In Photos: See The Stunning ‘Space Rainbows' Captured By NASA
There are no rainbows in space, but the next best thing has been snapped by a new NASA spacecraft now orbiting Earth while testing its cameras.
The spacecraft, called PUNCH (Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere), is about to begin investigating how the sun's outer corona — by far the hottest part of our star's atmosphere — becomes the solar wind that causes the Northern Lights.
The PUNCH mission blasted off on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on March 11, 2025. Also in the rocket's fairing was NASA's SPHEREx (Spectro-Photometer for the History of the Universe, Epoch of Reionization and Ices Explorer) observatory.
PUNCH isn't a single spacecraft. It comprises four small satellites that together create a single 'virtual instrument' that spans the whole PUNCH constellation. The aim is to make 3D observations of the sun's corona for at least two years.
It's hoped that by doing so, scientists will better be able to figure out how the sun's corona becomes the solar wind and so more accurately predict space weather. That's crucial because solar wind can greatly affect satellites and robotic explorers in space.
Captured on April 16, 2025, this is the first image taken by PUNCH's WFI-1 instrument. The ... More instrument's wide field of view reveals the glow of zodiacal light stretching up and to the right. The V shape of the Hyades star cluster appears near the top, with the more compact Pleiades star cluster to the lower right.
A rainbow is an optical illusion created by sunlight refracting and being reflected inside droplets of liquid in an atmosphere. That's not going to happen in space. PUNCH's 'space rainbows' are unique images of what astronomers call the zodiacal light, a triangular beam of light that can be seen on the horizon a few hours before sunrise or after sunset as the false dawn or false dusk.
PUNCH's stunning polarimetric triplet images are a combination of three images (red, green and blue) of sunlight being reflected by space dust. They were created during imaging tests of three polarizers on PUNCH on April 18, 2025, with the light colorized based on its angle (polarization).
For a few weeks in late September and October, a triangular beam of light appears on the eastern horizon a few hours before sunrise before gently fading. This is the "false dawn." In March and April, the opposite happens as a triangular beam of light appears on the western horizon a few hours after sunset — the "false dusk."
So-called zodiacal light — literally "light from the circle of animals" — is the glow of the solar system. Reflected sunlight from interplanetary dust around the sun between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter radiates across the (visible) optical spectrum and beyond.
Depictions of two kinds of dust in space: At left the pyramid-shaped glow of Zodiacal Light caused ... More by sunlight reflecting off interplanetary dust in the inner solar system from comets and meteoroids, while at right is the band of the bright Milky Way, made of stars in our galaxy. (Photo by: VW Pics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
It's called the zodiacal light because it appears above where the sun has just set/is about to rise, so along the ecliptic — the path of the sun through the daytime sky. This is the plane of the solar system, and it's where you'll find the belt of constellations across the night sky that the sun moves through in a calendar year — hence star signs. The 12 'signs' of the zodiac are all officially recognized astronomical constellations: Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius and Pisces. There's also a thirteenth, Ophiuchus, a huge constellation that the sun also passes through.
Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
25 minutes ago
- Medscape
Diverticular Disease Demystified: Myths, Risks & Modern Care
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hello. I'm Dr David Johnson, professor of medicine and chief of gastroenterology at Eastern Virginia Medical School and Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. Welcome back to GI Common Concerns . Diverticulosis and diverticulitis are both incredibly common conditions. It's estimated that over 70% of people aged 80 or older who undergo colonoscopy will have diverticulosis. Approximately 4% of those will develop diverticulitis in their lifetime, and roughly 15% of those cases will be complicated disease. Patients frequently ask what they can do to prevent diverticulitis or its recurrence, and the evidence to inform such conversations has evolved in recent years. This video provides an update on where we are presently. Rethinking Dietary Causes We've long emphasized diet in the management of diverticulosis and diverticulitis, and we considered it axiomatic that patients need to avoid corn, nuts, and seeds. However, a 2008 prospective cohort study in men challenged that approach, observing no association between consuming those dietary components and the risk of developing diverticulosis or diverticular complications. Although that study was performed exclusively in men, the lifetime risk for diverticulitis is actually higher in women, at approximately 5% vs 3.1%, respectively. A recent prospective analysis published in Annals of Internal Medicine from researchers at University of North Carolina adds important insights. It used validated dietary questionnaires in a large cohort of women [who had a sister with breast cancer but did not have breast cancer themselves at enrollment]. This allowed investigators to determine incident cases of diverticulitis over time, without the risk of recall bias. Researchers identified more than 1500 incident cases of diverticulitis for nearly 415,000 patient years of follow-up. They reported no association between a primary diagnosis of diverticulitis and consumption of corn, nuts, or seeds, including fresh fruits with seeds. Similarly, there was no link between those foods and the development of complicated diverticulitis resulting in abscess surgery or fistula. Collectively, these findings indicate that our patients do not necessarily need to avoid these foods. Instead, we can advise them to adopt an anti-inflammatory diet, such as the Mediterranean diet, which this recent study in women indicated had risk-reduction benefits. My own patients find these diets very easy to follow and quite practical. Modifiable Risk Factors for Recurrence The recurrence rate for diverticulitis is notably high. Within the first year after complete recovery, 8% of patients have an episode of recurrence, and approximately 20% within 10 years. The risk increases with subsequent episodes. After a second episode, it rises to 18% at 1 year and 50% at 10 years. After a third episode, the risk for recurrence is 40% at 3 years. Therefore, it's important to identify for our patients anything they can prospectively and proactively do to prevent a recurrent episode. There are several commonsense risk factors our patients should avoid. Smoking reduction or abstinence has proven benefits. Alcoholism, but not alcohol in and of itself, is associated with a higher risk. Chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is a known risk factor. Guidelines recommend the avoidance of regular NSAID use, although aspirin should be continued when justified for cardiac indications. Weight reduction, particularly among those with truncal obesity, seems to reduce the risk for diverticulitis. Vigorous physical activity also has an inverse, beneficial relationship for diverticulitis. Identifying all these approaches is a good, simple way to help patients going forward. Symptoms, Scans, and Supplementation The guidelines are shifting around the rush to use antibiotics for episodes of recurrence. For uncomplicated diverticulitis, antibiotics don't seem to do better than not using antibiotics. In general, we have shifted toward advising that patients adopt a clear liquid diet, avoid antibiotics, and inform us if they experience any alarm features, particularly fever or worsening pain. Exceptions to the recommendations to avoid antibiotics are made for patients who are frail, have multiple comorbidities, are immunocompromised, or have laboratory findings of severe inflammation, including C-reactive protein > 140 mg/L or a white blood count > 15,000. In such patients, antibiotics are still indicated right away. The extent of diverticulitis involvement on a CT scan would also be an indication for antibiotics. However, we don't want to rush to recommend a CT scan in all patients. This reflects our increasing awareness of the radiogenic risk of CT scans and abdominal CT scans, which I discussed in a recent video. CT scans are really overutilized, and we potentially need to take a step back in when we use them. Vitamin D status is another important factor, which I touched on in a recent article. Low vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk for diverticulitis. I routinely check the vitamin D levels in my patients and generally recommend vitamin D supplementation, given its very low risk and potential prophylactic value in patients with a history of diverticulitis. Genetic Predisposition There's a strong genetic predisposition for diverticulitis, which we often overlook in our discussions with patients. Over 30 genetic loci have been associated with diverticulosis, and at least four seem to be associated with diverticulitis. This is key when considering patients with a family history of diverticulitis, including their siblings. In monozygotic twins, the risk is higher than in dizygotic twins, accounting for about 50% of the recurrence risk for diverticulitis. We need to be proactive when asking about family history in order to identify patients who are at greater risk for disease development or recurrence. Lastly, I always tell my patients that intermittent, lingering symptoms, such as cramping, are quite common. About 45% of patients experience intermittent symptoms after recovery, which is mostly attributable to visceral hypersensitivity. There may also be a microbiome-related explanation for motility-related muscular changes related to diverticular disease. We can assure patients that they don't need to be alarmed by such symptoms, nor must they seek out immediate help from their healthcare provider. These symptoms are different from the acute and persistent worsening pain typified for diverticulitis. Instead, we can consider treating them with antispasmodics or low-dose antidepressants to manage their symptoms. I hope this overview gives you practical, evidence-based tools for discussing the management of diverticular disease with your patients. These conversations can be a lot more meaningful when supported by the latest data, allowing us all to do a better job. I'm Dr David Johnson. Thanks for listening, and I look forward to chatting with you again soon.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Free AI-powered summer camp helps Arizona kids catch up in class—and have fun doing it
A group of Arizona educators is trying something different to help Arizona students become more confident learners with the use of artificial intelligence and teachers in the classroom.
