Botti savouring ‘special day' with Italian Derby hero Molveno
Having seen his father Alduino, his uncle Giuseppe and his brother Stefano enjoy multiple victories in the Capannelle Classic, the Newmarket-based trainer was thrilled to get his name on the roll of honour, with fellow Italian Marco Ghiani in the saddle.
Botti said: 'We had a nice dinner with the jockey and his family last night and it was great.
'For us the Italian Derby means a lot. My dad won it a few times, as has my brother, so he couldn't be too upset finishing second and third this year!
'It was a great ride and I thought the horse was very brave. At one point I thought he'd slipped a little bit too far back in a field, but he actually picked up well in the straight.'
Molveno won three times on the all-weather during the winter and was last seen filling the runner-up spot in a handicap over Newmarket's Rowley Mile.
He faced a hike in class and distance in Rome, but Botti was confident his charge had what it took to make his presence felt.
'I always thought the extra three furlongs shouldn't be an issue. After his last run at Newmarket we thought we'd step up in trip and I said to the owner, who is Italian-based, if you want to go for the Italian Derby I wouldn't be against it,' he added.
'He loves fast ground. I know with his form you wondered whether he'd be good enough or not, but I've bought a few horses for my brother rated 90/95 who have been competitive, so we said we'd take a chance and it worked out quite well.
'I'm sure it was special for Marco as well. It was his first Group Two winner, he was born in Italy and his parents were there, so it was a special day for sure.'
Molveno looks set to enjoy a short break following his Italian heroics before being campaigned abroad later in the year.
Botti said: 'Having won a Group Two it will be really tough for him in England and as he travelled so well and likes fast ground, I think we'll campaign him more in the second half of the season in a few races maybe in Qatar and Bahrain and places like that.
'I think that's what we'll do. He deserves a break now as it's a long way to Rome, so we'll freshen him up and get him ready for the second part of the season.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
26 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Landlord wants permission for six-bedroom bedsit in Rhyl
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A landlord has applied for planning permission for a house of multiple occupation (HMO) in Rhyl. Majid Khan, of London-based Genics Investment, has applied to Denbighshire County Council's planning department, seeking permission for a change of use of 15 Chester Street from a dwelling to six-bedroom HMO. According to the application, the HMO is already in use but is not registered with Denbighshire County Council. The applicant says the building has been in continuous use as a HMO for more than ten years. The applicant has supplied a list of tenancy agreements, housing benefit details, and a statement from the previous landlord as 'evidence' of the above. A planning statement issued on behalf of Mr Khan reads: 'The property was purchased in 1996 for a HMO use, and the previous landlord did submit a planning application in (the) late 90s (or) early 2000s, but this was not registered formally on the council's records. Before the new directives came in 2014, a HMO Licence was not required. A HMO licence was granted and expired in 2020.' Sign up for the North Wales Live newslettersent twice daily to your inbox. HMOs are carefully regulated by some councils, especially in seaside towns, which may have a greater number of large empty properties. Rhyl councillor Brian Jones said he believed the town already had enough HMOs. 'In my opinion, Rhyl has more than enough HMOs,' he said. 'When Rhyl is compared to other towns in Denbighshire, Rhyl has by far the highest number. We have enough of them. We certainly don't need any more.' Denbighshire defines a HMO as a property rented to 'at least three people who are not from the same household, such as a family'. A HMO property in Denbigh, Llangollen, Prestatyn and Rhyl must have a licence if there are three or more tenants living there and: They form more than one household, with or without shared facilities (bathroom and kitchen) They form more than one fully self-contained household, but do not meet the 1991 Building Regulations and where less than two-thirds of the self-contained flats are owner occupied. The planning application will likely be debated at a future planning committee meeting at Ruthin 's County Hall HQ. Public notices in your area
Rhyl Journal
29 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Novak Djokovic focused on own game and not how to stop Jannik Sinner
