logo
Nationwide test call as more PFAS found in tap water

Nationwide test call as more PFAS found in tap water

The Advertiser20 hours ago
More types of chemicals that do not naturally break down have been detected in tap water, backing up calls for nationwide testing.
Among more than 20 chemicals previously undetected in Australian tap water is one occasionally found in bottled water, and another previously undetected contamination from firefighting foams.
The increased detections in samples from Sydney drinking water coincides with increased monitoring and concerns over the level of the contaminants considered safe, with some exceeding international guidelines.
"Sydney's water meets current Australian standards, but when considering health benchmarks used in other countries, some samples were near or above safety limits," University of NSW chemistry professor William Donald said.
He was the lead author of a study in environmental chemistry journal Chemosphere which reported the analysis of 32 tap water and 10 bottled water samples from Sydney catchment areas in early 2024.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of 15,000 highly toxic, synthetic chemicals used for their resistance to heat, stains and grease.
They are sometimes called "forever chemicals" because they break down extremely slowly, including in humans.
The researchers detected 31 chemicals, including 21 not previously recorded, as scientists grapple with removing the chemicals from the environment.
The task is made more difficult by tiny tweaks in chemical structures creating new compounds, requiring their own assessments for toxicity, environmental persistence and potential health impacts.
"We are stuck in a whack-a-mole situation with PFAS," Prof Donald said.
Regulating the compounds as a class of chemicals rather than individually could ease the burden.
A mobile filtration system was installed following the detection of PFAS chemicals at elevated levels in untreated water flowing into the Cascade water filtration plant in the NSW Blue Mountains in September.
Researchers are also working on materials designed to absorb and break down the chemicals in water.
The National Health and Medical Research Council updated its guidelines in June, but resisted implementing a draft guideline on perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), allowing double the concentration first floated.
If the 4ng/L guideline used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency had been adopted, the levels detected from samples at North Richmond in Sydney's northwest would have exceeded them.
PFOS - a known carcinogen used in firefighting foam - was detected at 6ng/L in some of those samples, 2ng/L below the Australian guidelines.
Lisa Hua, who along with Prof Donald, detected PFAS in the "tar balls" which closed Sydney beaches in October, said the low concentrations provided some reassurance.
But new technologies to remove the chemicals from the environment and prevent their release should be explored, and wider testing could provide more insight into the level of contamination across Australia.
"Expanding the current monitoring of PFAS could be beneficial to gain a greater understanding of seasonal variations of PFAS in drinking water supply," Dr Hua said.
Import, export, manufacture and use of some PFAS chemicals was banned nationwide in July.
Europe is mulling a union-wide PFAS monitoring framework to collect data and map pollution.
More types of chemicals that do not naturally break down have been detected in tap water, backing up calls for nationwide testing.
Among more than 20 chemicals previously undetected in Australian tap water is one occasionally found in bottled water, and another previously undetected contamination from firefighting foams.
The increased detections in samples from Sydney drinking water coincides with increased monitoring and concerns over the level of the contaminants considered safe, with some exceeding international guidelines.
"Sydney's water meets current Australian standards, but when considering health benchmarks used in other countries, some samples were near or above safety limits," University of NSW chemistry professor William Donald said.
He was the lead author of a study in environmental chemistry journal Chemosphere which reported the analysis of 32 tap water and 10 bottled water samples from Sydney catchment areas in early 2024.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of 15,000 highly toxic, synthetic chemicals used for their resistance to heat, stains and grease.
They are sometimes called "forever chemicals" because they break down extremely slowly, including in humans.
The researchers detected 31 chemicals, including 21 not previously recorded, as scientists grapple with removing the chemicals from the environment.
The task is made more difficult by tiny tweaks in chemical structures creating new compounds, requiring their own assessments for toxicity, environmental persistence and potential health impacts.
"We are stuck in a whack-a-mole situation with PFAS," Prof Donald said.
Regulating the compounds as a class of chemicals rather than individually could ease the burden.
A mobile filtration system was installed following the detection of PFAS chemicals at elevated levels in untreated water flowing into the Cascade water filtration plant in the NSW Blue Mountains in September.
Researchers are also working on materials designed to absorb and break down the chemicals in water.
The National Health and Medical Research Council updated its guidelines in June, but resisted implementing a draft guideline on perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), allowing double the concentration first floated.
If the 4ng/L guideline used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency had been adopted, the levels detected from samples at North Richmond in Sydney's northwest would have exceeded them.
PFOS - a known carcinogen used in firefighting foam - was detected at 6ng/L in some of those samples, 2ng/L below the Australian guidelines.
Lisa Hua, who along with Prof Donald, detected PFAS in the "tar balls" which closed Sydney beaches in October, said the low concentrations provided some reassurance.
But new technologies to remove the chemicals from the environment and prevent their release should be explored, and wider testing could provide more insight into the level of contamination across Australia.
"Expanding the current monitoring of PFAS could be beneficial to gain a greater understanding of seasonal variations of PFAS in drinking water supply," Dr Hua said.
Import, export, manufacture and use of some PFAS chemicals was banned nationwide in July.
Europe is mulling a union-wide PFAS monitoring framework to collect data and map pollution.
