Court dismisses corruption complaint against CM Siddaramaiah, minister over ad revenue losses
A Special Court in Bengaluru has dismissed a complaint alleging a conspiracy involving Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, Minister K J George, and three senior officials to cause significant advertisement revenue losses to the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) between 2015 and 2017. Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. (PTI)
The court ruled that the accusations lacked substance and were based on conjecture rather than concrete evidence.
Also Read - 'Catcalled and hooted at just for wearing a CSK jersey': Bengaluru woman recalls harassment outside Chinnaswamy
The complaint, filed by N R Ramesh, a former corporator and BJP leader, claimed that the BBMP suffered losses of ₹ 68.14 crore during Siddaramaiah's earlier tenure as Chief Minister (2013–2018).
Ramesh alleged that the state government used BBMP-owned bus shelters to advertise its achievements without paying the mandatory advertisement fee.
He further claimed that Congress leaders may have bribed BBMP and Information Department officials to avoid raising dues.
However, in its April 28 order, the Special Court, presided over by Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat, found the allegations insufficient to warrant even a preliminary inquiry.
The judge remarked that the complaint was rooted in "assumptions and presumptions" rather than material evidence, and emphasised that criminal proceedings cannot be initiated based on speculative claims.
The court acknowledged that while the use of bus shelters for government publicity without formal payments may indicate procedural lapses, such irregularities do not necessarily constitute corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Also Read - 'Don't sacrifice public transport for private vehicles': Tejasvi Surya writes to BBMP Chief on prime Bengaluru land
The Karnataka Lokayukta had earlier closed the complaint, stating that the BBMP, being the potentially aggrieved party, had not filed any grievance against the state government. It also noted that the complaint failed to establish the direct involvement of Siddaramaiah or George and appeared to challenge an administrative decision rather than allege a specific act of corruption.
Although Ramesh contended that the Lokayukta issued a 'one-sided report' and failed to investigate thoroughly, the Special Court upheld the Lokayukta's findings.
It also pointed out that since the BBMP receives financial aid from the state government, claiming misuse of public funds based solely on the absence of invoices was speculative.
Concluding its verdict, the court stated that reopening the case would not serve the cause of justice. "The complaint is devoid of merit and deserves to be rejected," it ruled, affirming that no prima facie case had been made under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru stampede: CM, DCM have 'blood on their hands', should quit: BJP leader Shobha Karandlaje
BJP leader and Union Minister of State Shobha Karandlaje on Saturday alleged that Chief Minister Siddaramiah and his deputy D K Shivakumar have "blood on their hands", as she held them directly responsible and demanded their resignation in connection with the June 4 stampede that killed 11 people. Demanding a probe by a sitting High Court judge for the truth to come out, she slammed the state government for suspending Bengaluru police commissioner B Dayananda and four other senior police officials over the incident. The Bengaluru North MP also questioned the Congress high command and party leader Rahul Gandhi's silence on the incident, and urged them to seek the CM and Deputy CM's resignation if they have "guts". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo "Is Karnataka Congress bankrupt of leaders other than Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar? Let the two face inquiry, make others CM and Deputy CM. Where are Congress general secretaries K C Venugopal and Randeep Singh Surjewala, who often come to the state for everything, hiding?" she asked. She further alleged that they are silent on the issue as the Karnataka Congress government is an ATM for the party's Delhi high command. The stampede occurred on June 4 evening in front of the Chinnaswamy stadium here, where a large number of people thronged to participate in the RCB team's IPL victory celebrations. Eleven people died and 56 were injured in the incident. Live Events "Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar have blood on their hands. The parents who have lost their children are cursing. They (CM and DCM) are trying to wash the blood on their hands and wipe it on police officers. A person known as a tough cop, a good and honest officer, who came from a normal family and became Bengaluru's commissioner has been suspended," Karandlaje said. Speaking to reporters here, she said this is a dark spot on this government and the CM's image. "In the history of Bengaluru or any metropolitan city, we have not heard about officials being transferred for mistakes, but here because of the mistake of the CM and his deputy, the Commissioner has been suspended. You (CM, DCM) have committed the fault and you are blaming them (officials) for it. You are wiping the blood on your hands on them," she added. Questioning Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar as to why they thought about holding this celebration, the MP from Bengaluru North asked are they partners with RCB in any ways? If laurals were brought to the country or the state by an official national or state team, then holding celebrations is understandable, but they were never felicitated this way, she noted and said, "When a private franchise RCB won the match, you wanted to celebrate. The grand stairs of Vidhana Soudha were reserved for swearing-in or government ceremonies all these years. You used it for a private team." Is anyone in the government is planning to have a partnership with RCB or planning for franchise