Emergency was ‘ominous' for country: K N Govindacharya
The former BJP functionary asserted that the Sangh Parivar gave stability to that movement.
New Delhi, Jun 22 (PTI) The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) played an important role in public awakening during the 'ominous' Emergency period with 65,000 people associated with it going to jail, former Sangh pracharak and political thinker N Govindacharya has said.
Responding to a question about the role of the RSS in the 'Sampoorna Kranti' movement ahead of the Emergency, Govindacharya said the Sangh had a very big role in that movement.
'Just like Kurma had played a role in maintaining balance during the 'samudra manthan' with Basuki Nag and Mandara Parvat, the RSS had a similar role. In such a situation, Sangh played an important role in public awakening,' he said.
According to mythology, Kurma, the tortoise avatar of Lord Vishnu, played an important role during the 'samudra manthan' (churning of ocean) to obtain the nectar of immortality.
He said the Emergency imposed by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25, 1975 was an outcome of her 'lust for power'.
'The Constitution was violated, fundamental rights and freedom of expression were crushed, forced sterilisation took place, censorship was imposed, human freedom and system were attacked. The Emergency was completely ominous and could have been avoided. But such a situation arose due to lust for power,' he said.
In response to a question about the circumstances leading to the Sampoorna Kranti movement, Govindacharya said such a situation arose due to issues like inflation, unemployment, bad governance, corruption, poor education.
'It started with the Bihar movement and at that time the students demanded arrangements for better studies, hostel facilities etc. But the then Education Minister of Bihar lathi-charged the students, chased them away and neglected them due to vote bank,' he recalled.
Govindacharya said with the arrival of Jayaprakash Narayan, the movement got leadership, gained stature and its credibility was established.
Asked about the reasons for imposing Emergency, Govindacharya said Indira Gandhi's insecurity within her party, the atmosphere created by some close people spreading wrong information and her objective of remaining in power by hook or by crook must have been the main reasons and for that morality was set aside.
Attacking the then Indira Gandhi led government, he said there was a stagnation in the system. The entire public was against insensitivity, irresponsibility and lack of accountability in the system and this was expressed during the students' movement.
In response to a question about his experience during the Emergency, he said he was in jail for two months during the Bihar movement (students' movement) and at the end of the Emergency he also had to go to jail.
The former Sangh Pracharak said during the movement, people associated with the Sangh Parivar used to go among the people with different names so that they could avoid arrest.
The Sampoorna Kranti movement against the Emergency was an unusual act of ordinary people, he stated.
When asked whether the objectives of the Emergency were achieved, Govindacharya said, 'The opposite happened. There was a change of power but the prohibitions were not followed.' Socialist leader Jayaprakash Narayan gave the call for Sampooran Kranti in 1974.
The demand for resignation of the then Ghafoor ministry in Bihar ultimately turned into a larger demand for the dismissal of the Indira Gandhi government. PTI DR DIV DV DV
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC hearing on presidential reference over Bill timelines: AG says ruling in TN Governor case dilutes powers of President, Governor
Attorney General for India R Venkataramani Tuesday informed the Supreme Court that Articles 200 and 201, which deal with the powers of the Governor and President to give assent to Bills, are also part of the basic structure of the Constitution and the Tamil Nadu judgement fixing timelines for them to do this 'dilutes' their power to say no to Bill which do not comply with the Constitution. Venkataramani informed a five-judge bench, which began hearing a reference made by President Draupadi Murmu on whether timelines can be fixed for the actions of the President or Governors. The bench presided by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai also comprises Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar. In April, a two-judge bench set a timeline for Governors to act on pending Bills, and, for the first time, prescribed that the President should take a decision on the Bills reserved for consideration by the Governor within three months from the date on which such reference is received. In a reference to the Supreme Court in May, President Murmu posed 14 crucial questions on the verdict. Meanwhile, in response to preliminary objections raised by Kerala and Tamil Nadu to maintainability of the Reference, CJI Gavai said, 'We will be expressing just a view of law, not on the decision in the Tamil Nadu case'. 'We are in advisory jurisdiction, we are not in appellate. In Article 143, the court can render an opinion that a certain judgment does not lay down correct law, but it will not overrule the judgment,' Justice Surya Kant stated.
