Today in History: June 11, University of Alabama desegregated
In 1776, the Second Continental Congress appointed the Committee of Five (composed of John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Robert Livingston, and Roger Sherman) to draft a declaration of independence from Great Britain, to be completed in the subsequent 17 days.
Advertisement
1955, in motor racing's worst disaster, more than 80 people were killed during the 24 Hours of Le Mans in France when two cars collided and crashed into spectators.
Advertisement
In 1962, Frank Morris, Clarence Anglin, and John Anglin, prisoners at Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary in San Francisco Bay, staged an escape, leaving the island on a makeshift raft. They were never found or heard from again.
In 1963, Vietnamese Buddhist monk Thích Quảng Đức lit himself on fire on a Saigon street as a protest against the Vietnamese government's persecution of Buddhists.
In 1963, the University of Alabama was desegregated as Vivian Malone and James Hood became the first two Black students allowed to enroll in classes; Alabama segregationist and Governor George Wallace initially blocked the doorway to the auditorium where course registration was taking place, delivering a speech before deferring to National Guard orders to move.
In 1987, Margaret Thatcher became the first British prime minister in over 160 years to win a third consecutive term of office as her Conservative Party held onto a reduced majority in Parliament.
In 2001, Timothy McVeigh, 33, was executed by lethal injection at the federal prison in Terre Haute, Indiana, for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people.
In 2009, with swine flu reported in more than 70 nations, the World Health Organization declared the first global flu pandemic in 41 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK councillor acquitted over 'cut all their throats' speech
By Sam Tobin LONDON (Reuters) -A British councillor was on Friday acquitted of encouraging violent disorder for saying far-right activists should have their throats cut amid riots last year, drawing claims from right-wing politicians of a hypocritical "two-tier" justice system. Ricky Jones made the comments at a counter-protest in London after three girls were murdered in the north English town of Southport and was suspended by the ruling Labour party. Misinformation on social media said the teenager who committed the murders at a Taylor Swift-themed dance event was an Islamist migrant, fuelling days of violent riots including attacks on mosques and hotels housing asylum seekers. Jones, 58, was cleared by a jury following a trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court. He had made the remarks to a crowd gathered near an immigration advice centre in London after reports that far-right supporters were planning a protest. "They are disgusting Nazi fascists ... We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all," he said, running a finger across his throat. Jones gave evidence that he did not intend his words to be taken literally and said his comments referred to far-right stickers with hidden razor blades found on a train. Right-wing politicians and activists said his case was an example of how Britain had an unfair police and justice system, with those who voice concerns about immigration treated differently to those who support liberal or left-wing causes. They contrasted Jones' treatment with that of Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Conservative councillor who was jailed for 31 months for inciting racial hatred for a post urging mass deportation of migrants and the burning of their hotels. Unlike Jones, she had pleaded guilty to the offence. Chris Philp, the opposition Conservative Party's home affairs spokesperson, said on X: "The development of two-tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming." Zia Yusuf, from the populist right-wing Reform UK party which is leading in opinion polls, also compared Jones' acquittal to Connolly's sentence. Prime Minister Keir Starmer was labelled "two-tier Keir" by some opponents last summer after claims some ethnic groups were policed more leniently than others, a suggestion that has been rejected by senior ministers, police chiefs and prosecutors.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Defiant Weoley campaigner defends England flags project amid racism backlash
One of the so-called 'Weoley Warriors' involved in a campaign to plaster the city with Union and England flags has spoken of wanting to 'restore pride' to 'neglected' working class communities in south Birmingham amid a backlash. The national flags have appeared along major routes and on lamp-posts around Weoley Castle, Bartley Green, Northfield and further afield, with hundreds more planned to go up, said Matt Glover, representing the group. He pledged the flags would almost certainly go back up if they are taken down by the council, which has said it has a duty to take down unsafe and unauthorised attachments on lamp-posts and highways structures. READ MORE: Birmingham City Council issues safety warning over flags lining city streets "It's just going to be cat and mouse. It will be a waste of public money," he said, claiming the group responsible were using safety gear and ladders to safely cable-tie flags and were acting responsibly. The group, describing themselves as 'Weoley Warriors', claim as many as 1,500 flags have now gone up across Northfield and neighbouring areas, with requests for more coming in every day. More than £2,500 has been donated to a gofundme campaign to cover costs. The proliferation of flags has caused a passionate debate in the city and beyond around national identity and how the flags are perceived. While