ownership, she sought to know, and further asked, "with these intentions, attempts were made to take publicity from RCB's win." Pointing out that the family of ministers and the CM had gathered there at the event at Vidhana Soudha, while the public was suffering, Shobha asked how the permission was given. Didn't the intelligence or police have information about the gathering of lakhs of people? "Stampede and death happened about 3:30-3:45 pm and the event began at 4 pm. The CM, DCM despite knowing deaths have happened, continued with the event. Siddaramaiah, you have celebrated RCB's victory standing on the dead bodies. There was a competition by those on stage along with their families to take photos with players. You did this despite having information about deaths.... You (DCM) went to the stadium and gave a kiss to the victory cup at the stadium," she alleged, adding that all of this happened on the dead bodies. She pointed out that the police had done their duty the entire night on June 3, till early next morning, as there were celebrations across the city following RCB victory. Demanding to know how two celebrations happened without government permission, she asked, "If permission was given by the government, then why are the police officials being suspended?" She also pointed out confusion about free tickets. With only three stadium gates being opened, a large crowd, and the government's carelessness, led to the stampede. Alleging that competition between Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar for publicity led to 11 deaths, the union minister highlighted posts on 'X' by the CM about the felicitation to RCB team in front of Vidhana Soudha. Further, asking how a magistrate can question the CM and DCM during the inquiry into the incident that has been ordered by the government, she further said, now you have ordered a probe by a one-man judicial commission, headed by retired Justice Michael D'Cunha. He is already probing Covid-19 illegalities. He hasn't given that report yet, why again him? "We have no opposition to him or any retired judge, but why only him? What's your intention? Coverup? Why not order a probe by a sitting High Court judge?" Questioning the actual number of injured, while alleging that the government may be trying for a "coverup", Karandlaje claimed that families of some injured are paying for the medical expenses, though the government has announced that it will bear the cost. She also asked as to why the government was protecting Karnataka State Cricket Association and its office bearers, and why were they not arrested when RCB and DNA event management officials were arrested?
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Some have habit of creating doubts': Minister Bhupender Yadav rebuts Jairam Ramesh on Delhi Zoo privatization concerns
Union Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav Saturday rebutted questions and privatization concerns raised by Congress leader Jairam Ramesh regarding the Delhi Zoo and an agreement proposed between the Centre-run establishment and Reliance-run Greens Zoological, Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre (GZRRC). In a post on social media platform X, Yadav said that the National Zoological Park (NZP), which is run by the Centre, had signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with GZRRC, based in Gujarat's Jamnagar, in January 2021, and NZP has sought to revise the existing MoU. He said NZP has signed MoUs with different organisations working in wildlife management in the past as part of its modernisation drive and will continue to do so. Replying to Ramesh's post, Yadav said, 'Some people have made it a habit to create doubts in the mind of the public at every instance.' Ramesh had said on June 4 that while the government 'claims that this is not a management transfer, its past record does not inspire confidence. Is this the first step towards handing over the zoo to a private enterprise?' Yadav said that the 2021 MoU between NZP and GZRRC focused on the exchange of animals, capacity building, animal keepers, technical exchanges on the scientific management of animals, and sharing knowledge on conservation breeding and education. 'Keeping in line with the common objectives of captive wildlife management and for further broadening the collaboration as per current management requirements, NZP sought to revise the existing MoU with GZRRC. The proposed MoU aims to foster collaboration in wildlife conservation, rescue, rehabilitation, animal health, and welfare,' Yadav said. The key areas of cooperation, he added, include support for veterinary care, enclosure design, enrichment, staff training, knowledge-sharing initiatives, and potential animal exchanges. Yadav added in his post that GZRRC has developed state-of-the-art facilities and services in animal health and welfare, world-class zoo designing, rescue and rehabilitation of wild animals, and habitat enrichment. NZP, he said, being a 60-year-old institution, has gained substantial expertise in breeding and care of many endangered species and is aiming to modernise its facilities and services by adopting best practices in animal welfare in captivity, as well as enhanced visitor experience, on par with a world-class zoo. The Central Zoo Authority granted approval to GZRCC in February 2019, and an initial recognition was granted in August 2020. As per its latest available annual report, GZRRC is home to 10,360 animals of 345 species. Most animals housed at GZRRC are 'part of its initiative to rescue captive animals from impoverished conditions in zoos and facilities in the nature of zoos, to decongest them and provide welfare to animals that were housed under sub-optimal conditions,' the annual report states. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had visited and inaugurated Vantara, the rescue facility at Jamnagar, on March 4 this year.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Karnataka HC poses 9 questions to govt on Bengaluru stampede: ‘Who took decision to hold RCB celebration?'
