Barrack: Washington to observe Sharaa before removing Syria from list of terrorism-supporting states
This statement comes a few weeks after U.S. President Donald Trump signed a decree formalizing the lifting of U.S. sanctions against Damascus. This measure, presented as a new step in the rapprochement between the two countries after the fall of Bashar al-Assad, was announced in Riyadh on May 13.
The U.S. president had then declared his intention to "give a chance for greatness" to the new Syrian authorities. The next day, he spoke with Sharaa, the interim president from the rebel coalition led by the Islamist group Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which overthrew the regime last December. Since then, Washington has lifted or eased a large part of its economic sanctions to allow Syria's return to the international financial system and encourage foreign investments.
Barrack said he "has confidence in Ahmad al-Sharaa's sincerity," considering that "his goals for Syria are consistent with those of the United States and its allies." He emphasized the importance of building a Syrian state that "includes all components of the country" to ensure stability and security.
Regarding the investigation into the murder of an American citizen in Sweida, Barrack noted that the Syrian administration "is fully cooperating with the FBI." The incident dates back to July, when a collective execution carried out in downtown Sweida was filmed and then posted online by one of the perpetrators. The events took place in a context of intercommunal tensions pitting Sunni Bedouin tribes, supported by government forces, against Druze factions. A Syrian-American citizen was among the identified victims.
On the subject of relations between Syria and Israel, the U.S. envoy stated that no agreement has yet been found on the nature of these relations, while admitting that Israeli intervention in Syria complicates the situation. In early July, however, Damascus declared itself willing to cooperate with Washington to return to the 1974 agreement with Israel. The Jewish state has been conducting airstrikes in Syria since December 2024 and has deployed troops in the demilitarized buffer zone of the Golan, in violation of that agreement, according to the UN. Damascus has not responded and acknowledged having conducted indirect talks with Israel aimed at reducing tensions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
Cabinet to meet again today on Hezbollah disarmament
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 13:47 Lebanon's cabinet is set to meet again on Thursday to discuss the thorny task of disarming Hezbollah, a day after the Iran-backed group rejected the government's decision to take away its weapons. With Washington pressing Lebanon to take action on the matter, U.S. envoy Tom Barrack has made several visits to Beirut in recent weeks, presenting officials with a proposal that includes a timetable for Hezbollah's disarmament. Amid the U.S. pressure and fears Israel could expand its strikes in Lebanon, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said Tuesday that the government had tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by the end of 2025. The decision is unprecedented since the end of Lebanon's civil war more than three decades ago, when the country's armed factions -- with the exception of Hezbollah -- agreed to surrender their weapons. The government said the new disarmament push was part of implementing a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah. That conflict culminated last year in two months of full-blown war that left the group badly weakened, both politically and militarily. Hezbollah said on Wednesday that it would treat the government's decision to disarm it "as if it did not exist," accusing the cabinet of committing a "grave sin." It added that the move "undermines Lebanon's sovereignty and gives Israel a free hand to tamper with its security, geography, politics and future existence." The Amal Movement, Hezbollah's main ally headed by Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, also criticized the move and called Thursday's cabinet meeting "an opportunity for correction." Iran, Hezbollah's military and financial backer, said on Wednesday that any decision on disarmament "will ultimately rest with Hezbollah itself." "We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions," Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi added, saying the group had "rebuilt itself" after the war with Israel. Two ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and the Amal Movement walked out of Tuesday's meeting on disarmament in protest. The two other ministers did not attend the session since they were abroad. Hezbollah described the walkout as a rejection of the government's "decision to subject Lebanon to American tutelage and Israeli occupation." Referring to Thursday's cabinet session, State Minister for Administrative Development Fadi Makki, a Shiite who is close to Salam, said Thursday that he "will not bear the approval of crucial decisions of this magnitude without the presence of the Shiite ministers." "Without completing the political process and if the Amal and Hezbollah ministers do not attend today, the cabinet session will not serve the public interest," he cautioned. Citing "political sources" with knowledge of the matter, pro-Hezbollah newspaper al-Akhbar said the group and its Amal allies could choose to withdraw their four ministers from the government or trigger a no-confidence vote in parliament by the Shiite bloc, which comprises 27 of Lebanon's 128 lawmakers. Israel -- which routinely carries out air strikes in Lebanon despite the ceasefire, saying it is targeting Hezbollah fighters and infrastructure -- has already signaled it would not hesitate to launch destructive military operations if Beirut failed to disarm the group. Israeli strikes in south Lebanon killed two people on Wednesday, according to the Lebanese health ministry.
