Amazon shares decline despite strong Q2 revenue performance
The drop followed a similar 7% decline in after-hours trading on Thursday, despite Amazon stock closing the regular session up 1.7% at $234.11.
In the second quarter, Amazon's revenue rose 13% year-over-year to $167.7 billion, surpassing the average analyst estimate of around $162 billion. Net income increased by more than one-third to $18.2 billion, reflecting strong operational performance across its core business lines.
Still, investors reacted negatively to the company's forecast for the current quarter. Amazon projected operating income in the range of $15.5 billion to $20.5 billion, with the lower end falling short of Wall Street's expectations, which averaged $19.4 billion.
The main concern was AWS, Amazon's long-dominant cloud platform. AWS revenue increased by 17.5%, roughly in line with market expectations but significantly below growth at competitors. Microsoft Azure posted a 39% year-over-year increase in cloud revenue, while Google Cloud grew nearly 32%.
All three cloud giants are investing heavily in data center expansion to support rising demand for artificial intelligence capabilities. Amazon disclosed capital expenditures of over $31 billion in Q2, with chief financial officer Brian Olsavsky stating that investment would continue at a similar pace in the second half of the year.
This raised concerns among investors about whether Amazon's aggressive infrastructure spending is delivering sufficient returns. Despite being the global leader in cloud services, AWS is facing increasing pressure from Microsoft and Google in the race to lead AI-powered cloud infrastructure.
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy defended the company's strategy during a call with analysts, saying AI adoption is still in its early stages. He emphasized Amazon's focus on offering lower operating costs for clients deploying AI software and acknowledged that demand is currently outpacing AWS's ability to scale.
In response to questions about tariffs introduced under former U.S. President Donald Trump, Jassy said it remains unclear who will ultimately bear the cost. He added that Amazon has not seen any significant decline in demand during the first half of the year, even though many goods sold on its U.S. platform are imported and subject to tariffs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
EU clears Just Eat takeover but imposes strict anti-cartel ruling
The European Commission has approved the €4.1 billion acquisition of Just Eat (JET) by Naspers, through its investment arm Prosus, after the technology group agreed to take concrete steps to reduce its influence in Europe's food delivery market. Prosus already holds a significant minority stake in Delivery Hero—one of the largest food delivery companies in Austria, Bulgaria, Italy, Poland and Spain—which operates popular brands such as Glovo, Foodora, and efood. The Commission said the measures were necessary to prevent Naspers from having significant sway over two of the sector's largest competitors, which could weaken competition and harm consumers. "To address the Commission's concerns, Naspers offered to significantly reduce its shareholding in Delivery Hero, below a specified very low percentage, within 12 months and to implement a set of additional commitments," the EU body said in a statement. "The Commission has the duty to assess mergers and acquisitions involving companies with a turnover above certain thresholds," the statement continued. Why is this important? In June 2025, the European Commission fined Delivery Hero and Glovo €329 million for operating a cartel—a high market concentration that lets them agree to drive up prices while not improving services—in the food delivery sector. That case reinforced regulators' concerns that without strict safeguards, large players may coordinate markets for profit instead of competing with both prices and quality. Just Eat runs familiar delivery platforms regularly used in Europe, such as Just Eat, Lieferando and others. Between them, these companies would control a significant slice of Europe's meal delivery market, which means most restaurants and customers would have limited alternatives. The European online food delivery market is worth tens of billions annually and has grown rapidly since the pandemic, making it a critical part of urban economies. This market has few big players, so any merger or ownership overlap can have an outsized impact on prices, restaurant commission rates and courier pay. The €329 million fine against Delivery Hero and Glovo in June 2025 proves that colluding within the market is not a theoretical risk and that European regulators have already caught major players gaming the market to limit competition. The deal is particularly notable as it is unusual for the Commission to demand a major sell-off of shares in another company or existing asset during a Phase I review, as it did on Monday. This signals that Brussels is taking a harder line on digital platform consolidation, especially in markets where just two or three players dominate across the bloc.
