
Labour and the dynamics of change
At the forefront of the context is the relationship between the labour force and related standards to guarantee that "labour is not a commodity" and that the human face at work needs protection in the form of human rights. The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the key standard-setter, even preceding the birth of the UN, and now also a specialised UN agency. It has evolved 192 Conventions, with the latest being on biological hazards confronting the health and well-being of workers.
These Conventions are complemented by the UN's own family of human rights standards, especially the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). The latter is sometimes clearer than ILO Conventions and helps to reinforce them. The most poignant query today is the right to strike, which has proved to be a thorn in the interpretation of ILO Convention Number 87 on Freedom of Association. While some claim that the latter does not cover the right to strike, the ICESCR stipulates explicitly the right to strike and over 100 countries, including Thailand, are parties to this treaty. The issue of whether Convention Number 87 covers such right is now before the International Court of Justice for clarification.
From a more political angle, non-democracies are often less comfortable with political rights, such as freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, as compared with social rights, such as access to education. A comprehensive response advocates respect for the full range of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, requiring astute and principled diplomacy-cum-levers.
The need to avoid a UN silo approach is also important. The UN Human Rights Council has been constructive in recent years to underline that "labour rights are human rights". For this reason, the fate of thousands of seafarers stuck on the high seas and elsewhere due to the Covid-19 pandemic has led to amendments of the ILO's Maritime Labour Convention, and social security is a key concern interrelated with the world of work.
Another area where labour at work interfaces with the changing international context is in relation to wars or armed conflicts. Do labour standards apply in such volatile situations? Although difficult, some labour standards, such as the treaty countering forced labour, ILO Convention Number 29, have been applied, for example, in regard to the women abused for sexual purposes during the Second World War.
ILO Convention Number 182 on prohibition of the worst forms of child labour also militates against conscription of children under 18. The monitoring mechanism of these Conventions, namely the ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, has called for attention to the role of non-government armed groups, which might be using children for this purpose, and the need for countermeasures.
Precisely because warfare often creates a vacuum where people are not adequately protected, now all too visible in border areas with online scams and human trafficking, it has become essential for labour protection to go hand in hand with transnational cooperation on law enforcement and pressures for accountability, not only through the UN but also via those constituencies supporting the various warring factions.
From another angle, the lens of sustainable development interplays closely with the labour context, and the world is now guided by the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. For instance, SDG Goal 8 calls for the elimination of child labour by 2025. While many, if not all of the SDGs, will be unfulfilled by the target year of 2030, they still act as drivers of change towards measurable standards within a given time frame. This year, the forthcoming World Social Summit will be an opportunity to reiterate those goals with more commitments on social protection, including for workers.
Another pressing issue is environmental protection, climate change and global warming. This necessitates rethinking labour at work. The ILO Conventions on occupational safety and health, Numbers 155 and 187, have become more important to address working conditions impacted by environmental changes, such as increased temperatures at work and recurrent flooding. New initiatives in this regard include "green collective bargaining" so that labour contracts can be more flexible to assist workers, complemented by climate-change-related paid leave, such as to cope with floods.
Interestingly, in the value chain, such as in the garment industry, due diligence on the part of the business sector is now emerging as a requisite for business and human rights, and good labour practices. This requires impact assessment, mitigation and remedies for workers and others affected especially by sub-par business practices.
Finally, there is the issue of digitalisation and the advent of Artificial Intelligence at the workplace. The vast pool of gig workers or platform workers in various industries, such as in the food industry, has pressed for a new response to workers in situations of precarity. The ILO is now drafting a new treaty on digital platform workers so that they will be protected by some, if not all, of the basic range of labour rights, such as on minimum wage, rest periods and coverage of accidents.
