UK weather favours Perseids meteor shower: know the exact time to watch
The spectacular Perseid meteor showe r has been building towards its 12 August climax as UK skies appear promising and Jupiter and Venus move closer together.
The meteor shower, which is sometimes confused with the Geminid shower, has been active since 17 July and will continue until 24 August, the Royal Observatory confirms.
Nevertheless, the quantity of meteors is anticipated to grow each night until reaching its absolute peak on 12 August, with the best place in the UK to spot it listed.
What exact time should I watch out for the Perseid meteor shower?
This evening, observers across the UK should be able to spot some meteors once the sun goes down, but the Royal Observatory advises the optimal time to gaze upwards is between midnight and 5.30am, reports the Express.
An added treat for those attempting to catch the meteor shower - Jupiter and Venus will also appear at their closest on 11 and 12 August.
NASA states that on the morning of the 12th, the two planets will be roughly a degree apart and will glow brightest before sunrise.
What is the weather going to be like?
This evening's weather conditions are anticipated to be "favourable" for viewing the Perseids shower, the Met Office confirms.
UK weather 'favourable'
The forecaster states that despite some regional cloud cover, most of the UK, particularly central England and Wales, will enjoy clear skies and mild temperatures.
"It's an excellent opportunity to witness one of nature's most dazzling displays," it says.
"Whether you're a seasoned stargazer or a curious newcomer, the Perseid meteor shower promises a memorable night under the stars."
While the 84% brightness of the moon may obstruct some viewers' visibility, NASA suggests that keen stargazers could still catch a glimpse of the action by positioning themselves behind a tall building or tree to block out some of the moonlight.
Here's how to watch the Perseid meteor showers
Experts advise observers to steer clear of well-lit and built-up areas and seek unobstructed views to fully appreciate the spectacle.
Meteorite specialist Dr Ashley King, from London's Natural History Museum, recommends standing on a hill in the middle of the countryside or heading to the coast as ideal spots for meteor viewing.
He warns that the skies might appear empty for the first 10 minutes while your eyes adjust to the darkness, so patience is key.
Using a red light torch can also be beneficial, as it won't strain your eyes while they acclimate to the dark.
He stated: "Once you get used to the low light levels, you'll begin to notice more and more. So don't give up too quickly."
The Perseids - named after the constellation Perseus, from which the meteors are believed to originate - are also renowned for their fireballs.
These are characterised by larger explosions of light and colour that linger in the sky longer than the average meteor streak.
NASA has dubbed it the "most popular meteor shower of the year".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
How to see the Perseid meteor shower during UK peak
The Perseid meteor shower is one of the brightest and fastest meteor showers of the year. The shower lights up the skies each summer and is known for its fast-moving meteors - often dubbed "shooting stars". Here is all you need to know about the meteor shower and how to view it in the UK. What is the Perseid meteor shower? The Perseids come from a comet called Swift–Tuttle, which orbits the Sun once every 133 years. The rocks collide with our own atmosphere at high speeds of between seven and 45 miles per second, causing the meteors to vaporise and leave behind a bright trail of light, also known as shooting stars. According to Royal Museums Greenwich, the average speed for a Perseid meteor is 36 miles per second. The air in front of the meteor is squashed and heated to thousands of degrees Celsius. The Perseid meteor shower will remain active and visible in the skies until August 24, it is expected to peak on August 12. It will bring up to 100 meteors to the night sky. How to catch a glimpse of the Perseids The Royal Museums Greenwich has provided its tips on viewing the meteor shower. One of the best annual meteor showers, the Perseids, will peak this month ☄️ Unfortunately this year, a nearly full Moon will wash out all but the brightest meteors. However, another favorite annual meteor shower, the Geminids, is poised for Moon-free viewing in December. — NASA Langley Research Center (@NASA_Langley) August 5, 2025 Its website says to ensure to check the weather forecast ahead of time, and if the forecast isn't favourable, find a different location to observe from or view the meteor shower on another day. However, visibility could be affected by bright moonlight from the recent Sturgeon Moon. Top tips on viewing the shower include: Make sure that you are in a dark sky area and have an unobstructed view towards the south Recommended Reading: Lie down on a blanket or sit in a lawn chair to ensure that you have a wide view of the sky Your naked eye is the best instrument to use to see meteors – don't use binoculars or a telescope as these have narrow fields of view Allow your eyes to adapt to the dark and don't look at any lights, or at your phone, to maintain your dark adaptation The Go Stargazing website also has some of the publicly accessible dark sky sites in the UK.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
NASA's nuclear gamble on the moon faces growing skepticism