More types of chemicals that do not naturally break down have been detected in tap water, backing up calls for nationwide testing.
Among more than 20 chemicals previously undetected in Australian tap water is one occasionally found in bottled water, and another previously undetected contamination from firefighting foams.
The increased detections in samples from Sydney drinking water coincides with increased monitoring and concerns over the level of the contaminants considered safe, with some exceeding international guidelines.
"Sydney's water meets current Australian standards, but when considering health benchmarks used in other countries, some samples were near or above safety limits," University of NSW chemistry professor William Donald said.
He was the lead author of a study in environmental chemistry journal Chemosphere which reported the analysis of 32 tap water and 10 bottled water samples from Sydney catchment areas in early 2024.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of 15,000 highly toxic, synthetic chemicals used for their resistance to heat, stains and grease.
They are sometimes called "forever chemicals" because they break down extremely slowly, including in humans.
The researchers detected 31 chemicals, including 21 not previously recorded, as scientists grapple with removing the chemicals from the environment.
The task is made more difficult by tiny tweaks in chemical structures creating new compounds, requiring their own assessments for toxicity, environmental persistence and potential health impacts.
"We are stuck in a whack-a-mole situation with PFAS," Prof Donald said.
Regulating the compounds as a class of chemicals rather than individually could ease the burden.
A mobile filtration system was installed following the detection of PFAS chemicals at elevated levels in untreated water flowing into the Cascade water filtration plant in the NSW Blue Mountains in September.
Researchers are also working on materials designed to absorb and break down the chemicals in water.
The National Health and Medical Research Council updated its guidelines in June, but resisted implementing a draft guideline on perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), allowing double the concentration first floated.
If the 4ng/L guideline used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency had been adopted, the levels detected from samples at North Richmond in Sydney's northwest would have exceeded them.
PFOS - a known carcinogen used in firefighting foam - was detected at 6ng/L in some of those samples, 2ng/L below the Australian guidelines.
Lisa Hua, who along with Prof Donald, detected PFAS in the "tar balls" which closed Sydney beaches in October, said the low concentrations provided some reassurance.
But new technologies to remove the chemicals from the environment and prevent their release should be explored, and wider testing could provide more insight into the level of contamination across Australia.
"Expanding the current monitoring of PFAS could be beneficial to gain a greater understanding of seasonal variations of PFAS in drinking water supply," Dr Hua said.
Import, export, manufacture and use of some PFAS chemicals was banned nationwide in July.
Europe is mulling a union-wide PFAS monitoring framework to collect data and map pollution.
More types of chemicals that do not naturally break down have been detected in tap water, backing up calls for nationwide testing.
Among more than 20 chemicals previously undetected in Australian tap water is one occasionally found in bottled water, and another previously undetected contamination from firefighting foams.
The increased detections in samples from Sydney drinking water coincides with increased monitoring and concerns over the level of the contaminants considered safe, with some exceeding international guidelines.
"Sydney's water meets current Australian standards, but when considering health benchmarks used in other countries, some samples were near or above safety limits," University of NSW chemistry professor William Donald said.
He was the lead author of a study in environmental chemistry journal Chemosphere which reported the analysis of 32 tap water and 10 bottled water samples from Sydney catchment areas in early 2024.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of 15,000 highly toxic, synthetic chemicals used for their resistance to heat, stains and grease.
They are sometimes called "forever chemicals" because they break down extremely slowly, including in humans.
The researchers detected 31 chemicals, including 21 not previously recorded, as scientists grapple with removing the chemicals from the environment.
The task is made more difficult by tiny tweaks in chemical structures creating new compounds, requiring their own assessments for toxicity, environmental persistence and potential health impacts.
"We are stuck in a whack-a-mole situation with PFAS," Prof Donald said.
Regulating the compounds as a class of chemicals rather than individually could ease the burden.
A mobile filtration system was installed following the detection of PFAS chemicals at elevated levels in untreated water flowing into the Cascade water filtration plant in the NSW Blue Mountains in September.
Researchers are also working on materials designed to absorb and break down the chemicals in water.
The National Health and Medical Research Council updated its guidelines in June, but resisted implementing a draft guideline on perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), allowing double the concentration first floated.
If the 4ng/L guideline used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency had been adopted, the levels detected from samples at North Richmond in Sydney's northwest would have exceeded them.
PFOS - a known carcinogen used in firefighting foam - was detected at 6ng/L in some of those samples, 2ng/L below the Australian guidelines.
Lisa Hua, who along with Prof Donald, detected PFAS in the "tar balls" which closed Sydney beaches in October, said the low concentrations provided some reassurance.
But new technologies to remove the chemicals from the environment and prevent their release should be explored, and wider testing could provide more insight into the level of contamination across Australia.
"Expanding the current monitoring of PFAS could be beneficial to gain a greater understanding of seasonal variations of PFAS in drinking water supply," Dr Hua said.
Import, export, manufacture and use of some PFAS chemicals was banned nationwide in July.
Europe is mulling a union-wide PFAS monitoring framework to collect data and map pollution.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online
Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online

