logo
The US-China trade escalation has no end in sight. Here's why Beijing's not backing down

The US-China trade escalation has no end in sight. Here's why Beijing's not backing down

Hong Kong
CNN —
What was supposed to be a historic, era-defining trade war launched by US President Donald Trump against a range of countries has, for now, narrowed in on a singular target: China.
Trump announced a three-month pause Wednesday on all the 'reciprocal' tariffs that had gone into effect hours earlier – with one exception, deepening a confrontation set to dismantle trade between the world's two largest economies. Then on Thursday, Beijing made good on its vow to bring in its own retaliatory tariffs.
The pace of that escalation has been stunning. Over the course of a week, Trump's tariffs on Chinese imports have jumped from 54 percent to 104 percent and now 125 percent – figures that add to existing levies imposed prior to the president's second term. And China has retaliated in kind, raising additional, retaliatory duties on all US imports to 84 percent.
The showdown sets up an historic rupture that will not only cause pain for both of these deeply intertwined economies – but add tremendous friction to their geopolitical rivalry.
'This is probably the strongest indication we've seen pushing towards a hard decoupling,' said Nick Marro, principal economist for Asia at the Economist Intelligence Unit, referring to an outcome where the two economies have virtually no trade or mutual investment.
'It's really hard to overstate the expected shocks this is going to have, not just to the Chinese economy itself, but also to the entire global trading landscape,' as well as on the US, he said.
Trump appeared to link his decision not to grant China the same reprieve as other nations to Beijing's swift retaliation, telling reporters Wednesday that 'China wants to make a deal, they just don't know how quite to go about it.'
But the view from Beijing looks dramatically different.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping, China's most powerful leader in decades, sees no option for his country to simply capitulate to what it calls America's 'unilateral bullying.' And he's playing to the crowd. Publicly, Beijing has drummed up fervent nationalism around its retaliation – part of a strategy it's been quietly preparing for more than four years since Trump was last in office.
While China has long said it wants to talk, Trump's rapid escalation instead appears to have confirmed for Beijing that the US doesn't. And in Xi's calculation, observers say, China is prepared not just to fight back, but to use Trump's trade turmoil to strengthen its own position.
'Xi has been very clear for a very long time that he expects China will enter a period of protracted struggle with the United States and its allies, that China needed to prepare for that, and they have quite extensively,' said Jacob Gunter, lead economy analyst at Berlin-based think tank MERICS.
'Xi Jinping has accepted that the gauntlet is thrown down, and they are ready to put up a fight.'
Employees produce basketballs for export at a factory in eastern China's Jiangsu province last month.
AFP/Getty Images
'War of attrition'
Whether Trump would have suspended his so-called retaliatory tariffs on China alongside other nations had Beijing not moved so swiftly to retaliate remains an open question. Canada had retaliated but was included in the reprieve, which does not remove a 10 percent universal tariff imposed last week.
Regardless, Trump, who the White House described earlier this week as having a 'spine of steel,' and Xi now appear locked in a war of attrition with the potential to upset a lopsided but highly integrated trade relationship worth roughly half a trillion dollars.
For decades, China has been the world's factory floor, where increasingly automated and high-tech production chains churn out everything from household goods and shoes to electronics, raw materials for construction, appliances and solar panels.
Those factories satisfied the demand of American and global consumers for affordable goods but fueled an enormous trade deficit – and a feeling among some Americans, including Trump, that globalization has stolen US manufacturing and jobs.
Trump's ratcheting up of tariffs to well over 125 percent could now cut China's exports to the US by more than half in the coming years, by some estimates.
Many goods from China won't be able to be quickly replaced – driving up US consumer prices, potentially for years, before new factories come online. That could ring up a tax hike for Americans of roughly $860 billion before substitutions, JP Morgan analysts said Wednesday.
In China, a wide swath of suppliers are likely to see their already narrow margins completely erased, with a new wave of efforts to establish factories in other countries set to begin.
The scale of the tariffs could lead to 'millions of people becoming unemployed' and a 'wave of bankruptcy' across China, according to Victor Shih, director of the University of California San Diego's 21st Century China Center. Meanwhile, US exports to China could 'go close to zero,' he added.
Shipping containers sit at a port in China's Tianjin in February.
Florence Lo/Reuters
'But China can sustain that (situation) much more so than American politicians can,' he said.
That's, in part, because China's ruling Communist Party leaders do not face swift feedback from voters and opinions polls.
'During Covid they shut down the economy (causing) untold employment, suffering – no problem.'
Beijing too believes it can weather the storm.
'In response to US tariffs, we are prepared and have strategies. We have engaged in a trade war with the US for eight years, accumulating rich experience in these struggles,' a commentary on the front page of Communist Party mouthpiece People's Daily said Monday.
It noted Beijing could take 'extraordinary efforts' to boost domestic consumption, which has been persistently weak, and introduce other policy measures to support its economy. 'The plans to respond are well-prepared and ample,' the commentary said.
And in the face of unknowns about how much further measures could escalate, voices from Beijing appear calm.
'The ultimate outcome hinges on who can withstand a longer 'economic war of attrition,'' economist Cai Tongjuan of China's Renmin University wrote in a state media op-ed earlier this week. 'And China clearly holds a greater advantage in terms of strategic endurance.'
US President Donald Trump signs executive orders and proclamations in the Oval Office at the White House on April 9.
Nathan Howard/Reuters
'Preparing for this day'
Beijing in recent weeks has also been talking to countries from Europe to Southeast Asia in a bid to expand trade cooperation – and one up the US by winning over American allies and partners exasperated by the on-again-off-again trade war.
But it's been bracing for US trade frictions since Trump's first trade war and his campaign against Chinese tech champion Huawei, which were a wake-up call to Beijing that its economic rise could be derailed if it wasn't prepared.
'The Chinese government have been preparing for this day for six years – they knew this was a possibility,' said Shih in California, who added that Beijing had supported countries to diversify supply chains and looked to manage some of its domestic economic challenges in preparation, among other efforts.
Today, China is much better placed to weather a broader trade conflict, experts say. Compared with 2018, it's expanded its trade relations with the rest of the world, reducing the share of US exports from roughly one-fifth of its total to less than 15 percent.
Its manufacturers have also set up extensive operations in third countries like Vietnam and Cambodia, in part to take advantage of potentially lower US duties.
China has also built out its supply chains for rare earths and other critical minerals, upgraded its manufacturing technology with AI and humanoid robots and ramped up its advanced technology capabilities, including semiconductors. Since last year, the government has also worked, with varying success, to address issues like weak consumption and high local government debt.
'(China's) weaknesses are significant, but in the context of an all-out brawl, these are manageable. The US is not going to be able to, on its own, bring China's economy to the edge of destruction,' said Scott Kennedy, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in the US.
'As much as Washington doesn't want to admit it, when China says you can't contain China economically, they have a point.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Calls for Immediate Removal of Homeless from Washington Streets
Trump Calls for Immediate Removal of Homeless from Washington Streets

