Students drop claim of Israeli genocide in Gaza
The 2,000-word motion, which expresses solidarity with Palestinians amid the Israel-Hamas war, was withdrawn earlier this week.
It was lodged with the university's student union (UMSU) by a student from the university's Friends of Palestine group several months ago.
The motion accuses Israel 'in its entirety' of being 'an apartheid settler-colonial state committing ongoing genocide against Palestinians' and recognises that 'as an occupied nation, the people of Palestine have the right to armed resistance under international law.'
It also urged full support for the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) movement against Israel.
In addition, the motion argues that a two-state solution has become 'impossible' due to the 'continued expansion of Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine' and advocates for a 'single, free, multi-faith Palestinian state'.
Manchester University's Friends of Israel Society was outraged by the motion and wrote to the UMSU, setting out why the proposal and the procedure for considering it were unlawful. It said the statement contained ' false and one-sided allegations '.
In March, a debate took place, and Jewish students put forward nine amendments to the motion, but these were rejected.
These included one that would have recognised Hamas as a terrorist organisation and another calling on Hamas to release the remaining hostages it still holds captive. A third urged the student union to refrain from 'glorifying' violence against Israeli civilians.
Jewish students held a silent protest outside the building where the meeting took place, holding pictures of Ariel and Kfir Bibas, who were held hostage in Gaza by Hamas.
Commenting on the motion being withdrawn, Jonathan Turner, chief executive of UK Lawyers for Israel (UKFLI), who worked with the Friends of Israel Society on getting the motion dropped, said: 'We are very pleased with this outcome, which clearly results from drawing attention to the student union's legal obligations.
'Student unions must conduct political debates fairly, must not discriminate against Jewish or Israeli students, and must not engage in political campaigns outside their charitable objects.
'We congratulate Naomi Brookarsh, president of the Israel Society at Manchester University, on her work resisting this attempt to misuse the student union to intimidate Jewish students and other students who support Israel.'
A spokesman for Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), who also wrote to the union and university to express concerns, told The Telegraph: 'Manchester University Students' Union disregarded the concerns of Jewish students and regulations for charities when it tried to advance this reckless and divisive motion.
'Whether or not it is meant as such here, the phrase 'armed resistance' is commonly used in this context as a euphemism for terrorism and the destruction of the Jewish state.
'At a minimum, this motion aspired to deprive the Jewish people of their right to self-determination.
'These motions do nothing to change things in the Middle East but contribute to the ostracisation of Jewish students on campus.
'This motion never should have been even drafted, let alone put forward. Jewish students have the same right to feel safe on their campus as any other group.
'We wrote to the students' union and are pleased to see that the motion has been withdrawn, even if there was no remorse in the withdrawal statement.
'We will continue to tackle extremism and antisemitism on university campuses wherever we find it.'
In a statement, the UMSU apologised for the length of time it took to consider the motion and said: 'We will be reviewing our democratic processes as a result.'
It added: 'We stand in full solidarity with the Palestinian resistance to ongoing genocide in Gaza.
'The double standards held over colonised people compared to those doing the colonising are absurd.
'Those in support of Palestinian liberation are required to constantly qualify their support of basic human rights, whilst Israel continues its extermination, starvation and 'conquest' of Palestinians undeterred.'
It went on to criticise charity law, which it said prevented students' unions from taking 'principled positions and resourcing campaigns on the most pressing issues of our day'.
In a statement issued previously, the University of Manchester said it considered 'aspects of this motion to be wholly unacceptable'.
It added that it had raised 'serious concerns with the students' union regarding its wording, particularly where it risks undermining the principles of equality, safety, and wellbeing.'