many residents have described them as 'positive', others have expressed concern about the underlying motivations of those involved, particularly after populist and far right organisations pledged their backing, including the leadership of Reform UK. Lee Anderson, Reform UK MP, described it as 'a disgrace' if the flags were taken down. One dissenter, who lives in Northfield, said: "This is not about celebrating all those who live in our city equally. Just look at all the comments, the people saying 'if you can't love our England flag then you can leave'...it's dressed up as pride in the flag but it plays right into the hands of racists who think they can decide who counts as British and who doesn't." Another said they were 'very uncomfortable' because, outside of sporting events, the flag had been tainted for so long by its association with far right views. But Glover, a dad of four and Justice for the 21 pub bombing victims campaigner, denied political or divisive intent and was disdainful of claims of racism. He said he was not personally putting up flags but described it as a 'positive' campaign that local working class people of all backgrounds, faiths and heritage supported. "We are working class people, not just white people, many of us are football fans, what we have in common is we are all proud of our flag and country, but people assume that makes us racist. "This is the flag flown on government buildings, on Buckingham Palace, everywhere, and it's the flag our troops fight under, yet somehow we should be ashamed of it." Mr Glover said he understood the council's safety concerns - listed in this article here - but claimed that those putting up the flags were acting responsibly and taking safety precautions. "The city council are trying to find an excuse to remove the flags of this nation and are creating a divide and more anger in the community," he claimed. He described himself as part of a group of 'proud men, some ex forces, some British, some Irish, who one day over a pint after a hard day's graft 'decided the country was in turmoil, the world was on the brink of the council was more worried about losing face to binmen than anything else' so decided to 'bring the once tight knit community of Weoley, Northfield and surrounding areas some hope.' "The outcome has been tremendous," he claimed. In a lengthy statement Mr Glover described touring world war memorial and battle sites, crying at the sounding of the Last Post and said he has 'prayed for every single soul lost (in wartime)...it breaks my heart to be called racist knowing my flag was a symbol of unity and pride. "It amazes me that some people are so stupid and blinkered that all they see is a stereotype of white English bald men as racists just for having a belief, passion and loyalty to this nation." But he went on to add a list of views he also subscribed to and said they were shared by many working class people 'sick of the establishment'. "Yes, we are fed up of illegal our taxes being spent on possible criminals and rapists; of two tier policing; of our own people not being able to get homes before foreign nationals; of foreign nationals getting (gifts and special treatment)," he added. He referred to sharia law and said he was angry that Eid was widely celebrated in the city but not St George's Day. "This isn't racism - it's frustration from being pushed into a corner and silenced. "If you want to live the flag of this nation, and if you don't like it, choose a country to move to that you do respect the flag of."
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cabinet Minister Dismisses Nigel Farage's Plea For Reform Peers With 1 Brutal Comment
A cabinet minister has brutally dismissed Nigel Farage's call for Reform UK to have its own peers in the House of Lords. The Reform leader has written to Keir Starmer saying it is unfair that his party has no one in the upper chamber despite getting four million votes at the last general election and leading in the opinion polls. Farage said there was a 'democratic disparity' in the Lords because parties like the Greens – which has fewer MPs than Reform – has people in the Lords. He also pointed out that the Lib Dems, which received fewer votes at the general election than Reform, has 76 peers. 'None of this holds water any longer given the seismic shifts that have taken place in British politics,' Farage said. It is a marked change in approach from Farage, who has previously called for the Lords to be abolished and who railed against 'unelected bureaucrats' when the UK was a member of the European Union. Asked about the comments on LBC this morning, defence secretary John Healey gave them short shrift. He said: 'The same Nigel Farage who called for the abolition of the House of Lords now wants to fill it with his cronies. 'I'm not sure that parliament is going to benefit from more Putin apologists like Nigel Farage, to be honest.' He added: 'At this point, when maximum condemnation of Putin is required, the voice of Reform is conspicuously absent in any of our discussions and any of our defence debates about Ukraine and about Russia.' A Downing Street spokesperson said: 'The process for appointments to the House of Lords follows established conventions and is guided by advice from the House of Lords Appointments Commission and other relevant bodies. 'While political parties may make representations regarding peerage nominations, decisions are made in line with long-standing procedures.' Related... LBC Presenter Fact Checks Nigel Farage's Claim Small Boats Have Made UK More Dangerous For Women And Girls Nicola Sturgeon Does Not Hold Back As She Takes Down 'Odious' Nigel Farage's Character Nigel Farage Modestly Claims Starmer Is 'Completely Obsessed With Me'
