logo
‘We're collateral damage' — WV school district hires attorney to review Morrisey's vaccine mandate

‘We're collateral damage' — WV school district hires attorney to review Morrisey's vaccine mandate

Yahoo13-05-2025

Inside a Kanawha County elementary classroom in West Virginia. (Lexi Browning | West Virginia Watch)
A West Virginia school district is hiring an attorney to sort out who has the authority to set school vaccination polices — is it the governor, the Legislature or the state health department?
It's the tip of the iceberg for legal questions and likely court challenges as county school boards and the state board of education are grappling with how to handle Gov. Patrick Morrisey's executive order mandating that public schools permit religious and philosophical exemptions to the state's strict school immunization rules.
The state's vaccine laws remain unchanged after the GOP-led House of Delegates voted down a broad vaccine exemption bill, and other attempts to revive the legislation failed, as well. Lawmakers who voted down the measure cited constituents' pleas for upholding vaccine laws during a wave of measles cases.
'I think we're collateral damage,' said Ohio County School Board President David Croft, adding that the school district will have outside counsel determine before the end of the month if the state's immunization laws or the executive order should take precedence.
'Our goal, and I hope the rest of the state follows, is to understand that the issue is not if a single board member is or is not in favor of vaccinations. But it is trying to [do] their duties as a county board of education member appropriately by following West Virginia laws,' he said.
Morrisey says that, regardless that the state immunization laws remain unchanged, public schools must comply with his executive order, citing a 2023 religious freedom law as its legal justification.
While some private schools say they won't comply, parents have already begun requesting a religious exemption to vaccine rules from the state health department.
'It's a complex legal analysis that has to be done here,' said Croft, who is an attorney.
He said the analysis will have to look at kids' constitutional rights to a safe education versus religious freedom, along with a disagreement between the executive and legislative branches of government.
'Our goal at the end of the day is to put our kids in the best position we can — and our teachers,' Croft added.
The issue is likely to end up before a judge ahead of next school year.
Croft noted that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which could preside over a possible challenge, already ruled in a 2011 lawsuit involving a Mingo County student that the state's vaccines laws were constitutional and did not overly burden a parent's right to free exercise of religion.
The push to edit the state's vaccine laws has been spearheaded by Sen. Laura Chapman, R-Ohio. She was the lead sponsor of a bill earlier this year that would have allowed religious exemptions for school vaccine requirements and revised the existing medical exemption process.
Chapman, a mother and attorney, said she wholeheartedly supports Morrisey's executive order regarding religious exemptions.
'Gov. Morrisey's executive action is well-grounded in law based on the Equal Protection for Religion Act, which protects against government discrimination against a sincerely held religious belief,' she said.
Prior to the executive order, West Virginia was among five states that didn't allow exemptions to school vaccine requirements based on religious or philosophical beliefs. State laws only allowed medical exemptions.
'We are one of the most religious states in the nation and we unfortunately are lumped in with liberal states like California and New York,' Chapman said. 'Each of our surrounding states offer a religious exemption and the [Centers for Disease Control] numbers are sub-herd immunity levels. There is no reason to believe West Virginia will be any different. Ultimately, a family should not be required to give up their religious beliefs in order to go to our fantastic public and private schools.'
Del. Shawn Fluharty, D-Ohio, was among the House's no votes on changing the state's vaccine laws. The bill was voted down 42-56 in March.
'We elect public officials to pass public policy, we don't elect kings and queens,' Fluharty said. 'This session, public officials listened to their constituents, medical professionals and experts by rightfully voting down this bad public policy. It's a shame the governor and his handlers want to circumvent this process.'
On Wednesday, the West Virginia school board will discuss religion exemptions from school vaccinations, according to their agenda.
State Schools Superintendent Michele Blatt earlier this month issued guidance to school superintendents recommending that students not be allowed to attend schools next year without the required vaccinations. She rescinded the memo at the request of Morrisey and is now working with the governor's office to issue clear guidance to schools about how to comply with the executive order, according to her statement.
Del. Hollis Lewis, D-Kanawha, has called on the state school board to maintain its current immunization requirements. He wrote a letter to the board on Tuesday, saying that Morrisey's executive order conflicts with existing statutory law and oversteps constitutional authority.
Hollis wrote that the current vaccine law 'protects the health and safety of West Virginia's children, families and communities.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kansas task force debates use of graduation rate to gauge student success
Kansas task force debates use of graduation rate to gauge student success

