
Meet Anil Ambani, Mukesh Ambani's stylish bahu who avoids limelight, left high-paying job for..., is married to…; not Shloka Mehta, Radhika Merchant
Ambani bahus are ruling the internet. Whether it's Shloka or Radhika, their makeup, their stunning looks, elegant outfits, their involvement in charitable activities and social initiatives, and their style statement have gained popularity over the years. However, there is one more family member, precisely Anil Ambani, Mukesh Ambani's 'bahu', who is as gorgeous as Isha Ambani, Shloka Ambani, Radhika Merchant, who left her high-paying job in the UK for …, her name is…
Some family members of the Ambani family have preferred to keep their lives private and away from the buzz and the media attention. One such member is Khrisha Shah, wife of Jai Anmol Ambani, Anil Ambani, and Tina Ambani's eldest son. To know more about her, read the detailed story below.
Well, Khrisha, the daughter of the late Nikunj Shah, former Chairman and Managing Director of Nikunj Enterprises, got married to Anil Ambani and Tina Ambani's eldest son, Jai Anmol Ambani. The couple got engaged in December 2021. Just two months later, the couple got married in February 2022.
Speaking about her education and work experience, Khrisha worked at Accenture UK as a technology consultant. She managed to handle high-scale public service projects. Reports suggest that she earned well at her corporate job. Despite having a high-paying job in the UK, she returned to India to pursue her career as an entrepreneur.
She founded her social network firm called Dysco, with an idea behind 'Creative Collaboration, International Networking, and Community Building.' Taking her entrepreneurial journey ahead, Khrisha launched a mental health campaign called #Lovenotfear to address the issues individuals face as a result of the deadly COVID-19 pandemic. Nikunj Shah, Khrisha's father, served as chairman and managing director of Nikunj Enterprises.
While her family is concerned, Khrisha's father, Nikunj Shah, served as the Chairman and Managing Director of Nikunj Enterprises. Her mother, Neelam Shah, is a fashion designer. She has two elder siblings: brother Mishal Shah, a businessman, and sister Nriti Shah, a fashion influencer.
Khrisha studied Social Policy and Development from the London School of Economics and earned a degree in Political Economics from the University of California.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Telcos get temporary relief in ₹141-crore spam penalty case
New Delhi: India's telecom operators won't need to pay penalties to the tune of around ₹141 crore levied by regulator for not being able to control spam till August 8, the next date of hearing on the case in the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal ( TDSAT ). The telecom tribunal, at a hearing Thursday, adjourned the matter till August 8, and asked the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India ( Trai ) to submit an affidavit on the matter. During the hearing, both sides presented their arguments. As Trai has to share further information, the tribunal asked the counsel for the regulator to file an affidavit containing the requisite details. The regulator had levied penalties on all three private telcos - Reliance Jio , Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea as well as state-run Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL) - for failing to control spam. However, the operators had challenged the penalties, arguing that the regulator should not have levied the penalties when an anti-spam platform was still in the process of development. TDSAT had stayed the Trai's penalties in January. The fines were levied as part of the Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference Regulations , 2018 (TCCCPR). The telcos argue that the delays in implementation of spam control measures were caused due to Covid and they were not responsible for the delay. To support their point, the telcos submitted details to the TDSAT stating that when Trai imposed the penalties, the digital consent acquisition (DCA) platform was still being deployed. While staying the penalties in its January 28 order, the TDSAT had observed that telecom firms were not responsible for the delay in implementation of the regulations, including the DCA. 'Thus, it is unfair and arbitrary on the part of the respondent to impose financial disincentives on the appellants (telcos) for something which was beyond their control,' TDSAT said in the January order. The levying of penalties on telecom firms as part of the TCCCPR has been a bone of contention between the regulators and telcos. While the regulator has been imposing penalties on telcos, it has not realised any money as operators contended that they should not be held accountable for something which they don't control or perpetuate. Failing to get the amount itself, the regulator had even asked the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to encash the bank guarantees of the companies to recover the amount. But the DoT has not agreed to the request of Trai. The regulator has been strengthening the TCCCPR rules, but the telcos argue that since key stakeholders like telemarketers, over the top (OTT) have been kept out of the purview of the rules, there won't be desired results to curb spam.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
TDSAT halts ₹141 cr spam penalties on telcos, next hearing on August 8
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India's top three private telcos won't need to pay penalties to the tune of around Rs 141 crore levied by regulator for not being able to control spam till August 8, the next date of hearing on the case in the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT).The telecom tribunal, at a hearing Thursday, adjourned the matter till August 8, and asked the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) to submit an affidavit on the the hearing, both sides presented their arguments. As Trai has to share further information, the tribunal asked the counsel for the regulator to file an affidavit containing the requisite regulator had levied penalties on all three private telcos - Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea - for failing to control spam. However, the operators had challenged the penalties, arguing that the regulator should not have levied the penalties when an anti-spam platform was still in the process of development. TDSAT had stayed the Trai's penalties in fines were levied as part of the Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference Regulations, 2018 (TCCCPR). The telcos argue that the delays in implementation of spam control measures were caused due to Covid and they were not responsible for the support their point, the telcos submitted details to the TDSAT stating that when Trai imposed the penalties, the digital consent acquisition (DCA) platform was still being staying the penalties in its January 28 order, the TDSAT had observed that telecom firms were not responsible for the delay in implementation of the regulations, including the DCA.'Thus, it is unfair and arbitrary on the part of the respondent to impose financial disincentives on the appellants (telcos) for something which was beyond their control,' TDSAT said in the January levying of penalties on telecom firms as part of the TCCCPR has been a bone of contention between the regulators and telcos. While the regulator has been imposing penalties on telcos, it has not realised any money as operators contended that they should not be held accountable for something which they don't control or to get the amount itself, the regulator had even asked the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to encash the bank guarantees of the companies to recover the amount. But the DoT has not agreed to the request of regulator has been strengthening the TCCCPR rules, but the telcos argue that since key stakeholders like telemarketers, over the top (OTT) have been kept out of the purview of the rules, there won't be desired results to curb spam.


