
WA universities reject claims they are turning out under-qualified teachers to work in other States
The universities have come under fire for reinstating a one-year graduate diploma for aspiring teachers — who already have a three-year degree in another field — to get them into classrooms faster, instead of insisting they do a two-year postgraduate master's degree.
Teacher registration bodies in NSW and Victoria have raised concerns about teachers using the one-year WA course as a back door — under national mutual recognition arrangements — to achieve registration in those States.
Governments in those States have said they will look at how to block their employment.
NSW Education Standards Authority said it had received some applications from WA graduates since the one-year qualification was introduced last year, and it expected numbers to rise.
'In 2024, the teacher authority in WA took the unusual step of accrediting qualifications that don't meet nationally-agreed standards,' NESA chief executive Paul Martin said. 'There are no simple solutions to the teacher workforce challenge. But the answer cannot be to lower expectations of teacher preparation.'
But Curtin University school of education head Jeff Brooks said the criticism was unfair, and he found it 'frustrating' that solutions to Australia's 'huge teacher shortage' were being dismissed — especially when the alternative was no teacher at all.
'It's absolutely not a loophole — it's a teacher registration pathway, that's it,' he said.
'School systems across Australia are already full of people who qualified as a teacher through the grad dip, because it was in play for many years previously.
'Many of those people are systems leaders. Many of those people are principals. Many of them are highly-decorated, award-winning, amazing teachers.'
Professor Brooks said Curtin introduced the intensive program last year after extensive consultation with the Department of Education.
'We don't want to bring teachers into the field who are going to fail,' he said. 'The pathway itself is not necessarily a predictor of the quality or success of the teachers.'
A spokesperson for Edith Cowan University said claims that WA was lowering standards were unfounded.
'The legislation has simply enabled universities to support teaching workforce needs in WA with the same quality and rigour that we always have,' they said. 'Less than 1 per cent of ECU's graduate diploma of teaching cohort are students from other States.'
A State Government spokesperson said the re-introduction of graduate diplomas offered a more efficient pathway into the teaching profession for holders of non-teaching degrees.
'This has helped to attract future teachers from a variety of learning backgrounds and has bolstered the supply of quality teachers into WA classrooms,' they said.
'It is important to note that the Teacher Registration Board WA's registration standards have not changed, and all teachers must meet specific requirements to demonstrate that they are fit to teach.
'Teachers must always meet the proficient level of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers within three years in order to achieve full registration, no matter their qualification.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
30-07-2025
- The Advertiser
'Gaping hole' in social media ban as YouTube plugged in
Australian children will be barred from having YouTube accounts under an incoming social media ban, but experts are warning of inadequate tools to enforce the measures. The video-sharing website was initially spared from the world-first national ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But after receiving advice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the federal government decided to include the platform as part of the social media ban. Under the changes, children won't be allowed to have YouTube accounts that allow users to watch age-restricted videos. Children will still be able to access YouTube Kids or view any videos accessible while not logged into the platform. Social media expert Tama Leaver from Curtin University said there was no evidence that the planned tools would be good enough to verify users' ages, although a final report into measures to enforce the ban was still due to be released. "There is a gaping hole in this policy," he told AAP. "We should have the technical road map for how this is expected to work. "The government should have been able to say to platforms, 'these are things that we believe are reliable enough'." Swinburne University media expert Belinda Barnet said YouTube wasn't a "special case" as the company had been arguing, with the platform presenting the same risk of harm as any social media site. "We can expect there's going to be a very difficult period where the platforms make 'first pancake' mistakes in Australia and there's an adjustment period," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged parents who had lost their children to suicide following social media abuse and thanked them for their courage in speaking in favour of the ban. "Their stories are felt by countless other parents and by communities right across the country," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. Mia Bannister, who lost her 14-year-old son Ollie in 2024, said parents had been advocating for greater protections for young people. "It wasn't the result of one voice, but the power of many united in purpose, driven by hope and committed to protecting our kids," she said. YouTube said it shares the government's goal to reduce online harm but argues that it differs from others and is not a social media platform. "We will consider the next steps and will continue to engage with the government," a spokesperson said. YouTube also says it is often used as an educational resource by teachers in the classroom. The platform's inclusion was foreshadowed after the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than on any other platform. It will join other platforms, such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in 2024. Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media platforms had been "on notice" since December and were given 12 months to develop verification processes. "We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that's why I will not be intimidated by leaving threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh described the backflip on exempting YouTube as a "blatant broken promise" to Australians. "We are concerned that the eSafety Commissioner is testing boundaries which are moving beyond what Australians are comfortable with," she said. YouTube's parent company Google has already threatened to sue Australia on the grounds that a ban would restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Australian children will be barred from having YouTube accounts under an incoming social media ban, but experts are warning of inadequate tools to enforce the measures. The video-sharing website was initially spared from the world-first national ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But after receiving advice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the federal government decided to include the platform as part of the social media ban. Under the changes, children won't be allowed to have YouTube accounts that allow users to watch age-restricted videos. Children will still be able to access YouTube Kids or view any videos accessible while not logged into the platform. Social media expert Tama Leaver from Curtin