Washington tries to maintain B.C. ties amid Trump era tensions
Lt Gov. Denny Heck presiding over the Senate floor on April 27, 2025. (Photo by Jacquelyn Jimenez Romero/Washington State Standard)
When Washington Lt. Gov. Denny Heck arrived in British Columbia last week, he wondered how he'd be received.
After all, the past few months have seen the usually strong relationship between Canada and the United States upended. Since January, President Donald Trump has played tariff politics with the allies north of the border and repeatedly expressed interest in annexing Canada as the '51st state.'
Heck and the Washington delegation brought a simple message: 'We love Canada.'
Canadian legislators from both parties welcomed the envoy in Victoria and emphasized that they remain in step with Washington state.
'We've always had this strong relationship between Washington and B.C. and that continues despite the challenges that we're facing from the White House,' said Rick Glumac, the province's trade minister. 'This is one man that's causing a lot of turmoil, not just in Canada but across the world in terms of how these tariffs are being handled.'
To Heck, the reception was 'incredibly gratifying.'
'Looked at another way, maybe this is just an opportunity to double down on our friendship,' Heck said in an interview.
Heck traveled with Democratic state Sens. Lisa Wellman, of Mercer Island, and Sharon Shewmake, of Bellingham, along with a couple of his advisers.
Their visit to the B.C. Legislature last Tuesday came the same day Trump met with the new Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, in the Oval Office. In the meeting, Carney made clear to Trump the United States would never annex Canada.
With their Canadian counterparts, Washington officials discussed the now-paused negotiations on updating the Columbia River Treaty governing the transboundary waterway and housing issues. Heck, a lead adviser on housing during Gov. Bob Ferguson's transition into office, said he was particularly interested in B.C.'s regulations to tax outside speculators who snatch up homes and leave them vacant and limit short-term rentals.
The two sides also came to an informal agreement on how to organize an interparliamentary exchange to make such meetings an annual occurrence. Washington lawmakers last year approved opening such a dialogue between the two Legislatures.
Heck expects to soon formalize that agreement. The goal is to 'learn from one another, but the truth is, it has this kind of overarching purpose, I hope, to maintain good, strong communications, so that the deep, deep friendship we have can continue.'
Shewmake cited next year's FIFA World Cup, the development of a new regional hub focused on hydrogen power and the fentanyl epidemic as topics she hopes to collaborate on. She also mentioned recycling policy as Washington embarks on a new program that puts more of the onus on packaging producers to ensure their products are recyclable — a goal for which Canada is ahead of the curve.
In the meantime, Blaine, in Shewmake's borderland district, is dealing with declining sales tax revenue with fewer Canadians crossing the border, the senator said.
Glumac pointed to the potential for a high-speed rail corridor connecting Portland and Vancouver, B.C., an idea that has yet to gain serious momentum.
And issues like wildfire know no borders.
Another piece Washington lawmakers could learn from is the unique question-and-answer period the B.C. Legislature reserves for members of the minority party to grill the ruling party, separate from floor debate on a specific policy.
'It's a part of the opposition holding the government accountable and transparent, but it did not seem to be personal at all when all was said and done,' Heck said. He described it as a 'different way to practice democracy.'
Heck, chair of the Legislative Committee on Economic Development and International Relations, led a trade mission to Canada last June, with stops in Vancouver and Ottawa.
The trip helped deliver an agreement between British Columbia and Washington for local wine grape growers to ship massive amounts of their grapes north of the border after a freeze devastated the Canadian harvest.
Members of the B.C. Legislature visited Washington for meetings in January.
Washington is a vital trade partner for B.C., with nearly one-third of the province's exports to the United States going to the Evergreen State, according to the Business Council of British Columbia.
In 2023, Washington imported over $7 billion worth of goods, like oil and gas, from the province. That oil is often imported to refineries in northwest Washington for refining and then traded back to Canada.
Washington exported over $5 billion to B.C. Top exports include electric power, refined petroleum and seafood products.
'Our two regions share one of the most vibrant cross-border trade relationships in North America, and strengthening those economic ties is a priority we both deeply value,' said Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia Raj Chouhan in a statement.
'Lieutenant Governor Heck emphasized that British Columbia is a key partner for Washington, and that the State stands shoulder-to-shoulder with our Province during these challenging times in the Canada–U.S. relationship,' Chouhan continued. 'I trust that Lieutenant Governor Heck left Victoria with no doubt that this sentiment is fully and firmly reciprocated.'
Gov. Bob Ferguson also met late last month with Craig Weichel, the consul general of Canada in Seattle. After the meeting, Ferguson wrote on social media that 'both of us recognize, as neighbors and allies, cooperation and constructive dialogue has made for prosperity and safety on both sides of our shared border.'
