ECGRA, Erie County invest nearly $1 million to address shortage of early childhood educators
ECGRA Executive Director Perry Wood said the grants ― the Early Childhood Educator Retention Awards ― serve to boost a vital sector in Erie County that's long been underfunded and understaffed.
'According to Start Strong PA, there are currently 93 unfilled early childhood educator positions in Erie County. If filled, these roles could serve 744 more children,' Wood said at a check presentation Thursday at St. Martin Early Learning Center.
'That's why these grants are so important. They represent a crucial step forward in supporting the dedicated professionals who care for and educate our young learners.'
The $991,785 in grants were funded by a $2.5 million investment of American Rescue Plan funds from Erie County government. ECGRA has also provided a $2.5 million match in gaming revenue for a collective $5 million child care investment.
'An investment in child care is an investment in workforce development ― that is economic development,' said Erie County Executive Brenton Davis. 'Without parents being able to become dual income families, we're unable to lift our community up the economic mobility ladder.'
Thursday's investment represents the first phase of a broader, multi-step initiative to strengthen Erie County's early learning infrastructure, according to ECGRA.
Kenya Johnson, owner of Learning Ladder Early Child Care, said the grants will have a 'real and meaningful' impact on her center, both in terms of retaining quality teachers and giving them some much-needed recognition.
'For many of them, this extra income will make a difference in their personal lives ― paying bills, putting gas in their car, covering groceries and that all matters,' she said. 'But beyond the money, it's the message that came with it. That message says: We see you, we appreciate you and we want to keep you here doing what you do best.'
Asha Graeb, director of the St. Martin Early Learning Center, added that early childhood educators often have limited support and resources despite the crucial role they play in a child's life.
'Our teachers work every day to create safe, nurturing environments where children can build confidence, spark curiosity and learn compassion,' she said.
A Child's World Daycare & Learning; $23,683
Annie's Bubble Care; $6,459
Barb's Care A Lot; $19,377
Barbs Family Learning Group Daycare LLC; $6,459
Boro Babies Child Care Center; $9,689
Bright Horizons at Erie; $29,066
Corry Alliance Childcare Learning Center; $8,074
Creative Learning Childcare – iRock; $35,525
Cuddle Time Daycare; $1,077
Dr Gertrude Barber Corry; $12,918
Dr Gertrude Barber Happy Hearts; $46,290
Eagles Nest Group Daycare; $6,459
Early Connections City Center; $16,148
Early Connections Harbor Homes Early Learning Center; $6,459
Early Connections North East; $6,459
Early Connections Union City; $23,683
Early Learning Center; $19,377
Early Learning University; $24,760
Eastside YMCA; $33,372
Elk Valley Elementary YMCA; $9,689
EPS Pennbriar Childcare LLC; $16,417
Erie First Early Education Center; $11,303
Fit Kids; $10,227
Glenwood YMCA; $17,224
Growing and Learning Center; $43,060
Handled with Care; $37,678
I Love It Daycare Learning Center; $15,071
Javonne Beason; $1,077
Jumpstart Early Learning Center LLC; $6,459
KinderCare 1279; $8,612
Learning Ladder; $18,301
Little Explorers Christian Academy; $5,378
Lollipop U Daycare; $8,612
McKean Elementary YMCA; $2,153
Milestones Early Learning Academy; $13,995
Milestones Early Learning Center; $21,530
Miss Julies Childcare; $11,842
Miss Rose's Learning Center; $8,612
Montessori in the Woods; $9,150
My Terra Village; $4,844
New Horizons Early Learning Center; $10,750
Northwestern YMCA; $8,612
Playway Loving Childcare Center LLC; $5,383
Saint Benedict Center; $52,749
Saint Vincent Child Care Center; $34,448
South Hills Child Development Center; $37,139
St. Martin Early Learning Center; $76,432
St. Paul's Child Development Center; $24,760
Summit YMCA; $6,459
Teresa Jordan; $6,000
The International Institute of Erie; $10,765
Tracy Heutsche; $4,844
Twinkle Time Child Care Center; $5,921
Waterford YMCA; $10,765
Wattsburg Elementary YMCA; $9,688
World of Care; $12,918
YMCA Camp Sherwin; $2,153
YMCA of Corry Daycare; $47,366
Young Environment; $20,992
A.J. Rao can be reached at arao@gannett.com. Follow him on X @ETNRao.