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Kansas task force debates use of graduation rate to gauge student success

Sen. Renee Erickson, second from left, a Wichita Republican who leads the Kansas Legislature's school finance task force, said Kansas should retain use of high school graduation statistics to measure student achievement despite criticism it was unclear earning the diploma meant students were prepared for college or the workforce. (Kansas Reflector screen capture from Legislature's YouTube channel) TOPEKA — Disagreement exists on the Kansas Legislature's task force reworking the state's public school finance formula about the importance of high school graduation rate as a measure of student success. A member of the task force pointed to alleged manipulation of student records at Wichita Southeast High School as evidence of why a district's annual graduation rate shouldn't be viewed as a significant metric, while others defended graduation rates as an evaluation tool when determining whether districts prepared students for the workplace or college. Rep. Kristey Williams, an Augusta Republican, said the Wichita school district had touted a 5.1 percentage point surge in its graduation rate in 2024 to 84.3%. Wichita Southeast's graduation rate climbed 12.5 percentage points in 2024 to a record-high 86.3%. Southeast's principal was replaced last week amid reports of suspected grade fixing that may have been associated with helping students meet graduation requirements. 'I wouldn't use graduation rates,' said Williams, who didn't see a meaningful correlation between graduation rate and student success. 'If we want to baby sit, that's one thing. If we want to have a safe place for them, that's one thing. But that doesn't mean you're learning anything.' Frank Harwood, a deputy commissioner of the Kansas State Department of Education, said one potential incident of administrative misconduct shouldn't justify dismissal of graduation rates as a means of measuring school districts. 'When you look at any industry, including the Legislature, there are bad actors,' he said. 'It doesn't mean you should throw out that metric all together. I'm not saying graduation rate is the best indicator, but I think it is an indicator that we can't just ignore.' The Kansas State Board of Education made elevating the state's high school graduation rate a feature in its 'Kansans Can' agenda and in terms of school district accreditation. The state board's graduation-rate goal was set at 95%. Kansas' adjusted cohort graduation rate, which tracked student graduation within four years and took into account transfers, has ranged from 86% to 89% during the past decade. In 2022-2023, more than 90 of the state's 287 school districts graduated 100% of students. Twenty school districts had graduation rates below 80% during that academic year. The Wichita district's graduation rate was at 79.2% during that period, while the Kansas City, Kansas, district came in at 73.4%. Sen. Renee Erickson, a Wichita Republican serving as chairwoman of the Legislature's school-finance task force, said Kansas should continue to include graduation rate in a set of evaluation metrics. She said the state needed to develop a definition of what a high school diploma revealed about students. Erickson said employers had reported a high school diploma didn't guarantee a quality worker. University or college officials indicated high school graduates didn't necessarily have skills to succeed in higher education, she said. 'I have post-secondary folks in my office frequently and they're saying, 'They're not prepared for our level of work,'' the senator said. 'I'm not blaming. I'm just telling you, if you can't acknowledge that, we've got a problem.' Task force member Pat Pettey, a Democratic senator from Kansas City, Kansas, said it would be folly to drop the graduation rate as an indicator of a school district's ability to prepare students for the future. 'I still am a strong supporter of graduation rates because having a high school diploma is a key to opening the first door to get a job. I don't believe it is the key, but if they don't have that they're not on a trajectory to be economically successful,' Pettey said.

Trump's conflict with Musk explodes into a public feud
Trump's conflict with Musk explodes into a public feud

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's conflict with Musk explodes into a public feud

