Trump slaps sanctions on Canadian ICC judge in clash over US and Israel investigations
International Criminal Court
(
ICC
) on Wednesday(August 20), imposing sanctions on four officials, including a Canadian judge, over their roles in investigations targeting US personnel and Israeli leaders.
The State Department said the measures freeze assets held in US jurisdictions and restrict financial transactions, the latest step under an executive order signed by President
Donald Trump
in February that authorizes penalties against ICC officials deemed to threaten American sovereignty.
Canadian judge among those targeted
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Crossout 2.0: Supercharged
Crossout
Play Now
Undo
Among the sanctioned officials is Kimberly Prost, a Canadian national who has served on the ICC's Trial Division since 2018. According to the State Department, she was targeted for her ruling authorizing the court's investigation into alleged war crimes committed by US personnel in Afghanistan.
Prost, a veteran jurist, previously worked as the United Nations Security Council's first Ombudsperson for its Al Qaida Sanctions Committee and spent nearly two decades with Canada's Department of Justice.
Live Events
Also sanctioned were French judge Nicolas Yann Guillou, who was part of the panel that issued arrest warrants last year for Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu
and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Deputy Prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal, who upheld the Gaza-related warrants.
Renewed offense against the ICC
The decision reflects the administration's intensifying pushback against the ICC. Neither the US nor Israel is a member of the tribunal, and Washington argues the court has no authority over its nationals.
'The United States has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicization, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty, and illegitimate judicial overreach,' the State Department said in a statement.
The administration has framed the sanctions as necessary to protect American service members and diplomats, as well as Israel, from what it considers politically motivated prosecutions.
Echoes of Trump's first term
The move mirrors the Trump administration's first-term clash with the court, when sanctions were imposed on then-prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and another senior official during probes into Afghanistan and Israel. Those measures were lifted by President
Joe Biden
in 2021, though his administration maintained opposition to ICC jurisdiction over non-member states.
But Trump, who returned to office this year, has revived the hardline approach. The latest designations follow earlier sanctions in June against four other ICC judges.
ICC and global response
The ICC condemned the decision, calling it a direct assault on judicial independence.
Israel welcomed the US decision. Netanyahu, facing the court's arrest warrant, praised the sanctions.
Meanwhile, rights groups warned that the measures could hinder global accountability efforts.
Domestic challenge
The administration's aggressive stance is also facing domestic challenges. A federal judge in Washington blocked parts of Trump's executive order on constitutional grounds, ruling that restrictions on providing services to ICC officials infringed on free speech protections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
"Only Way Democrats Can Get Elected" Does Donald Trump Have The Power To Ban Mail-In Ballots?
"Only Way Democrats Can Get Elected" Does Donald Trump Have The Power To Ban Mail-In Ballots? | 4K Last Updated: Crux Videos President Donald Trump plans to get rid of mail-in ballots ahead of the 2026 elections for the House of Representatives and Senate. "An executive order is being written right now by the best lawyers in the country to end mail-in ballots because they're corrupt," Trump said. During a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House, Trump also showed a political motivation, saying that mail-in voting is "the only way" Democrats "can get elected". With Democratic voters traditionally more likely to use mail-in ballots than Republicans, Trump's pledge is his latest effort to reshape the midterm election battlefield to his party's advantage. n18oc_world n18oc_crux
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
Judge Rejects DOJ's Bid to Unseal Epstein Records, Calls It Diversion Tactic
Last Updated: Criticism has mounted against former President Donald Trump and the DOJ for their decision earlier this year not to make the Epstein files public. A US federal judge has rejected the Justice Department's latest attempt to unseal grand jury records related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. On Wednesday, US District Judge Richard Berman, based in Manhattan, ruled against the Department of Justice (DOJ), stating that the Trump administration is in a better position to release materials concerning the late financier and convicted sex offender, reported Reuters. The judge turned down the motion to unseal the grand jury indictment from 2019, criticising the DOJ's approach as a distraction. 'The instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession," Berman wrote in his decision. He pointed out that the Trump administration had already chosen not to release those files in July despite its own investigation. Criticism has mounted against former President Donald Trump and the DOJ for their decision earlier this year not to make the Epstein files public. In July, Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval to unseal grand jury materials. However, grand jury proceedings, designed to protect the integrity of criminal investigations, cannot be made public without judicial approval. During his 2024 election campaign, Trump had vowed to release the Epstein files, claiming that Democrats were concealing the truth. However, the DOJ's July memo dismissed the existence of any so-called 'Epstein client list" and reiterated that Epstein died by suicide while awaiting trial. Epstein was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking minors but was found dead in his jail cell in 2019. He had pleaded not guilty at the time of his arrest. His sudden death, coupled with his connections to high-profile political and business figures, sparked a wave of conspiracy theories alleging a cover-up. On August 11, another Manhattan judge, Paul Engelmayer, similarly rejected a DOJ request to unseal grand jury evidence related to Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime associate. Maxwell, who was convicted of recruiting and grooming underage girls for Epstein, is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence. She had pleaded not guilty and, after losing an appeal, has requested the US Supreme Court to review her case. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
