Selling to the Pentagon is messy and complex. Startups like this one are trying to make it easier.
The US military's vast portfolio of weapons, capabilities, and technologies — both the ones it already has and the ones it wants — is widespread and not easily sourced. Details about those budgets, too, can be confusing and taxing to sort through.
This is "a very manual and confusing process to go through because there's no single source of truth about what the data is for the Defense Department contracting and acquisition process," Michael Brown, the former director of the Defense Innovation Unit, explained. The information can be found scattered across an overwhelming number of documents, websites, organizations, and budgets.
A Pentagon data dashboard
There are start-ups trying to leverage artificial intelligence and data science to help companies through the maze. One of them is a company called Obviant. Business Insider recently chatted with its leadership.
The company is built around a program of the same name that is designed to help make sense of chaotic Department of Defense data. It intends to be a one-stop information shop for defense firms or investors, Brendan Karp, one of the company's founders, said.
He said the program can also be useful for government officials, even those involved in these projects, to see the Pentagon's sprawling collection of programs and budgets more clearly.
Through extensive data engineering, the team compiled information from thousands of sources and compiled it into one database, providing a cohesive, user-friendly picture of the sweeping defense acquisition landscape, Karp said. The platform shows program performance, breaks down funding and contract data, and highlights which companies are working on what.
Obviant's users can search for more general capabilities — electronic warfare, for example, or uncrewed underwater vehicles — to see which branches are working on those systems and what solicitations are out there. And all the data is sourced, be it a document or a congressional hearing. For the latter, it will show users exactly where a program or project was discussed.
"Instead of having to figure out how this information is pieced together in isolation," Karp said, "I can have a quicker picture."
Obviant uses some artificial intelligence and machine learning processes, but it's largely built on about a year's worth of heads-down data scripting. Karp said the team figured out what trusted sources mattered, how to collect data from them, and how to piece them together for better understanding.
AI could be used to maintain the program and further refine its information and models, as well as advance functions like an AI-powered search engine.
The user can ask a question — say, "where is the funding for counter-drone systems going?" or "what are the latest updates on Golden Dome?" — and get detailed answers, project sources, news coverage, comments from officials, and more.
Who are programs like this for?
The most obvious audience for software solutions like Obviant would be companies looking into pursuing DoD contracts. They can find potential collaborators, see what companies are already working on, and determine what their business plans should be.
Brown, who's now a partner at Shield Capital, one of Obviant's investors, said the platform is a "game-changer for anyone that's in that ecosystem."
Forecasting and informed insight into the inner workings of the Defense Department and surrounding industries are useful for firms and investors, but also operations overseeing programs.
"I think it's also a very useful tool for the government to see how well the budget lines up with strategy," Brown said of Obviant. There's also potential value for researchers and think tanks.
Obviant is designed to be "a single source of truth," Karp said, explaining that government workers definitely benefit from having a clearer understanding of what's actually in their portfolios — and what other offices across the Pentagon could be working on something similar.
Efforts to improve insight into Pentagon processes come amid debates around the need to overhaul DoD's rigid acquisition process to meet the speed of technological innovation — especially in software, AI, and drones, rapidly emerging technology.
Those conversations have been heavily focused on what weapons the DoD believes will be important for deterring or fighting future conflicts and the need expressed by officials to get those capabilities in the hands of the warfighter quickly.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's drone deal with Ukraine is a path to U.S. military reindustrialization
President Trump has long promised to deliver better deals — ones that put American interests, industry and strength first. Coming on the heels of his Alaska meeting with Vladimir Putin, a historic drone megadeal between the U.S. and Ukraine — reportedly valued between $10 billion and $30 billion — offers Trump the chance to pressure Moscow while securing a deal that advances U.S. strategic interests. This deal isn't just a defense contract. It is a strategic bridge between America's current industrial limitations and the wartime production capacity the we need to deter future conflict. It is also a warning shot to China that the U.S. is getting serious about scaling military drone innovation at speed and cost. America's unmanned drone arsenal is not ready for a prolonged fight in the Indo-Pacific. Despite advances in AI and autonomous systems, we face a dangerous gap — we lack the industrial base to produce the volume of smart, expendable and networked uncrewed systems required for high-intensity, multi-domain conflict. That's where this deal comes in. America's industrial base needs time to build factories, establish supply chains that are compliant with Pentagon rules and iterate on product designs to deliver the necessary unmanned systems needed for a fight in the Indo-Pacific. Ukraine, out of sheer necessity, has become the world's most advanced proving ground and manufacturer for uncrewed military systems. In 2024 alone, it produced over 1.7 million drones — fielded, iterated and improved in combat conditions that mirror the future of warfare far more closely than American test ranges in Hawaii or Arizona ever could. From low-cost first-person vehicles to strategic sea drones and long-range deep-strike capabilities, Ukrainian engineers have led the charge for uncrewed systems and what Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth rightly called 'the biggest battlefield innovation in a generation.' The U.S. shouldn't try to reinvent the wheel. Instead, we should springboard off Ukraine's hard-earned experience to accelerate our own industrial and technological transformation. (Full disclosure: My firm does consulting work in Ukraine, but I have no financial ties to Ukrainian drone companies.) This deal offers three critical advantages. First, it is a strategic bridge to reindustrialization. Building a new defense industrial base in America will take years, if