WASHINGTON — The simmering tension between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk exploded in public Thursday, with the president sharply criticizing the Tesla CEO's attacks on the Republican policy bill and Musk firing back that the president would have lost the election without his help. 'I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office during a bilateral meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' The comments — and the flurry of online retorts from Musk that quickly followed — mark the latest development in a remarkable break between the world's richest man and the U.S. president who invited him into his administration. Musk's actions at the Department of Government Efficiency defined the early stages of Trump's second term, and the two showered each other in mutual praise earlier this year. But the relationship cooled as Trump's priorities shifted to major spending legislation and Musk wound down his time at the White House. Trump suggested that Musk, who earlier this week called the GOP bill a "disgusting abomination," was upset that the bill cut out a tax credit meant to incentivize electric vehicle purchases. "Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles and they're having a hard time with electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy," Trump said. "Elon knew this from the beginning." Tesla is the biggest electric vehicle maker in the United States. The company's sales have suffered in recent months, reflecting increased global competition and backlash generated by Musk's political activities. Since leaving his White House role last week, Musk has said he is back at work at his companies, including Tesla and major government contractor SpaceX, '24/7.' Tesla's stock, however, has stumbled as he's ramped up his attacks on Trump's signature bill. Shares are down more than 20% so far this year. Trump's comments Thursday are his strongest yet against a man who was once his top campaign donor and one of his closest advisers. Musk, who jokingly referred to himself as "first buddy," officially left the administration last week on a less amicable note. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' he told CBS during his last few days as a special government employee. Reacting to Trump's comments Thursday, Musk first brushed them off, posting "whatever," before quickly escalating to claims that Trump owes his election victory to him. He posted criticism of Trump or the bill over two dozen times in the hours that followed. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," he said. "Such ingratitude," he added. Musk, who spent more than $250 million to help Trump in last year's presidential election, said last month that he planned to do "a lot less" political spending in future elections. 'I think I've done enough," he told Bloomberg. Musk's opposition to the House bill appears to have also strained his relationship with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., who said Wednesday that the billionaire had done a "180" in terms of his support of the measure and didn't respond to his call after Musk came out against it. Johnson told reporters on Capitol Hill Thursday morning that he had planned to call Musk again during the day. The version narrowly passed by the House would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime work, boost funding for immigration enforcement and the military, would make cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted in an estimate released Wednesday that the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Last week, Trump praised Musk's work leading the Department of Government Efficiency, which directed massive financial and job cuts to the federal government — but still fell short of Musk's goal of cutting $2 trillion from the federal budget. "Elon's really not leaving," Trump said. "He's going to be back and forth, I think. ... It's his baby and I think he's going to be doing a lot of things. But Elon's service to America has been without comparison in modern history." This article was originally published on

How Trump and Musk went from bromance to bitter dispute
How Trump and Musk went from bromance to bitter dispute

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

How Trump and Musk went from bromance to bitter dispute

The bromance of President Trump and Elon Musk appears to be over after a public fracturing on Thursday. The big picture: The Tesla CEO initially seemed to leave the Trump administration on a good note and was expected to remain one of the president's most influential outside advisers. That no longer appears to be the case. While both men are known to go on social media rampages, the president admitted Thursday he was bothered by his former adviser's posts criticizing his "big, beautiful" spending bill. Here's a look at how the pair's relationship took off and came to an end: June 5: Trump admits rupture President Trump said Thursday he doesn't know if he and Musk will still have "a great relationship" after the former DOGE head spent days blasting the spending bill. Musk fired back in an X response writing, "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." June 3: Musk criticizes "One Big, Beautiful Bill" Musk slammed the bill as a "disgusting abomination," writing in a post on X, "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." In another post, Musk responded to a user's criticism of the bill writing, "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." May 28: Musk confirms he's departing administration Musk confirmed he is leaving the Trump administration, thanking Trump "for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending." The billionaire CEO pivoted to damage control in his final days as a "special government employee," publicly recommitting to Mars, cars and robots after a bruising year in the political limelight. Feb. 11, 2025: Musk joins Trump in Oval Office Musk, with his young son in tow, appeared alongside Trump in the Oval Office. The pair defended their efforts to enact major changes to the government and to limit spending. Nov. 12, 2024: DOGE announced Trump announced that Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy would lead a new " Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), operating as an independent advisory group to cut government spending and streamline bureaucracy. Nov. 6, 2024: Election night Musk was with Trump on election night as the latter was declared the winner of the presidential election. Oct. 16, 2024: Musk becomes GOP mega-donor Musk gave nearly $75 million in three months to his pro- Trump America PAC, underscoring his commitment to getting Trump elected. He eventually donated more than $250 million to the super PAC during the 2024 election campaign, making Musk Trump's biggest financial booster. Oct. 5, 2024: "Dark MAGA" Musk appeared at a Trump rally for the first time since his endorsement, wearing a black "Make America Great Again" cap, and said: "As you can see, I'm not just MAGA — I'm dark MAGA." Aug. 12, 2024: Musk suggests role in White House Musk hosted Trump on X for a "conversation" that turned into an extension of a campaign speech, where he suggested that Trump should form a commission focused on "government efficiency" and appoint him to it. July 13, 2024: Musk endorses Trump Musk endorsed Trump on X minutes after he was ushered off stage by Secret Service agents at a rally in Pennsylvania when the then-presidential hopeful came under fire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store