This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: 59 Erie County child care providers receive $1 million in grants
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cathie Wood Just Loaded Up on This Defense Stock (Hint: It's Not Palantir)
Key Points One of Cathie Wood's largest positions in the Ark portfolio is Palantir Technologies, which dominates the military intelligence pocket of the artificial intelligence (AI) realm. More recently, she has been building a stake in one of Palantir's key partners. As AI becomes a higher priority for military operations, traditional defense contractors could be positioned for long-term gains. 10 stocks we like better than L3Harris Technologies › CEO and chief investment officer of Ark Invest Cathie Wood earned a reputation for making high-conviction bets on disruptive, speculative opportunities aimed at toppling legacy incumbents in markets such as financial services, technology, and pharmaceuticals. When it comes to artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, it's no surprise that Wood has taken a liking to data analytics powerhouse Palantir Technologies, the third-largest holding across Ark's exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Every now and then, however, Wood quietly complements Ark's high-growth positions with a select group of blue-chip counterparts. In Palantir's case, the company is often linked with an emerging corner of the AI realm, using its analytics platforms to bolster the capabilities of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). While Palantir will likely remain a core Ark position, recent buying activity hints that Wood may be broadening her exposure within the national security arena, scouting for under-the-radar opportunities even as Palantir remains her flagship pick at the intersection of AI and military operations. Throughout the summer, Wood has been accumulating shares of L3Harris Technologies (NYSE: LHX) in both the ARK Space Exploration & Innovation and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics funds. Let's explore what may have prompted this move and assess if defense tech investors should consider looking beyond familiar names like Palantir. Understanding how AI fits into the defense equation While AI has become the dominant megatrend driving the technology sector, most conversations still center on chips, data centers, cloud infrastructure, or workplace productivity tools. Behind the scenes, however, AI is rapidly emerging as a transformative tailwind reshaping modern military strategy. AI's applications in national security range from satellite imagery analysis and equipment maintenance to cybersecurity threat detection and autonomous navigation for unmanned systems like drones. Among established defense contractors, the usual names include Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, RTX, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, and L3Harris. Palantir stands apart from these incumbents thanks to its versatile AI platforms, including Foundry and Gotham. This integrated ecosystem has positioned Palantir as the operating system supporting a wide range of military operations, securing billion-dollar contracts with the Army and Navy, and extending its reach overseas through collaborations with U.S. allies in NATO. Why might Cathie Wood like L3Harris stock? Like many of its peers mentioned above, L3Harris manufactures mission-critical systems poised to benefit from deeper integration of AI-enhanced capabilities. This makes it plausible that Wood is targeting stealth opportunities to complement Ark's more pure play AI holdings, such as Palantir. That same logic helps explain why several defense-adjacent companies such as electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft (eVTOL) Archer Aviation and Joby Aviation, Kratos, AeroVironment, and Lockheed found a place in Ark's portfolio. When it comes to L3Harris however, I think there is a more specific catalyst behind Wood's recent buying. While Palantir often commands the spotlight in the DOD's high-profile technology awards, many other contractors secure portions of these deals. L3Harris is one of them, partnering with Palantir to develop the Army's next-generation ground transportation systems under the Titan program. During the company's second-quarter earnings call, L3Harris CEO Christopher Kubasik even highlighted the collaboration, noting, "our ongoing partnership with Palantir on the U.S. Army's Titan program continues to mature". Is L3 Harris stock a buy? The comparable company analysis benchmarks L3Harris against a peer set of leading defense contractors on an enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) basis. From a valuation standpoint, L3Harris trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 16.4 -- a discount to historical peaks but still on the higher end of this cohort. Despite this relative premium, analysts largely view L3Harris through the lens of a conventional defense contractor, valuing the company based on its current contracts and pipeline. I think that the upside from AI integration is not yet fully reflected in L3Harris's share price. As AI-enabled services become a greater priority at the Pentagon, the narrative around traditional contractors could shift especially as they form deeper ties with leading technology platforms like Palantir -- as L3Harris is already doing. For this reason, I see L3Harris as well positioned for long-term valuation expansion and consider it a savvy buy at current levels. Should you invest $1,000 in L3Harris Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in L3Harris Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and L3Harris Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Adam Spatacco has positions in Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AeroVironment, L3Harris Technologies, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Lockheed Martin and RTX. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Cathie Wood Just Loaded Up on This Defense Stock (Hint: It's Not Palantir) was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Time Magazine