Scientific American
an hour ago
- Scientific American
7 Big Mysteries about Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS
Earlier this month astronomers were thrilled to discover only the third known interstellar object ever seen in our solar system. Now dubbed 3I/ATLAS, the suspected comet has just zoomed past the orbit of Jupiter, traveling so fast that it's bound to slip through our sun's gravitational grip. The high speed and hyperbolic trajectory of 3I/ATLAS means it must have come from another star and was cast adrift in the Milky Way by some unknown process before it eventually, by chance, briefly swooped by our sun. It will reach about the orbit of Mars before it boomerangs back toward interstellar space, never to be seen again, at the end of this year. That's why astronomers have been racing to study 3I/ATLAS since July 1, when Larry Denneau of the University of Hawaii first spied it using a telescope in Chile that's part of the globe-spanning Asteroid Terrestrial-Impact Last Alert System (ATLAS). Soon more powerful observatories, including the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and Hubble Space Telescope, will scrutinize the object—which, thanks to its alien, interstellar provenance may be the oldest comet anyone has ever seen. 'I didn't get any sleep for like 35 hours,' says Bryce Bolin of Eureka Scientific in California, who rushed to release a preprint paper and arrange additional observations following 3I/ATLAS's discovery. 'It ruined my weekend.' On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Stefanie Milam of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center is part of a group that had reserved time on JWST to observe an interstellar object—if the researchers were fortunate enough for one to be discovered. But the group's luck was tested when it couldn't reach the lead of its program—Martin Cordiner, also at Goddard—to kick the observations into action. 'He was hiking in Maine when the object was discovered, and we could not reach him—he was completely off the grid,' Milam says. 'When he finally got back, his phone just blew up. I said, 'You're never allowed to go on vacation again!'' So why exactly are astronomers so eager to observe this object, and what do they hope to learn? Where did 3I/ATLAS come from? The first major question to answer about 3I/ATLAS is its origin. Tracing it back to an individual star is likely impossible, given the mixing of myriad stars in their orbits around our galaxy across billions of years. But we might be able to work out roughly the region it came from. One team of astronomers has already begun doing just that, using the high velocity of the object with respect to our sun—60 kilometers (37 miles) a second—to argue that it might have come from the vicinity of our galaxy's thick disk. This is a puffy torus of older stars moving at high velocities above and below the main flat plane of the Milky Way—which is where our sun serenely orbits. A thick-disk origin might mean that 3I/ATLAS is extremely ancient, more than eight billion years old. 'It's from a star that's potentially not even there anymore,' says Michele Bannister of the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, a co-author on the work. Aster Taylor of the University of Michigan performed a different age analysis based on the trajectory of 3I/ATLAS and suggests the object is 11 billion to three billion years old. 'We get similar answers,' Taylor says. Such estimates might soon be revised if subsequent observations can show just how much space weathering the object has endured during its interstellar sojourn. How big is it? Currently, 3I/ATLAS is inside the orbit of Jupiter and approaching the orbit of Mars, which it will cross in October, passing about 0.2 astronomical unit (one fifth the Earth-sun distance) from the Red Planet. Although early observations have led astronomers to categorize 3I/ATLAS as a comet, at the moment, it's not behaving exactly like one. The object doesn't display a large tail or enveloping coma of cast-off gas, only a hint of dust—but that is expected to change soon. As it traverses the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter and basks in the sun's radiance, its surface should warm enough to sublimate ice, venting sufficient material to form a large coma and perhaps a prominent tail. A substantial coma would be like a curtain drawn over astronomers' eyes, obscuring their view of the object and complicating efforts to gauge its dimensions. Before that happens, a team led by David Jewitt at the University of California, Los Angeles, is hoping to pin down its size with Hubble in August. (Other telescopes might be able to determine the size of 3I/ATLAS, too.) Initial estimates suggested 3I/ATLAS might be up 20 kilometers (12 miles) across—very big for a comet—but most astronomers now think it is much smaller. 