See - Sada Elbalad

time10 hours ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

Trump Calls for Immediate Removal of Homeless from Washington Streets

Taarek Refaat President Donald Trump on Sunday called for the immediate removal of homeless individuals from the streets of Washington D.C., signaling a dramatic escalation in his administration's crackdown on urban crime and public disorder, even as official crime data suggests a downward trend in the capital. In a post on his platform Truth Social, Trump issued a blunt warning: 'The homeless must leave immediately. We will provide you with accommodations, but far from the capital.' The president's comments follow an alleged attempted carjacking involving a former government official, an incident that has reignited public debate over safety in the nation's capital. Trump linked the episode to broader crime concerns and promised swift federal action. 'Everything will happen very fast, just like we did at the border,' he wrote. 'No more Mr. Nice Guy. We want our capital back.' Last month, President Trump signed an executive order making it easier for cities to clear homeless encampments, a move that critics say undermines civil rights and risks further marginalizing vulnerable populations. Under the order, local jurisdictions can request federal assistance for the relocation of unsheltered individuals, including the use of federally managed facilities away from city centers. The White House argues the measure is necessary to restore order, cleanliness, and public safety in urban areas. Trump's remarks on Sunday reinforce his administration's intent to remove homeless populations from visibility, particularly in high-profile cities like Washington D.C., which he has repeatedly criticized as a symbol of Democratic dysfunction. Despite Trump's assertions, official statistics show a decline in violent crime across D.C. this year. However, some high-profile incidents, including assaults and carjackings, have sparked heightened public anxiety, which the Trump administration has seized on as justification for its tough-on-crime policies. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser's office has not publicly responded to the president's latest directive, but previous statements suggest deep concern over federal overreach into municipal governance, particularly on issues related to housing and civil liberties. Homeless advocacy groups quickly condemned the president's language, calling it dehumanizing and unconstitutional. 'Forcibly removing people without addressing the root causes of homelessness, like housing, addiction, and mental health, is not a solution,' said one policy director at a national homelessness nonprofit. 'It's a campaign tactic, not a plan.' Legal experts also warned that any attempt to relocate individuals without due process could face constitutional challenges, especially if tied to political optics rather than actionable social services. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 Videos & Features Story behind Trending Jessica Radcliffe Death Video News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani

Over 100 B Laban workers face forced transfer or termination, lawyer says
Over 100 B Laban workers face forced transfer or termination, lawyer says

