Sonam Srivastava's Independence Day guide to building a self-reliant portfolio
ADVERTISEMENT Edited excerpts from a chat:
From your perspective, what does financial independence mean for investors today? Which sectors today best represent India's march toward economic self reliance (Aatmanirbhar Bharat)?
For today's investors, 'financial independence' means the ability to meet life goals without compromising lifestyle or taking on costly debt,built on three pillars:
(i) robust buffers (6–12 months' expenses, adequate insurance)(ii) disciplined, rules based investing that compounds ahead of inflation(iii) diversification across assets, factors and business cycles.
ADVERTISEMENT In an era where US tariffs on Indian goods could hit export-heavy sectors (textiles, steel, chemicals), financial independence for the nation means strengthening domestic supply chains and reducing vulnerability to trade restrictions. Now, in India's Atmanirbhar journey, we see 5 standout pillars: Unlock 500+ Stock Recos on App Defence manufacturing: Import substitution shields us from foreign supply disruptions. Exports hit a record ₹23,622 cr in FY25, with indigenised systems gathering global traction.
Renewables: Energy self-sufficiency reduces exposure to oil price shocks from Middle East instability. Installed RE capacity reached ~220 GW by Mar 2025, with a record ~22 GW added in H1 2025
Renewables: Energy self-sufficiency reduces exposure to oil price shocks from Middle East instability. Installed RE capacity reached ~220 GW by Mar 2025, with a record ~22 GW added in H1 2025 Digital public infrastructure: UPI now processes ~19.5 bn transactions a month (≈628 mn daily, July '25), lowering frictions and enabling inclusion. The PLI umbrella (₹1.97 lakh cr across 14 sectors) remains a key accelerant of these trends.
Pharma & biotech: Demand for affordable medicines is global and relatively tariff-resistant.
Local manufacturing, electronics & FMCG: Smartphone exports jumped to ~$24.1 bn in FY25, up 55% YoY, a flagship PLI success. Catering to India's massive domestic market provides a natural buffer from global trade wars.
How do you strike a balance between supporting domestic industries and leveraging global opportunities?
ADVERTISEMENT The balance shifts when geopolitical winds turn against you. With tariffs, global opportunities don't vanish, but they require strategic re-routing. How to adapt: Double down on domestic growth stories – The rural economy, infra push, urban consumption — these aren't dependent on trade deals.
Selective global exposure – Use global ETFs to tap US tech, ASEAN manufacturing hubs, or Europe's green energy without over-relying on India-US trade.
Hedging currency risks – The rupee could swing sharply during geopolitical tensions; currency-hedged products can reduce volatility.
South-South trade – Look at Indian companies shifting export focus to Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia where tariff barriers are less severe. Keep any single theme to 10% or less, and rebalance on a fixed date, not on headlines. A simple basic checklist can help most investors fundamentally at least: is the business improving, is the price fair, and is the trend healthy? If an investment no longer passes those checks, trim it back to target.
ADVERTISEMENT What is the investing equivalent of a 'freedom struggle' for retail investorsFor retail investors, the modern 'freedom struggle' is against three foes: (1) high costs and mis selling(2) behavioural biases (FOMO, panic selling, anchoring)
ADVERTISEMENT (3) information overloadPrefer transparent, rules driven investment vehicles over tips, influencers and telegram groups. Measure risk by 'how far can this fall and can I sit through it?' not by short term returns. Cut churn, avoid leverage unless you truly understand it. Quiet, repeatable habits win in the long run.
How can investors symbolically celebrate Independence Day through their portfolios while also making sound financial choices?
To celebrate Independence Day in your portfolio, do something small but permanent: raise your SIP by 10%, rebalance back to plan, and add a modest 'India build out' sleeve (5–10%) via diversified baskets across sectors that make sense for you. In today's tariff-hit world, symbolic patriotism in investing could mean: Allocating more to companies building for domestic consumption rather than overexposed exporters.
Investing in import-substitute sectors — e.g., electronics manufacturing, indigenous defence tech.
Backing companies with diversified export bases so they're not dependent on one major market like the US.
Green & energy security plays — Reducing India's reliance on volatile global oil markets. Also, consider a government backed debt allocation for stability, review term and health insurance, and harvest tax losses where allowed. Skip big one day bets. The symbolism is clear, back India's productive capacity. The prudence is in diversification, costs you can explain, and risks you can sleep with.