'It's probably somewhere in the range of one or two kilometers,' says John Noonan at Auburn University in Alabama. That would be somewhat comparable in size to our first two interstellar visitors: 1I/ʻOumuamua, which was discovered in 2017 and was up to about 400 meters (0.25 mile) long, and 2I/Borisov, which was found in 2019 and was about one kilometer (0.6 mile) wide. If 3I/ATLAS turns out to be much bigger, 10 kilometers (six miles) or more, this would pose problems for preexisting estimates of many big interstellar objects reside in the galaxy. 'It's statistically extremely unlikely we should ever see something that size,' Noonan says. 'Theorists don't like that. But as an observer, I would love to see a really weird, big object.' How fast is it spinning? As well as its size, one of the key properties astronomers want to know about 3I/ATLAS is its rotation rate—something they might discern by watching the object's changing brightness as it spins. The spin of 3I/ATLAS could carry clues as to how the object was ejected from its home star in the first place. 'Certain ways of kicking these objects out tend to make them spin up,' Taylor says. A close pass of a gas giant planet, for instance, could easily set the object twirling while hurling it away from its home star. Conversely, a slow rotation period would suggest the object experienced a more gentle ejection. 'You could do this when stars die,' Taylor says. 'They lose a lot of mass, and so the gravitational force on objects at the outer edge of their system goes away. Those objects become unbound and just flow out into the galaxy.' The rotation period can also tell us more about the shape of 3I/ATLAS—a steady rotation suggests a fairly spherical form, whereas a fluctuating rotation speed might suggest a 'wonky shape,' Taylor says, like that of 'Oumuamua, which was estimated to be cigar- or pancake-shaped. What is 3I/ATLAS made of? If 3I/ATLAS really is an ancient cometary castaway that has been drifting through the galaxy for eons, it might be full of ice that has never been heated by a star. If so, then as it gets closer, the object might suddenly erupt into activity. While that could be bad news for measuring its size, it would aid efforts to determine 3I/ATLAS's chemical composition. JWST and Hubble would be best suited for the task of picking apart the different species of molecules that might erupt from 3I/ATLAS. Unfortunately, however, in October, when the object will be at its warmest, closest point to our star (called perihelion), Earth will be on the other side of the sun. This will make observations from our planet almost impossible. In November, post-perihelion, Noonan will use Hubble to study 3I/ATLAS and its emissions, looking for signs of substances such as hydroxide and hydrogen that can help clarify its composition. If the object is several billion years old, as predicted, then it might be rich in water because of the suspected formation environment around older stars. 'You would expect a lot of hydrogen coming from these water-rich irradiated objects, if this is really as old as [thought],' Noonan says. Milam and her colleagues, meanwhile, will use JWST in August and December to observe 3I/ATLAS before and after perihelion. Thanks to its keen infrared vision, JWST is better suited for teasing out the presence of molecules such as water, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and ammonia. 'We can really home in and see what this thing looks like,' she says. 'Borisov had a pretty boring chemistry, but it wasn't like any object in our solar system—there was hardly any water at all but a lot of carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide. With JWST, we're hoping to see a lot of carbon dioxide [on 3I/ATLAS], maybe even water, if it's as pristine as people are projecting.' Although the overall view from Earth degrades as the object approaches perihelion, some telescopes will be less visually impaired. Those operated by the Lowell Observatory in Arizona, for instance, are primed to observe 3I/ATLAS at dawn and dusk, when the sun is below the horizon. This will allow for studies even when the object will be close to our star from our planet-bound perspective. 'The Lowell Discovery Telescope is really well suited to observations close to the horizon,' says Nick Moskowitz, an astronomer at Lowell Observatory. 