Fast-tracking a NASA plan to build a nuclear reactor on the moon may sound dubious. Experts say that's because it is. 'The whole proposal is cock-eyed and runs against the sound management of a space program that is now being starved of money,' national security analyst, nuclear expert and author Joseph Cirincione told The Independent. Nuclear has been used in space since the 1960s. That's nothing new. The U.S. launched its first test reactor into orbit in 1965, and the former Soviet Union has sent up dozens more. NASA says that a new 100-kilowatt reactor could be used to power a future base at the lunar South Pole, and fuel prospective missions to Mars and beyond. Nuclear would help to fill gaps in solar energy that occur when that side of the moon is in darkness for two weeks. The majority of space experts have said that placing a reactor on the moon is possible, so, why is NASA's current plan 'cock-eyed?' The problem is the proposed timeline. Interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy, who also serves as President Donald Trump's Secretary of Transportation, pushed to expedite the project, detailed in a memo this week. Duffy said the administration wanted to have a nuclear reactor ready to launch by 2030. Earlier this year, China and Russia announced a plan to build a nuclear reactor for a lunar base by 2035. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a 'keep-out' zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' Duffy said. NASA first announced in 2021 that it would put a reactor on the moon 'within a decade.' In 2024, NASA then said that their target date for delivery a reactor to the Earth-based launchpad was the early 2030s. But, Cirincione says essentially no progress has been made. 'It was in the last Trump administration that NASA had put out a press release, they had a YouTube video, they had these announcements about how they're going to develop these small, modular nuclear reactors for use on the moon, and it was going to be ready by 2026,' said Cirincione, who is vice-chair of the Center for International Policy, a non-profit that advocates for a peaceful approach to foreign policy. 'Oh, really? So, where is it?' Ultimately, the expert believes a nuclear reactor on the moon could take up to 20 years to become a reality. NASA would need a working launch vehicle, a small and adaptable reactor, and the ability to land on the moon. Right now, the SpaceX Starship is the only vehicle option – but it has exploded during several of its test flights. NASA has been working with Boeing on a Space Launch System - the main competitor to Space X's Starship - but that program would be canceled under the Trump administration's proposed cuts which slash 24 percent from NASA's overall budget. Landing on the moon is no picnic, and attempts by Japanese space companies in 2023 and 2025 ended in crashes. There are also the scientific and technological advances needed for the nuclear reactors. The reactors must be able to withstand harsh conditions on the moon, including temperatures swings from 250 degrees Fahrenheit during the day to minus 400 degrees at night. 'Small modular nuclear reactors, it turns out, are always just around the corner – a corner you never get to turn,' Cirincione said. Many scientists and nuclear energy experts have shared in Cirincione's skepticism. Dr. Kathryn Huff, a former nuclear energy official at the U.S. Department of Energy, and professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, wrote in a Bluesky social media post that she's not 'bullish' on 'unrealistic timelines.' 'The 2030 target does not align well with recent budgetary trends…' she explained in a statement, shared by the university. 'Accelerating the FSP program could come at the expense of other critical priorities, including earth science, climate observation and space-based weather forecasting – all core elements of NASA's public-serving mission.' Dr. Alfredo Carpineti, an Italian astrophysicist, wrote in IFLScience this week that the proposal is 'unfeasible.' 'Even if we allow landing the nuclear reactor on December 31, 2030, the timing is really too short for something that must not have any faults if you want to operate it safely,' Carpineti wrote. Others were more optimistic about NASA's accelerated timeline. Sebastian Corbisiero, a senior program manager at Idaho National Laboratory who leads the Energy Department's space reactor program, told The Independent that a nuclear reactor on the moon is 'doable' by 2030. 'Nuclear reactor technology has been around for decades, so its well known,' he said. 'Some key differences with a space reactor is that it needs to fit on a rocket, so there are mass and volume requirements; and that the system needs to operate in vacuum – so components will need to be built to survive that environment.' Dr. Bhavya Lal, a former associate administrator for technology, policy, and strategy at NASA, and former aerospace executive Roger Myers, recently argued that it would be possible to have nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030, and it would take $3 billion to do so. 'It's possible, but it will require serious commitment,' Lal told The Independent. But even if plans are speeded up, Lal says there's no need to worry about the prospect of the moon blowing up. It's 'simply not grounded in science,' she said.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Scientists want to send tiny, solar-powered spacecraft to Mars
Scientists want to send tiny, solar-powered spacecraft to examine difficult-to-reach parts of Earth 's atmosphere – and eventually other planets too. The small devices are able to float in the air and could carry sensing instruments to monitor our climate as well as explore Mars, the researchers behind them suggest. Unlike conventional spacecraft, they do not need fuel to stay floating in the atmosphere. Instead, they use energy from light, through a process known as photophoresis that has been used to make objects levitate for 150 years. Despite that long history, the practical use of photophoresis has been limited to truly tiny objects or very powerful artificial light, and practical devices have not worked out. Now, however, researchers believe that they have made a centimetre-long flying device out of perforated sheets that can use natural sunlight to stay afloat. The flying structure is made from two thin, perforated membranes that are attached together by tiny supports. They can be used to create a tiny disc that is then able to leveitate. They could be sent up to the upper layers of the Earth's atmosphere. If they can be scaled up slightly, they would be able to carry antennae and circuits that would allow them to be used to monitor the atmosphere and for other science work. Eventually, the same design could be taken to other planets, they suggest. It is currently almost prohibitively expensive to send satellites to Mars, for instance – but doing so with the tiny spacecraft could allow researchers to monitor conditions on that planet, they say. 'If the full potential of this technology can be realized, swarms or arrays of such photophoretic flyers could be collecting high-resolution data on the temperature, pressure, chemical composition and wind dynamics of the mesosphere within the next decade,' Igor Bargatin from Penn University wrote in an article accompanying the new research.