University said there was no evidence that the planned tools would be good enough to verify users' ages, although a final report into measures to enforce the ban was still due to be released. "There is a gaping hole in this policy," he told AAP. "We should have the technical road map for how this is expected to work. "The government should have been able to say to platforms, 'these are things that we believe are reliable enough'." Swinburne University media expert Belinda Barnet said YouTube wasn't a "special case" as the company had been arguing, with the platform presenting the same risk of harm as any social media site. "We can expect there's going to be a very difficult period where the platforms make 'first pancake' mistakes in Australia and there's an adjustment period," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged parents who had lost their children to suicide following social media abuse and thanked them for their courage in speaking in favour of the ban. "Their stories are felt by countless other parents and by communities right across the country," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. Mia Bannister, who lost her 14-year-old son Ollie in 2024, said parents had been advocating for greater protections for young people. "It wasn't the result of one voice, but the power of many united in purpose, driven by hope and committed to protecting our kids," she said. YouTube said it shares the government's goal to reduce online harm but argues that it differs from others and is not a social media platform. "We will consider the next steps and will continue to engage with the government," a spokesperson said. YouTube also says it is often used as an educational resource by teachers in the classroom. The platform's inclusion was foreshadowed after the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than on any other platform. It will join other platforms, such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in 2024. Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media platforms had been "on notice" since December and were given 12 months to develop verification processes. "We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that's why I will not be intimidated by leaving threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh described the backflip on exempting YouTube as a "blatant broken promise" to Australians. "We are concerned that the eSafety Commissioner is testing boundaries which are moving beyond what Australians are comfortable with," she said. YouTube's parent company Google has already threatened to sue Australia on the grounds that a ban would restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Australian children will be barred from having YouTube accounts under an incoming social media ban, but experts are warning of inadequate tools to enforce the measures. The video-sharing website was initially spared from the world-first national ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But after receiving advice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the federal government decided to include the platform as part of the social media ban. Under the changes, children won't be allowed to have YouTube accounts that allow users to watch age-restricted videos. Children will still be able to access YouTube Kids or view any videos accessible while not logged into the platform. Social media expert Tama Leaver from Curtin University said there was no evidence that the planned tools would be good enough to verify users' ages, although a final report into measures to enforce the ban was still due to be released. "There is a gaping hole in this policy," he told AAP. "We should have the technical road map for how this is expected to work. "The government should have been able to say to platforms, 'these are things that we believe are reliable enough'." Swinburne University media expert Belinda Barnet said YouTube wasn't a "special case" as the company had been arguing, with the platform presenting the same risk of harm as any social media site. "We can expect there's going to be a very difficult period where the platforms make 'first pancake' mistakes in Australia and there's an adjustment period," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged parents who had lost their children to suicide following social media abuse and thanked them for their courage in speaking in favour of the ban. "Their stories are felt by countless other parents and by communities right across the country," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. Mia Bannister, who lost her 14-year-old son Ollie in 2024, said parents had been advocating for greater protections for young people. "It wasn't the result of one voice, but the power of many united in purpose, driven by hope and committed to protecting our kids," she said. YouTube said it shares the government's goal to reduce online harm but argues that it differs from others and is not a social media platform. "We will consider the next steps and will continue to engage with the government," a spokesperson said. YouTube also says it is often used as an educational resource by teachers in the classroom. The platform's inclusion was foreshadowed after the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than on any other platform. It will join other platforms, such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in 2024. Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media platforms had been "on notice" since December and were given 12 months to develop verification processes. "We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that's why I will not be intimidated by leaving threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh described the backflip on exempting YouTube as a "blatant broken promise" to Australians. "We are concerned that the eSafety Commissioner is testing boundaries which are moving beyond what Australians are comfortable with," she said. YouTube's parent company Google has already threatened to sue Australia on the grounds that a ban would restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Australian children will be barred from having YouTube accounts under an incoming social media ban, but experts are warning of inadequate tools to enforce the measures. The video-sharing website was initially spared from the world-first national ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But after receiving advice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the federal government decided to include the platform as part of the social media ban. Under the changes, children won't be allowed to have YouTube accounts that allow users to watch age-restricted videos. Children will still be able to access YouTube Kids or view any videos accessible while not logged into the platform. Social media expert Tama Leaver from Curtin University said there was no evidence that the planned tools would be good enough to verify users' ages, although a final report into measures to enforce the ban was still due to be released. "There is a gaping hole in this policy," he told AAP. "We should have the technical road map for how this is expected to work. "The government should have been able to say to platforms, 'these are things that we believe are reliable enough'." Swinburne University media expert Belinda Barnet said YouTube wasn't a "special case" as the company had been arguing, with the platform presenting the same risk of harm as any social media site. "We can expect there's going to be a