The vanishing promise: How Trump's visa policies are pushing talent away from US campuses
The United States has long sold itself as the world's premier destination for higher education, a place where students from every corner of the globe could bring their dreams, talent, and ambition. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now But that promise is fading. A mix of visa delays, travel bans, and political hostility under President Donald Trump has reshaped the international student experience, and pushed thousands of aspiring scholars to look elsewhere. From dream to dead end For decades, international students formed a cornerstone of American higher education. According to The New York Times, nearly one million were studying in the US just a year ago, and universities — from Columbia to Purdue to Arizona State, relied on them not just for their talent but also for the financial stability they brought. Many paid full tuition, subsidizing aid for domestic students and funding crucial research. But Trump's policies flipped the script. Students from Iran, Afghanistan, and other countries directly impacted by the administration's travel bans found themselves locked out. Even those from top-sending nations like India and China, who make up the bulk of America's international student body, were slowed down by bottlenecked visa appointments and heightened scrutiny. In some months, there were no student visa slots available at all. The Institute of International Education , in a survey of more than 500 US universities, found that over a third reported a dip in international applications last year, the steepest drop since the pandemic. NAFSA , a leading association for international educators, projected that if these problems persisted, new enrollment could fall by as much as 40% this fall, a staggering 150,000 students lost. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'They're literally some of the best in the world' The biggest loss, educators warn, is not financial, it's intellectual. Wendy Wolford, vice provost for international affairs at Cornell University, told The New York Times that 'they're literally some of the best in the world.' Students arriving from abroad enrich classrooms, contribute to groundbreaking research, and expose peers to new perspectives. Their absence, Wolford said, diminishes US campuses and curtails the country's soft power, as fewer students return home carrying goodwill for America. But many students now feel unwelcome. The Trump administration's rhetoric often painted them as security risks or competitors taking slots from US citizens. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools, they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Trump argued at one point. Policies followed words. Visas were revoked by the thousands, more than 6,000 in a single year. Students caught up in deportation threats described the process as opaque, while immigration lawyers said many cases seemed ideological. According to The New York Times, o ne Iranian student, Noushin, who secured admission to the University of South Carolina, has been waiting months in 'administrative processing.' On Telegram, she discovered hundreds of others in similar limbo. A chilling effect The fear is not only about entry but also about what comes after. Some students who managed to secure visas worried about being 'trapped', unable to travel home for holidays or apply for internships without risking their status. Others abandoned US universities altogether, choosing institutions in Europe or Asia instead. 'The rules of the game changed dramatically,' Wolford told The New York Times. Trump's travel bans made matters worse. Afghan women awarded full scholarships in the US found themselves unable to attend because visas were simply impossible to obtain. Iranian students, despite winning admission and funding, were stuck abroad while their American peers moved ahead in research labs. Even universities scrambled for solutions. Cornell, for instance, offered affected students the chance to begin the semester at partner campuses in Scotland, Hong Kong, or South Korea. Few took up the offer. Most either held out hope for US visas, or simply gave up. What's at stake The ripple effects stretch far beyond enrollment charts. Losing international students means losing top-tier researchers, engineers, and innovators, many of whom might otherwise stay in the US to fuel its workforce and economy. 'Students like me are not a threat to U.S. society,' Pouria, an Iranian doctoral admit stuck in visa delays, told The New York Times . His research, backed by the Texas Department of Transportation, now risks stalling. For decades, the US higher education system has thrived precisely because it attracted global talent. Now, as students turn away in response to Trump-era policies, other countries are seizing the opportunity. European and Asian universities are seeing the benefits of American hesitation. The question lingers: Will the US regain its role as the beacon for global talent, or will the vanishing promise of its universities become permanent? TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