not decades. The Ukrainian drone deal buys us time, capability and breathing room. It delivers operationally relevant drones at scale today, while we rebuild factories, train workers and realign acquisition models to fit a 21st-century fight. It's not a handout — it's a hedge against our current vulnerabilities. Second, the operational gains generated by this deal will have applicability in a potential war in the Pacific. Ukraine's drones, as successful as they have been in trench warfare, won't map one-to-one to a theater characterized by vast maritime distances and denied environments. But Ukraine's deep-strike and naval drone programs — already disrupting Russia's dominance in the Black Sea — have direct applications for U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. Integrating these capabilities into U.S. doctrine will enhance our lethality, expand the kill chain and signal to Beijing that American deterrence is not theoretical. Third, this deal gives us access to the world's best combat-proven drone engineers. And this is where the real opportunity lies. Through long-term partnerships, American companies — from major defense contractors to venture-backed disruptors — can tap into Ukraine's top-tier talent. These are engineers who have lived through a decade's worth of research-and-development cycles over the last two years. Given the multi-year scope of the deal, this isn't a one-off purchase — it's a pipeline of talent, innovation and battlefield iteration aligned to U.S. warfighting priorities. If the U.S. partners deeply with Ukraine on drone innovation, it also denies Beijing access to a combat-proven technology base. It ensures that battlefield-proven AI, swarming tactics and electronic warfare capabilities stay in U.S.-aligned hands. And it turns Ukraine into an asset to help anchor American technological and industrial advantage in a world increasingly defined by great-power competition. Some will argue this is just another foreign entanglement. That is a misread. This is not about subsidizing a foreign war — it's about integrating battlefield-tested systems into American force design, doctrine and war-fighting functions. It's about readiness. And it's about building the industrial muscle to back up our strategy with actual mass. Trump has a unique opportunity to redefine American defense procurement — not as a bureaucratic bottleneck, but as a competitive advantage. This deal embodies his 'Peace Through Strength' doctrine: hard power, smart economics and global signaling all in one move. If Trump leans in, he won't just be supporting Ukraine. He'll lay the groundwork for America's reindustrialization, reshaping deterrence in the Pacific and putting the U.S. back in command of the battlefield technologies of tomorrow. The deal is on the table. The question is, will he seize it?


Bloomberg
9 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Pentagon Eyes $3.5 Billion Restock Costs From Israel Operations
The Pentagon plans to spend more than $3.5 billion to replenish inventories in the wake of recurring Israel operations, underscoring the costs of maintaining a stepped-up presence in the Middle East. The funds, outlined in budget documents prepared through mid-May, are meant for both weapons restocking — such as for the missiles fired to repel Iranian attacks, including at least $1 billion for RTX Corp. missile interceptors — as well as for a range of mundane tasks including radar upkeep, refurbishing vessels and transporting munitions.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
X-Bow Systems and U.S. Army Announce $13.9 Million Joint Investment for Next-Generation GMLRS Rocket Motor
Investment to Boost Production of Critical Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Components ALBUQUERQUE, N.M., Aug. 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- X-Bow Systems Inc (X-Bow), the leading non-traditional producer of advanced solid rocket motors (SRMs) and defense technologies, and the U.S. Army, with support from the Department of Defense Office of Strategic Capital (OSC), have announced a $13.9 million joint investment. This collaboration aims to design, prototype, and test an advanced manufactured SRM for the standard-range Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS). This joint investment, facilitated by OSC, is a strategic effort to address constraints in the nation's production capacity for missiles, munitions, and SRMs, which are currently limited by older manufacturing processes. The initiative seeks to establish an alternative supply source and strengthen the solid rocket motor industrial base, using X-Bow's patented advanced-manufactured solid-propellant (AMSP) processes for SRMs. "This investment will introduce next-generation manufacturing for critical defense systems," said Jason Hundley, CEO of X-Bow Systems. "Our Luling, Texas campus, using these advanced methods, will have the capability to produce thousands of SRMs, including GMLRS." OSC is supporting the U.S. Army in this effort through a cost-matching structure that facilitates this partnership, combining U.S. Government funding with private sector matching funds. This collaboration directly supports the Army's objectives to secure a robust and reliable supply of critical munitions. This Advanced Manufacturing Pathfinder is being coordinated by OSC on behalf of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (OUSD(R&E)) and in support of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology (ASA(ALT)) and the Army's Program Executive Office for Missiles and Space (PEO MS). X-Bow will partner with Kord Technologies, LLC (Kord), a wholly owned subsidiary of KBR, to develop this Pathfinder. Kord will provide systems engineering and technical support. The project will culminate in a static fire demonstration of the GMLRS propulsion prototype, supporting the development of a new non-traditional supplier for DoD. About X-Bow SystemsX-Bow Systems is disrupting the aerospace industry with innovative and cost-effective advanced manufactured energetics for the solid rocket motor and launch vehicle market. X-Bow is also designing and building a suite of modular solid rocket motors and small launch vehicles for both orbital and suborbital launch services. X-Bow is led by CEO Jason Hundley, Chairman Mark Kaufman, CTO Max Vozoff, CRO Maureen Gannon, General Counsel John Leary, COO Mike Bender and a growing team of seasoned industry veterans and new space entrepreneurs. X-Bow is a dual-use technology company with investment from: Crosslink Capital, Razor's Edge Ventures, Balerion Space Ventures, Boeing, Arkenstone Capital, The Capital Factory, Upsher Management Company, Event Horizon Capital, and Lockheed Martin Ventures. Headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico, X-Bow has additional presence in California, Alabama, Colorado, Texas, Utah, Maryland and Washington, DC. For more information visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE X-Bow Systems Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data