'We will be able to track it closer in to perihelion than other facilities.' An unlikely additional capability will be at Mars, where spacecraft such as NASA's Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) orbiter may be able to see 3I/ATLAS as it passes about 30 million kilometers (19 million miles) from the planet. 'It'll be pretty large and apparent in the sky,' Noonan says, providing the object kicks into activity as hoped. 'They'll be able to see the coma,' giving us an insight into 3I/ATLAS's activity near the sun that would otherwise be impossible to see from Earth. Will it survive? A big unknown about 3I/ATLAS is whether it will actually survive its close encounter with our sun. While 'Oumuamua did so, Comet Borisov was not so fortunate, with the object appearing to split and break apart on its way out of our solar system. The same fate could befall 3I/ATLAS. 'Borisov fragmented, which is pretty usual for comets,' Bannister says. All eyes will be on our latest visitor to see if the same thing happens again. An additional quirk of 3I/ATLAS's survivability is the impact of solar wind, which may snip away any cometary tail as it is ejected. By chance, the object is entering our solar system at quite a shallow angle, much flatter than that of most comets, which means it will experience stronger solar headwinds. Sarah Watson of the University of Reading in England and her colleagues are using this quirk to study how the solar wind traverses into the outer solar system. 'We can potentially calculate the speed of the solar wind,' she says, by noticing the impact of the solar wind on the purported comet's tail, if one materializes. Could we reach it? No spacecraft will be able to reach 3I/ATLAS. It is moving too fast and is too far from Earth for us to consider launching something in time. Yet an upcoming European Space Agency (ESA) mission called Comet Interceptor, set to launch in 2029, might attempt to visit another interstellar object, if we find one within its reach. The spacecraft will be positioned past the moon's orbit away from the sun and, if a suitable target is found, will be commanded to fire its engines and try and intercept the incoming alien object. If no suitable interstellar object is found, Comet Interceptor will instead be sent to one of several intriguing comets of our solar system. 'It is possible we could get an interstellar object, but we have to be really lucky,' says Colin Snodgrass, an astronomer at the University of Edinburgh, who is deputy lead on the mission. How many are there? One of our biggest outstanding questions about interstellar objects concerns their unknown abundance. The object 3I/ATLAS is our third interstellar visitor in eight years—a real but weak hint of how many are out there, waiting to be found. Predictions estimate there are trillions upon trillions of interstellar objects drifting around our galaxy, and perhaps one in our solar system at any given time—but they're typically just so faint that they're unlikely to be found by most telescopes. This is expected to change when a new telescope called the Vera C. Rubin Observatory begins a 10-year survey of the sky later this year. Rubin is expected to see somewhere between six and 51 interstellar objects in its 10-year survey. Seeing such a population will tell us 'how unique, or varied, planetesimal formation is across different parts of the galaxy,' Bannister says, referring to kilometer-scale objects thought to coalesce around newborn stars that become the feedstock for planets—and, when kicked to a system's hinterlands, become a reservoir of comets. One puzzling question is why we haven't seen much smaller interstellar objects, Moskowitz says. If smaller objects are more plentiful than larger objects, as scientists expect, then we should have seen some small interstellar objects entering our atmosphere, appearing as meteors streaking across Earth's skies at speeds and trajectories that clearly convey their interstellar origins. Detections of such objects have been claimed, but the evidence behind them has failed to convince most experts. The apparent absence of small interstellar interlopers 'is telling us something, but we don't know what that is yet,' Moskowitz says. 'I think that's going to be one of the major questions: Why are we seeing these big cometlike things coming through the solar system, but we're not seeing things that are smaller? It may have to do with the survivability of stuff out there in the galaxy, but we need more data.'