Ferguson also recently met with the head consul of Mexico in Seattle to similarly emphasize the state's relationship with the country.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
39 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom says Trump purposely 'fanned the flames' of L.A. protests in address to California
Gov. Gavin Newsom Tuesday night accused President Trump of intentionally fanning the flames of the Los Angeles protests and 'pulling a military dragnet across' the city endangering peaceful protesters and targeting hardworking immigrant families. The Democratic governor's comment's were a forceful rebuke to the president's claims that deploying the California National Guard and U.S. Marines to the city was necessary to control the civil unrest. 'Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities – they're traumatizing our communities,' Newsom said. 'And that seems to be the entire point.' The governor posted his video address to California on social media hours after Trump said he sent in troops to protect immigration agents from 'the attacks of a vicious and violent mob' in a speech at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. The picture Trump painted of the federal government's role in the protests against immigration raids marks a sharp contrast to Newsom's assertion that state and local law enforcement were successfully keeping the peace before federal authorities deployed 'tear gas, 'flash-bang grenades' and 'rubber bullets' on Angelenos exercising their Constitutional right to free speech and assembly. Then Trump 'illegally' called up the California National Guard, Newsom said. 'This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk,' Newsom said. 'That's when the downward spiral began. He doubled down on his dangerous National Guard deployment by fanning the flames even harder. And the president, he did it on purpose.' The governor, who has become a target for Republicans and a central figure in the political and legal battle around the protests, has said for days that an 'unhinged' Trump deployed federal troops to intentionally incite violence and chaos, seeking to divert attention away from his actions in Washington and assert his 'dictatorial tendencies.' Newsom and Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a request for a restraining order earlier Tuesday asking a federal judge to call off the 'Department of Defense's illegal militarization of Los Angeles and the takeover of a California National Guard unit.' The request came the day after California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration alleging that the deployment of the guard without the governor's consent violated the U.S. Constitution. After returning to Washington, Trump commented on the 'good relationship' he's always had with Newsom, before blaming the governor for the unrest. 'This should never have been allowed to start, and if we didn't get involved, Los Angeles would be burning down right now,' Trump said, and then made a reference to the deadly wildfires in the Los Angeles area in January. 'Just as the houses burned down.' He said the military is in the city to deescalate the situation and control what he described as paid 'insurrectionists,' 'agitators' and 'troublemakers.' 'We have a lot of people all over the world watching Los Angeles,' Trump said. 'We've got the Olympics, so we have this guy allowing this to happen.' On Monday, Trump said his top border policy advisor Tom Homan should follow through on threats to arrest the governor. Newsom immediately jumped on the comment, comparing the federal administration to an 'authoritarian regime.' 'I never thought I'd hear those words. Honestly, Democrat, Republican. Never thought I'd hear those in my lifetime to threaten a political opponent who happens to be sitting governor,' Newsom said. House Speaker Mike Johnson declined to answer a question about whether Newsom should be arrested on Tuesday and instead said the governor should be 'tarred and feathered.' Newsom took a shot at Johnson during his address, saying the speaker has 'completely abdicated' his responsibility for Congress to serve as a check on the White House. He warned that 'other states are next.' 'At this moment, we all need to stand up and be held to account, a higher level of accountability,' Newsom said, imploring protesters to exercise free speech rights peacefully. 'I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress, and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and anxiety. 'What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty. Your silence. To be complicit in this moment. Do not give into him.' Staff writer Laura Nelson and Washington Bureau Chief Michael Wilner contributed to this report.

43 minutes ago
‘Crisis of Donald Trump's making:' California Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla
ABC News' Linsey Davis is joined by California Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla weighing in on the ongoing ICE raids in Southern California as protesters continue to take to the streets. June 10, 2025


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Arizona governor vetoes bill banning teaching antisemitism, calls it an attack on educators
PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would have banned teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and exposed educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. The proposal would have prohibited teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would have barred public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Hobbs, a Democrat, said Tuesday that the bill was not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits," she said in a statement. "Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff." Hobbs described antisemitism as a very troubling issue in the U.S., but said students and parents can go through the state's Board of Education to report antisemitism. The measure cleared the Legislature last week on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with 'unlawful discrimination' to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, has said his proposal would create accountability when educators fail to protect students from the rise in antisemitism since the start of the Israel-Hamas war. Opponents said the bill aimed to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opened up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would have been able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. Last week, Lori Shepherd, executive director of Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, wrote in a letter to Hobbs that if the bill were approved it would threaten teachers' ability to provide students with a full account of the holocaust. Under the bill, 'those discussions could be deemed 'antisemitic' depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intent or context,' she said. The bill would have created a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a second offense to a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate and a third offense to a revocation of the certificate. At colleges and universities, violators would have faced a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would have required colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.