very difficult period where the platforms make 'first pancake' mistakes in Australia and there's an adjustment period," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged parents who had lost their children to suicide following social media abuse and thanked them for their courage in speaking in favour of the ban. "Their stories are felt by countless other parents and by communities right across the country," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. Mia Bannister, who lost her 14-year-old son Ollie in 2024, said parents had been advocating for greater protections for young people. "It wasn't the result of one voice, but the power of many united in purpose, driven by hope and committed to protecting our kids," she said. YouTube said it shares the government's goal to reduce online harm but argues that it differs from others and is not a social media platform. "We will consider the next steps and will continue to engage with the government," a spokesperson said. YouTube also says it is often used as an educational resource by teachers in the classroom. The platform's inclusion was foreshadowed after the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than on any other platform. It will join other platforms, such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in 2024. Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media platforms had been "on notice" since December and were given 12 months to develop verification processes. "We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that's why I will not be intimidated by leaving threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh described the backflip on exempting YouTube as a "blatant broken promise" to Australians. "We are concerned that the eSafety Commissioner is testing boundaries which are moving beyond what Australians are comfortable with," she said. YouTube's parent company Google has already threatened to sue Australia on the grounds that a ban would restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)


West Australian
07-07-2025
- West Australian
WA universities reject claims they are turning out under-qualified teachers to work in other States
WA universities have hit back at criticism they are producing under-qualified teachers who are taking advantage of a loophole to work at schools in other States without meeting the same registration standards. The universities have come under fire for reinstating a one-year graduate diploma for aspiring teachers — who already have a three-year degree in another field — to get them into classrooms faster, instead of insisting they do a two-year postgraduate master's degree. Teacher registration bodies in NSW and Victoria have raised concerns about teachers using the one-year WA course as a back door — under national mutual recognition arrangements — to achieve registration in those States. Governments in those States have said they will look at how to block their employment. NSW Education Standards Authority said it had received some applications from WA graduates since the one-year qualification was introduced last year, and it expected numbers to rise. 'In 2024, the teacher authority in WA took the unusual step of accrediting qualifications that don't meet nationally-agreed standards,' NESA chief executive Paul Martin said. 'There are no simple solutions to the teacher workforce challenge. But the answer cannot be to lower expectations of teacher preparation.' But Curtin University school of education head Jeff Brooks said the criticism was unfair, and he found it 'frustrating' that solutions to Australia's 'huge teacher shortage' were being dismissed — especially when the alternative was no teacher at all. 'It's absolutely not a loophole — it's a teacher registration pathway, that's it,' he said. 'School systems across Australia are already full of people who qualified as a teacher through the grad dip, because it was in play for many years previously. 'Many of those people are systems leaders. Many of those people are principals. Many of them are highly-decorated, award-winning, amazing teachers.' Professor Brooks said Curtin introduced the intensive program last year after extensive consultation with the Department of Education. 'We don't want to bring teachers into the field who are going to fail,' he said. 'The pathway itself is not necessarily a predictor of the quality or success of the teachers.' A spokesperson for Edith Cowan University said claims that WA was lowering standards were unfounded. 'The legislation has simply enabled universities to support teaching workforce needs in WA with the same quality and rigour that we always have,' they said. 'Less than 1 per cent of ECU's graduate diploma of teaching cohort are students from other States.' A State Government spokesperson said the re-introduction of graduate diplomas offered a more efficient pathway into the teaching profession for holders of non-teaching degrees. 'This has helped to attract future teachers from a variety of learning backgrounds and has bolstered the supply of quality teachers into WA classrooms,' they said. 'It is important to note that the Teacher Registration Board WA's registration standards have not changed, and all teachers must meet specific requirements to demonstrate that they are fit to teach. 'Teachers must always meet the proficient level of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers within three years in order to achieve full registration, no matter their qualification.'

The Age
03-07-2025
- The Age
Why experts want NSW schools to introduce a brand-new subject
The NSW government announced last year that studying democracy and the legal system would be compulsory in primary schools from 2027. A NESA spokesperson said 'every student' would benefit from mandatory civics and citizenship education, included within the new primary school Human Society and its Environment (HSIE) syllabus, and years 7 to 10 mandatory history, geography, PDHPE and elective commerce syllabuses. But there is no dedicated civics syllabus for year 11 and 12 students, the topic only partly covered in legal studies and economics. Murray Print, a leader in Australian civics education, said civics must be a standalone subject. 'If you require something to be taught in school, and you do not give it a standalone status, and preferably mandatory status, then it gets lost,' he said. 'It gets lost in teachers' overwork, it gets lost in the curriculum of the school.' He acknowledged that resourcing was the source of a lot of the resistance to introducing a course. 'There's not a trained pool of teachers who can teach that standalone subject,' he said. At Pymble Ladies College, Year 12 students Madeline Watson, Christiana Soo, and Lauren Korenblyum pushed for their school to introduce a 'women in politics mentorship program' after realising how many of their peers were disengaged from civics. 'The only education I remember learning about politics was in year 6. We had a brief excursion to Canberra and there was a brief unit on how parliament works but obviously in year 6 you are not really paying attention,' said Madeline. Lauren, who voted for the first time this year, said many of her peers who were also first-time voters had minimal knowledge. 'In one of my classes we were encouraged to do the vote compass and most people had never even heard of the parties,' she said. Acting Education Minister Courtney Houssos said the updated curriculum would be an improvement as civics education would no longer be optional.