Appeals Court Declines to Lift Restrictions on DOGE's Access to Social Security Information
A federal appeals court on April 30 said it would not lift the restrictions on the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing unredacted Social Security data of millions of Americans.
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' full panel of judges voted 9-6 to keep U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander's previous
On April 17, Hollander's order
Hollander
'For some 90 years, SSA has been guided by the foundational principle of an expectation of privacy with respect to its records. This case exposes a wide fissure in the foundation,' she wrote.
Hollander concluded that the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the other enjoining plaintiffs are likely to prevail in their claims that the SSA giving DOGE access to unredacted data was not only arbitrary and capricious, but also in violation of federal laws.
Related Stories
4/3/2025
4/29/2025
'And, plaintiffs have demonstrated that their members will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a preliminary injunction, the equities tip in their favor, and the preliminary injunction serves the public interest,' she wrote.
The order did not block DOGE from accessing redacted Social Security data stripped of personally identifiable information, as long as the staffers who view it undergo training and background checks.
Additionally, DOGE must remove any unredacted or non-anonymized data it has already obtained and cannot make changes to SSA computer code, Hollander ordered.
Attorneys for DOGE had argued that working to anonymize data would be too burdensome and could obstruct the Trump administration's efforts to root out fraud in the agency.
On April 30, Appellate Judge Robert B. King—writing for the majority—said that DOGE wants 'immediate and unfettered access to all' Social Security records, including 'the highly sensitive personal information of essentially everyone in our Country,' such as mental health and medical records for disability recipients, and bank information.
'All this highly sensitive information has long been handed over to SSA by the American people with every reason to believe that the information would be fiercely protected,' King wrote.
Writing for those who voted against the majority ruling, Appellate Judge Julius Richardson said a smaller three-judge group should have handled the case, instead of the 4th Circuit's full panel of judges. Additionally, he said the plaintiffs have failed to prove that DOGE has actually looked at their unredacted personal information, but are rather upset by the possibility of 'abstract harm.'
Zachary Stieber contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Indianapolis homebuyers gain the upper hand
Homebuyers hold an edge in Indianapolis and across the nation — so long as you can cover the bigger tab. The big picture: There are nearly 500,000 more sellers than buyers in the U.S. housing market, Redfin estimates based on April figures. Why it matters: That's the widest gap on record — and a big reversal from just a few years ago, when buyers were desperate to find a place to live, sending prices into the stratosphere, Axios' Emily Peck and Sami Sparber report. By the numbers: There are 33.7% more sellers than buyers nationally. At no other point since Redfin began tracking in 2013 have sellers outnumbered buyers by such a large percentage. A year ago, sellers outnumbered buyers by 6.5%, and two years ago, buyers outnumbered sellers. Zoom in: The Indy metro had nearly 1,500 more sellers than buyers, a 21% difference, signaling a home buyer's market. Indianapolis also ranks fifth overall when tracking metros with the biggest year-over-year increases in pending home sales. Context: Redfin counted sellers as the number of active listings in a given area and created a model to estimate the total buyers. Where it stands: The one-two punch of still-soaring home prices and mortgage rates is making it hard for buyers, especially first-timers, to find a place they can afford despite the shift. Add to that the extreme economic uncertainty of 2025. Tariff news, layoff fears and, for many federal workers, layoff realities, are tamping down buyer demand. Yes, but: For home sellers "the mortgage rate lock-in effect is easing," per Redfin. "For most people, it's not realistic to stay put forever; job changes, return-to-office mandates and divorce force people to move." Elevated mortgage rates are becoming the norm. "The idea of taking on a higher mortgage rate also isn't as shocking as it was when rates first skyrocketed in 2022." Between the lines: Buying a home remains out of reach for most Americans, as the National Association of Realtors pointed out in a recent report. The median home price sold in the U.S. in the first three months of this year was $417,000, per federal data — 33% more than during the same period in 2019, before the housing market went haywire, outpacing inflation and incomes. Indy's median home sale price was $255,000 as of April per Redfin, a 4.9% increase when compared to the previous year. The household income required to afford a median home in the Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson metro has also increased nearly 4% since last year. What to watch: Historically, when sellers outnumber buyers, prices drop. And in some markets, listings have already started falling. Redfin believes prices will dip 1% by the end of the year (not exactly a huge discount, to be sure). The bottom line: "The balance of power in the U.S. housing market has shifted toward buyers, but a lot of sellers have yet to see or accept the writing on the wall," said Redfin senior economist Asad Khan in the report.
