'Bade ghar ki thakurayin': Aishwarya Rai breaks internet again with demure ‘Paro in 2025' Cannes look; fans give verdict
Aishwarya Rai once again has the Indian internet dwellers in a chokehold, thanks to her latest Cannes Film Festival outing. She attended the premiere of The History of Sound at the fest, flaunting a pristine white Manish Malhotra saree and enormous ruby necklaces. Her red sindoor popping and a regal train trailing behind her, Aishwarya reminded fans of someone special: herself.
Several fashion and Bollywood pages shared Aishwarya's photos and videos from the red carpet on social media overnight, one of them being anonymous fashion watchdog, Diet Sabya. They wrote, very appropriately, 'OH SHE BROUGHT THE MARTINEZ TO A SCREECHING HALT LMAOOO. Not a soul blinked. Waiters dropped trays. Champagne paused mid-bubble. Girls in archival Gaultier turned their heads. The girlies and the gays knew.'
A post shared by DietSabya® (@dietsabya)
And they knew, 'mother' was indeed 'mothering'. The comments section was flooded with obsessed reactions for the 'OG Kween of Cannes'. 'Me entering my sasural dining table after waking up at lunch time,' someone very accurately visualised Aish's queenly walk in the hotel lobby, in their own little domestic life scenario.
'Uffff! The face card never declined 🔥1000/ 10,' said a fan about the 'most beautiful woman in the world'. 'Brace yourself—to see MILs and bhabhis in gandi copies of this look next shaadi season,' predicted another.
Many comments had one common idea, this was Aish recreating her Paro from Devdas look with a 2025 update. The sindoor, the saree, the golden border, heavy jewels, the high contrast makeup all reminded fans of Paro in her 'thakurain era'.
'Bade ghar ki thakurayan,' wrote a fan. 'Roop bhi hai , Gun bhi aur daulat bhi," someone brought back her perfect line from the movie. 'The only chaand who has no daag,' another Devdas reference was dropped. And another, 'Aaj se hum bhi zameendar honge, energy.'
'Paro after divorcing rich old Thakur,' someone was inspired to come up with an alternate ending to Sanjay Leela Bhansali's 2002 hit. In it, Aishwarya plays Paro, who falls in love with the son of a rich man, Dev. When his family rejects her, she is married off to another, older man, even richer than Dev and his family.
At the festival, Aishwarya was representing the cosmetics brand L'Oreal.
The 78th Cannes Film Festival is witnessing a significant Indian presence this year, with filmmaker Payal Kapadia being part of the main competition jury.
Bollywood icons Sharmila Tagore and Simi Garewal attended the world premiere of the newly restored version of Satyajit Ray's 1970 classic Aranyer Din Ratri.
On Wednesday, director Neeraj Ghaywan presented his film Homebound at the film gala under the Un Certain Regard segment. He was accompanied by actors Janhvi Kapoor, Ishaan Khatter, and Vishal Jethwa as well as producer Karan Johar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
Karan Johar Reportedly Gets A Face Insurance; What Does It Really Mean?
Last Updated: Karan Johar has reportedly insured his face, inspired by a friend. Find out what does a face insurance really mean. Karan Johar has reportedly insured his face. Well, the filmmaker-producer has yet to confirm the development, but a viral Reddit post claimed so. Insurance of one's face or other bodily assets is becoming a popular trend. But what exactly does face insurance mean? Let's find out. What does face insurance mean? For actors, models, and high-profile influencers, appearance is more than just aesthetics – it's a crucial part of their brand and a main source of income. In these cases, the face becomes an asset worth protecting, and insurance companies are now offering specialised policies. Face insurance generally covers injuries, disfigurement, and other facial damages –whether from accidents, botched cosmetic procedures, or unexpected health issues – that could impair a celebrity's ability to work. This financial protection compensates for potential loss of earnings and, in some instances, medical expenses. Celebrities find it a logical progression for those whose careers heavily depend on their appearance. If an actor or model loses a significant endorsement due to facial damage, the financial impact can be substantial. Insurance also provides peace of mind and is often required by studios or brands. While the practice may seem extreme to some, it is similar to other forms of body-part insurance already popular among celebrities – from singers insuring their vocal cords to athletes covering their legs or hands. What is the rumour about Karan Johar's face insurance? A recent viral Reddit post claims KJo recently insured his face. The post recently caught everyone's attention by stating that KJo flew to South Korea to get his face insured. Reportedly, the filmmaker was 'inspired' by a close friend from the South film industry to take this step. 'Rumour has it Karan Johar secretly flew to South Korea multiple times to get… his face insured. Yup, inspired by a close friend, and apparently it's a trend there. Insiders say he's been way more chill since—smiling more, less snappy, even gave a rare compliment at work. No word from him yet, but now we're all wondering: does this cover acne, sunburns, wrinkles? And how much is that premium?!" the post read. Amitabh Bachchan, Anil Kapoor, John Abraham have insured their assets Karan Johar is not the first Indian celebrity to insure a body part. Amitabh Bachchan has his voice insured, and it is said that John Abraham has insured his buttocks. Hollywood celebs, too, have spent exorbitant amounts to insure their precious assets. Jennifer Lopez have reportedly insured her curves for a reported $27 million, while Mariah Carey insured her legs and vocal cords for an astonishing $70 million. David Beckham, renowned for his football skills and marketability, insured his legs for about $70 million during his career. Supermodel Heidi Klum insured her legs, with one leg reportedly valued higher due to a scar on the other. First Published:
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Chris Martin, Dakota Johnson wanted to experience...": Sonali Bendre recalls her Babulnath Temple visit with Coldplay singer, Hollywood actress