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Kehna kya chahte ho', BJP asks Rahul Gandhi after expert's U-turn on Maharashtra voter data
Squaring off against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for levelling allegations of vote theft against the Election Commission of India, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday cited the apology by CSDS's Sanjay Kumar for error in data presented in his X post, what the BJP said was used by the Lok Sabha LoP to claim voting fraud in Maharashtra elections. LoP in the Lok Sabha and Congress leader Rahul Gandhi with LoP in the Bihar Assembly and RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav and CPI (ML) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya (@INCIndia) Political analyst and psephologist Sanjay Kumar on Tuesday apologised for his post on Maharashtra elections, which reported a considerable fall in voter numbers in two assembly seats compared to the recent Lok Sabha elections. He said an error occurred while comparing 2024 Lok Sabha and assembly election data, attributing it to a misread row by the data team. 'Kehna kya chahte ho', BJP asks Rahul Gandhi In a press conference on Tuesday, BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia launched a sharp attack on Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of creating chaos and evading accountability. 'Jab aarop ka pramaan manga jaaye toh bhag jaana, halaknama manga jaaye toh shapat patra pe nai dunga ... har jagha arajyakta failta hun tabhi toh Rahul kehlata hu... ye BJP ki zimmedari banti hai ki samvidhan ka samman karte hue jo aarop opposition laga rahe hain ki vote chori ho rahi hai, EVM kharab hai, VVPAT se milan nai hota hai... ek sawal uthta hai, Rahul Gandhi ji ye PC aapke liye hai, agar dum khum ho toh uttar zaroor dijiye,' Gaurav Bhatia said. 'When asked for proof of his allegations, he runs away. When asked for an affidavit, he refuses. Wherever I spread disorder, that's when I'm called Rahul—this seems to be his approach,' the spokesperson said. Emphasizing the BJP's responsibility to uphold the Constitution, he dismissed Opposition claims of vote rigging, faulty EVMs, and VVPAT mismatches as baseless. 'Rahul Gandhi, this press conference is directed at you – if you have the courage, respond,' Bhatia added. Referring to Gandhi's statements about alleged voter manipulation in Maharashtra, Gaurav Bhatia pointed out inconsistencies: 'On February 3, 2025, he claimed in Lok Sabha that 70 lakh new voters were added in just five months; on February 7, in a press conference, the number was 29 lakh; and by July 9 in poll-bound Bihar's Patna, he said the voter count had increased by 1 crore during major elections." Kehna kya chahte ho (What exactly is he trying to say?' Gaurav Bhatia said, highlighting that even when the Election Commission invited Rahul Gandhi for a dialogue, he refused to engage and decided to level allegations on the road. BJP's Gaurav Bhatia cited Supreme Court's Tuesday move to dismiss petition challenging 2024 Maharashtra elections over alleged 'bogus voting'. He also cited the same petition that was taken up and dismissed by the Bombay high in June 2025. He said the courts said the petitions were moved in a casual manner without any 'tangible material' to prove the claims. BJP picks on CSDS chief's U-turn Bhatia then cited prominent psephologist and Lokniti-CSDS co-director Sanjay Kumar's U-turn, which has sparked a political controversy after he deleted a post on X in which he highlighted a dramatic surge in voter numbers in two Maharashtra assembly constituencies—Nashik West and Hingna—between the 2024 Lok Sabha and Assembly elections. The data he shared was seen as lending weight to the Congress party's allegations of "vote chori" (vote theft) in Maharashtra, a charge prominently voiced by party leader Rahul Gandhi. Kumar posted the figures on August 17, reporting a 47.38 per cent increase in voters in Nashik West and a 43.08 per cent rise in Hingna. However, the post was later deleted, a move that only intensified the political row. "I sincerely apologise for the tweets posted regarding Maharashtra elections. Error occurred while comparing data of 2024 Lok Sabha and 2024 Assembly. The data in row was misread by our Data team. The