Intel's $24 billion rally sends valuation to dot-com levels
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
After months of turbulence, Intel Corp. bulls are finally being rewarded for their patience. But the stock's sudden rebound comes with a worrying side effect: a valuation so high its most recent precedent is from the dot-com era more than two decades ago.Shares of the struggling chipmaker have rallied 28% this month, adding about $24 billion in market value, on reports that the US government is in talks for a potential equity stake, as well as plans for a $2 billion investment from Japan's SoftBank Group Corp. The jump has Intel trading at 53 times profits projected over the next 12 months, the highest since early 2002, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.'The stock looks incredibly expensive here,' said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial Services. 'That kind of multiple is a bet that the government will push Intel so hard on customers that it becomes a winner.'The surge in Intel this month followed a slump in the wake of a disappointing earnings report on July 24 and criticism of Tan earlier by President Donald Trump, who called for the CEO to step down, citing conflicts of interest. After meeting with Tan on Aug. 11, Trump changed his tune, saying Tan's 'success and rise is an amazing story.'Since then, reports have circulated that the Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10% in the company. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday that the talks are aimed at converting US grants already made to Intel under the Chips and Science Act into non-voting equity. Intel shares slid 1.2% in after-hours trading.Of course, the US's plans regarding Intel haven't been finalized and could still change. Intel declined to comment on Lutnick's remarks.For Paul Nolte, market strategist and senior wealth manager at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management, the potential government involvement could benefit Intel in the short-term but may pose a risk in the long term.'This strikes me as an easy road to get onto, but a hard one to get out of,' Nolte said. 'At the end of the day, this raises so many more questions than it answers.'Meanwhile, Intel's premium valuation is largely a reflection of just how much its profitability has collapsed in recent years.Intel is projected to generate more than $1 billion in adjusted profit over the next four quarters, after losing about $1.3 billion in the previous four, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. From 2018 to 2021 the company generated more than $20 billion in annual profits on average.'We have no idea what Intel can deliver in earnings growth since it is so behind on tech and because you can't cost-cut your way to growth,' said Nancy Tengler, chief executive officer of Laffer Tengler Investments. 'It's hard to have confidence in the estimates, which makes it difficult to assess the valuation. I think it's overvalued, but I also think the picture is so uncertain that it wouldn't be attractive at any price.'Wall Street largely echoes her caution. Fewer than 8% of the analysts tracked by Bloomberg recommend buying the stock, while nearly 80% have the equivalent of a neutral rating. In addition, at its Tuesday close of $25.31, Intel trades notably above the average price target of about $22, representing the weakest return potential among components of the Nasdaq 100 Index.Still, there is optimism that Chief Executive Officer Lip-Bu Tan will be able to turn things around. Much of his focus has been on cost cutting, which has improved Intel's outlook to return to profitability but raised concerns the chipmaker may be bowing out of the race for technological leadership. Part of his effort has also been centered on a costly build out of its foundry operations undertaken by his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger.'Clearly it's going to take a number of years for it to really start operating on a smooth basis,' said Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager of the Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity fund. 'We've got trust in him, but we think he's got a long slog ahead.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
EAM S Jaishankar meets Russian President Putin in Moscow amid Trump's tariff fury
EAM S Jaishankar meets Russian President Putin in Moscow amid Trump's tariff fury Lavrov meets Wang, Kim; China, N Korea and Russia discuss Ukraine issue & Iranian nuclear threat Lavrov meets Wang, Kim; China, N Korea and Russia discuss Ukraine issue & Iranian nuclear threat Russian FM Sergei Lavrov meets Chinese counterpart Wang Yi; discuss ties with Ukraine, US Putin makes stopover in Magadan on his way to Alaska summit with Trump Putin makes stopover in Magadan on his way to Alaska summit with Trump Russian President Vladimir Putin's Full Speech at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok Russia-Ukraine ceasefire soon? Putin meets US envoy Steve Witkoff as Trump's peace deadline nears
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump escapes $454M fraud penalty: What the ruling means and what happens next
Donald Trump civil fraud penalty overturned — In a major legal twist, a New York appeals court has thrown out the $454 million civil fraud judgment against President Donald Trump, a penalty that had threatened his business empire. The case, brought by Attorney General Letitia James, accused Trump of inflating property values to secure loans and insurance deals. Donald Trump civil fraud penalty overturned — A New York appeals court has struck down the $454 million judgment against Donald Trump, giving the former president a major legal reprieve. The case, filed by Attorney General Letitia James, accused Trump of inflating property values to secure better loans and insurance. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What the case was really about Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why the appeals court overturned the penalty What happens next Why this matters beyond Trump Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The political stakes FAQs: A New York appeals court has thrown out the nearly half-billion-dollar civil fraud penalty that Donald Trump was ordered to pay earlier this year, reshaping one of the most consequential legal battles facing the U.S. decision, handed down Thursday by a divided five-judge panel in Manhattan, not only spares Trump an immediate financial blow but also raises fundamental questions about how aggressively state officials can police corporate civil fraud case was launched in 2022 by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who accused Trump of inflating his net worth for years to obtain favorable loans and insurance Arthur Engoron, who presided over a three-month bench trial, sided with James last year. In February 2024, he imposed a staggering $454.2 million penalty, plus interest, and barred Trump and his family business from seeking loans from New York banks for three argued that Trump's exaggerations were deliberate, widespread, and showed 'a complete lack of contrition.' He also curtailed the business roles of Trump's adult sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, while placing the Trump Organization under a court-appointed James, the verdict was a marquee win — proof, in her words, that no one, not even a former president, was above the law. But for Trump, it was another in a long series of courtroom battles defining his Appellate Division's ruling was far from unanimous. Two judges agreed that Trump had committed fraud but ruled the penalty excessive under the Constitution's ban on disproportionate two said the trial judge should not have pre-judged Trump's liability before the trial even began, requiring a retrial. A fifth judge dissented entirely, saying the lawsuit should have been split highlights how legally complex the case has become. The majority agreed that James had the authority to sue, but they could not settle on whether Trump's liability had been properly established or whether the punishment was lawful. The result: the $454 million penalty has been wiped away, at least for ruling is not the end of the road. James could appeal to New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, to try to reinstate the penalty. If she does, the fight could stretch well into 2026, keeping Trump's finances under the microscope during an election cycle where his legal exposure is already a major political the court-appointed monitor overseeing the Trump Organization remains in place. That means Trump's business dealings will still be scrutinized, even though the financial penalty and loan restrictions have been its core, the case goes beyond one businessman. It touches on the broader question of how much leeway prosecutors and regulators should have in policing financial misstatements, particularly when those misstatements don't clearly lead to direct losses for banks or James cannot ultimately reinstate the penalty, it could embolden other executives accused of manipulating valuations, reinforcing the idea that such exaggerations are a routine part of real estate and finance rather than punishable fraud. On the other hand, if higher courts side with her, it could expand the power of state attorneys general to impose sweeping penalties even in the absence of clear victim has consistently denied wrongdoing, calling the lawsuit a political witch hunt. The reversal now gives him a powerful talking point: that even New York's appellate judges saw the penalty as overreach. That narrative could resonate with voters who already view his legal troubles as politically the story is not finished. James can still appeal, and Trump is far from free of legal peril, with multiple criminal and civil cases ongoing. For now, though, he has won breathing room in a case that threatened to strip hundreds of millions from his centers on claims Trump inflated property values to get better loans and insurance case could move to New York's highest court if Attorney General Letitia James appeals.
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
Bad news for IT professionals as Donald Trump may ban H-1B visa for Indians due to....
Bad news for Indians as H-1B visa holders in US are being asked to reveal home address and... H-1B visa system: In a environment where the United States, led by President Donald Trump is taking every step possible to negatively impact the India-US relations, reports have it that the next target of the US President could be the H-1B visa system through which Indian IT engineers make a career in the US. For those unversed, the Donald Trump led US government has imposed a massive 50% tariff on its exports to the United States in a matter of punishment for India due to the import of Russian crude oil. Here are all the details you need to know about the H-1B visa system and why they could be the next target of the US government. Why US may take action on the H-1B visa system next? Media reports suggest that H-1B visas could be the next target, which may be cause of concern for the over 2 lakh Indians who secured such visas in FY 2024. Reports also say that the Make America Great Again Supporters (MAGA) supporters of Donald Trump are driving an online campaign against Indian tech workers, arguing that they take away American jobs amid mass layoffs. 'End Indian H-1B visas to replace American jobs and stop sending money and weapons to the Obama/Biden/Neocon Ukraine Russia war.' politician Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the most prominent voices to have re-started the online campaign against the H-1B visa said on X (formerly Twitter). Story highlights: 1. After Trump imposed massive tariffs on India, there are reports that H-1B visa system can be the next target. Add as a Preferred Source 2. Trump's MAGA supporters are calling for a ban on the visa system. 3. The VISA system is critical as it's used by Indian IT professionals. 4. Donald Trump has imposed 50 % tariff on India. What does Donald Trump think on H-1B visa system? 'We want competent people coming into our country. And H-1B, I know the programme very well. I use the programme. Maître d', wine experts, even waiters, high-quality waiters — you've got to get the best people. People like Larry, he needs engineers, Masa also needs… they need engineers like nobody's ever needed them,' US President Trump had said on the H-1B visa system.
