logo
Wes Streeting's divide and rule tactics may have won against the doctors – but more strikes are coming

Wes Streeting's divide and rule tactics may have won against the doctors – but more strikes are coming

The Guardian19 hours ago
When thousands of ambulance workers went on strike on 21 December 2022 to demand better pay and conditions, the then shadow health secretary, Wes Streeting, wasn't shy in pointing out who was responsible. In their refusal to negotiate, he tweeted, Rishi Sunak and Steve Barclay had driven NHS staff to strike, leaving patients 'in no doubt who is to blame for this chaos'.
Three years and one general election later, the surgical slipper is firmly on the other foot. Resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – have just finished a five-day strike, demanding a 29% pay rise over the next few years. Among placards on picket lines calling for 'pay restoration' and an end to 'cuts so deep that even a surgeon couldn't fix it' were printed copies of Streeting's tweet.
Gone is the relaxed attitude displayed by the health secretary towards the British Medical Association (BMA) in 2024, when he agreed a deal with doctors that set them on a 'journey to pay restoration'. He has called this latest strike a 'gift to Nigel Farage' and urged resident doctors to cross picket lines and join their colleagues still 'turning up to work'. He has described the strike not only as 'reckless', but as an action that 'enormously undermines the entire trade union movement'.
Union general secretaries have been quick to shoot back, with Dave Ward of the Communication Workers Union calling Streeting's comments 'shameful', and the Public and Commercial Services Union's Fran Heathcote accusing the health secretary of 'carping in the Murdoch press' instead of negotiating a settlement. For a government whose relationship with organised labour has so far been largely harmonious – apart from Unite's suspension of Angela Rayner over the Birmingham bin strikes – Streeting's denouncement of the BMA is the closest Labour has come to picking a fight with the unions. Is this the government's industrial shot across the bows?
While on the face of it, the row might seem like the first real sign of confrontation between Labour and the unions, it's worth taking a closer look at what is happening. Underlying Streeting's intervention are a number of factors that make the BMA an easy target for a government that's keen to display that it can be tough on unions and not in the pocket of its 'union paymasters'.
The BMA is not affiliated to Labour, nor is it part of the Trades Union Congress, making Labour's institutional link to it much weaker. There's also the fact that resistance to the strike isn't coming only from the government's side: other healthcare unions have expressed unease over existing discrepancies in NHS pay offers. Last month, the Royal College of Nursing called the government's decision to award resident doctors a 5.4% pay increase while offering nursing staff 3.6% 'grotesque'.
In a video posted on X about the strike, Streeting plays into those divisions within the movement, stoking tension between resident doctors and other NHS workers. He talks about 'working hard with … staff that aren't paid as much as doctors to make sure that your pay and your career progression and the conditions that you work in are also good for you'.
Add to that the older consultants and medical professionals who have been having their say: that a strike would 'further diminish the ability of the NHS to deliver', that 'it is too soon to go again', or simply that resident doctors are being 'very greedy'.
Then there's the drastic lurch by the Tories – both in government and opposition – to the right on industrial matters, with Kemi Badenoch proposing this week to ban doctors from taking strike action, putting them under the same rules that apply to police, prison officers and soldiers. This approach gives Streeting more room to present himself as tough but reasonable.
This isn't to defend Streeting, who is probably more than happy to use strike action to justify further NHS privatisation. Nor is it to undermine how galling his comments are for those standing out on the picket lines. One doctor has called them a 'slap in the face', while another asked where the Streeting of 2022 had gone: 'He was making some good points.'
But government condemnation of the strike does not necessarily reflect a wider shift in its strategy towards unions. Amid frenzied attacks by Tories and their media allies on Labour's link with the unions, the reality of the relationship is all too often drowned out. That makes it harder to understand key dynamics: it's likely to be transport unions that the government hopes to take on, not only industrially but politically.
It also makes it harder to spot how unions' different industrial priorities inform their relationship with the government. With so much of Labour's employment rights bill left to secondary legislation, general secretaries still have eyes on the prize of getting their sectoral needs met, whether that's Unison pushing for fair pay agreements or the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers for zero-hours contract reform. Then there's the fact that there are those in Labour who are itching to embrace the spirit of the 1980s and launch a full-frontal attack on the movement.
The country is once again facing the prospect of widespread public sector industrial action, with nurses and teachers potentially set to join the strike action. A decade of suppressed public sector pay, inflation and increases in the cost of living has challenged the idea that certain professions' wages are always guarantees of a good life. On a basic starting salary of £38,831 and saddled with as much as £100,000 of student debt, it's no longer enough for new resident doctor recruits to simply wait to earn more at some distant point in the future.
While there are grievances specific to the resident doctors' strikes – a shortage of speciality training posts and having to spend thousands of pounds on exam fees, courses and equipment such as stethoscopes – many of their concerns are felt deeply across the movement. Stubborn mountains of student debt, housing costs that utterly eclipse wages and crumbling public services that drive down working conditions are not unique to the BMA.
For this dispute, Labour has used inter-union tensions over NHS pay – as well as the outdated idea that all resident doctors are middle-class professionals – as a political opportunity to dodge blame for the strike. But that strategy won't work for all strikes. As public sector unrest continues to unfold, the government's battle with the unions might well begin in earnest.
Polly Smythe is labour movement correspondent at Novara Media
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawyers warn Starmer recognising Palestinian state could break international law
Lawyers warn Starmer recognising Palestinian state could break international law

BBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Lawyers warn Starmer recognising Palestinian state could break international law

Some of Britain's most distinguished lawyers have warned the government that recognising a Palestinian state would breach international Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced the UK would move towards recognition unless Israel met certain conditions, including agreeing a ceasefire and reviving the prospect of a two-state solution, on Tuesday.A day later, Canada announced it would also move towards recognition at a UN summit in September, where 147 of the UN's 193 member states already formally recognise a Palestinian opponents argue Palestine does not meet the legal requirements for statehood under international law because important criteria have not been met. The Montevideo Convention sets out the criteria for the recognition of a state under international law as a defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.A group of 43 peers, including some of the UK's most eminent lawyers, has set out their belief that Sir Keir's pledge could be in breach of international law as the territory may not meet these criteria for a letter to the government's attorney general, Lord Hermer, first reported by the Times, they call for him to advise the prime minister against recognition."It is clear that there is no certainty over the borders of Palestine," they argue, and also that "there is no functioning single government, Fatah and Hamas being enemies". "The former has failed to hold elections for decades, and the latter is a terrorist organisation, neither of which could enter into relations with other states," the letter adds. The peers warn that it "would be unwise to depart from" the Convention, signed in 1933, "at a time when international law is seen as fragile".They add: "You have said that a selective, 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience."Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law."Lord Hermer has previously insisted that a commitment to international law "goes absolutely to the heart" of the government's approach to foreign BBC has obtained a full list of signatories, which includes the prominent barrister Lord Pannick - who represented the previous government at the Supreme Court over its Rwanda well as lawyers, some of Parliament's most prominent Jewish voices, including crossbench peer Baroness Deech, Labour's Lord Winston and the Conservatives' Baroness Altmann, have also put their name to the letter. The peers' intervention follows condemnation of Sir Keir's announcement by Emily Damari, a British-Israeli women who was held captive by Hamas for more than a year, who said Sir Keir is "not standing on the right side of history". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also claimed it "rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism".Responding to fears the decision to recognise a Palestinian state does not align with the 1933 Montevideo Convention, business minister Gareth Thomas told Times Radio: "We haven't signed up to the Montevideo Convention, but is there a clear population in in Palestine? Yes, there is in Gaza and the West Bank."We have made clear that we think you would recognise the state of Palestine, and that state of Palestine would be based on the 1967 borders."Of course, there would have to be land swaps and there would be a shared capital of Jerusalem. They are well-regarded international views."Thomas stressed the UK Government had "made clear that there needs to be reform to the Palestinian Authority, that Hamas can have no role in the future government of Gaza and Palestine more generally". Pointing to the 147 other countries that have already recognised a Palestinian state, he added that the prime minister "was in talks this week with a series of countries, including Canada, and Canada have overnight, as you will have seen, taken the decision to recognise Palestine in September".Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his country plans to recognise a Palestinian state as part of the two-state solution - that is Israel and Palestine living said his decision was prompted by the "catastrophe" in Gaza, and because he feared the prospect of a Palestinian state was "receding before our eyes".The Palestinian Authority - which runs parts of the occupied West Bank - must commit to "much-needed reform" he said, and Hamas, which controlled Gaza, "can play no part".The UK has said it too would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel committed to a Keir has said the UK will only refrain from recognition if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two also said Hamas must immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and "accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza". Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.

Unique blood test could catch cancer early
Unique blood test could catch cancer early

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Unique blood test could catch cancer early

A new clinical trial, Enlighten, is assessing a blood test designed to detect 10 different types of cancer in their very early stages. Developed by Proteotype Diagnostics and led by the Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, the test identifies specific proteins in the blood that indicate the immune system's response to initial cancer signs. Unlike other tests focusing on abnormal DNA, Enlighten targets protein levels, which experts believe are more effective for detecting cancer at its earliest stages. The Modernised trial aims to recruit 1,000 patients across various solid tumour types, with 450 already participating, and is running at multiple hospital sites in the UK. Researchers emphasise that early cancer detection, facilitated by such tests, is crucial for improving treatment options and increasing successful outcomes for patients.

Bird flu confirmed at commercial poultry farm near Tiverton
Bird flu confirmed at commercial poultry farm near Tiverton

BBC News

time17 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Bird flu confirmed at commercial poultry farm near Tiverton

Bird flu has been confirmed at a farm in Devon, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has said the case had occurred at a commercial poultry business near Tiverton on Wednesday and that all birds at the site would be humanely culled. A 3km (1.9 mile) protection zone and 10km (6.2 mile) surveillance zone has been declared around the keeping poultry or other captive birds within the two zones must keep them housed and a record of all people who enter or leave the property, Defra said. It comes after a case of bird flu was confirmed in poultry near Minehead and Dulverton in Somerset on Scotland and Wales have been designated an avian influenza prevention zone (AIPZ) with mandatory biosecurity measures in place until further AIPZ measures apply to all bird keepers whether they have pet or commercial biosecurity is essential to protecting flocks from bird flu, Defra added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store