The Advertiser

timean hour ago

  • The Advertiser

Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online

Teenagers risk being exposed to misinformation and harmful body image content as they turn to social media for health information. Research published by The Royal Children's Hospital on Wednesday found that while two-thirds of teens get health guidance from social media, more than a third wished their bodies were different after viewing content. Fitness and diet are among the most popular topics being accessed by teenagers on the platforms. Year 9 student Willow told AAP social media can be a harmful place as it applies pressure for young people to fit certain societal standards of beauty and body image. She said health and wellness treatments such sun tanning were widely discussed among friends at school and on social media, making them hard to avoid. "Recently I've seen (content) romanticising tan lines," she said. "It's probably not the best thing for young skin or those more prone to melanoma." The National Child Health Poll surveyed more than 1400 Australian parents, and one of their children aged between 12 and 17 years old. It found that many teens make health decisions based on social media content, with more than a third having tried or considered something new after seeing it online. Willow said she had seen peers trying trends like switching to retinol in their skincare routines, which isn't recommended for young people. Almost all young people aged 12 to 17 years use social media, with three quarters reporting it hard to know what is true and untrue. Pediatrician and director of the National Child Health Poll Anthea Rhodes said it was critical teens questioned what they saw online and learned how to find trustworthy health information. "They're being presented with huge amount of content that's often quite persuasive. It may be emotive and engaging and offers solutions or advice to common challenges that we know teenagers face," she told AAP. "This really leaves them quite vulnerable to being misled." From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and YouTube. The study found that 86 per cent of teens and parents interviewed believed children under 16 years will still find ways to access social media once the regulation is introduced. 'Young people are still faced with a huge amount of information to navigate once they do hit 16 and can legally enter that social media space," Dr Rhodes said. Lifeline 13 11 14 Butterfly Foundation 1800 334 673 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Teenagers risk being exposed to misinformation and harmful body image content as they turn to social media for health information. Research published by The Royal Children's Hospital on Wednesday found that while two-thirds of teens get health guidance from social media, more than a third wished their bodies were different after viewing content. Fitness and diet are among the most popular topics being accessed by teenagers on the platforms. Year 9 student Willow told AAP social media can be a harmful place as it applies pressure for young people to fit certain societal standards of beauty and body image. She said health and wellness treatments such sun tanning were widely discussed among friends at school and on social media, making them hard to avoid. "Recently I've seen (content) romanticising tan lines," she said. "It's probably not the best thing for young skin or those more prone to melanoma." The National Child Health Poll surveyed more than 1400 Australian parents, and one of their children aged between 12 and 17 years old. It found that many teens make health decisions based on social media content, with more than a third having tried or considered something new after seeing it online. Willow said she had seen peers trying trends like switching to retinol in their skincare routines, which isn't recommended for young people. Almost all young people aged 12 to 17 years use social media, with three quarters reporting it hard to know what is true and untrue. Pediatrician and director of the National Child Health Poll Anthea Rhodes said it was critical teens questioned what they saw online and learned how to find trustworthy health information. "They're being presented with huge amount of content that's often quite persuasive. It may be emotive and engaging and offers solutions or advice to common challenges that we know teenagers face," she told AAP. "This really leaves them quite vulnerable to being misled." From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and YouTube. The study found that 86 per cent of teens and parents interviewed believed children under 16 years will still find ways to access social media once the regulation is introduced. 