used to perpetuate the genocide in Gaza." On Saturday, the Democratic Socialists of America, of which Ocasio-Cortez is a member, said it was crucial that lawmakers backed all-encompassing arm embargoes against Israel, including those concerning defensive weapons. 'While the Congresswoman voted against the defense appropriations bill itself, voting against funding for the imperialist military-industrial complex and the Israeli genocide, we were further deeply disappointed by her clarifying statement on her position on the Iron Dome. AOC faces backlash for crying, but not voting, over bill to fund Israel's Iron Dome Read More » 'Along with other US-funded interceptor systems, the Iron Dome has emboldened Israel to invade or bomb no less than five different countries in the past two years.' DSA said that providing any military aid to Israel while they carried out a genocide with US support is completely unacceptable as it legitimised "its eliminationist campaign against the Palestinian people". "The fact that Representative Ocasio-Cortez acknowledges that Israel is carrying out this genocide makes her support for military aid all the more disappointing and incongruous," DSA continued. On Monday, Ocasio-Cortez faced criticism from members of the public, including at least one person who defaced her campaign office with red paint. A sign was also left outside the building, accusing the congresswoman of funding a genocide in Gaza. The New York native in 2021 faced a deluge of criticism over the Iron Dome defence system, when she cried on the House floor after changing her vote from "no" to "present" on providing $1bn in funding for the defence system. In an open letter after that incident, she said she had changed her vote because she was subject to "hateful targeting".
Al Etihad
3 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Fundamentals of GCC policy on conflicts in Middle East
22 July 2025 00:27 MARIAM MOHAMED ALJNEIBIThe columnist is a writer with the think-tank firm TRENDS Research & AdvisoryThe Middle East continues to face a web of overlapping tensions that shape its political and security landscape. While the risk of escalation remains real, these challenges also present an opportunity for regional actors to promote dialogue and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have adopted a measured approach rooted in neutrality, balanced diplomacy, and a commitment to international law. They maintain relations with all parties involved in regional disputes – and internationally, too – while rejecting any attempts to impose dominance through diplomatic efforts, the Gulf states continue to enhance their security readiness, contributing to broader regional and global initiatives aimed at de-escalation. Their refusal to engage in retaliatory military action reflects a deliberate choice to prevent further in Gaza, Lebanon and Israeli-Iranian tensions are stark reminders of the volatility. For the Gulf states, geographic proximity makes the stakes especially high. Their populations and economies are directly exposed to the fallout of any navigating these interconnected challenges, the GCC's consistent focus on diplomacy and stability offers a pragmatic path in a region often at risk of spiraling deeper into conflict in any part of the region can send shockwaves across the entire Middle East and may drag in actors with no direct stake in the original dispute. This is particularly true when global economic interests are at risk or when armed proxy groups resort to violence under the pretext of linking the interests of one party to another. Such dynamics endanger critical infrastructure, including energy facilities, civilian sites, industrial zones, and logistical networks, while disrupting transportation and trade position of GCC states is based on a fundamental pillar, which is maintaining security and stability. The region cannot afford further attrition, having already endured a series of wars that impeded its economic development. For this reason, Gulf countries prioritise building and the use of state resources for growth and sustainable amid complex regional dynamics and ongoing conflicts, they remain committed to advancing prosperity and improving the quality of life for their people, with a clear and ambitious outlook towards the this focus on development, Gulf countries use their foreign policies as tools to defuse conflict zones, diversify their alliances with Eastern and Western partners, and intensify diplomatic efforts to contain the scope of conflict in the Middle such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Oman often lead de-escalation efforts through regional and international mediation, seeking calm and stability to facilitate the success of economic diversification plans and to ensure peace, security, business, trade, tourism and GCC does not shy away from thorny issues or obstacles. They actively pursue every opportunity to stabilise the region, whether through economic partnership agreements or reconciliation with regional actors, in pursuit of calm and also apply diplomatic pressure where needed to secure both immediate and long-term gains for the Arab region. This approach has enabled improved economic relations without having to align with one axis against GCC countries engage in negotiations and mediation on complex issues, but they firmly refuse to be a party to any armed conflict, directly or indirectly. They will not allow any party to use their territory, airspace, or waters to launch aggression against another country, while reserving the right to self-defence and the protection of their lands, people, infrastructure and economic assets from any form of balanced position of the GCC countries, which is rooted in respect for sovereignty and a desire to calm conflicts and wars in the Middle East, is built on clear criteria for stability. It reflects a form of active neutrality, rejecting engagement in conflict and favouring diplomatic solutions. In addition to that, Gulf countries recognise the urgency of diversifying energy export routes to reduce risks, strengthening their domestic front, maintaining strategic balance with wisdom, and deepening joint Gulf coordination until a comprehensive regional and security cooperation framework for the Middle East is established. Source: Aletihad - Abu Dhabi
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Gaza's 'last lifelines' are collapsing, UN chief warns
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres on Monday condemned the fast-deteriorating conditions in Gaza, warning that vital aid efforts are collapsing. Israeli bombardments have intensified in recent days just as aid deliveries are being impeded, undermined and endangered, he said. 'The last lifelines keeping people alive are collapsing,' Mr Guterres said in a statement, expressing deep concern over 'growing reports of children and adults suffering from malnutrition'. He also criticised Israel's order for people to leave parts of Deir Al Balah, home to tens of thousands of people in southern Gaza. It will push people 'into more desperate conditions and further displacement and restricts the United Nations' ability to deliver life-saving aid'. Israeli tanks entered Deir Al Balah's southern and eastern districts for the first time on Monday. Israel said its military believes hostages may be held there. The area is packed with Palestinians displaced during more than 21 months of war in Gaza, hundreds of whom fled west or south after Israel issued an evacuation order, saying it sought to destroy Hamas infrastructure and capabilities. 'UN staff remain in Deir Al Balah, and two UN guesthouses have been struck, despite parties having been informed of the locations of UN premises, which are inviolable. These locations – as with all civilian sites – must be protected, regardless of evacuation orders,' the UN chief said. The warning came as more than two dozen western nations called for an immediate end to the conflict, stating that civilian suffering had 'reached new depths' amid Israel's expanded military operations in central Gaza. The UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) warned that conditions in Gaza are 'near impossible'. Israel's evacuation order cuts through 'Deir Al Balah all the way to the Mediterranean Sea, further fragmenting the Strip and pushing people into overcrowded, unsafe areas with no shelter or essential supplies,' OCHA said. Initial UN estimates suggest between 50,000 and 80,000 people are in the targeted zone, including some 30,000 displaced individuals sheltering in 57 sites. The mass evacuation order, the UN agency said, has 'dealt yet another devastating blow to the already fragile lifelines keeping people alive across the Gaza Strip.' The deepening crisis was underscored on Sunday when a World Food Programme (WFP) convoy carrying food supplies into Gaza came under fire near an Israeli checkpoint. In a statement, the WFP said crowds of starving civilians gathered as the lorries approached, only to be hit by gunfire from Israeli tanks, snipers and other forces. Dozens of people were killed. 'The agency is deeply concerned and saddened by this tragic incident resulting in the loss of countless lives,' the WFP said, adding that many more suffered life-threatening injuries. 'These people were simply trying to access food to feed themselves and their families on the brink of starvation.'
