'They made a mistake': Steenhuisen slams Afrikaners who fled to US
Minister of agriculture John Steenhuisen has criticised the group of 49 Afrikaners who recently sought refuge in the US, saying they have made a mistake.
Steenhuisen was speaking at Nampo Harvest Day in Bothaville, Free State, on Friday.
'We can't determine where people live and what their life choices are. I think they've made a mistake,' he said.
'We are on the cusp of great things in South Africa with a new government, new energy and new growth initiatives. I think South Africa will start to take off in a major way and become the envy of the world.'
He expressed his commitment to supporting farm workers, farm owners and the agricultural industry, urging them to stay and contribute to the country's development.
'They will get my full attention and support during my time as a minister.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
26 minutes ago
- IOL News
The fallout from Trump's Afrikaner project on Ramaphosa's National Dialogue agenda
President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended BEE as an engine of growth. Image: GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa's upcoming national dialogue aims to tackle critical issues facing the country, including the divisions sparked by US President Donald Trump's controversial offer of resettlement to white Afrikaners, alongside pressing concerns regarding unemployment and poor governance. On Wednesday, Ramaphosa announced the appointment of an 'eminent persons group,' comprising 31 South Africans, who will spearhead the National Dialogue scheduled for August 15. One of the eminent persons, who requested anonymity, said the dialogue can be seen as a response to concerns, aiming to address the country's challenges and promote national building. 'The issue should definitely come up, although everybody has a choice to leave the country. "We are way beyond the colour lines now and should focus on nation building with the people who are in the country, instead of dwelling in the past. 'Sure, it's a bone of contention but we do have bigger problems," she said. However, not all are on board with Ramaphosa's dialogue initiative. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party has rejected the dialogue as an "elitist farce," saying it is a "staged theatre for the political elite". In a statement its spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, asked why there were no ordinary South Africans, such as shack dwellers, represented? 'The so-called Eminent Persons Group, handpicked by the very same ruling class responsible for mass unemployment, deepening poverty, collapsing infrastructure and the ongoing betrayal of the Freedom Charter, is a mockery of the suffering endured daily by millions of destitute and despondent South African,' Ndhlela wrote. The EFF has also expressed skepticism, questioning the government's motives and the selection process for the Eminent Persons Group. "The challenges Ramaphosa's National Dialogue seek to address are not a product of triumph of human sacrifice against evil, which require collective national reconstruction, but are a product of man-made destruction and corruption of which he and the party he leads have been at the centre of," the EFF said in a statement. The DA's national spokesperson, Willie Aucamp, welcomed the National Dialogue saying his party would embrace the opportunity. 'I think it's high time that we as a nation get together and discuss collectively what we see as a road forward for this country,' he said. Build One South Africa (BOSA) described the announcement as a positive and necessary step forward for the country at a time of great political uncertainty, public anxiety, and economic malaise. The GOOD Party's general secretary Brett Herron said it was long overdue as the wait had been frustrating.
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa's National Dialogue to discuss divisions caused by Trump's Afrikaner resettlement project
President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced that the National Dialogue will be held in August. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers President Cyril Ramaphosa's national dialogue to address the pressing issues in the country will address the divisions created by US President Donald Trump's offer of resettlement to white Afrikaners as well as issues on unemployment and poor governance. On Tuesday, Ramaphosa announced the appointment of an 'eminent persons group' made up of 31 prominent South Africans who will lead the National Dialogue, set to take place on 15 August 2025. The dialogue will also recent comments made by US President Donald Trump, who invited white Afrikaners to relocate to the US based on false claims of white genocide - an issue that has become a divisive factor in the country. One of the eminent persons, who requested anonymity, said the dialogue can be seen as a response to these concerns, aiming to address the country's challenges and promote national building. 'The issue should definitely come up, although everybody has a choice to leave the country…We are way beyond the colour lines now and should focus on nation building with the people who are in the country, instead of dwelling in the past. 'Sure, it's a bone of contention but we do have bigger problems," she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading However, not all are on board with Ramaphosa's dialogue initiative. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party has rejected the dialogue as an "elitist farce," saying it is a "staged theatre for the political elite". In a statement on Wednesday, its spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela asked why there were no ordinary South Africans, such as shack dwellers, represented? 'We reject this dialogue as a tone-deaf charade engineered by a regime clinging to power, desperately trying to manufacture consent through elitist backroom dealings. 'The so-called Eminent Persons Group, handpicked by the very same ruling class responsible for mass unemployment, deepening poverty, collapsing infrastructure and the ongoing betrayal of the Freedom Charter, is a mockery of the suffering endured daily by millions of destitute and despondent South African,' Ndhlela wrote. The EFF has also expressed skepticism, questioning the government's motives and the selection process for the Eminent Persons Group. "The challenges Ramaphosa's National Dialogue seek to address are not a product of triumph of human sacrifice against evil, which require collective national reconstruction, but are a product of man-made destruction and corruption of which he and the party he leads have been at the centre of," the EFF said in a statement. The DA's national spokesperson, Willie Aucamp, welcomed the National Dialogue saying his party would embrace the opportunity. 'I think it's high time that we as a nation get together and discuss collectively what we see as a road forward for this country,' he said. Build One South Africa (BOSA) described the announcement as a positive and necessary step forward for the country at a time of great political uncertainty, public anxiety, and economic malaise. The GOOD Party's general secretary Brett Herron said it was long overdue as the wait had been frustrating. 'Nearly a year has passed since political parties signed the Statement of Intent of the Government of National Unity (GNU), which explicitly committed to convening a National Dialogue to tackle the country's deep and urgent delay in giving effect to this promise has been frustrating, but the time for talking has finally arrived, and it must now be time for action too,' Herron said.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Operation New Broom is echo of apartheid past