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
Tech expert: AI is key to bridging productivity gap between EU and US
Despite cultural similarities and technological progress, the productivity gap between Europe and the United States not only persists – it's growing. Euronews spoke with new technology market expert Dawid Osiecki, who recently co-authored a 40-page report analysing economic development on both sides of the Atlantic, about why this is happening and what might change. "We recently conducted a study that clearly shows: the difference between the US and Europe isn't just about money," Osiecki said. "It's also about the number of large companies that can effectively implement new technologies, including AI" or artificial intelligence. AI: opportunity or challenge in technological revolution? "Comparing data since 1996, we see very clearly that the US has emerged more effectively from successive crises – the 2008 financial crisis, the pandemic, and the current one related to AI transformation," Osiecki said, adding that each crises led to increased production in the US. But in Europe, the response has been "stagnation," he added. The key differences? Investments and the structure of the economy. The US stock market is dominated by the so-called Big Tech companies – the seven largest technology companies that not only generate enormous value growth but also effectively implement the latest technologies. As for Europe, "we didn't seize this opportunity," Osiecki said. The economist and former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi's report on how to improve the European Union's competitiveness indicates that AI could be Europe's chance to close the gap with the US. But even here, the situation is not simple. European workers claim to understand the benefits of AI by a whopping 95 per cent, yet two-thirds fear losing their jobs. Meanwhile, three-quarters indicate they lack meaningful access to AI tools in the workplace. And one-third say they do not have training or education that would allow them to better use new technologies. Fewer giants, more mid-sized companies Data collected in a study of 800 companies from six European countries shows that the largest European companies (valued over $10 billion or €8.68 billion) are adopting AI at a rate comparable to American giants. The challenges begin among smaller companies. "The problem lies at the bottom. Smaller companies, especially those valued between $1 billion and $2.5 billion [€2.2 billion], are three times less likely to successfully implement AI than their American counterparts," Osiecki said. Furthermore, the European economy is more fragmented: there are more mid-sized companies, but fewer global giants. These smaller organisations often have limited access to technology, tools, and specialised staff. Company size isn't the only factor. Sector differences are equally significant. The aerospace, defense, and advanced industries are leaders in AI use in Europe. Meanwhile, the public and energy sectors lag significantly behind, with differences reaching dozens of percentage points. Results vary similarly between countries. Switzerland, Germany, and France lead the way, but after taking into account sectoral structure, the United Kingdom emerges as the leader, with AI adoption rates exceeding 50 per cent. On the other hand, while France has large companies and high technological ambitions, it shows surprisingly low adoption rates – around 30 per cent. Spain and Italy are at the bottom of the rankings. Investment is the biggest challenge, according to Osiecki. Between 2013 and 2023, investment capital in new technologies in the US was 5 to 7.5 times greater than in Europe. At the same time, European companies tried to compensate with organisational differences – to no avail. "You can't just tighten your belt for a decade and expect results. You have to invest, train, and implement new technologies with courage," Osiecki said. How to bridge the gap European bureaucracy is often perceived as a barrier to innovation. According to Osiecki, this is not a problem for the largest players in Europe. "For smaller companies, however, regulations can be an excuse or an obstacle," he added. In his opinion, the key is not only simplifying regulations but faster decisions, greater courage, and mass technological education. The EU has ambitious goals: by 2030, 75 per cent of companies should use cloud technologies and AI, and at least 20 million citizens should possess advanced digital skills. Increasing investment in new technologies, supporting medium-sized companies in adopting AI, bridging the gap between sectors and countries, unlocking tools for employees, and providing them with training will be crucial, Osiecki said. "If we don't do this, European productivity will continue to lag behind. And with it, the competitiveness of the entire continent," he said.
LeMonde
2 days ago
- LeMonde
Trump's tariffs and strong euro act as double whammy for European companies
When the dollar began to slide in April following the announcement of so-called "reciprocal" tariffs by Donald Trump, many voices across Europe started to wonder: Could the euro's moment in the global spotlight be in sight? In the face of erratic decisions by the United States − which is amassing colossal debt − and a White House openly challenging the independence of the Federal Reserve, the single currency could offer a welcome haven of stability. Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank (ECB), even devoted a speech to this prospect: "The shift under way also offers opportunities for Europe to take greater control of its own destiny and for the euro to gain global prominence." Four months later, the main effect of this strong euro has been the complaints of businesses. Even more than the tariffs, which have so far been uncertain and unpredictable, major European companies have suffered from the euro's appreciation. Against the dollar, the euro gained 13% since the start of the year, now standing at $1.17; it has stabilized at around that level for a month. The euro appreciated by a similar amount against the yuan, China's currency, because Beijing has acted to keep its currency stable against the dollar. The euro also rose by around 6% against the Japanese yen and the South Korean won.
