Outrage as Working with Children Check only takes 30 minutes and requires a simple online form
A major spotlight has this week been put on child safety tools after a man was charged with 70 offences at a Melbourne childcare centre.
Childcare worker Joshua Brown, 26, has been charged in relation to eight victims who attended a Point Cook childcare centre between April 2022 and January 2023.
A Working with Children Check usually handles state-by-state but involves a national police check and a review of reportable workplace misconduct.
Previously, the check has been a key safety tool used to ensure kids are being kept safe.
The Herald Sun compared the online form with Victoria's Responsible Service of Alcohol course, which requires up to 10 hours of training in order to become certified.
A number of childhood sexual abuse advocates, including Australian Childhood Foundation survivor Emma Hakansson, 25, said it was 'laughable' that governments considered the current checks acceptable.
'The adult who sexually abused me also had a WWCC,' she said in a report in the publication.
'The WWCC could be a tool to arm safe adults with training to keep children safe, and it's absurd we trust adults with children without any training, while training is required to serve alcohol, even to handle food.'
On Friday, journalists Luke Bona and Susie O'Brien joined Nat Barr on Sunrise to discuss the relative ease in meeting the Working with Children Check requirement.
Both called for tougher regulations.
'The story that has sparked all this is the most horrific thing,' Bona said.
'Remember, everybody is presumed innocent until proven guilty, but the spotlight is certainly on the safety and welfare of our children.
'The safety of our children is the most important thing we can offer, and we must provide.
'So, I take my hat off to Hetty Johnson from Bravehearts who's going to form her own course.
'But it's got to be mandatory, because the message is, we've got to keep kids safe at all costs.'
This week, journalist Susie O'Brien reported that educators facing serious allegations can still work in childcare centres for up to two years due to regulatory issues.
They are often allowed to work during the investigation.
'The comparison between the RSA and the Working with Children Check is really interesting, because you can be fined $10,000 for serving someone drunk,' O'Brien began.
'You probably lose your job, find it hard to get another job.
'But you can be a childcare worker who molests a toddler.
'Yes, you will lose your job, but you can continue working in other centres for up to two years, while they and decide if you're guilty or not, particularly in this state, but other states as well.
'It can take up to two years for a predator to be removed from childcare centres, and that is a massive problem.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Cloud of secrecy' that's failing Australian parents
As Victoria police investigate a number of sexual assault claims linked to Melbourne childcare worker Joshua Brown, lawyer and sexual assault advocate Andrew Carpenter has made a disturbing revelation about another high profile child abuse investigation. Brown, 26, was charged in May with more than 70 offences including sexual activity in presence of a child under 16, sexual assault of a child under 16 and possessing child abuse material. He has yet to enter pleas to the charges. Carpenter's comments, made on Gary Jubelin's I Catch Killers podcast, refer to the handling of the investigation of serial paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith, who last year was sentenced to life in prison for sexual offences relating to at least 73 victims, mostly girls aged between three and five years old, in several early childhood centres across a span of nearly 20 years. Griffith is one of Australia's worst paedophiles, and his crimes shocked the public when, in 2022, the AFP announced the charges against him. Yet Carpenter describes the handling of that investigation – especially in comparison to that currently underway in Victoria – as being 'covered in a cloud of secrecy,' revealing there had been complaints against Griffith since 2014. 'I applaud the Victorian police for their work,' says Carpenter. 'As soon as they uncovered the alleged offender in Victoria, they identified 24 centres where crimes have been alleged to have occurred, they notified thousands of parents and students as to what centres they were, a timeframe in which the alleged offender was working there, and they got on the front foot, set up hotlines for individuals to get information, and asked 1200 children to get STI checks.' In Griffith's case, says Carpenter, the response couldn't have been more different. 'The hardest thing with [Griffith's case] is that the public still doesn't know what centres this offender went to,' he explains. 'And we are talking about almost 3000 counts at the start. I think they whittled it down to about 1500, but it was 73 children that he pleaded guilty to abusing. And the public still does not know which centres he worked at and which timeframe this occurred in.' 'Griffith's crimes were preventable and foreseeable,' he says. 'There were people dating back nine years who actually first raised concerns about him. He was spoken to by the police, but they didn't even take steps to go through his device, on which they would've found tens of thousands of images of child abuse. His crimes were calculated and over a span of time, and the parents that complained about him earlier on didn't see any recourse.' A father himself, Carpenter believes there could be 'hundreds, if not thousands of other students out there that have been impacted by this individual in Queensland that will never be known.' He says the very young age of Griffith's victims would mean many of them may not be able to properly recall events well enough to disclose the abuse. 'I asked my oldest son who's five today, if he remembers a child that he went through preschool and kindy with that he last saw a year ago,' he continues. 'He couldn't remember who it was. And you've got children now, five years after the fact of when this guy had his main offences – they wouldn't remember a thing that happened to them. So the issue here is that we've got one police force that's coming out on the front foot saying 'we need to adequately investigate this now', and then we've got the Queensland police officers that have investigated [Ashley Griffith's crimes] within a cloud of secrecy, where the full extent of his crimes will never be truly known.' 'I mean, we're not even at the tip of the iceberg with Queensland,' adds Carpenter. Equally disturbing, the lawyer says a whistleblower seeking to make media aware of Griffith's crimes ended up being charged with computer hacking. She was later found not guilty of computer hacking allegations. When 60-year-old Queensland grandmother Yolanda Borucki spoke to A Current Affair producers about failings in the investigation into Griffith's crimes, she quickly found herself at the centre of a police raid. Yolanda told reporters that she had made a complaint about Griffith at a Uniting Church childcare facility a year beforehand, but nothing was done. 'A few days later, a task force rocked up at her doorstep and raided her house, and she got charged with computer hacking,' explains Carpenter. 'All for simply saying, 'here is evidence of me providing the childcare centre proof that I had made a previous complaint.' She went through the ringer of a trial and her fight got made public,' he continues. 'Yet the offender who sat in secrecy for many years was able to keep his anonymity for quite some time.'