Understandably, the workforce might fear that AI will disrupt their lives and lead to dismissals and redundancies. A preferred approach is thus to plan for AI inclusion to augment the capacity of workers rather than to displace them. For instance, AI will be especially useful for the 3Ds -- "Difficult, Dirty and Demeaning" -- tasks, such as mining, pesticide spraying and various types of cleaning. Another 3Ds also open the door to AI: Delicate, Dreary and Didactic tasks, such as precise medical procedures, repetitive chores and training-cum-education, respectively.
There will be a hotchpotch world where human labour will exist side by side with the presence of non-humans, requiring empathy for sentient beings, grounded on decent work for all.
Vitit Muntarbhorn is a Professor Emeritus, a former member of the ILO CEACR, and a UN Special Rapporteur. This article is derived from his address at the international Labour Law Research Network Conference, held recently in Bangkok.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Bangkok Post
a day ago
- Bangkok Post
Thailand, Cambodia clash despite ceasefire hopes
SAMRAONG (CAMBODIA) - Thailand and Cambodia clashed for a fourth day Sunday, despite both sides saying they were ready to discuss a ceasefire after a late-night intervention by US President Donald Trump. The neighbours, popular destinations for millions of foreign tourists, have been locked in their bloodiest conflict in years over their disputed border, with at least 33 people confirmed killed and more than 200,000 displaced. Both said they were willing to start talks to end the fighting, after Trump spoke to the two prime ministers late on Saturday and said they had agreed to meet and "quickly work out" a ceasefire. But fresh artillery clashes erupted on Sunday morning near two long-contested ancient temples in the frontier region between northern Cambodia and northeast Thailand that has seen the bulk of the fighting. Cambodian defence ministry spokeswoman Maly Socheata said Thai forces began attacking areas around the temples at 4.50am. The regular thump of artillery rattled windows in the Cambodian town of Samraong, around 20 kilometres (12 miles) from the frontline, AFP journalists said. Thai Army Deputy Spokesman Ritcha Suksuwanon said Cambodian forces began firing artillery around 4:00 am as the two sides battled for control of strategic positions. - Ceasefire calls - Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet on Sunday said his country "agreed with the proposal for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between the two armed forces". He said his Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn will talk to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to coordinate with the Thais, but warned Bangkok against reneging on any agreement. Earlier, after Trump's call, Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said he had agreed in principle to entering a ceasefire and starting talks "as soon as possible". But he warned that Cambodia must show "sincere intention" to bring about peace. A long-running border dispute erupted into combat this week with jets, tanks and ground troops battling in the rural border region, marked by a ridge of hills surrounded by wild jungle and agricultural land where locals farm rubber and rice. Thailand says seven of its soldiers and 13 civilians have been killed, while Cambodia has confirmed eight civilian deaths and five military. The conflict has forced more than 138,000 people to be evacuated from Thailand's border regions, and 80,000 have been driven from their homes in Cambodia. After an urgent United Nations Security Council meeting Friday in New York, Cambodia's UN Ambassador Chhea Keo said his country wanted "an immediate ceasefire" and a peaceful resolution of the dispute. UN chief Antonio Guterres urged both sides Saturday to "immediately agree to a ceasefire" and hold talks to find a lasting solution. "The Secretary-General condemns the tragic and unnecessary loss of lives, injuries to civilians and the damage to homes and infrastructure on both sides," his deputy spokesman Farhan Haq said in a statement. Both sides have blamed the other for firing first. Cambodia has also accused Thai forces of using cluster munitions, while Thailand accused Cambodia of targeting civilian infrastructure, including a hospital hit by shells. The fighting marks a dramatic escalation in a long-running dispute between the neighbours over their shared 800-kilometre border where dozens of kilometres are contested.

Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Thailand calls for UNSC support
Thailand has officially submitted a letter to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), presenting evidence that Cambodia initiated the armed conflict in the latest exchanges of gunfire between the two countries. Maratee Nalita Andamo, deputy spokeswoman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said on Friday that Cambodia has submitted a letter to the UNSC, requesting an emergency meeting to address the border conflict. In its letter, Cambodia accuses Thailand of violating its sovereignty -- an accusation Thailand firmly rejects. "This claim is completely contrary to the facts," Ms Maratee said. Presenting evidence to UN "The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has already submitted a formal letter to the UNSC to clarify the situation, including evidence that Cambodian forces initiated the violence. Their actions led to numerous Thai casualties, both deaths and injuries, and clearly constitute an act of aggression against Thailand's sovereignty." She added that Thailand has requested the UNSC President circulate the Thai letter among member states to ensure the international community is fully informed of the facts. She said a closed-door meeting was held on Friday at 3pm local time in New York to discuss the border situation. She clarified that such meetings are standard practice when armed clashes occur between states and are not intended for passing any resolutions. Instead, the session will serve as an official forum for the parties involved, along with the 15 member states of the UN Security Council -- both permanent and non-permanent members -- to present and receive factual information. Thailand's permanent representative to the UN in New York will attend the session on behalf of the Thai government. "Cambodia has initiated a series of intense attacks against Thailand, targeting not only military objectives but also causing significant harm to Thai civilians, particularly in residential communities and critical public facilities such as hospitals. These attacks have resulted in multiple deaths and injuries,'' Ms Maratee said. International law violation She said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has issued a clear statement condemning the actions of the Cambodian armed forces as a serious violation of international law and has downgraded diplomatic relations with Cambodia accordingly. The Thai government is demanding that Cambodia take responsibility for a number of incidents, including cases where Thai soldiers stepped on landmines on July 16 and 23, and immediately cease attacks on all targets, both military personnel and civilians. Ms Maratee further emphasised that Cambodia's actions violate international law, specifically the First Geneva Convention, which protects state hospitals, and the Fourth Geneva Convention, which safeguards medical units. In a special cabinet session convened under the framework of the National Security Council on Thursday, the government approved resolutions authorising the armed forces to take necessary actions to safeguard Thailand's sovereignty and downgrade diplomatic ties. Anwar proposes mediation Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai yesterday said that Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, in his capacity as Asean chair, contacted him directly by phone on Thursday and discussed the border situation, subsequently posting on his personal Facebook page about his wish to act as a neutral intermediary. 'Civilians as human shields' The Facebook page "Army Military Force – Reserve" has released footage showing that the Cambodian artillery firing into Thai territory was positioned dangerously close to civilian residential areas. "Cambodia is using its own civilians as human shields. We have compiled clips from July 24 to 25 July showing Cambodian soldiers placing multiple rocket launcher systems, including BM-21 and RM-70, within communities and agricultural areas in Oddar Meanchey and Preah Vihear provinces." Thaksin's mood Former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra took to the social media platform X late on Thursday to express gratitude for the concern and diplomatic outreach, but said the Thai military should first be allowed to "teach a lesson" to Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen, whom he described as "deceptive" and whom he likened to the historical figure Phraya Lawaek. Thaksin's remarks come amid rising tensions and armed clashes along the border, and have sparked debate over the tone and timing of political messaging during such a potentially explosive military standoff.

