Why China may be keeping a close eye on Trump's Middle East moves
As the US gets more entangled in the
Israel-Iran conflict , China is likely to be keeping a close watch and
picking up some clues on American interventionism in regional disputes.
According to one China watcher, Beijing may be a 'long-term beneficiary' of the American retreat from stable leadership, as Washington's strikes on Iran have revealed it to be an uncertain and unpredictable global power.
More significantly, the conflict has revealed Washington's reluctance to engage in a prolonged war, offering the Chinese leadership clues on how the Trump administration might approach other flashpoints, including Taiwan.
The US carried out air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last weekend in an operation Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called a 'resounding success' that obliterated Iran's nuclear capabilities. It followed an intense exchange of fire between Israel and Iran that started on June 13 when Israel launched surprise air attacks on Iranian military and nuclear facilities.
On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump announced that a ceasefire had been reached in the '12-day war' between the traditional adversaries.
However, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday downplayed the impact of the US strikes, claiming that Tehran had delivered a 'slap to America's face' by striking a US airbase in Qatar over the weekend.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Africa could emerge a winner from China's war-induced energy shift
A ceasefire has brought a reprieve to the war between Israel and Iran , halting the single most dangerous regional conflict in recent years. For Beijing, the world's largest oil importer, the lesson from the brief, 12-day conflict, could not be clearer: China cannot continue to rely on a region so prone to disruption for the resources needed to power its economic development. China has been successful at maintaining a balancing act between competing geopolitical forces, importing vast amounts of discounted crude from Iran while securing long-term liquefied natural gas (LNG) deals with Gulf suppliers . It has also cultivated diplomatic neutrality and maintained a strong relationship with Israel. This neutrality has allowed Beijing to support energy needs without hindering geopolitical ambitions. The fragility of this strategy has been seen in the most recent round of conflict, which jeopardised shipping routes , disrupted supply chains and led to a global spike in energy costs. Lessons learned will not be limited to the Middle East. These will resonate across Beijing's global foreign policy apparatus. Beijing's reliance on Iranian oil was at its peak in 2024, when it bought around 1.5 million barrels per day, which accounted for about 90 per cent of Iranian oil shipments and 15 per cent of Chinese crude consumption. Chinese consumption of Iranian oil has since dropped to 740,000 barrels per day. Whether the ceasefire holds is immaterial at this point. Diversification is a strategic imperative. Beijing will continue to look towards LNG, the country's most viable hedge in the immediate term. Even this, however, comes from the yet-to-be-stabilised Middle East. Just before the recent war erupted, ENN LNG Singapore – a subsidiary of China's ENN Natural Gas – signed a long-term agreement with the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company. As the war has shown, while such arrangements are stabilising, they are far from immune to sudden disruption. The primary solution that might offer long-term energy security for Beijing is renewables. In 2024, non-fossil fuels made up 56 per cent of total installed electricity generation capacity. By the end of 2024, China's cumulative renewable energy capacity reached nearly 1.9 billion kilowatts, a 25 per cent year-on-year increase. China's electric vehicle (EV) market grew at the equally astounding rate of almost 40 per cent in 2024.
RTHK
6 hours ago
- RTHK
US Senate opens debate on Trump spending bill
US Senate opens debate on Trump spending bill The Senate opened debate on Trump's spending bill after Republican holdouts delayed what should have been a procedural vote. File photo: Reuters US senators debated into the early hours of Sunday Donald Trump's "big beautiful" spending bill, a hugely divisive proposal that would deliver key parts of the US president's domestic agenda while making massive cuts to social welfare programs. Trump is hoping to seal his legacy with the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which would extend his expiring first-term tax cuts at a cost of US$4.5 trillion and beef up border security. But Republicans eyeing 2026 midterm congressional elections are divided over the package, which would strip health care from millions of the poorest Americans and add more than US$3 trillion to the country's debt. The Senate formally opened debate on the bill late on Saturday, after Republican holdouts delayed what should have been a procedural vote -- drawing Trump's ire on social media. Senators narrowly passed the motion to begin debate, 51-49, hours after the vote was first called, with Vice President JD Vance joining negotiations with holdouts from his own party. Ultimately, two Republican senators joined 47 Democrats in voting "nay" on opening debate. Trump has pushed his party to get the bill passed and on his desk for him to sign into law by July 4, the United States' independence day. "Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform after the vote to begin debate. "Republicans must remember that they are fighting against a very evil, corrupt and, in many ways, incompetent (Policywise!) group of people, who would rather see our Country 'go down in flames' than do the right thing," he said in an earlier post. Democrats are bitterly opposed to the legislation and Trump's agenda, and have vowed to hold up the debate. They began by insisting that the entirety of the bill be read aloud to the chamber before the debate commences. The bill is roughly 1,000 pages long and will take an estimated 15 hours to read. "Republicans won't tell America what's in the bill," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. "So Democrats are forcing it to be read start to finish on the floor. We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it." If passed in the Senate, the bill would go back to the House for approval, where Republicans can only afford to lose a handful of votes -- and are facing stiff opposition from within their own ranks. (AFP)
The Standard
6 hours ago
- The Standard
A Trump political dynasty? His son Eric says maybe
Eric Trump speaks to media at Trump Tower in New York City, U.S., June 16, 2025. (Reuters/File)
