
Lukashenko sweeps to victory in Belarus after stage-managed election
Alexander Lukashenko, Europe's longest-serving leader, has extended his 31-year rule in Belarus after being declared the winner of a presidential election that his exiled opponents and Western countries have denounced as a sham.
Unlike in 2020, when Lukashenko allowed an unusually competitive election and faced the greatest threat to his regime since he came to power in 1994, Sunday's result was never in doubt.
In this stage-managed affair, Lukashenko faced only token opposition, with one candidate admitting he was running merely 'alongside' the strongman leader, not instead of him. Official results released early Monday found Lukashenko had won in another landslide with 86.8% of the vote.
The result grants Lukashenko a seventh term in power and cements his grip on the former Soviet republic, a major Russian ally that has played a key role in Moscow's war against Ukraine, from serving as a launching pad for its full-scale invasion in February 2022 to becoming a staging post for Russian tactical nuclear weapons.
Lukashenko's reliance on his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, has deepened since the last Belarusian election in 2020, when he faced an unexpectedly stiff challenge from Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, a political novice who entered the race after her husband, Sergei, was jailed and prevented from running.
Although official figures said Lukashenko won by a landslide in 2020, Tsikhanouskaya claimed victory and spearheaded huge protests, with hundreds of thousands taking to the streets to demand the end of Lukashenko's regime.
With Moscow's backing, the regime responded brutally, imprisoning tens of thousands of protesters and driving Tsikhanouskaya and others into exile. According to Viasna, a Belarusian human rights group, the regime is still holding more than 1,200 political prisoners.
The crackdown was so brutal that Tsikhanouskaya, now living in neighboring Lithuania, declined to call for public protests this time round. Instead, she asked Belarusians simply to vote against all candidates on the heavily-vetted ballots. Her opposition movement called the vote a 'a meticulously orchestrated charade designed to perpetuate the illegitimate dictator's grip on power.'
In a lengthy news conference after casting his vote on Sunday, Lukashenko maintained that Belarus is a democracy because his rivals were given a choice. 'Some chose prison, others chose exile,' he told the BBC.
Lukashenko also told reporters that he did not care whether the West recognizes Belarus' election or not.
Kaja Kallas, the European Union's foreign policy chief, said the vote was 'neither free nor fair,' calling it 'a blatant affront to democracy.'
The Kremlin, however, hailed Lukashenko's victory. China's President Xi Jinping also congratulated him.
The 70-year-old Lukashenko has given little indication that he intends to step down, even after his seventh term, Nigel Gould-Davies, the former UK ambassador to Belarus, told CNN.
Gould-Davies, who is now a senior fellow for Russia and Eurasia at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said that Lukashenko is unlikely to relinquish power on his own accord.
'Dictators, even if they want to, fear stepping down voluntarily,' he told CNN. 'It's a secret weakness of autocracies.'
Before Sunday's vote, Lukashenko mocked opposition leaders who he said were waiting for him to 'drop dead,' telling them: 'Don't hold your breath.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UN nuclear watchdog finds Iran isn't complying with its obligations
VIENNA (AP) — The U.N. nuclear watchdog's board of governors on Thursday formally found that Iran isn't complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years, a move that could lead to further tensions and set in motion an effort to restore United Nations sanctions on Tehran later this year. Iran reacted immediately, saying it will establish a new enrichment facility 'in a secure location' and that 'other measures are also being planned.' 'The Islamic Republic of Iran has no choice but to respond to this political resolution,' the Iranian Foreign Ministry and the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said in a joint statement. Nineteen countries on the International Atomic Energy Agency's board, which represents the agency's member nations, voted for the resolution, according to diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the outcome of the closed-doors vote. Russia, China and Burkina Faso opposed it, 11 abstained and two did not vote. In the draft resolution seen by The Associated Press, the board of governors renews a call on Iran to provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Western officials suspect that the uranium traces could provide evidence that Iran had a secret nuclear weapons program until 2003. The resolution was put forward by France, the U.K., Germany and the United States. Speaking to Iranian state television after the vote, the spokesman for the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said that his agency immediately informed the IAEA of 'specific and effective' actions Tehran would take. 'One is the launch of a third secure site' for enrichment, spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said. He did not elaborate on the location. Iran has two underground sites at Fordo and Natanz and has been building tunnels in the mountains near Natanz since suspected Israeli sabotage attacks targeted that facility. The other step would be the advanced centrifuges at Fordo. 'The implication of this is that our production of enriched materials will significantly increase,' Kamalvandi said. According to the draft resolution, 'Iran's many failures to uphold its obligations since 2019 to provide the Agency with full and timely cooperation regarding undeclared nuclear material and activities at multiple undeclared locations in Iran ... constitutes non-compliance with its obligations under its Safeguards Agreement.' Under the so-called safeguards obligations, which are part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran is legally bound to declare all nuclear material and activities and allow IAEA inspectors to verify that none of it is being diverted from peaceful uses. The draft resolution also finds that the IAEA's 'inability ... to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively peaceful gives rise to questions that are within the competence of the United Nations Security Council, as the organ bearing the main responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.' The vote comes at a sensitive time as tensions in the region have been rising, with the U.S. State Department announcing on Wednesday that it is drawing down the presence of people who are not deemed essential to operations in the Middle East. U.S. President Donald Trump has previously said that Israel or the U.S. could carry out airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed. The U.S. and Iran have been holding talks on Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. Oman's foreign minister said earlier Thursday that a sixth round of negotiations will be held in his country on Sunday. The draft resolution makes a direct reference to the U.S.