Mada

time11 hours ago

  • Mada

Over 100 B Laban workers face forced transfer or termination, lawyer says

More than 100 workers for the Alexandria branches of B Laban, a multi-national dessert franchise with factories and shops across the country, say they are being forced by the company to either transfer outside the governorate or lose their jobs, their lawyer Sherif Yehia told Mada Masr. Workers in other governorates have reported a similar wave of decisions from branch managers. The incident has brought B Laban back into the media limelight after its sudden closure on the grounds of putative health and food safety violations, in a decision that the government quickly reversed which made headlines earlier this year. The company informed the workers that they would be fired if they did not comply with the transfer decisions immediately, Yehia said on Saturday. The decisions, which the lawyer described as arbitrary, were issued without prior notice, leaving the workers unable to organize their living arrangements with their families. While the company said it would grant workers benefits in exchange for moving to another governorate, 'this has not yet happened,' he added. The same group of workers have filed complaints at local Labor Ministry directorates in Agami-Hanofil and Smouha, objecting to the company's decision to force them to transfer to branches outside the governorate. Yehia also said he is preparing to file lawsuits in the coming days if solutions are not reached for workers who do not wish to transfer to the company's branches in Cairo. Responding to circulating claims that over 1,000 workers were subject to similar decisions, a B Laban statement carried by media outlets on Thursday denied that it had taken any arbitrary action to dismiss employees. It stated that it took action for the 'voluntary' transfer of 85 percent of its Alexandria-based workforce to Greater Cairo as part of a restructuring and integration process for all its factories to merge into a new centralized factory in Obour City. The move was aimed at 'doubling production capacity and implementing control and quality systems.'. In return, B Laban stated it offered employees benefits, including a 70 percent relocation allowance, a 20 percent meal allowance and free transportation. Meanwhile, legal settlements were reached for 15 percent of the employees who refused to transfer, according to the company, which added that it is 'committed to the labor law.' Employees of branches outside of Alexandria have reported similar decisions. A Cairo employee at the company's branch in Qanater al-Khayriyah told Mada Masr last week that he was forced to resign four months before the end of his contract term, in exchange for July's salary. Speaking on condition of anonymity, the worker said he was informed a decision had been made to transfer him and five colleagues at the branch to another governorate but not told which. The workers attempted to persuade management to reverse the decision but were not able to. They were informed by management only that 'the company had liquidated one of its factories in Alexandria and would purchase a plot of land to establish a large factory, and that it was redistributing its employees.' The manager of the Qanater branch, Walid Hawash, denied to Mada Masr any knowledge of news circulating about worker layoffs or transfers to other branches. Two employees at a B Laban factory in Obour City described a similar pattern earlier this year, telling Mada Masr that health violations at the factory were flagged in April, but that instead of working to address these violations, the decision was made to relocate the factory to the Fifth Settlement, a practice replicated for several other branches. The employees said at the time that dozens of workers were laid off, mostly Sudanese nationals who had been working temporarily without being granted social or health insurance, while others were transferred from locations close to their homes to distant locations, making it nearly impossible for them to continue working.

Chinese defence expert dismisses India's claim of downing Pakistani jets
Chinese defence expert dismisses India's claim of downing Pakistani jets

Daily News Egypt

time12 hours ago

  • Daily News Egypt

Chinese defence expert dismisses India's claim of downing Pakistani jets

A former Chinese defence attache on Sunday dismissed India's delayed claim that it had shot down six Pakistani aircraft during their May conflict as 'self-amusement,' saying the assertion lacked evidence and was widely questioned by the international community. Three months after the clashes, Indian Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh claimed on Saturday that his country had shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft. Cheng Xizhong, a former Chinese defence attache in South Asia, called Singh's remarks 'comical, implausible and unconvincing.' 'We may call it self-amusement,' he said in a statement reported by the Associated Press of Pakistan. 'The Indian side has not presented any evidence, such as photos of the wreckage of the fighter jets, radar monitoring data, etc, while the Pakistani side had previously presented a large amount of relevant evidence of shooting down the Indian fighter jets.' Pakistan has consistently denied that India downed any of its aircraft and says it shot down six Indian planes. Pakistani Defence Minister Khawaja Asif on Saturday swiftly rubbished Singh's 'belated assertions,' stating that 'not a single Pakistani aircraft was hit or destroyed.' The Chinese expert noted that India had never produced any evidence to prove its claims, while Pakistan had 'immediately provided a detailed technical report to international media after the clash ended.' Cheng, who is currently a senior research fellow at the Charhar Institute think tank, also cited 'confirmations from world leaders, senior Indian politicians, and foreign intelligence assessments that India suffered heavy losses of multiple aircraft.' 'It is thus evident that no Pakistani fighter jet was hit or destroyed by the Indian side. On the contrary, the Pakistani side shot down six Indian fighter jets and destroyed S-400 air defence positions, among other achievements, which is an indisputable fact,' he added. Following the air combat in May, reports from international media and officials from various countries affirmed some of India's losses. The Washington Post, citing visual evidence, reported that at least two French-made Indian fighter jets were shot down by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF). France's air chief, General Jerome Bellanger, has previously said that he has seen evidence of the loss of three Indian fighters, including a Rafale. A Reuters report cited India's intelligence failure as central to the air battle, which led to the downing of Rafale aircraft by the PAF's J-10 fighters using PL-15 missiles. Two days after the May 7 air combat, a PAF deputy chief of operations, Air Vice Marshal Aurangzeb Ahmed, shared the locations where five Indian jets were downed — four along the Line of Control and one near Bathinda. A Dawn report, citing PAF officials, said that three Rafales, one Su-30MKI, and one MiG-29 were downed within a 40-minute spanwithout any Pakistani jet crossing the border. Singh's claim also drew criticism within India, with Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera questioning the timing and circumstances of the alleged operation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store