What investment principles from India's independence struggle can be applied to modern day portfolio management? Lessons from the independence struggle that work in markets: Discipline → Our leaders planned for food security amid global uncertainty; you should plan for liquidity during market sell-offs. Follow a plan even when it's hard
Patience → In politics, trade negotiations take years; in investing, recovery from macro shocks also demands time. Allow compounding years, not months
Unity-in-diversity → hold multiple assets and factors so one setback doesn't sink you
Self-reliance → Just as Nehru built NAM (Non-Aligned Movement), your portfolio should be India-focused but globally aware. Have emergency cash and low leverage
Flexibility in tactics → The freedom movement adjusted strategies when faced with new challenges; likewise, shift portfolio weightings when geopolitics changes the risk landscape. Put this to work with a written plan, periodic rebalancing, and a multi-factor core portfolio (quality, value, momentum, low-volatility etc). Keep fees and taxes low, track mistakes openly, and let data, not drama, decide adds, trims, and exits.
Can MFs surpass FIIs in ownership over the next decade? With sustained SIP inflows (~₹15,000 to ₹16,000 crore per month as of mid-2025), growing financial literacy, and the rising middle class, it's very plausible that MFs could surpass FIIs in the next decade. Why it might happen: Domestic SIP flows are far more stable and immune to short-term trade headlines — they're driven by salaried individuals, not hot money. SIP culture is becoming habitual, much like monthly utility bills.
to short-term trade headlines — they're driven by salaried individuals, not hot money. SIP culture is becoming habitual, much like monthly utility bills. FIIs are highly sensitive to global trade frictions and political tensions. If Trump's tariffs escalate into broader trade barriers, FIIs may trim India exposure in favour of 'safer' or more open markets.
Retirement planning, insurance-linked investments, and equity awareness are expanding beyond metro cities into Tier-2/3 towns.
Regulatory push for retail participation and digital onboarding has made investing almost frictionless.
If FIIs sell due to macro shocks, MFs may naturally increase their share by buying those very stocks at lower valuations. However, surpassing FIIs will also depend on:
Sustained economic growth above 6%+ with SIP inflows keeping pace with GDP and inflation
Political stability and reform continuity: Policy stability is critical — Atmanirbhar Bharat reforms need to be sustained despite political cycles.
Continued trust in domestic fund managers and product transparency
Domestic sentiment must hold even during external shocks (which requires ongoing investor education). If current trends continue, MF ownership crossing FIIs by 2035 is not only possible — it's likely.
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh to be developed on lines of Gujarat's GIFT city: Kataria
City Beautiful will be developed as a National Service Industry Centre on the lines of Gujarat's GIFT city, UT administrator Gulab Chand Kataria said in his Independence Day speech on Friday. Gulab Chand Kataria (HT Photo) GIFT City, short for Gujarat International Finance Tec-City, is a smart city, part of India's vision to attract fintech companies and global trading institutions, and compete with international financial hubs such as Dubai, Singapore, and London. In Chandigarh, the plan is to turn it into a model of sound economic regulations, efficient governance, and modern infrastructure. Kataria further said that the recent demolition drives against illegal colonies and markets had freed 55 acres, worth nearly ₹2,500 crore, which will now be used for public welfare projects. The administrator also announced that a 400-bed regional medical hub would be established in Sector-53 in collaboration with AIIMS and NITI Aayog. The facility will focus on maternal and child care, emergency services, health research, and rehabilitation. He also mentioned the expansion of rooftop solar projects, the floating solar plant at Sector-39, the launch of e-Sanjeevani tele-consultation, and the implementation of the MoRTH scheme for road accident victims. Speaking on other development projects, the administrator said that work on the ₹90-crore four-lane flyover from PGIMER to Sarangpur and Tribune flyover, which recently received approvals, will start soon. These projects will help ease the traffic troubles in the city.


Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
When sambar met caviar
The Indian diaspora has become a lot more affluent, and they are seeking luxurious experiences, which include dining on exquisitely created and presented food from their home country.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Trump's Tariff Threat Tests India-US Relations
Published : Aug 16, 2025 19:25 IST - 6 MINS READ There is a distinct souring of sentiment in the narrative across India's 24-hour news channels. A news anchor opens her piece with a sarcastic diatribe on how, if only Trump were president of the USA in the past, so much could have been avoided through history; the First World War, the Second World War, all of it. The screen behind her displays an image of the US president with the text 'Earth is spinning better, thank Trump!'. The title of this video op-ed piece is 'Why Trump Should Never Win the Nobel Peace Prize'. It is a marked departure from the rapturous reception a second Trump term got only nine months back. A statement released then by India's External Affairs Ministry described how the two leaders had reaffirmed their commitment to a mutually beneficial and trusted partnership and agreed to remain in touch and meet soon. Social media and news coverage were awash with praise both for this sweeping victory and the warm and cordial relations between Mr Trump and Mr Modi. President Trump's decision and threat to now impose a 50 per cent tariff by the end of August because of India's purchase of Russian oil has escalated a stand-off over trade and led to a spiral of news flow; the US will regret treating India this way, warns one piece; US-India relations are at their worst, bemoans another. The social media clarion has sounded—it is time to ditch American products and companies like McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon; although how exactly that will be done remains unclear. All this unfolding while a fresh deadline to this hefty tariff clocks down. So much has changed in nine months. India has for now been steely in its response; but both choices present hard outcomes. Global commodity data shows India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, which is about 37 per cent of its total imports. Since 2023, India has been the biggest market for Russian crude, and between the two largest buyers of Russian crude, India and China, it is India that is clearly more dependent. According to data and analytics company Kpler, India imported 89 million tonnes (seaborne crude) last year, which was more than China's import. Switching crude oil varieties and buyers is neither going to be easy nor practical for India's refineries, aside from the fact that it also threatens to ratchet up prices. Also Read | America's melting ice cube and other tariff fairy tales On the flip side, the collateral damage of a 50 per cent tariff slap will be large. There are a number of export-oriented industries that are already feeling jittery; textiles, for one, the gems and jewellery sector, another, where the US makes up 30 per cent of its exports. Many export-oriented industries are in fact also labour-intensive industries, and a hit to their fortunes will have a massive knock-on effect on jobs. The list of vulnerable companies includes the big gun, Reliance Industries, which signed a 10-year contract to buy nearly 5,00,000 barrels a day of crude from Russia's state-owned Rosneft, making it the biggest-ever energy agreement between the two nations. Reliance has been exporting its refined products to both Europe and North America. A breakdown in ties with Western countries will mean significant changes in its business and perhaps its profitability in the months to come. India's domestic advantage with a large consumer market has been pointed to, but whichever way you cut it, a tariff hike of this quantum will see economic damage and dented investor sentiment for the country. There are counter-arguments to the possibility of a grim reset in Indo-US ties. One, that this will be yet another flip-flop by the US President, where a resolution of some sort will be cobbled together before the end of August, which is the deadline set by him. Two, that the two countries are now intertwined across too human and financial capital strands; Indian tech firms have long been present in America's industry through its services and its engineers. Money now flows both ways through venture capital and significant equity market exposure. Ripping all that apart will take more than tariff sabre-rattling. All or some of this may prove to be true. But there are also two clear questions here that need to be reckoned with. India was used to being the 'pick me' candidate when it came to China, where there was tactical and strategic advantage in building strong relations with India to offset China's growing strength in the region. Many nations, the US included, are having a rethink about that approach. China is no longer taboo, and India is no longer the counterfoil to China's regional dominance. Worse yet is the distinct turn in relations between the US and India's other neighbour, Pakistan. What started with a rather embarrassing display of cornering credit, President Trump claimed he was the one to put a stop to an imminent war between India and Pakistan—a claim that has been consistently repeated while speaking on the subject. While Indian diplomatic channels frantically tried to belie that take, Pakistan not only concurred with the US President's statement, it went on to nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Relations between the US and Pakistan have been on the upswing since then, ranging from private lunches with Pakistan's top military brass and talks about potentially boosting trade and commercial ties. It has left the Indian government with egg on its face and a disgruntled domestic mood. India and Pakistan, to America's mind are now firmly re-hyphenated. Also Read | Modi's foreign policy in shreds as non-alignment becomes multi-alignment How did it all turn sour so quickly when the singular narrative so far has been Prime Minister Modi's outstanding personal equation with Trump—from walking out hand in hand to address a rally in Houston, Texas a few years ago, to what is now being termed the lowest point in Indo-US ties in many decades; the 'great friendship' has not yielded any joy on economic ties. Perhaps the first lesson then is when policies—foreign, national, or economic—are built around personalities rather than nations, egos tend to get in the way. Especially when there is a domestic fan base that has been cheering the 'strongman' approach to cater to. There is also a view that this could be the moment India dives into structural reforms. In other words, this will be the catalyst for the great reset. As we wait on that outcome to emerge, it gives rise to the second question: Was that not the plan with the 'Make in India' campaign launched a decade ago? What has gone so sorely wrong ten years into its launch, where is the performance audit on the promised nation-building initiatives, the manufacturing thrust, more jobs for more people? This present round of tariff threats and ultimatums could go in any direction. Frankly, it does not even matter. The economic ground is shifting beneath the feet of both leaders. Time to see who has feet of clay. Mitali Mukherjee is the Director of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. She is a political economy journalist with more than two decades of experience in TV, print and digital journalism. Mitali has co-founded two start-ups that focussed on civil society and financial literacy and her key areas of interest are gender and climate change.