-Iran talks, stressing its 'support for a diplomatic solution to the problems posed by the Iranian nuclear program, including the talks between the United States and Iran, leading to an agreement that addresses all international concerns related to Iran's nuclear activities, encouraging all parties to constructively engage in diplomacy.' A senior Western diplomat last week described the resolution as a 'serious step,' but added that Western nations are 'not closing the door to diplomacy on this issue.' However, if Iran fails to cooperate, an extraordinary IAEA board meeting will likely be held in the summer, during which another resolution could get passed that will refer the issue to the Security Council, the diplomat said on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the issue with the media. The three European nations have repeatedly threatened in the past to reinstate sanctions that have been lifted under the original 2015 Iran nuclear deal if Iran does not provide 'technically credible' answers to the U.N. nuclear watchdog's questions. The authority to reestablish those sanctions by the complaint of any member of the original 2015 nuclear deal expires in October, putting the West on a clock to exert pressure on Tehran over its program before losing that power. The resolution comes on heels of the IAEA's so-called 'comprehensive report' that was circulated among member states last weekend. In the report, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said that Iran's cooperation with the agency has 'been less than satisfactory' when it comes to uranium traces discovered by agency inspectors at several locations in Iran. One of the sites became known publicly in 2018, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu revealed it at the United Nations and called it a clandestine nuclear warehouse hidden at a rug-cleaning plant. Iran denied this, but in 2019, IAEA inspectors detected the presence of uranium traces there as well as at two other sites.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'They are not so successful' — Zelensky rejects claims of major Russian advances
President Volodymyr Zelensky dismissed Russian claims of significant battlefield gains, calling them part of a disinformation campaign during an interview with Bild published on June 12. Zelensky rejected claims of Russian advance as "a Russian narrative," insisting that Ukraine's forces have been holding off a renewed offensive for nearly three weeks. "The Russians are not so successful, to say the least," Zelensky said. His remarks come amid a surge in Russian military operations across Ukraine's eastern and northern regions, including Russian claims of territorial gains in Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy oblasts — assertions Kyiv denies. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told the Russian state media on June 9 that the offensive in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk Oblast aims to establish a so-called "buffer zone" on Ukrainian territory. The statement followed Russian President Vladimir Putin's earlier announcement that Moscow intends to create security corridors along Ukraine's borders with Russia's Kursk, Bryansk, and Belgorod regions. Ukrainian officials denied any Russian advances into Dnipropetrovsk. "As of the morning of June 9, all Russian information, including Peskov's statements, about an offensive in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast does not correspond to reality," said Andrii Kovalenko, head of Ukraine's Center for Countering Disinformation. Ukraine's Southern Operational Command described the situation as "tense" but said no breakthroughs had occurred. Despite the absence of confirmed ground incursions, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has faced frequent missile and drone attacks. In April, the region initiated mandatory evacuations from four front-line villages as a precautionary measure. Separately, open-source monitoring group DeepState showed some advances near the Russian border in Sumy Oblast. On June 8, DeepState confirmed that Russian troops had occupied the village of Loknia in Ukraine's Sumy Oblast. Located about 30 kilometers (20 miles) north of Sumy, the village lies close to the Russian border in an increasingly volatile region. The Ukrainian General Staff has not commented on the development. According to an article by Ukrainska Pravda, Russian forces began advancing into northern Sumy Oblast in late February or early March, taking advantage of the withdrawal of Ukraine's most combat-capable units. These were reportedly replaced by newly formed, under-resourced brigades with minimal combat experience and limited equipment. Since March, Russia has reportedly taken control of about 200 square kilometers (80 square miles) in northern Sumy Oblast, including roughly a dozen small villages. The advances have triggered civilian evacuations. As of May 31, regional authorities ordered the evacuation of 213 settlements. Read also: As Russia inches closer to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, new Ukrainian region might soon be at war We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Russia's war losses hit 1 million, says UK Defence Intelligence
Russia has suffered approximately one million casualties killed and wounded since the onset of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Source: UK Defence Intelligence update dated 12 June on X (Twitter), as reported by European Pravda Details: The update estimates that around 250,000 Russian soldiers have been killed or are missing, marking the highest number of Russian military losses since World War II. In 2025 alone, Russia may have lost over 200,000 personnel, with the Ukrainian General Staff reporting an average of more than 1,250 Russian casualties daily. Total cumulative Russian losses from February 2022 to June 2025. Photo: UK Defence Intelligence UK Defence Intelligence highlights that the high number of wounded personnel, particularly those with multiple injuries, places significant strain on Russia's military medical system, contributing to personnel shortages and logistical challenges. Despite these losses, Russian military leadership likely persists with a strategy of mass offensives, leveraging numerical superiority to achieve tactical gains and exhaust Ukrainian defences. The Kremlin's senior leadership is almost certainly prepared to sustain high casualties, provided they do not trigger significant public or political backlash and as long as losses can be offset by recruitment. Background: A previous UK intelligence update indicated that 2025 could see record-high Russian losses in the war against Ukraine. UK Defence Intelligence devoted its 27 April update on the Russo-Ukrainian war to Moscow's recruitment of foreigners for the war against Ukraine. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!