If Operation New Broom is the new face of immigration enforcement in South Africa, then shame on all of us. In a move that belongs more in the archives of apartheid than in a democratic constitutional state, the department of home affairs has launched 'Operation New Broom', a campaign whose stated aim is to 'combat illegal immigration' through biometric verification and mass raids. Sweeping with a 'broom' is no innocent metaphor, it's drawing a very intentional parallel between illegal migrants and rubbish, a dehumanising tell-tale signal of stripped rights, dignity and humanity. An affront to every value enshrined in our Bill of Rights. If this is the new face of immigration enforcement in South Africa, then shame on all of us. Barely two days after the campaign was launched on 21 May, more than 50 individuals, including children, pregnant women and asylum seekers, were rounded up during an early morning raid at the Plastic View informal settlement in Tshwane. Minister Leon Schreiber called it 'a new era of digital border enforcement'. What followed was hardly innovation; it was humiliation, institutional cruelty dressed up in the vocabulary of tech-enabled governance. Lawyers for Human Rights and 20 other organisations said the operation 'marks a troubling descent into repressive state practices reminiscent of the apartheid past'. That is no exaggeration. Operation New Broom is not a policy, it is abuse of power, a show of force for the sake of political optics, where the primary victims are those least able to defend themselves. Children were taken from schools and homes without due process. Babies were detained at the Lindela Repatriation Centre, a facility unfit to care for them. ALSO READ: Home Affairs launches Operation New Broom to tackle illegal immigration The constitution is clear: the detention of children must be a last resort and for the shortest appropriate period. These events lay bare a troubling trend: the creeping securitisation of SA's borders and the scapegoating of migrants to mask governance failures. This cannot be claimed to be part of an effort to address unlawful entry, it is a campaign showcase masquerading as immigration enforcement, a political theatre dressed as policy. A familiar playbook keeps unfolding: blame the foreigner, distract the public and dress up persecution as patriotism. Ahead of the 2026 municipal elections, politicians like Gayton McKenzie (Patriotic Alliance) have already begun calling 'Abahambe' (let them go) for the removal of migrants along ethnic and racial lines, embracing his xenophobic labelling. Taking centre stage globally and in SA at the same time was the media frenzy surrounding the 59 Afrikaners granted refugee status by the US on the basis of alleged racial and economic persecution. A sad irony that is difficult to ignore, particularly from within the African continent and SA itself, where the principles of Ubuntu, as enshrined in the constitution, call for compassion, shared humanity and the protection of the vulnerable. The Constitutional Court has repeatedly affirmed Ubuntu as a guiding principle not only in private law, but in matters of state conduct. ALSO READ: Big changes coming for ID, passport applications and birth registrations – Home Affairs It is meant to embody dignity, empathy and social solidarity – all of which are absent from Operation New Broom. Though the department has framed its action as lawful and measured and Cabinet has publicly praised it, nothing about the manner in which these raids were conducted passes constitutional muster. This is not a crisis that ends at the border. Migrants may be the primary targets today, but the machinery of arbitrary enforcement rarely limits itself to one category of individuals. Even SA citizens without access to proper documentation already encounter a contrarian bureaucracy on many levels. In August last year, 700 000 IDs were automatically unilaterally blocked by the department, some merely on the suspicion of fraud or due to duplicate IDs reflecting in the systems, with no prior warning or due diligence. The courts confirmed this to be unconstitutional because it lacked fair procedures, such as notice, investigation and an opportunity for appeal. The dysfunction is systemic and it does not discriminate as neatly as the policies claim to. Without constitutional watchdogs and public scrutiny, no-one is immune. Today's raid is tomorrow's precedent. Some have pointed to the use of biometric verification as a sign of progress and, indeed, it can significantly streamline processes and increase efficiencies on multiple levels. ALSO READ: EFF calls for treason charges against corrupt Home Affairs officials But in the hands of untrained officials and opaque institutions, such tools carry significant risk. Mismanagement is not a technical glitch, it is a gateway. Without safeguards, digital enforcement quickly slides into digital authoritarianism. Deploying facial scans and fingerprint readers without legal safeguards or oversight is not governance, it is surveillance. When the state uses such tools in vulnerable communities already suffering from economic exclusion and neglect, it amounts to profiling at scale. This is not a moment for silence or bureaucratic indifference. It is a moment to remember that democracy is measured not by how we treat the powerful, but by how we treat the most vulnerable. State-led roundups, data-driven profiling and the slow bleed of constitutional values is a recipe for instability. Amnesty is not capitulation; it is legal realism. It is an invitation to build a functioning migration system that does not rely on repression to operate. It is time for a new broom, yes, but one that sweeps away injustice, not people. One that restores rights, not just order. NOW READ: Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 'refugees' return to South Africa?
