
Laxatives and nappies: how schools are coping with constipation in pupils
While constipation is known to be a common problem in children, teachers say they are being asked to administer more laxatives like Movicol which have been prescribed by GPs to their pupils. In the most concerning cases it can lead to surgery, while in others school avoidance, because of embarrassment and discomfort.
Guardian analysis found that more than 44,000 children were admitted to hospital with constipation last year, based on NHS data for England and Wales that also shows a 60% rise in hospital diagnoses of constipation in primary schoolchildren in the past decade.
Sarah Smith, executive headteacher of two primary schools in Blackpool, Christ the King and St Cuthbert's Catholic academies, said potty training and toileting problems were an issue in both schools – as in many others across England. However, the issue of constipation has received less attention.
'We don't really know the extent of the issue of constipation. Because that is something that families wouldn't necessarily tell us,' said Smith.
'But the local health authority in Blackpool give a product called Movicol in an attempt to make kids go regularly and that is a product that we have in our school medical safe that children are prescribed, and we do administer that to children in a number of classes.
'If I'd said that word [Movicol] 10 years ago, very few staff would have known what it was. Whereas if I say it now, I would say 90% of my staff would know it's for a bowel problem.'
Smith said as well as diet and exercise, lack of water was a factor in constipation. 'We have water bottles coming out of our ears and we encourage every child to bring water in, but there is a massive reluctance for kids to drink just plain water.' Juice is discouraged, other than at break and lunchtimes, because of tooth decay.
She also raised concern about cuts to health visitors and the impact that might be having on toileting issues. 'I had so many visits as a mum of a toddler. Every other month there was something else, but they have been massively cut, so new mums may struggle.'
On Movicol, she said: 'I look after two schools and we have kids on that product and I am certain there will be more, but often we only find out by accident – maybe they have an accident in school – but it's not talked about confidently like perhaps it would if they're struggling to read.'
In school, the children who have been prescribed Movicol are given hot-water bottles if they get tummy ache, and the school will ring home to inform the parents.
'The other thing I find most bizarre is the increasing number of kids who have a phobia of a toilet and they can't poo on another toilet,' said Smith. 'The last couple of years we have had at least one child in our school that's been unable to go to the toilet, generally to go for a poo. It's only post-Covid we've seen that.'
Smith said she and colleagues in other schools would soon be receiving details of their new intake for the next year and discussing the challenges that lie ahead. 'What we generally talk about is how things feel as though they're getting harder and harder in every sense of the word, whether it's speech, whether it's toileting, whether it's behaviour.
'Covid is still the gift that people have forgotten about, and it is still giving, because of what happened in those months when nobody went to see these people.'
Dr Babu Vadamalayan, a paediatric gastroenterologist working in the NHS and private hospitals in London, said the causes of constipation are multi-factorial and children across all socioeconomic groups are affected.
It can be triggered by dirty school toilets, while there is also concern about lack of free access to toilets at school. A survey of 900 secondary schoolchildren by Eric, the children's bowel and bladder charity, found almost half (48%) are not allowed to go to the toilet during lessons.
If a child's constipation is not addressed effectively early on, it can become chronic. 'When it becomes a soiling issue, it's a huge embarrassment for them,' said Vadamalayan.
Simone Beach, head teacher of Sacred Heart Catholic primary school in Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, is also aware of more children in her school suffering from constipation and is concerned about the impact it can have on their education.
'There are lots of reasons why children are suffering from constipation and it affects their education,' she said. 'Some of our children might have a drop in attendance and it's because they are having issues in that way. Some children require hospital admission in really severe cases.'
Beach believes the cost of living crisis and child poverty, which affect many in the community the school serves, may be playing a part. 'That always has an impact on a child's physical and mental health,' she said. 'The truth is that if you are a family living in poverty, life is tough.
'There are a number of children who regularly have Movicol. We have 218 children on roll and a handful will be having daily sachets of Movicol. They may have tummy ache. Then there's that worry that they might have an accident, especially as they get older and that's when you start to see it affect attendance.
'A few years ago, we would have been giving Movicol to one child in school, now it's five or six. It's all age groups.'
Some children may have to wear protective Pull-Ups in case of accidents. 'We had one child in the past who needed nappies right the way through juniors till they left.'