'Young people are still faced with a huge amount of information to navigate once they do hit 16 and can legally enter that social media space," Dr Rhodes said. Lifeline 13 11 14 Butterfly Foundation 1800 334 673 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Teenagers risk being exposed to misinformation and harmful body image content as they turn to social media for health information. Research published by The Royal Children's Hospital on Wednesday found that while two-thirds of teens get health guidance from social media, more than a third wished their bodies were different after viewing content. Fitness and diet are among the most popular topics being accessed by teenagers on the platforms. Year 9 student Willow told AAP social media can be a harmful place as it applies pressure for young people to fit certain societal standards of beauty and body image. She said health and wellness treatments such sun tanning were widely discussed among friends at school and on social media, making them hard to avoid. "Recently I've seen (content) romanticising tan lines," she said. "It's probably not the best thing for young skin or those more prone to melanoma." The National Child Health Poll surveyed more than 1400 Australian parents, and one of their children aged between 12 and 17 years old. It found that many teens make health decisions based on social media content, with more than a third having tried or considered something new after seeing it online. Willow said she had seen peers trying trends like switching to retinol in their skincare routines, which isn't recommended for young people. Almost all young people aged 12 to 17 years use social media, with three quarters reporting it hard to know what is true and untrue. Pediatrician and director of the National Child Health Poll Anthea Rhodes said it was critical teens questioned what they saw online and learned how to find trustworthy health information. "They're being presented with huge amount of content that's often quite persuasive. It may be emotive and engaging and offers solutions or advice to common challenges that we know teenagers face," she told AAP. "This really leaves them quite vulnerable to being misled." From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and YouTube. The study found that 86 per cent of teens and parents interviewed believed children under 16 years will still find ways to access social media once the regulation is introduced. 'Young people are still faced with a huge amount of information to navigate once they do hit 16 and can legally enter that social media space," Dr Rhodes said. Lifeline 13 11 14 Butterfly Foundation 1800 334 673 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Teenagers risk being exposed to misinformation and harmful body image content as they turn to social media for health information. Research published by The Royal Children's Hospital on Wednesday found that while two-thirds of teens get health guidance from social media, more than a third wished their bodies were different after viewing content. Fitness and diet are among the most popular topics being accessed by teenagers on the platforms. Year 9 student Willow told AAP social media can be a harmful place as it applies pressure for young people to fit certain societal standards of beauty and body image. She said health and wellness treatments such sun tanning were widely discussed among friends at school and on social media, making them hard to avoid. "Recently I've seen (content) romanticising tan lines," she said. "It's probably not the best thing for young skin or those more prone to melanoma." The National Child Health Poll surveyed more than 1400 Australian parents, and one of their children aged between 12 and 17 years old. It found that many teens make health decisions based on social media content, with more than a third having tried or considered something new after seeing it online. Willow said she had seen peers trying trends like switching to retinol in their skincare routines, which isn't recommended for young people. Almost all young people aged 12 to 17 years use social media, with three quarters reporting it hard to know what is true and untrue. Pediatrician and director of the National Child Health Poll Anthea Rhodes said it was critical teens questioned what they saw online and learned how to find trustworthy health information. "They're being presented with huge amount of content that's often quite persuasive. It may be emotive and engaging and offers solutions or advice to common challenges that we know teenagers face," she told AAP. "This really leaves them quite vulnerable to being misled." From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and YouTube. The study found that 86 per cent of teens and parents interviewed believed children under 16 years will still find ways to access social media once the regulation is introduced. 'Young people are still faced with a huge amount of information to navigate once they do hit 16 and can legally enter that social media space," Dr Rhodes said. Lifeline 13 11 14 Butterfly Foundation 1800 334 673 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)

Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online
Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online

Teenagers risk being exposed to misinformation and harmful body image content as they turn to social media for health information. Research published by The Royal Children's Hospital on Wednesday found that while two-thirds of teens get health guidance from social media, more than a third wished their bodies were different after viewing content. Fitness and diet are among the most popular topics being accessed by teenagers on the platforms. Year 9 student Willow told AAP social media can be a harmful place as it applies pressure for young people to fit certain societal standards of beauty and body image. She said health and wellness treatments such sun tanning were widely discussed among friends at school and on social media, making them hard to avoid. "Recently I've seen (content) romanticising tan lines," she said. "It's probably not the best thing for young skin or those more prone to melanoma." The National Child Health Poll surveyed more than 1400 Australian parents, and one of their children aged between 12 and 17 years old. It found that many teens make health decisions based on social media content, with more than a third having tried or considered something new after seeing it online. Willow said she had seen peers trying trends like switching to retinol in their skincare routines, which isn't recommended for young people. Almost all young people aged 12 to 17 years use social media, with three quarters reporting it hard to know what is true and untrue. Pediatrician and director of the National Child Health Poll Anthea Rhodes said it was critical teens questioned what they saw online and learned how to find trustworthy health information. "They're being presented with huge amount of content that's often quite persuasive. It may be emotive and engaging and offers solutions or advice to common challenges that we know teenagers face," she told AAP. "This really leaves them quite vulnerable to being misled." From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and YouTube. The study found that 86 per cent of teens and parents interviewed believed children under 16 years will still find ways to access social media once the regulation is introduced. 'Young people are still faced with a huge amount of information to navigate once they do hit 16 and can legally enter that social media space," Dr Rhodes said. Lifeline 13 11 14 Butterfly Foundation 1800 334 673 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)

Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online
Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online

West Australian

time2 hours ago

  • West Australian

Body image concerns as teens seek health advice online

Teenagers risk being exposed to misinformation and harmful body image content as they turn to social media for health information. Research published by The Royal Children's Hospital on Wednesday found that while two-thirds of teens get health guidance from social media, more than a third wished their bodies were different after viewing content. Fitness and diet are among the most popular topics being accessed by teenagers on the platforms. Year 9 student Willow told AAP social media can be a harmful place as it applies pressure for young people to fit certain societal standards of beauty and body image. She said health and wellness treatments such sun tanning were widely discussed among friends at school and on social media, making them hard to avoid. "Recently I've seen (content) romanticising tan lines," she said. "It's probably not the best thing for young skin or those more prone to melanoma." The National Child Health Poll surveyed more than 1400 Australian parents, and one of their children aged between 12 and 17 years old. It found that many teens make health decisions based on social media content, with more than a third having tried or considered something new after seeing it online. Willow said she had seen peers trying trends like switching to retinol in their skincare routines, which isn't recommended for young people. Almost all young people aged 12 to 17 years use social media, with three quarters reporting it hard to know what is true and untrue. Pediatrician and director of the National Child Health Poll Anthea Rhodes said it was critical teens questioned what they saw online and learned how to find trustworthy health information. "They're being presented with huge amount of content that's often quite persuasive. It may be emotive and engaging and offers solutions or advice to common challenges that we know teenagers face," she told AAP. "This really leaves them quite vulnerable to being misled." From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and YouTube. The study found that 86 per cent of teens and parents interviewed believed children under 16 years will still find ways to access social media once the regulation is introduced. 'Young people are still faced with a huge amount of information to navigate once they do hit 16 and can legally enter that social media space," Dr Rhodes said. Lifeline 13 11 14 Butterfly Foundation 1800 334 673 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store