Ten year West Lothian plan raises concern as council given just weeks to agree
Councillors may have just over a month before they are asked to agree to a 1,000-plus pages draft of evidence to submit to the Scottish Government for a new Local Development Plan.
Concern has been raised over the amount of time West Lothian councillors have been given to consider a ten-year planning blueprint for the area.
Councillors may have just over a month before they are asked to agree to a 1,000-plus pages draft of evidence to submit to the Scottish Government for a new Local Development Plan.
The plan is a guide to what happens in the county between 2028 and 2038, and covers housing development, infrastructure, transport, and communities.
But the initial hefty document brought more questions and criticism than answers this week.
Linlithgow' Lib Dem councillor Sally Pattle told a meeting of the Economy Community Empowerment and Wealth Building PDSP that she had 'serious concerns' that councillors would have enough time ' to get this right.'
The document - 1059 pages long - is the combined two years of evidence gathered which has to be presented to the Division of Planning and Environmental Appeals DPEA to be ' gate checked' as the foundation of the next Local Development Plan (LDP).
This broad brush approach to evidence gathering threw up anomalies and outdated information which the SNP's Andrew Miller highlighted, including one suggestion that three buses served Livingston Village when in fact none do.
Only half way through the meeting did councillors find out that council officers had based their ward evidence on community council boundaries, which threw up anomalies such as bus services.
Councillors also picked over the lack of details in individual sections of the report demanding more detail be included before a final draft goes to a meeting of the full council and then on to the DPEA.
Councillor Susan Manion stressed on several occasions that this was the first draft of the document and was open to change and improvement.
All councillors moved to praise officers for the amount of work that has gone into the first draft.
Councillor Pattle said: 'I am now seriously concerned as I have sat here for the past ninety minutes, it's been revealed that we are supposed to go to full council to agree this and that its five weeks time.
'I was under the impression that when it went to full council it would be after recess in September, giving us months to prepare for this.'
Addressing the ranks of planning officers seated in the Livingston chamber, councillor Pattle continued: 'I appreciate your time today and I'm sorry that we have come across as hyper local but that's our job.
'We are here to scrutinise on behalf of our wards to make sure this incredibly important document is right when it goes to the gate check.
'I am now extremely concerned that we are not going to be given adequate opportunities to do that.'
And she warned: 'Developers are going to be watching us like hawks. they are going to be using this as the basis for development for the next ten years. We have to get this right. I would like some reassurance that we are going to be given enough time to do that.'
Fellow Linlithgow Councillor Pauline Orr, SNP, said: ' It's a huge piece of work and we are the face of our communities so we absolutely have to get it right.' She praised the 'amazing' work of the officers in producing the 1059 pages of evidence.
Director of Planning Craig McCorriston moved to reassure the meeting that he was happy to meet councillors and take additional information from them to correct inaccuracies.
He said that the draft evidence had to be ready to present to the DPEA by May 2028. The process is defined by government legislation but he conceded that the time frame for the council to prepare the draft was 'tight and we do have to work at speed.'
He added: 'We have opened up to scrutiny today in a way which we hope is helpful to members and will engage further in the coming week to go through matters of concern or errors. Then we will ask the Provost to progress to a special meeting of the full council.'
He stressed: 'If we get this wrong it is going to independent scrutiny and the DPEA Reporter will send it back to us if we have not gathered enough evidence. I'm pretty confident that we are just about there but am happy to take that extra few days to go through things with members.'
Councillor Willie Boyle said: ' I'm looking forward to further opportunities to discuss it when it comes to actually putting the plan together. Power to your elbow I know we are up against a time schedule here and I fully accept that. We are where we are with that. We need to get it done.'
Depute SNP group leader Pauline Stafford said: 'I'd like to acknowledge the work that's gone into this report and I hope members of the public will take time to read through it as well.'
Councillor Stafford added: ' I sit on the Development Management [Committee] and the reason I do is because I think it has such a vital role to play in all we do in council.
"This is what builds strong thriving communities. Planning is often, for elected members, misunderstood and for the public is often mistrusted, and as much transparency we can provide and show communities we have actually listened is vital.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Winter fuel payment U-TURN could give Scots £70million cash boost
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RACHEL Reeves' winter fuel payments u-turn could give Scotland a £70million boost, experts said yesterday. The Chancellor confirmed payments will be reinstated for some pensioners by tweaking the means test that left millions of people frozen out last year. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 The vital fuel payment is set to be reinstated by UK Government Credit: Alamy 3 The u-turn will increase funding available to the Scottish Government Credit: PA Bea Boileau of the Institute of Fiscal Studies said: 'This will increase funding available for the Scottish Government. "How much will depend on how many pensioners WFP is extended to.' Ms Reeves said today: 'People should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get winter fuel payment this winter. 'We will set out how everything will be paid for at the budget in the autumn.' It comes after Labour slashed entitlement to the payments of up to £300 from around a million Scots to fewer than 200,000 last year. The Scottish Government has already pledged £100 heating payments to every pensioner. SNP Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'It still sounds as if the UK Government is planning to target vulnerable pensioners to help balance the books.' We previously told how over one million state pensioners in Scotland are to benefit from a new winter fuel payment. The winter fuel payment was replaced with the pension age winter heating payment (PAWHP) last year, as part of the devolution of welfare powers. First Minister John Swinney confirmed last month that a new universal payment for older Scots is to be introduced. It will be worth up to £300. Mr Swinney said he will not leave OAPs struggling due to "Labour broken promises". He added: "It is so inexplicable that one of the first things Keir Starmer did when he became Prime Minister was to cut this vital lifeline for our pensioners. 'Labour scrapping the Winter Fuel Payment was a complete betrayal – up there with Thatcher's poll tax or Nick Clegg on tuition fees. "I am not willing to see Scottish pensioners left to struggle because of Labour broken promises. "So we listened to what people were telling us and we took action. "That means older people in Scotland will receive this crucial support before we get into the worst of the winter weather – and unlike Labour, we will never abandon this vital support for our pensioners. That is my guarantee." The new pension age winter heating payment will be dished out by November 30, St Andrew's Day, this year.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Now health minister backs adding crack room to controversial 'shooting gallery' facility