For Beach, it's all part of a school's work. 'Sacred Heart, probably like lots and lots of other schools, it's not just about teaching them maths and English. You are there to support their families, in all sorts of ways.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Drastically improve your posture with three doctor-approved exercises
An NHS GP has shared three simple exercises that can help you improve your posture, as he said he would never recommend a posture-correcting brace to his patients Many people live sedentary lifestyles, sitting for prolonged periods. Whether they're desk-bound at work or spend weekends binge-watching TV, such habits can wreak havoc on their backs and posture. For those struggling with posture issues and seeking solutions, you might have seen online ads for wearable braces that promise to realign your spine and correct your posture. However, one medical expert warns that these devices could do more harm than good. Doctor Suraj Kukadia, an NHS GP and emergency doctor, has spoken out against using posture-correcting braces. Instead, he offers three straightforward exercises to enhance your posture without any risks. Known as Dr Sooj on TikTok, the doctor shared his advice in a video: "I have never recommended one of those posture-correcting braces, because they actually weaken your back muscles, which are responsible for your posture. So here are three simple exercises you can do to improve your posture." 1. Hip flexor stretches Dr Sooj points out that our modern lifestyle means we're often sitting down – whether it's watching TV, driving, commuting, or working at desks – leading to "internally rotated" hips. To counteract this, he suggests a hip flexor stretch as the first exercise. The stretch begins with you kneeling on one knee, ensuring "everything at 90 degrees". Next, tilt your pelvis "posteriorly" - meaning toward the back - and then lean forward. Dr Sooj revealed he could feel a "wonderful stretch" in his thighs, which is precisely the sensation you're aiming for. To enhance the stretch, twist your upper body away from the muscle being stretched or lean to the opposite side. For the best outcome, Dr Sooj suggests maintaining the stretch for 30 to 60 seconds on each side. 2. Chest muscle stretch Those who spend hours slouched over a computer might notice their chest becoming internally rotated. Dr Sooj's second exercise, requiring nothing more than a doorframe, can counteract this issue. To open up your chest muscles, grasp the doorframe with one hand and extend your arm fully. Then pivot your entire body away, keeping your arm outstretched. You'll feel the pull across your pectorals. Dr Sooj assures that the height of your arm isn't crucial during this stretch, and you can adjust the angle to suit your comfort and mobility level. As with the thigh stretch, aim to hold this position for 30 to 60 seconds. 3. Strengthen the back The last exercise focuses on fortifying the back and is performed standing with arms extended in front. It involves several steps, but once mastered, it should become quite simple. Dr Sooj detailed the routine, saying: "We pull our shoulder blades back to engage our back muscles, elbows back to 90 degrees, and then rotate up. Rotate down, forward, and relax. So shoulder blades, elbows, rotate. Do that 15 to 20 times, multiple times a day." Wrapping up his instructional clip, he added: "Have a go with those three exercises and let me know how you get on."


The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wes Streeting's divide and rule tactics may have won against the doctors – but more strikes are coming
When thousands of ambulance workers went on strike on 21 December 2022 to demand better pay and conditions, the then shadow health secretary, Wes Streeting, wasn't shy in pointing out who was responsible. In their refusal to negotiate, he tweeted, Rishi Sunak and Steve Barclay had driven NHS staff to strike, leaving patients 'in no doubt who is to blame for this chaos'. Three years and one general election later, the surgical slipper is firmly on the other foot. Resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – have just finished a five-day strike, demanding a 29% pay rise over the next few years. Among placards on picket lines calling for 'pay restoration' and an end to 'cuts so deep that even a surgeon couldn't fix it' were printed copies of Streeting's tweet. Gone is the relaxed attitude displayed by the health secretary towards the British Medical Association (BMA) in 2024, when he agreed a deal with doctors that set them on a 'journey to pay restoration'. He has called this latest strike a 'gift to Nigel Farage' and urged resident doctors to cross picket lines and join their colleagues still 'turning up to work'. He has described the strike not only as 'reckless', but as an action that 'enormously undermines the entire trade union movement'. Union general secretaries have been quick to shoot back, with Dave Ward of the Communication Workers Union calling Streeting's comments 'shameful', and the Public and Commercial Services Union's Fran Heathcote accusing the health secretary of 'carping in the Murdoch press' instead of negotiating a settlement. For a government whose relationship with organised labour has so far been largely harmonious – apart from Unite's suspension of Angela Rayner over the Birmingham bin strikes – Streeting's denouncement of the BMA is the closest Labour has come to picking a fight with the unions. Is this the government's industrial shot across the bows? While on the face of it, the row might seem like the first real sign of confrontation between Labour and the unions, it's worth taking a closer look at what is happening. Underlying Streeting's intervention are a number of factors that make the BMA an easy target for a government that's keen to display that it can be tough on unions and not in the pocket of its 'union paymasters'. The BMA is not affiliated to Labour, nor is it part of the Trades Union Congress, making Labour's institutional link to it much weaker. There's also the fact that resistance to the strike isn't coming only from the government's side: other healthcare unions have expressed unease over existing discrepancies in NHS pay offers. Last month, the Royal College of Nursing called the government's decision to award resident doctors a 5.4% pay increase while offering nursing staff 3.6% 'grotesque'. In a video posted on X about the strike, Streeting plays into those divisions within the movement, stoking tension between resident doctors and other NHS workers. He talks about 'working hard with … staff that aren't paid as much as doctors to make sure that your pay and your career progression and the conditions that you work in are also good for you'. Add to that