Bangkok Post
3 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Labour and the dynamics of change
The fluctuating international context compels countries in this region and beyond to recalibrate their labour laws, policies and practices. This is particularly critical at a time of great demographic changes, such as declining and ageing population in parts of the globe, compromised by a more transactional and conditional world of "quid pro quo". Thailand faces an inflection point on this front, requiring dynamic adjustments. At the forefront of the context is the relationship between the labour force and related standards to guarantee that "labour is not a commodity" and that the human face at work needs protection in the form of human rights. The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the key standard-setter, even preceding the birth of the UN, and now also a specialised UN agency. It has evolved 192 Conventions, with the latest being on biological hazards confronting the health and well-being of workers. These Conventions are complemented by the UN's own family of human rights standards, especially the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). The latter is sometimes clearer than ILO Conventions and helps to reinforce them. The most poignant query today is the right to strike, which has proved to be a thorn in the interpretation of ILO Convention Number 87 on Freedom of Association. While some claim that the latter does not cover the right to strike, the ICESCR stipulates explicitly the right to strike and over 100 countries, including Thailand, are parties to this treaty. The issue of whether Convention Number 87 covers such right is now before the International Court of Justice for clarification. From a more political angle, non-democracies are often less comfortable with political rights, such as freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, as compared with social rights, such as access to education. A comprehensive response advocates respect for the full range of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, requiring astute and principled diplomacy-cum-levers. The need to avoid a UN silo approach is also important. The UN Human Rights Council has been constructive in recent years to underline that "labour rights are human rights". For this reason, the fate of thousands of seafarers stuck on the high seas and elsewhere due to the Covid-19 pandemic has led to amendments of the ILO's Maritime Labour Convention, and social security is a key concern interrelated with the world of work. Another area where labour at work interfaces with the changing international context is in relation to wars or armed conflicts. Do labour standards apply in such volatile situations? Although difficult, some labour standards, such as the treaty countering forced labour, ILO Convention Number 29, have been applied, for example, in regard to the women abused for sexual purposes during the Second World War. ILO Convention Number 182 on prohibition of the worst forms of child labour also militates against conscription of children under 18. The monitoring mechanism of these Conventions, namely the ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, has called for attention to the role of non-government armed groups, which might be using children for this purpose, and the need for countermeasures. Precisely because warfare often creates a vacuum where people are not adequately protected, now all too visible in border areas with online scams and human trafficking, it has become essential for labour protection to go hand in hand with transnational cooperation on law enforcement and pressures for accountability, not only through the UN but also via those constituencies supporting the various warring factions. From another angle, the lens of sustainable development interplays closely with the labour context, and the world is now guided by the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. For instance, SDG Goal 8 calls for the elimination of child labour by 2025. While many, if not all of the SDGs, will be unfulfilled by the target year of 2030, they still act as drivers of change towards measurable standards within a given time frame. This year, the forthcoming World Social Summit will be an opportunity to reiterate those goals with more commitments on social protection, including for workers. Another pressing issue is environmental protection, climate change and global warming. This necessitates rethinking labour at work. The ILO Conventions on occupational safety and health, Numbers 155 and 187, have become more important to address working conditions impacted by environmental changes, such as increased temperatures at work and recurrent flooding. New initiatives in this regard include "green collective bargaining" so that labour contracts can be more flexible to assist workers, complemented by climate-change-related paid leave, such as to cope with floods. Interestingly, in the value chain, such as in the garment industry, due diligence on the part of the business sector is now emerging as a requisite for business and human rights, and good labour practices. This requires impact assessment, mitigation and remedies for workers and others affected especially by sub-par business practices. Finally, there is the issue of digitalisation and the advent of Artificial Intelligence at the workplace. The vast pool of gig workers or platform workers in various industries, such as in the food industry, has pressed for a new response to workers in situations of precarity. The ILO is now drafting a new treaty on digital platform workers so that they will be protected by some, if not all, of the basic range of labour rights, such as on minimum wage, rest periods and coverage of accidents. Understandably, the workforce might fear that AI will disrupt their lives and lead to dismissals and redundancies. A preferred approach is thus to plan for AI inclusion to augment the capacity of workers rather than to displace them. For instance, AI will be especially useful for the 3Ds -- "Difficult, Dirty and Demeaning" -- tasks, such as mining, pesticide spraying and various types of cleaning. Another 3Ds also open the door to AI: Delicate, Dreary and Didactic tasks, such as precise medical procedures, repetitive chores and training-cum-education, respectively. There will be a hotchpotch world where human labour will exist side by side with the presence of non-humans, requiring empathy for sentient beings, grounded on decent work for all. Vitit Muntarbhorn is a Professor Emeritus, a former member of the ILO CEACR, and a UN Special Rapporteur. This article is derived from his address at the international Labour Law Research Network Conference, held recently in Bangkok.