New Delhi [India], June 7 (ANI): British band Coldplay's lead vocalist, Chris Martin, came to India earlier this year and surprised his desi fans not only with his soulful concerts but also with his spiritual side. Before his gigs at the DY Patil Stadium in Navi Mumbai on January 18 and 19, Chris, along with Hollywood actress Dakota Johnson, paid a sacred visit to the iconic Babulnath Temple. They were joined by Bollywood star Sonali Bendre and 'Swades' fame actress Gayatri Oberoi. Several images and videos went viral in which Chris, Dakota, Sonali and Gayatri were seen offering prayers. Dakota and Chris, who have now reportedly parted ways, embraced Indian culture with full devotion. Sonali and Gayatri also accompanied Dakota to the iconic Siddhivinayak Temple in Mumbai back in January. Dressed in traditional attire, the trio appeared to be in high spirits, engaging in a lively conversation as they made their way through the temple grounds. Recalling meeting Chris and Dakota, Sonali in an Interview with ANI, shared, ' She's (Dakota) such a lovely person. It was my yoga teacher who told me that, you know what, somebody is coming in and they want to be taken to a few temples. Will you do this? I'm like, okay, who is it? And that's how I get to know. So I think Chris and her (Dakota) wanted to have a temple experience. And I think that's an experience everybody should have at some point. It was lovely. With her (and Chris), the night before everybody got to know we had visited Babulnath Temple. And then the next day, we visited Siddhivinayak Temple.' Meanwhile, Chris and Dakota recently made headlines with their alleged break-up. A source informed US-based magazine PEOPLE about their split. 'It feels final this time,' one source said of the split. Reps for the stars did not respond to PEOPLE's requests for comment. In March 2024, an insider told PEOPLE that Johnson and Martin had actually been engaged for 'years' after first sparking engagement rumours in 2020, though they were 'in no rush to get married' at the time. When breakup rumors surfaced in August 2024, a rep for the actress shut down the reports and said the pair were 'happily together.' Around the same time, a source said, 'Sure, they've had issues and taken breaks in the past, but things are great now. They both love their careers. They are balancing things the best they can.' Prior to that, a source said in June 2024 that Johnson and Martin, who mostly kept their relationship private, had their 'ups and downs, but now they're definitely back on.' Chris and Dakota have not addressed their separation rumours yet. (ANI)
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Tyranny of television
It's 2025, and yet prime-time Indian television continues to glorify cruelty against women under the garb of 'traditional values'. There is a deeply disturbing serial currently airing on a Hindi general entertainment channel, centred on the character of a kind, talented, and good-hearted young woman who is relentlessly humiliated because of her weight. From the very beginning, she is taunted by her mother and grandmother for not being slim — despite their knowledge that a pregnancy-related medicine made weight loss impossible for her. Then follows not just casual body shaming, but sustained psychological torment, emotional degradation, and outright abuse by her in-laws — presented as a woman's duty to 'adjust' and 'win hearts'. A wealthy businessman arranges her marriage to his son, praising her sanskaars. But the groom, diabetic and secretly in love with the bride's model cousin, refuses to accept her. He avoids her, sleeps on the sofa, while his mother and aunt connive to frame her as clumsy and incompetent. They engineer her every mistake, then punish her for it — all the while she tries to prove her worth like the archetypal docile bahu, with a bowed head and a constant stream of apologies. In a recent and deeply disturbing episode, she is forced to pose as a servant when a domineering relative visits. She is insulted, spanked with a rod, and nearly trapped into spending the night with a hired actor posing as her husband — all in a calculated scheme to drive her out. Yet, she endures this cruelty in silence, convinced that suffering is the road to love. A new episode reached a new low. It humiliated not one, but two women, turning their pain into a farce for viewer amusement. A village girl chosen by the visiting grandaunt to marry the hero (unaware he's married) is pitted against the wife. The episode ends without justice or consequence — only the image of a woman broken by public mockery. One feels sick watching it. Evil message What are we teaching viewers — especially young women — through such shows? That if you are overweight or from a rural background, you must grovel for love and acceptance? That abuse by in-laws must be endured in the name of parampara? That silence, shame, and submission are signs of virtue? And what message are we sending to in-laws — that cruelty is permissible as long as it's cloaked in tradition? This is not entertainment. This is emotional abuse disguised as morality. The show doesn't challenge oppression, but romanticises it. It rewards toxic behaviour, even painting abusers as concerned, well-meaning elders. Worse, it normalises violence. Every humiliation the young woman suffers is presented as a test of character. But acceptance by whom? A mother-in-law who hires a man to seduce her daughter-in-law? A grandaunt who hits her with a rod for minor mistakes? These aren't 'family trials' — they are criminal acts. In the real world, any woman subjected to this level of abuse would suffer long-lasting psychological damage. But on TV, these acts are framed as character-building, as if pain is the price of acceptance. If the show truly intended to critique social cruelty, it could have shown the young woman resisting, reclaiming her dignity, or getting in-laws who value her. The message could have been one of strength, not submission. This show is a regressive, damaging portrayal of Indian womanhood. We cannot let mainstream media glorify abuse in the name of sanskaars. As viewers and citizens, all should strongly protest the normalisation of familial abuse, and call for a boycott of such content. Channels must rethink their programming. They cannot promote humiliation, cruelty, and misogyny as tradition. The show must be stopped before it harms. vineykirpal@