The Print
35 minutes ago
- The Print
Not just AK-203, India & Russia to jointly manufacture AK-19 and PPK-20 for domestic use and export
While the AK-203, which will replace the INSAS (Indian Small Arms System) and will be the mainstay of the Indian armed forces for years to come, is currently being delivered with 50 percent indigenisation, this will rise to 70 percent by October this year and will be 100 percent by 31 December, 2025. The development comes even as Indo-Russian Rifles Private Limited (IRRPL), a joint venture between the two countries, races towards delivery of 7,000 more AK-203 assault rifles by 15 August, taking the total to 55,000 so far. Korwa (Amethi): India and Russia are in advanced talks to jointly manufacture the AK-19 carbine and the PPK-20, a sub-machine gun, not just for domestic consumption by the armed and police forces but also for export. Chambered for the 7.62×39 rounds, the AK-203 is a product of India's Army's decades long search to replace the 5.56×45 mm INSAS that was plagued by several issues. 'We have been contracted for 6,01,427 AK-203 by the defence ministry to be delivered by 2032. However, we have really picked up the production pace and will finish off the contract by the end of 2030. We will be doubling our production capacity to 600 rifles per day which basically translates to one rifle every 100 seconds,' Maj Gen S.K. Sharma, CEO and CMD of Indo-Russian Rifles Private Limited, told ThePrint at his factory in Amethi's Korwa. As reported first by ThePrint in July 2019, the Indian government has decided to deploy serving officers as CEO of the joint venture. Along with Maj Gen Sharma, there are two more serving officers of Colonel-rank who have been deputed to the IRRPL. Speaking about the future, Maj Gen Sharma said: 'We are in talks with Russia for the full transfer of technology for the AK-19 and the PPK-20, both of which are excellent choices when it comes to small arms'. He said that talks are in an advanced stage and the project will cater not only to domestic demand but also exports. 'The charter of the IRRPL underlines exports. We have already received several queries for the export of AK-203. Export deals will be done once we double our production capacity by the end of this year,' he added. Refusing to name any countries, he said the queries have come from nations which have ties with both India and Russia, basically those in South East Asia, Africa and the MENA region, Middle East and North Africa. 'This is over and above the contracts that will be inked with several state and central armed police forces which have evinced interest,' he said. As part of the project, eight Russian technical experts are stationed at Korwa and they will be there till all rifles are manufactured. As part of the plan, the IRRPL has outsourced the manufacturing of components to two suppliers who have further outsourced to various other entities. The IRRPL assembles 50 components, which includes 180 child parts, and tests them for quality and other issues. 'We have handheld our suppliers and have managed to create an ecosystem,' Maj Gen Sharma said. Also Read: Ahead of Modi's visit to Moscow, Indo-Russia venture delivers 35,000 AK-203 rifles to Army A look at AK-203 Weighing just 3.8 kg, the AK-203 is 690 mm long with a folded butt and can fire 700 rounds per minute with an effective firing range of 800 metres. Compared to the AK-103, which was originally meant for joint production, the AK-203 comes with collapsible stock that can be adjusted according to a shooter's height. The AK-203 also has a different safety mechanism that enables a soldier not to lose contact with the grip when changing firing modes during an operation. It also has a new flash hider that comes handy when the assault rifle is used with night vision, since muzzle flash from a bullet can hamper visibility. The AK-203 deal was first announced in 2018, but hit a roadblock over price negotiations. The Made in India price was higher than what a direct import from Russia would have cost. The defence ministry had even constituted a committee to break this logjam. The delay forced the Army to order SiG 716 rifles from the US under a fast-tracked process to arm its frontline troops. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: SIG Sauer 716 rifles are a stopgap. AK-203 is the future rifle of Indian armed forces