The Karnataka High Court has posed a set of nine questions to the Congress government in the state over the stampede tragedy at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru that resulted in 11 deaths during a felicitation for the IPL-winning Royal Challengers Bengaluru team on Wednesday. Among the key questions that the high court posed on Thursday and sought answers for by June 10 are: Who decided to hold the victory celebration? In what manner and when? Was any permission sought to organise the event? And whether any SOP (standard operating procedure) has been formulated to manage a crowd of 50,000 and above in any sports event and celebrations of this nature? The questions were posed by a division bench headed by acting Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao and Justice C M Joshi in the course of a suo motu writ petition taken up by the court regarding the cricket stadium tragedy in Bengaluru. The other questions the high court posed were: * What steps were taken to regulate the traffic? * What steps were taken to regulate the public/crowd? * What medical and other facilities were arranged at the venue? * Any assessment was made in advance on the number of people, who may be present at the time of celebrations? * Whether persons injured were given immediate medical attention by the medical experts at the venue? If not why? * How much time was taken to take the injured to the hospitals? The high court's suo motu petition and questions posed by it reportedly triggered the suspensions of five police officers, including the Bengaluru police commissioner, on June 6 following consultations by Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah with his legal advisor A S Ponnana and the state Advocate General K M Shashikiran Shetty, as per sources. The flow of events leading to the tragedy as analysed from communications between the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) and the government, the social media timelines of RCB handles and the Bengaluru traffic police, as well as statements made in police FIRs suggest that the cricket association sought permission on June 3 for an event for felicitation of the RCB cricket by the CM and deputy CM at the government headquarters, Vidhana Soudha, on June 4 in the event of RCB winning the IPL finals against Punjab Super Kings. KSCA CEO Shubhendu Ghosh wrote to the government's Department of Personnel and Administration (DPAR) – the custodians of the Vidhana Soudha – on June 3 on behalf of event management firm DNA Network for permission for a felicitation of RCB players at the Vidhana Soudha. The DPAR responded on the morning of June 4 granting permission for the event by laying down as many as 16 conditions to protect the portals of the Vidhana Soudha, where the event would be held on the evening of June 4, with Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar attending. Siddaramaiah's political secretary, K Govindaraju, an MLC and ambitious sports administrator who was sacked on Saturday, is alleged to have influenced the decision-making at the highest levels in the government to hold the Vidhana Soudha event. Even as the 4 pm Vidhana Soudha event was cleared by the government, the Bengaluru police—the sanctioning authority—had not granted permission for a victory parade from the Vidhana Soudha to the Chinnaswamy Stadium for RCB fans due to crowd control fears. Although no official permission was granted by the police, the RCB management went on to unilaterally announce a victory parade at 7.01 am on the morning of June 4, triggering a fan frenzy. The RCB/KSCA also sent out a media advisory around 10.30 am on June 4 saying there would be a felicitation by Siddaramaiah at the Vidhana Soudha at 4 pm, a victory parade around 5 pm, and a felicitation at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium at 6 pm. The Bengaluru traffic police timeline on X shows that two traffic advisories were put out around 2.45 pm and 3.30 pm about the felicitation at the Chinnaswamy stadium at 5 pm, with no mention of a victory parade. The Karnataka government, while suspending five police officers, stated that though the RCB CEO informed the Bengaluru police commissioner on June 3 about holding the victory parade and celebrations on June 4, the police failed to give a written reply to the organisers 'rejecting the permission'. A suo motu FIR filed in the Cubbon Park police station by the now-suspended police inspector A K Girish over the stadium deaths says Ghosh approached the police on June 3 for an event at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium on behalf of RCB. The Bengaluru police, who registered the FIR on June 5 for culpable homicide, causing voluntary hurt and unlawful assembly against the RCB, the KSCA, and DNA Network, arrested an RCB marketing head and a senior DNA official on Friday. Meanwhile, on Friday, the Karnataka High Court granted conditional interim protection from arrest to three KSCA officials, including president Raghuram Bhat, a former cricketer, in the stadium deaths case. The KSCA officials claimed in their high court petition that DNA officials held a meeting with Bengaluru police on June 3 on holding the celebration event if RCB won. The petition also says that KSCA and DNA officials met Siddaramaiah and the state chief secretary for government support for the event to be held at the Vidhana Soudha. 'Celebrating the victory was in fact the call of the government as it felicitated the players at the Vidhana Soudha in the presence of the chief minister, deputy CM, and several cabinet ministers, with all the secretariat and police higher-ups being present,' states the KSCA petition. The Karnataka government on Saturday issued an order for a judicial inquiry to be conducted into the stadium tragedy by Justice John Michael Cunha, a retired high court judge. The government has also directed a magisterial inquiry by the deputy commissioner for the Bengaluru region in his capacity as an executive magistrate.