a day ago
- Time Magazine
Why So Many Childcare Centers Are Closing
For nearly 18 years, Corrine Hendrickson has run a family daycare out of her home in rural Wisconsin, navigating the low pay and long hours because she loves the job. But at the end of August, before a new school year begins, she's shutting down Corrine's Little Explorers for good. With the disappearance of federal and state subsidies that kept her afloat for the last few years, she says, the model no longer works, and she doesn't want to have to choose between raising rates or taking a pay cut. She's not alone: in Wisconsin, other childcare centers are closing ahead of the new school year. 'We're getting to an inflection point,' she says. 'I think enough of us are going to close that they're going to have to do something.' Across the country, childcare centers are struggling as they never have before. A perfect storm of rising costs, worker shortages, and the expiration of federal and state grants makes it extremely difficult for these businesses to operate. Childcare has long been in crisis. Overhead costs like buildings and liability insurance are expensive, and to take care of young kids, centers need a lot of staff, which means they have to spend a lot on payroll. But they also can't charge too much money, or families will drop out. 'Childcare is a textbook example of a broken market,' said Janet Yellen, back in 2021 when she was Secretary of the Treasury. Read More: Why So Many Women Are Quitting the Workforce But for all the struggles of childcare providers in recent years, the pandemic provided an unlikely source of hope. The American Rescue Plan included $24 billion for a Child Care Stabilization program that helped 220,000 centers keep paying wages, benefits, rent, utilities, and other costs. Another $15 billion went to help expand access to childcare. Some of that funding expired in Sept. 2023; the rest expired one year later. And while some states were able to move around federal funds or pass temporary legislation to financially support childcare facilities, that funding is expiring in much of the country. 'It was already a non-sustainable business model, and it got even worse,' says Julie Kashen, senior fellow and director for women's economic justice at the Century Foundation, a left-leaning think tank. 'The pandemic funding really helped prop it up, but ultimately turned into a bridge to nowhere.' Indeed, Corrine Hendrickson said she was actually most solvent during the pandemic; the federal funding even allowed her to hire an extra substitute employee. But, she says, she had been thinking of getting out of the childcare business leading up to the pandemic. She only makes a profit of $20,000 a year, which is an extremely low salary for all the work she does. When it became evident that neither the federal nor state government was going to continue to support childcare providers in Wisconsin, she says, she decided to close her business. The end of funding appears to be leading to many closures. North Carolina, for example, was able to stretch its federal pandemic dollars through June 2024. But after that, 43 centers across the state closed, according to Candace Witherspoon, director of the division of child development and early education in North Carolina. The state was able to release some stopgap funding that lasted through March 2025, but when that ended, even more programs closed. The state has seen 158 programs shutter since the beginning of the year, she says. Read More: 'People Are Going to Die': Cuts Leave Domestic Violence Support Groups Reeling The federal funding allowed many centers to raise pay from $11 an hour to $14, Witherspoon says, but even the higher rate is not enough to attract and retain workers when fast-food restaurants and other businesses pay considerably more. About half of childcare providers in the state aren't able to offer health insurance for their workers, and about 43% of childcare workers in the state are on some form of public assistance like Medicaid and food stamps. Yet demand for childcare is high. 'North Carolina is in crisis because many of our parents are being forced to leave the workforce' since they can't find care for their children, Witherspoon says. In North Carolina, there's only one infant and toddler spot for every five families applying for care. When childcare centers close or parents are unable to find a spot for their children, one parent—usually the mother—often drops out of the workforce to care for the kids. Between the second quarter of 2023 and the third quarter of 2024, the number of people who reduced their hours to part-time or who left the labor force altogether due to childcare rose 43%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. One analysis of the childcare stabilization funds dispersed during the pandemic found that they helped the mothers with young children stay in the workforce. About 26% of the money spent to stabilize childcare actually ended up back in the government's coffers through tax receipts. As federal and state dollars expire, the childcare business is getting even tougher. Inflation is driving up costs like rent and insurance. Labor is becoming more expensive, and providers are facing more competition from other businesses that can pay better. And roughly 20% of the childcare workforce is made up of immigrants, which means that the Trump Administration's deportation campaign is affecting some workers. One childcare provider in Seattle, for instance, was recently detained by ICE. Read More: Positive Economic Data Is Still Hiding Bleak Reality for Many Families The cost of childcare now exceeds the price of college tuition in 38 states and Washington, according to an analysis conducted by the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank. Meanwhile, the median wage in early care and education falls below 97% of other occupations, according to the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment at the University of California, Berkeley. The median wage is $13.07 an hour, but ranges from $10.60 in Louisiana to $18.23 in Washington, D.C. For many providers, raising prices is not an option. Already, prices have grown by 29% since 2020—faster than overall inflation, according to Child Care Aware, an advocacy group. 