A heroin shooting gallery may be extended to allow drug users to inhale crack cocaine without prosecution after the controversial move was yesterday backed by Scotland's Health Secretary. Neil Gray told MPs that the existing Glasgow drug consumption room pilot has 'limitations' because it only allows addicts to inject. He said there is 'international evidence' to support extending it to include an inhalation room, and the Scottish Government and Lord Advocate would consider the issue if there is an application by the operator of The Thistle. He also indicated support for considering further drug consumption rooms before the pilot scheme is evaluated. At Westminster's Scottish Affairs Committee yesterday, Mr Gray said: 'I understand because of the changing nature of substance dependency that the current establishment of the facility on an injection facility basis may provide limitations, and there is international evidence to point to the relative success of inhalation facilities.' Bosses of the £2.3million 'safer consumption centre' in Glasgow first outlined proposals to set up an inhalation room for smoking crack cocaine within the facility in March. They hoped this would attract more addicts to the Scottish Government-financed clinic, which is run by the Glasgow City Council and NHS bosses. Laura Zeballos, deputy director of the Scottish Government's drugs policy division, yesterday said: 'There is international evidence that inhalation rooms are standard components of safer consumption facilities, we see that in many of the facilities in Germany, in Denmark and France, where their role in preventing respiratory harm is noted in the evidence base as a result.' Annemarie Ward, chief executive of Faces and Voices of Recovery, said: 'I'm deeply concerned. What Neil Gray is now floating is a further normalisation of drug use, this time by providing a publicly sanctioned space for people to inhale crack cocaine. Let's call this what it is: state-enabled self-destruction. 'The fact that this expansion is even being discussed before there's been any independent analysis of the Glasgow facility's impact should worry everyone. 'We are sprinting ahead with a radical public health experiment while bypassing basic evidence, democratic accountability, and common sense. 'The original injection facility was sold as a tightly controlled pilot — now we're talking about rolling out more sites, even as the drug death toll continues to mount and treatment access remains abysmal. 'We're giving out crack pipes, but we won't fund real rehab. ' Mr Gray said there is interest from other parts of Scotland for drug consumption rooms and they need to come forward with proposals. He said: 'That does not necessitate having to wait until the end of the pilot; that could happen before then.' Scottish Conservative drugs spokesman Annie Wells said: 'Neil Gray needs to drop this reckless plan and urgently confirm that his government will wait for a full report on their flagship facility before agreeing to support any more consumption rooms.' A Home Office minister yesterday said the Labour Government will not support drug consumption rooms and won't change laws to allow more to operate.
North Wales Chronicle
5 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
University of Edinburgh lecturers to walk out over planned £140m cuts
The action will see members of the University and College Union (UCU) strike during an open day on June 20, followed by a further five-day walkout in September to coincide with the university's 'welcome week' for new students. Union members are also set to take part in action short of a strike, including working to contract, not covering for absent colleagues, and a 'possible marking and assessment boycott'. The UCU announced the action following a ballot which saw a 60% turnout, with 84% backing strikes and 93% voting in favour of action short of a strike. The news came on the same day university principal Professor Sir Peter Mathieson appeared before a Holyrood committee, where he defended his six-figure salary and acknowledged the university is not in deficit. Sophia Woodman, UCU Edinburgh University branch president, said it is 'not too late' for the strike to be averted, and she called on senior management to rule out compulsory redundancies. 'Staff want a sustainable future for the university as much as anybody and we want to work with senior management to end this dispute,' she said. 'But we're clear that the use of compulsory redundancies is unacceptable. 'With the resources and reserves held by the university it can easily afford to rule out sacking staff. 'The decision to let the strike continue, with all the disruption to students that it entails and a possible marking and assessment boycott, is a matter of choice for Peter Mathieson and the university senior management. 'The union's door is open to talks and I'd appeal to them to heed this final warning, rule out compulsory redundancies and end this unnecessary dispute.' The union claimed the proposed £140 million of cuts would be the 'largest ever' made by a university in Scotland, and said management have failed to make a case for cuts of this size while at the same time planning 'record' investment in buildings and infrastructure. It added that research and teaching staff are the 'backbone' of the university, and cutting them rather than buildings is a 'false economy'. Jo Grady, UCU general secretary, said: 'UCU members at Edinburgh University are ready and willing to strike to save jobs and save this university, but disruption can still be avoided. 'Edinburgh University is a wealthy university with, at the last count, over £3 billion in its reserves. 'The Scottish Government should follow the lead of ministers in Wales and call on universities to use their reserves to avoid job losses.' The union said walkouts will take place on June 20 and September 8-12, with action short of a strike beginning on June 20. Responding to the announcement, Sir Peter said: 'We have been transparent about the savings urgently needed to secure our financial footing, with forecasts showing that we will be in deficit from the next financial year should we not act now. 'Failure to take preventative steps would leave us in an unsustainable situation, requiring deeper savings. 'We respect colleagues' right to take part in industrial action, and will do all we can to minimise disruption to students should this take place. 'We will also continue to work with our joint trade unions as plans develop to deliver these savings.'