The University of Manchester has been approached for further comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
DWP launches independent review into Post Office staff prosecutions
The Department for Work and Pensions is launching an independent review into its handling of prosecutions against Post Office staff. There were around 100 prosecutions by the DWP between 2001 and 2006, during the Horizon IT scandal. The decision to review the work on the cases comes after it was revealed the Post Office investigation team shared information with the DWP. The investigation will look at the period of time covered by the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act 2024, from 1996 to 2018. This was the legislation that effectively gave a blanket exoneration to Post Office staff convicted in that time, but it did not include DWP-related convictions. It was uncovered that the DWP and Post Office had conducted joint investigations during the scandal by Sky News last May. Responding to the findings at the time, lawyer and then-chair of the Justice Select Committee, Sir Robert Neill KC said the DWP convictions need to be 'looked at'. "I think that's the area they need to look at if we are saying their approach was tainted from the beginning - in the way the investigators adopted things - then joint operations I suspect would be just as tainted arguably as something where it has been the Post Office on its own." A DWP spokesperson said: 'We have committed to commissioning an independent assurance review where Post Office members of staff were prosecuted by the Department for welfare-related fraud. 'These cases involved complex investigations and were backed by evidence including filmed surveillance, stolen benefit books and witness statements – to date, no documentation has been identified showing that Horizon data was essential to these prosecutions.' Lawyer Neil Hudgell, who represented several victims of the Post Office scandal, said the review was 'wholly inadequate', adding that the DWP "should not be marking its own homework.' "Any involvement in the process of appointing reviewers undermines all confidence in the independence of the process," he said. The Horizon IT scandal saw approximately 1,000 individuals wrongfully prosecuted and convicted. Around £1 billion has been paid to victims so far according to the Department for Business and Trade, after a legal act which came into effect on 25 January 2024 authorised automatic compensation. The inquiry into the scandal is still ongoing, having published the first volume of its final report in July.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Diane Abbott: I told Corbyn not to set up Left-wing party
Diane Abbott advised Jeremy Corbyn against setting up a new Left-wing party, it has been claimed. Ms Abbott, a close ally of the former Labour leader, said she had warned that the party had little prospect of success under the first-past-the-post system when the pair spoke before its launch. The 71-year-old did not rule out joining the new party, formed by ex-Labour independent MPs Mr Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, but strongly suggested she would be staying put as an independent MP. She told an event at the Edinburgh Book Festival: 'There were people around Jeremy encouraging him to set up a new party, and I told him not to. 'It's very difficult under first-past-the-post system for a new party to absolutely win. 'If it wasn't first-past-the-post, then you can see how a new party could come through, but I understand why he did it.' The new grouping, widely known as Your Party, was launched last month in July but lacks a formal name, although Ms Sultana favours the name 'The Left' or 'The Left Party' for the organisation, as 'it says what it is on the tin'. Ms Abbott said: 'At this point in time, it's difficult to see how a brand new party wins. 'However, I think Jeremy's party is going to do a lot better than people think because a lot of people who are not necessarily terribly Left-wing people, are a tiny bit disappointed about the way we've gone in the past year.' The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington had the Labour whip withdrawn for the second time in two years in July after she was accused of expressing a lack of regret over a letter to The Observer in 2023 in which she suggested that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. Ms Abbott, who served as Mr Corbyn's shadow home secretary, has been a fierce critic of the Government since Labour took power last July. Speaking to campaigner Talat Yaqoob at the festival to promote her book A Woman Like Me, Ms Abbott said: 'It's a tricky state of play. I wouldn't have thought that you'd have a Labour government and they'd be cutting winter fuel allowance for the elderly and benefits for the disabled.' She was also critical of the decision to proscribe Palestine Action, branding it 'a complete disgrace'. The MP told the audience of her anger at not being called by Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle in the aftermath of allegedly racist comments made by Frank Hester, the Conservative Party donor, in 2024. She claimed she had stood during Prime Minister's Questions more than 40 times to be called to speak, after Sir Keir Starmer, Rishi Sunak and Sir Ed Davey had all spoken about the incident. Mr Hester was reported to have said Ms Abbott made him want to 'hate all black women' and that she 'should be shot'. She said Sir Keir had approached her after the session and asked what he could do to help. Ms Abbott claimed she suggested that he restore the Labour whip but said her proposal went nowhere. She recalled: 'I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip'. And as if he hadn't heard, he said, 'Is there anything I can do for you?' It was like he was deaf. And I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip', and he realised I wasn't going to play that game and he went off.'
BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Israel will begin ceasefire negotiations, Netanyahu says
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he has instructed negotiations to begin for the release of all remaining hostages and an end to the war in Gaza on terms "acceptable to Israel".Netanyahu told Israeli troops on Thursday night that his cabinet had also approved plans for a massive assault on Gaza City in the north of the territory, despite widespread international and domestic opposition. Hamas agreed to a proposal drawn up by Qatari and Egyptian mediators for a 60-day ceasefire on Monday, which according to Qatar would see the release of half of the remaining hostages in responding for the first time, Netanyahu has not accepted the deal currently on the table. In a video statement during a visit with the Gaza division's headquarters in Israel on Thursday night, Netanyahu said he had "instructed to immediately begin negotiations for the release of all our hostages"."I have come to approve the IDF's (Israel Defense Forces) plans to take control of Gaza City and defeat Hamas," he said."These two matters - defeating Hamas and releasing all our hostages - go hand in hand," Netanyahu added, without providing details about what the next stage of talks would officials have this week been voicing opposition to a ceasefire deal that would only involve the partial release of believes that only 20 of the 50 hostages are still alive after 22 months of Thursday, Israel's military said it had warned medical officials and international organisations to prepare for the planned evacuation of Gaza City's one million residents ahead of an offensive to occupy it.