'If I raise tuition, will I lose too many families to stay afloat? If I don't raise tuition, will I be able to stay afloat?' says Meghann Carrasco, the founder and executive director of Seedlings to Sunflowers, a nonprofit childcare provider in Maine. The center used the pandemic funding to stay open for all but two months during the pandemic, and is now struggling because its Pre-K program is under-enrolled. The center raised prices 16% this year, the most it has ever raised tuition, and lost some families who couldn't afford it, Carrasco says. Even with the tuition increase, Seedlings to Sunflowers was only able to stay open because it embarked on a fundraising campaign in its community, securing $25,000 in interest-free loans and donations. 'The amount of programs closing daily is more than we've ever seen,' Carrasco says. Read More: Why So Many Seniors Can't Afford Long-Term Care Most providers say that without federal or state funding, they do not have a long-term future. Federal funding for childcare was close to becoming a reality in 2021, when the House passed a child care solution in the Build Back Better Act, but it was stripped from the next version of the bill, which became the Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats in Congress introduced a bill in April 2025 that would increase federal spending on childcare, but it's unlikely to go anywhere, especially in a political climate where some Republicans are backing policies that encourage more mothers to stay at home. For now, says Kashen of the Century Foundation, childcare providers have to hope that their states will help them survive. This creates a patchwork system where providers in certain states—often blue states—will stay open and educate more children, while others, in red states, will close or only stay open for people who can afford it. New Mexico, for instance, passed a constitutional amendment in 2022 guaranteeing the right to early childhood education. The state devoted a portion of money from oil and gas development fees to early care and education, amounting to about $150 million a year for early childhood education programs. Vermont passed Act 76 in 2023, which will fund childcare through a 0.44% payroll tax; Massachusetts added half a billion dollars in funding for childcare providers in 2024; and Connecticut passed a bill in 2025 that creates a new endowment for early childhood education. Most states, though, passed nothing at all.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves to raise ‘stealth and sin' taxes to cover black hole
Rachel Reeves is set to hit British consumers with extra 'sin taxes', leading forecasters have predicted, which are widely seen as regressive taxes that could hit people on lower income. The Chancellor faces having to raise £20bn in taxes at this year's Autumn Budget to restore her 'already paltry' margin of £9.9bn in headroom, according to Pantheon Macroenomics. Its UK economists Robert Wood and Elliott Jordan-Doak said the costs incurred from U-turns on welfare savings and lower tax receipts than expected could erode her fiscal buffer. They said Reeves could look to sin taxes, which could include adding levies on gambling and junk food, to rebuild her buffer while a 'stealth tax' by extending a freeze on income tax thresholds could help her fill an estimated £13bn fiscal hole. Axing the two child benefit cap, which would cost around £3.2bn, and a move to pull a rabbit out of the hat at the Budget could lead to higher costs for the government. With the backing of the progressive think tank Institute for Public Policy Research, Former Prime Minister and Chancellor Gordon Brown argued increasing levies on online casinos and slots machines to 50 per cent could get the Treasury enough to cover the costs of scrapping the cap. Regressive taxes Other 'sin' taxes beyond gambling may include higher duties on tobacco, alcohol or sugar, as well as junk food. The government has already moved to reduce sales of junk food by adding to red tape on supermarkets on healthy food standards. Charities and health groups including Diabetes UK and the World Cancer Research Fund have previously called for higher levies on soft drinks and salty food. Some duties rise with inflation but Rachel Reeves could move to raise taxes higher. The government has also opened consultations on proposals to end the exemption from sugar taxes on milk-based drinks, suggesting that milkshakes and lattes could be subject to higher taxes. The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), a free market think tank, has described sin taxes as regressive as they take a 'greater share of income from the poor than from the rich in all plausible scenarios'. Christopher Snowdon, head of lifestyle economics at the IEA, said: 'The sugar tax has been such a dramatic failure that it should be repealed, not expanded. 'It has been costing consumers £300 million a year while childhood obesity rates have continued to rise.' Tobacco companies have meanwhile argued that the existence of a tax gap worth £1.4bn between 2023 and 2024, which shows the difference between the tax paid to HMRC versus the tax that should be paid based on consumption, is evidence of a booming black market for cigarettes and tobacco. The alternative option for Rachel Reeves would be to adjust fiscal rules by bringing forward a rule, which is set to come in 2027, that allows her to have a forecast deficit of 0.5 per cent of GDP in day-to-day government spending, according to Pantheon Macroeconomics. This change could allow her to build £17bn in headroom but it could spook bond traders due to the impact of higher borrowing and her betrayal of 'non-negotiable' rules. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