7NEWS
2 days ago
- 7NEWS
Melbourne appeal AFL tribunal's three-match ban of veteran defender Steven May
Melbourne are exercising their right to appeal the Steven May guilty verdict, which saw the star defender suspended for three games on Wednesday night by the AFL tribunal. May was found guilty of rough conduct for a collision that concussed Francis Evans and left the Carlton forward with a broken nose and a chipped tooth. The tribunal ultimately found that May did not fulfill effectively his duty of care to the extent that 'a reasonable player' would under specific circumstances. But the decision has divided the AFL world, and former greats and expert Channel 7 commentators Nick Riewoldt and Matthew Richardson expressed their disbelief in the verdict on Thursday morning. Riewoldt, in particular was shocked the use of the words 'reasonable player'. 'I want to meet this reasonable player,' Riewoldt said on Triple M. 'I can't wait to meet him. Who is he? Who is this reasonable player? Superman, part Superman, part Flash, can bend time, can do all of these things. 'Unbelievable decision from the AFL tribunal last night to suspend Steven. May. 'I really thought that common sense was going to prevail.' Riewoldt said he thought the case would be similar to that of Fremantle captain Alex Pearce, whose three-match ban for concussing Port Adelaide's Darcy Byrne-Jones in May was overturned at the tribunal. Pearce was cleared after Fremantle successfully argued that he was contesting the ball. Pearce also declared at the time 'it would not sit well with me if I pulled out of that contest'. 'We had one earlier in the year with Alex Pearce, where I thought 'good', they're not trying to jam every incident into their own framework, into their own narrative, that every head knock and subsequent concussion is a breach of duty of care,' Riewoldt said. 'There are going to be accidents. It's a contact sport, and I thought this one would fit that mould perfectly, and yet, here we are, Steven May being suspended for three weeks. 'There has to be an appeal.' Richmond legend Matthew Richardson agreed. 'I didn't like it,' Richardson said on Channel 7's Sunrise. 'I thought, right from the start Steven May was contesting the ball. They arrive pretty much at the same time. I mean, there's a 10th of a second in it. 'I think Steven May tried to win the footy. It was an accidental collision. And it's a big ruling for the AFL and the game, in my belief. 'I mean, basically it looks like to me that if you concuss someone, no matter how accidental it is, you're going to get rubbed out. 'I think they just need to be transparent, the AFL, and come out and say that. 'I think Melbourne and Steven May, they've got to appeal this, because all the people I speak to, past players, no one has agreed with that decision so far.' Melbourne revealed they were appealing the decision on Thursday afternoon.
7NEWS
3 days ago
- 7NEWS
Daughter speaks out after teenage boy pleads guilty to Vyleen White murder in Queensland
The daughter of a woman who was stabbed to death has spoken out as the family wait to see if the teen responsible will be sentenced under Queensland 's new Adult Crime Adult Time laws. Vyleen White, 70, was killed by a 16-year-old boy outside Redbank Plains Town Square shopping centre, west of Brisbane, in February 2024. WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: Teen pleads guilty to murder. The teen, who is turning 18 later this year, was charged with murder and unlawful use of a motor vehicle plus three counts of stealing. On Tuesday he pleaded guilty to all the charges in Brisbane Supreme Court. Queensland's Liberal National government introduced new Adult Crime Adult Time laws after winning the 2024 election. Under the new laws, juveniles can face adult sentences for more than 30 offences including attempted murder, rape, attempted rape, torture and aggravated attempted robbery. However, the law does not apply in this case because it only came into effect in December 2024 and does not apply retrospectively. The teenager faces a maximum of 10 years behind bars unless the court finds the offence to be particularly heinous. White's daughter, Cindy Micallef, said she hoped the judge would determine the crime to be serious enough to fall under the new law. 'This is open to interpretation by the judge so, let's just hope he finds this situation particularly heinous, because I know the rest of Queensland does,' she told Sunrise. 'Our family certainly do.' Micallef and her family have been vocal about reforming the state's youth crime system in the wake of their matriarch's death. She said a lot of young repeat offenders remain in the community and are continuing to 'raise hell'. 'You could be at the shops and there will be a group of them giving someone a hiding and they just keep doing this sort of stuff,' Micallef said. 'They get put away for a couple of weeks but then they're back out again.' Queensland Premier David Crisafulli said Micallef was inspiring and the new laws were driven by her family's tragedy. He said he would continue to strengthen youth justice laws and make changes as required. 'I spoke to (Micallef) last night, I spoke to her dad Victor this morning, they're two of the greatest Queenslanders you'll ever meet,' he told Sunrise. 'We're investing in early intervention for the first time in a long time and rehabilitation to try to turn kids around. 'Our mission is to make sure that we turn around that next cohort and make sure there are consequences for those who do continue to those kinds of crimes.' White's family members who were in court did not audibly react to the guilty pleas on Tuesday. 'Every aspect of our lives has changed, every aspect, and it's something you can't possibly imagine,' White's daughter Julie said. Prosecutor Chris Cook sought a pre-sentence report by November 3 and a November 12 sentencing. The teenager will remain in custody until his next court appearances.