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Popular Stephen Starr restaurants boycotted by Democrats
Top Democrats in the House and Senate are boycotting hot Washington, D.C. restaurants that include those owned by famed Philadelphia restaurateur Stephen Starr over labor disputes. Why it matters: The targeted restaurants in Starr's empire include some of the buzziest spots for Democratic fundraisers. Driving the news: More than 50 House and Senate Democrats have signed onto Unite Here Local 25's pledge to avoid six D.C. venues. Zoom in: Starr, who is a Democratic donor, is facing boycotts of his Le Diplomate, Osteria Mozza and The Occidental. The other three boycotted restaurants are founded by chef Ashok Bajaj of Knightsbridge Restaurant Group. The list: Among the signers are some of Democrats' top fundraisers and biggest names, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) are also on the list. Meanwhile, Philly Reps. Brendan Boyle, Dwight Evans and Mary Gay Scanlon signed the boycott list, per Unite Here's website. U.S. Sen. John Fetterman and Philly-regional Rep. Madeleine Dean were not on the pledge list as of Friday. Between the lines: Political groups and candidates have spent thousands of dollars at those spots over the past year, federal campaign records show. Former President Obama and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos made headlines when they dined at Osteria Mozza in January. Then-President Biden was a repeat customer at Le Diplomate during his presidency. What they're saying: Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told Axios: "We can have big policy debates, but we also have to show the American people some concrete examples." He added: "This is our opportunity when we're here in Washington, D.C. to not just go vote in the Capitol but actually go out in the community and make a difference." "We can say that all members on the list are personally boycotting," Benjy Cannon, a spokesperson for the union, told Axios in a message. "Many of them have been meeting personally with STARR and Knightsbridge workers all year." The other side:"Local 25's call for a boycott is baseless," Starr restaurants said in a statement. "A boycott of any kind can result in lost hours, wages, and tips that hardworking employees rely upon." "It is unfortunate that an organization that claims to want to represent employees would call for an action that would harm them." "We respect our employees' wishes," Bajaj said. "How many of these congress members even know themselves that they're signing?" Zoom out: Starr's restaurant group has accused Unite Here Local 25 of overly aggressive tactics. That includes union reps showing up with petitions outside employees' homes, leading one bartender to sign it even though she planned to vote against a union, as Eater reported in February. Francisco López, a Le Diplomate server of five years, told Axios some employees are holding counter protests to the union.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Major Social Security Mistakes Boomers Can't Stop Making
Retirement planning is both complicated and high-stakes — a recipe for mistakes with major financial consequences. And sure enough, Business Insider reported that more than half of Americans over 65 earn less than $30,000 a year. As you plan your own retirement, watch out for these Social Security mistakes plaguing current baby boomers. Check Out: Read Next: Too many people reach their early 60s and think: 'I've been paying into the system for decades, I need to lock in my share!' Unfortunately, that leaves them with far lower lifetime benefits than if they'd waited. 'Filing early means locking in a permanent reduction in benefits, up to 30% if your full retirement age is 67,' explained Christine M. Parisi, senior wealth advisor at R.W. Rogé & Company. If you take benefits at age 62, you receive just 70% of your full retirement benefit. At 67, you collect 100%. Wait until 70, and you receive 124% of your full Social Security benefit. Learn More: Plan to continue working for a while? Hold off on taking Social Security — and not just to secure higher benefits. 'If your earnings exceed the annual limit, the Social Security Administration may withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn over the threshold,' Parisi added. 'Benefits can also push your income higher for Medicare-related costs like IRMAA, meaning you could end up paying more in premiums.' Plus, combining your salary with Social Security can push you into a higher tax bracket. You can end up handing much of that money right back to Uncle Sam. If one spouse earned significantly higher income, or worked for many years longer, their benefits will be higher. Plan to optimize those, perhaps by having that spouse delay benefits while the family lives on earned income or distributions from retirement accounts before taking benefits. Parisi noted that different rules apply to surviving spouses. 'If your late spouse worked long enough to qualify for Social Security, you may be able to start collecting survivor benefits as early as age 60. Unfortunately, many don't realize this is even an option until it's too late.' First and foremost, when you planned your retirement income, did you account for taxes? You'll still owe income taxes in retirement, at least under current tax laws. 'A portion of Social Security benefits are taxable, up to 85%, based on your provisional income,' said Keith Hensley of Florida Financial Planning. Many states tax Social Security benefits as well. The upshot? You may need more money saved for retirement than you thought. Again, you may be better off working another year and delaying Social Security benefits. It may not be too late for a Roth conversion to make sense. If you have a year with lower income, consider taking the tax hit and converting some of your traditional retirement funds to Roth accounts, so they can compound tax-free and you can avoid paying taxes on withdrawals in retirement. If Social Security is your only — or your primary — plan for retirement income, expect stormy seas ahead. William Connor, CFA and CFP with Sax Wealth Advisors, added some historical context. 'Social Security was created as a safety net for older Americans. It was not designed as a primary source of retirement income, and won't replace your working income.' Instead, combine it with other sources of income such as retirement accounts, health savings accounts (HSAs), taxable brokerage accounts, real estate investments and perhaps part-time fun working gigs. The less you rely on Social Security income, the more comfortable and secure your retirement will be. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Every State? This article originally appeared on 5 Major Social Security Mistakes Boomers Can't Stop Making Sign in to access your portfolio