tweet has since been removed. I had no intention of dispersing any form of misinformation," Sanjay Kumar said on X on Tuesday, what BJP's Guarav Bhatia said was a lie 'being served for over 40 hours'. It all stems from an August 7 press conference of Rahul Gandhi in which he cited data from the Mahaevpura Assembly segment in Karnataka to accuse the Election Commission of tampering with electoral rolls at the behest of the BJP. He referred to it as "vote chori", or theft of votes, and described it as part of a broader pattern of "fraud" being committed across the country. In the August 7 press conference, Rahul Gandhi had alleged that more than 1 crore new voters were added to Maharashtra's electoral rolls in the five months between the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections – a figure he noted far exceeded additions typical for a five-year period. Gaurav Bhatia also pointed to a now-deleted X post of Congress leader Pawan Khera that carried data to back voter fraud allegations against EC. Gaurav Bhatia asked 'who will take responsibility for the damage to democracy'.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Vice-Presidential poll: Reddy vs Radhakrishnan puts alliances to test; how the numbers stack up
NEW DELHI: The opposition on Tuesday named former Supreme Court judge B Sudershan Reddy as its candidate for the upcoming vice-presidential election. This comes days after the National Democratic Alliance announced Maharashtra governor CP Radhakrishnan as its nominee. The vice-presidential election has turned into a "South vs South" contest, with Radhakrishnan hailing from Tamil Nadu and Reddy from Telangana. The NDA's decision to field CP Radhakrishnan as its vice-presidential candidate has put the DMK in a spot, as rejecting a candidate from Tamil Nadu could be portrayed as disregarding Tamil pride—an issue rivals are expected to highlight in the 2026 campaign. However, extending support to the BJP's nominee would go against the DMK's long-standing political positioning against the Centre. Meanwhile, the opposition has countered with its own strategy by fielding an eminent Telugu face, making it difficult for parties in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana—the YSRCP and the BRS—to not back Reddy. TDP leader Nara Lokesh, however, met Radhakrishnan in Delhi and extended warm wishes on behalf of his party. How the numbers stack up The vice president is elected by members of both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, including nominated members of the Upper House. Currently, the NDA holds a comfortable edge. The combined strength of the two Houses stands at 786, factoring in six vacancies—one in the Lok Sabha (Basirhat, West Bengal) and five in the Rajya Sabha (four from Jammu and Kashmir and one from Punjab, where AAP MP Sanjeev Arora stepped down after winning a state assembly bypoll last month). To win, a candidate must secure at least 394 votes, assuming full turnout. The BJP-led NDA is well positioned. It commands the support of 293 MPs in the 542-member Lok Sabha and 129 MPs in the Rajya Sabha (effective strength: 240), including likely backing from nominated members. This gives the ruling alliance a projected total of 422 votes—well above the required majority. However, if a few NDA members rebel and vote for the INDIA bloc candidate, the balance may shift. Under Article 68(2) of the Constitution, an election to fill a vacancy in the office of the vice president due to resignation, death, removal, or otherwise must be held "as soon as possible." The person elected will serve a full five-year term from the date of assuming office. The vice-presidential election follows the system of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote and is conducted via secret ballot, as laid down in Article 66(1). Electors rank candidates in order of preference. The vice president is the second-highest constitutional authority in India and also serves as ex-officio chairperson of the Rajya Sabha. While the tenure is five years, the incumbent continues until a successor takes office. Dhankhar, who took office in August 2022, resigned abruptly citing health reasons. His resignation letter was submitted to President Droupadi Murmu and took effect immediately.