Djokovic reached his 51st grand slam semi with a clinical four-set win over German third seed Alexander Zverev on Wednesday night. The 38-year-old remains firmly in the hunt for a record 25th major title and a fourth at Roland Garros. But standing in his way is Italian top seed Sinner, who has looked imperious in Paris this fortnight. The 23-year-old is yet to drop a set this tournament, and has not even lost his serve since his opening round match against Arthur Rinderknech. He has won 19 consecutive matches at grand slams after recent triumphs at the US Open and Australian Open, and two more wins here would put him three quarters of the way towards a 'Sinner slam'. Djokovic executed his gameplan against Zverev to perfection, regularly dragging the 28-year-old into the net and then passing or lobbing him, but Sinner is too quick and too smart to fall for that. 'I know what to expect from Jannik,' said Djokovic. 'He's going to come out and play at a very high level, as he did basically every tournament that he played in the last year and a half. I don't expect anything less from him. ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?#RolandGarros — Roland-Garros (@rolandgarros) June 4, 2025 'But these kind of match-ups and challenges extract the best out of me. Playing best-of-five, late stages of a grand slam against number one in the world, you can't get more motivated than that for me at this age. 'That's how I see it now. How am I going to stop him? I don't think about that. I think about how am I going to execute what I want on the court and feel how I want to feel. That's where my thoughts are going. 'Of course I'm going to sit with my team and think about it, work on the practice court a little bit on specifics that will be the case when I play Jannik. I'll do my best to get ready.' Djokovic had endured one of the worst runs his entire career when he lost three straight matches before limbering up for Roland Garros in Geneva, where he won his 100th ATP title. Grand slams clearly still bring out the best in the Serbian, even if he has not won one since the 2023 US Open. Sinner said: 'He has shown now in the last period that he is back to the level. 'He plays very, very well, so it's going to be quite tactical but very, very difficult. He's such an experienced player, 24 grand slams. I think that says everything.' There are two Italian men in the semi-finals for the first time at a grand slam in the Open era, with Lorenzo Musetti facing Carlos Alcaraz, the defending champion. Further Italian success arrived in the mixed doubles final on Thursday, when Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori beat American duo Taylor Townsend and Evan King 6-4 6-2.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Supreme Court spares US gun companies from Mexico's lawsuit
WASHINGTON, June 5 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday spared two American gun companies from a lawsuit by Mexico's government accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels and fueling gun violence in the southern neighbor of the United States. The justices in a 9-0 ruling overturned a lower court's ruling that had allowed the lawsuit to proceed against firearms maker Smith & Wesson (SWBI.O), opens new tab and distributor Interstate Arms. The lower court had found that Mexico plausibly alleged that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales, harming its government. The companies had argued for the dismissal of Mexico's suit, filed in Boston in 2021, under a 2005 U.S. law called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that broadly shields gun companies from liability for crimes committed with their products. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided in 2024 that the alleged conduct by the companies fell outside these protections. "Mexico alleges that the companies aided and abetted unlawful sales routing guns to Mexican drug cartels. The question presented is whether Mexico's complaint plausibly pleads that conduct. We conclude it does not," liberal Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court. The case came to the Supreme Court at a complicated time for U.S.-Mexican relations as President Donald Trump pursues on-again, off-again tariffs on Mexican goods. Trump has also accused Mexico of doing too little to stop the flow of synthetic drugs such as fentanyl and migrant arrivals at the border. Mexico's lawsuit, filed in Boston in 2021, accused the two companies of violating various U.S. and Mexican laws. Mexico claims that the companies have deliberately maintained a distribution system that included firearms dealers who knowingly sell weapons to third-party, or "straw," purchasers who then traffic guns to cartels in Mexico. The suit also accused the companies of unlawfully designing and marketing their guns as military-grade weapons to drive up demand among the cartels, including by associating their products with the American military and law enforcement. The gun companies said they make and sell lawful products. To avoid its lawsuit being dismissed under the 2005 law, Mexico was required to plausibly allege that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales and that such conduct was the "proximate cause" - a legal principle involving who is responsible for causing an injury - of the harms claimed by Mexico. Mexico in the lawsuit sought monetary damages of an unspecified amount and a court order requiring Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms to take steps to "abate and remedy the public nuisance they have created in Mexico." Gun violence fueled by trafficked U.S.-made firearms has contributed to a decline in business investment and economic activity in Mexico and forced its government to incur unusually high costs on services including healthcare, law enforcement and the military, according to the lawsuit. Mexico, a country with strict firearms laws, has said most of its gun homicides are committed with weapons trafficked from the United States and valued at more than $250 million annually. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case on March 4.