Nahar Net
4 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Trump to meet Putin in coming days with venue to be announced later
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 12:22 A meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump has been agreed, a Kremlin official said Thursday, and it could possibly take place next week at a venue that has been decided "in principle." "At the suggestion of the American side, it has been agreed in principle to hold a bilateral meeting at the highest level in the coming days, Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov told reporters. Next week is the target date for a summit, Ushakov said, while noting that such events take time to organize and no date is confirmed. The possible venue will be announced "a little later," he said. He also played down the possibility of Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky joining the summit meeting to discuss ending Russia's 3-year-old invasion of its neighbor, which the White House said Trump is ready to consider. "We propose, first of all, to focus on preparing a bilateral meeting with Trump, and we consider it most important that this meeting be successful and productive," Ushakov said. A meeting between Putin and Trump would be their first since the Republican president returned to office this year. It would be a significant milestone in thewar, though there's no promise such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting, since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their demands. Western officials have repeatedly accused Putin of stalling for time in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. Putin has in the past offered no concessions and will only accept a settlement on his terms. It was not clear whether Trump's Friday deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing in Ukraine still stood. Support for continuing the fight wanes in Ukraine A new Gallup poll published Thursday found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion. The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 — the year the war began — when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. The poll came out on the eve of U.S. President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about 7 in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last month renewed his offer to meet with Russia's Vladimir Putin, but his overture was rebuffed as Russia sticks to its demands, and the sides remain far apart. Most Ukrainians do not expect a lasting peace anytime soon, the poll found. Only about one-quarter say it's "very" or "somewhat" likely that active fighting will end within the next 12 months, while about 7 in 10 think it's "somewhat" or "very" unlikely that active fighting will be over in the next year.
Nahar Net
4 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Israeli strikes on south kill two, including child
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 11:26 Israel launched a series of air strikes on southern Lebanon on Wednesday night, killing two people including a child. The strikes wounded at least three people according to the health ministry. An Israeli strike on the southern town of Toulin killed one person and wounded another, the health ministry said, adding later that another person of Syrian nationality was killed and two were wounded in a separate strike on Deir Seryan. The Israeli military said it struck "weapons storage facilities, a missile launcher and Hezbollah terrorist infrastructure which stored engineering tools that allowed for the re-establishment of terrorist infrastructure in the area". Hezbollah said Israel must halt the attacks before any domestic debate about its weapons and a new defense strategy could begin. The strikes come ahead of a cabinet meeting scheduled for Thursday to continue talks on Hezbollah disarmament. The government had tasked the army in an earlier session Tuesday with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by year end. The plan is to be presented to the government by the end of August for discussion and approval. Hezbollah said it would treat the decision "as if it did not exist", accusing the cabinet of committing a "grave sin". It "fully serves Israel's interests and leaves Lebanon exposed to the Israeli enemy without any deterrence", the group said. The Amal movement, headed by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, accused the government of "rushing to offer more gratuitous concessions" to Israel when it should have sought to end the ongoing attacks. It called Thursday's cabinet meeting "an opportunity for correction". Hezbollah opponent the Lebanese Forces, one of the country's two main Christian parties, said the cabinet's decision to disarm the militant group was "a pivotal moment in Lebanon's modern history -- a long-overdue step toward restoring full state authority and sovereignty". The Free Patriotic Movement, the other major Christian party and a former ally of Hezbollah, said it was in favor of the army receiving the group's weapons "to strengthen Lebanon's defensive power". Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a televised interview that any decision on disarmament "will ultimately rest with Hezbollah itself". "We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions," he added, noting that the group had "rebuilt itself" following setbacks during its war with Israel.