the older consultants and medical professionals who have been having their say: that a strike would 'further diminish the ability of the NHS to deliver', that 'it is too soon to go again', or simply that resident doctors are being 'very greedy'. Then there's the drastic lurch by the Tories – both in government and opposition – to the right on industrial matters, with Kemi Badenoch proposing this week to ban doctors from taking strike action, putting them under the same rules that apply to police, prison officers and soldiers. This approach gives Streeting more room to present himself as tough but reasonable. This isn't to defend Streeting, who is probably more than happy to use strike action to justify further NHS privatisation. Nor is it to undermine how galling his comments are for those standing out on the picket lines. One doctor has called them a 'slap in the face', while another asked where the Streeting of 2022 had gone: 'He was making some good points.' But government condemnation of the strike does not necessarily reflect a wider shift in its strategy towards unions. Amid frenzied attacks by Tories and their media allies on Labour's link with the unions, the reality of the relationship is all too often drowned out. That makes it harder to understand key dynamics: it's likely to be transport unions that the government hopes to take on, not only industrially but politically. It also makes it harder to spot how unions' different industrial priorities inform their relationship with the government. With so much of Labour's employment rights bill left to secondary legislation, general secretaries still have eyes on the prize of getting their sectoral needs met, whether that's Unison pushing for fair pay agreements or the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers for zero-hours contract reform. Then there's the fact that there are those in Labour who are itching to embrace the spirit of the 1980s and launch a full-frontal attack on the movement. The country is once again facing the prospect of widespread public sector industrial action, with nurses and teachers potentially set to join the strike action. A decade of suppressed public sector pay, inflation and increases in the cost of living has challenged the idea that certain professions' wages are always guarantees of a good life. On a basic starting salary of £38,831 and saddled with as much as £100,000 of student debt, it's no longer enough for new resident doctor recruits to simply wait to earn more at some distant point in the future. While there are grievances specific to the resident doctors' strikes – a shortage of speciality training posts and having to spend thousands of pounds on exam fees, courses and equipment such as stethoscopes – many of their concerns are felt deeply across the movement. Stubborn mountains of student debt, housing costs that utterly eclipse wages and crumbling public services that drive down working conditions are not unique to the BMA. For this dispute, Labour has used inter-union tensions over NHS pay – as well as the outdated idea that all resident doctors are middle-class professionals – as a political opportunity to dodge blame for the strike. But that strategy won't work for all strikes. As public sector unrest continues to unfold, the government's battle with the unions might well begin in earnest. Polly Smythe is labour movement correspondent at Novara Media


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
BMA hits back at claims it refused to allow doctors to work in critical areas during strike
The British Medical Association has hit back at claims the organisation refused to allow doctors to keep working in critical areas during five days of strike action. Resident doctors – previously known as junior doctors – began a five day strike across England on Friday as part of an escalating row between NHS bosses and the BMA over pay. The strike ended at 7am this morning (Wednesday). During a strike, NHS trusts can apply for measures, often called "derogations", which would allow doctors to return to work providing critical services when it is feared patient safety is at risk. In an update to staff on Tuesday morning, Sir James Mackey, chief executive of the NHS, said 18 requests for patient safety mitigations (derogations) had been turned down. Sir Jim claimed that in nine of the 18 cases, the BMA said it would allow doctors to return to work, but only if they were paid "extortionate" rates. "Unfortunately, despite all requests being made and verified by senior medics, 18 have been rejected by the BMA, with half of those rejections saying the BMA would support only if extortionate pay rates were offered to striking doctors," Sir James said. But a spokesperson for the BMA told Sky News the claims by Sir James were "untrue and unfounded". "When a derogation is agreed between the BMA and NHS England and which requires a resident doctor to return to work, they do not receive any kind of enhanced payment because those resident doctors are going back to their ward or department to do their usual work," they said. 1:16 "Sir James is clearly quite confused about the derogation process if he is suggesting anything different." 'Wholly wrong and untrue' The BMA said before any derogation is granted, a trust is expected to demonstrate it has "done everything possible to incentivise non-striking doctors to cover the vacant shifts". "This can include paying enhanced rates of pay and this is a usual practice when asking doctors to take on extra-contractual work, over and above their normal hours and is not exclusive to covering gaps that trusts have failed to adequately plan for during industrial action." They said the claim that the BMA requires increased payments to striking doctors is "wholly wrong and Sir James Mackey should withdraw these comments and apologise for the misleading impression they are creating". Fewer patients were affected by the five-day walkout compared to previous strikes, NHS officials said this morning, with fewer doctors taking to picket lines. The number of appointments, procedures and operations that were postponed are expected to be published later this week. But as this week's strike comes to an end, the union is not ruling out further strikes. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has said future talks could lead to improvements in the working lives of resident doctors but he has repeatedly said there is no more money for pay. But BMA leaders have insisted there must be some discussion around pay. Last July, resident doctors were awarded a raise of 22% over two years, the highest public sector award in recent years. But the BMA has argued that pay has declined significantly since 2008, and are calling for a rise of 29.2% to reverse "pay erosion".