logo
'Worrying rise in dog attacks on children', says Sussex surgeon

'Worrying rise in dog attacks on children', says Sussex surgeon

BBC News26-03-2025

Health officials in West Sussex have reported a concerning rise in the number of children being treated for dog-related injuries. The Queen Victoria Hospital (QVH) in East Grinstead, which specialises in reconstructive surgery, said it was having to deploy more resources to treat children bitten by dogs. Siva Kumar, consultant surgeon at the QVH, told the BBC the rise in dog attacks was mainly affecting adults, but there had been a "worrying" increase in the number of paediatric cases since the Covid pandemic. He said more cases involved head and neck injuries, especially in children under five due to their size and because they tend to put their faces near dogs.
'Attacks are preventable'
Mr Kumar said a "really important" public health message was that a large majority of dog bites were preventable. "We need to educate both kids and parents that if there is a dog that they're not familiar with, just be careful and mindful," he added. Mr Kumar also urged people to ensure dogs were "well supervised".
Dog attacks recorded by police in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex have risen 38% since 2018, according to figures. Offences where a dog was dangerously out of control causing injury to a person or guide dog rose to 2,884 in 2023 from 2,083 in 2018. Ownership has grown, in parallel. The People's Dispensary for Sick Animals estimated there were some 11 million dogs in the UK in 2023 - up 8% in one year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Doctor shares why you must never wash clothes at 90 or 40 degrees & the right temperature for ‘everything but gym gear'
Doctor shares why you must never wash clothes at 90 or 40 degrees & the right temperature for ‘everything but gym gear'

The Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Sun

Doctor shares why you must never wash clothes at 90 or 40 degrees & the right temperature for ‘everything but gym gear'

A DOCTOR has revealed why you should never wash clothes at 90 or 40 degrees. Not only this, but the pro also shared the correct temperature for 'everything but workout gear.' 4 4 4 4 So if you want to save cash and ensure your favourite tops don't get damaged, then you've come to the right place and will need to take notes. Speaking on BBC Morning Live, Dr Xand van Tulleken, who is best known for presenting the CBBC children's series Operation Ouch! and the Channel 4 show How to Lose Weight Well, got candid on how we should really be doing our laundry. The expert explained that while 90 degrees will 'kill' bacteria, it could have a very negative impact on your clothes. He stressed: 'The hottest your washing machine will go is 90 degrees usually and that will kill everything. 'It's almost boiling it. It's bad for the clothes, it's very expensive. 'Whatever's happened to those clothes, I think you've got to get new clothes at that point.' He then voiced when to use the 60 degree function, as he added: '60 degrees, certain bugs will be killed and that can be quite good. 'So if you've got an infection going round your house, particularly think of something like norovirus, put it up at 60, along with the mechanical cleaning and the detergent, that's quite good.' But Dr Xand admitted why he wouldn't ever wash his clothes at 40 degrees, as he confessed: 'Personally, I don't see the point in 40 degrees, because it's too hot to be cheap and it's too cold to kill anything. 'Commit to one or the other, either go hot or go cold.' Cleaning fan reveals the cheap, easy way to get clothes smelling 'beautiful' without shelling out on pricey dryer sheets As a result, he acknowledged: '30 degrees, that gets the job done. It is much cheaper. 'So going from 40 to 30 saves you almost 40% in energy costs, it's quicker. Make sure you get a lower temperature detergent.' But Dr Xand then revealed the temperature he uses to wash the majority of his clothes - and you'll need to prepare to be shocked. The TV personality said: 'I've gotta say, I'm a 20 degrees guy for everything except my workout clothes which go in hotter. '20 degrees saves 62% of your money compared to 40 degrees, so that is a big deal. 'But at lower temperatures, you've got to think about cleaning your machine.' And when it comes to cleaning your washing machine, Dr Xand suggested: 'The detergent tray where all the mould grows, that can be a real nuisance to clean. I put it in the dishwasher. Laundry tips Catherine Green, sustainable cleaning expert at smol shared her laundry tips. How often should you be remaking your bed? When it comes to your bed, maintaining a hygienic sleep setup can actually improve your sleep quality, helping you start every day better. Most people shed 500 million skin cells per day and a lot of that ends up in bed for dust mites to feed on. And those with asthma or allergies might see symptoms worsen by sleeping on dirty sheets! You want to be washing your sheets once a week - or every 10 days if you don't suffer from allergies and wear nightclothes. Bedding builds up with sweat, skin cells and oils quickly, even if it doesn't look dirty. Using an effective detergent like smol's will still give you a great clean on a 20°C cycle - that's better for the planet and your energy bills! What temperature do smol recommend then? For your regular weekly washes I recommend washing most loads at 20°C for 30 minutes. It's gentler on fabrics, slashes energy use, and still delivers excellent stain removal with the right detergent. A colder wash can actually be more effective if you opt for a bio detergent as its enzymes need cooler water; too hot and they lose their ability to digest stains. A wash at 60°c (unless you have silk sheets) every now and again can help kill off dust mites and other nasties. What's the difference between bio and non-bio detergent? Bio detergents contain enzymes, which are especially good at breaking down tough stains like food, grass, or sweat. It's best used in mid to low temperature washes (ideally between 20-40°C) as anything hotter can cause them not to work effectively. Non-bio skips the enzymes, which in turn makes it more suitable for those with sensitive skin or allergies. Although non-bio doesn't contain enzymes, it's still great at removing stains and keeping your clothes clean, you just may need to use a slightly higher temperature setting to aid with the cleaning process. 'And then mechanical cleaning of the drum - just a cloth, some vinegar, wiping is really good. 'If your machine has a cleaning cycle which runs at a high temperature, do that according to the manufacturer's instructions and then air it out.' Social media users react The BBC clip has since been shared on social media and has quickly gone viral, racking up four million views. Stunned by the expert's advice, Instagram users eagerly raced to the comments to share which temperature they use to get dirty clothes clean. One person said: 'I do 40 degrees because often clothes get ruined on 60 and don't get clean enough on 20 or 30. Plus the detergent needs to be able to dissolve and not clog up your pipes.' Another added: 'Nah mate, 40 degrees all the way. Hot enough to kill bacteria and get rid of hard stains but cold enough so it doesn't ruin clothes.' A third commented: 'I'm a 30° girly and always will be, detergent, stain remover, laundry sanitiser and conditioner and then a low heat tumble dry. Clothes are lovely and soft, stains are gone and totally fresh. Only do a 90° wash for bedding and white towels.'

'My wife was told pain after surgery was trapped gas - weeks later she was dead'
'My wife was told pain after surgery was trapped gas - weeks later she was dead'

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'My wife was told pain after surgery was trapped gas - weeks later she was dead'

Retired hairdresser Val Burkill, 73, died following a botched routine procedure to remove gallstones - her husband Garry says his family has 'never been the same without her' A woman who died of sepsis three weeks after a routine medical procedure that was caused by sub-standard care was told she 'probably had trapped wind'. Retired hairdresser Val Burkill, 73, underwent a procedure to remove gallstones on October 1, 2020 at Rotherham Hospital, South Yorkshire. Known as endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), a flexible tube with a camera on the end is used to help identify and diagnose issues with a person's bile ducts. The grandmother-of-seven's procedure only lasted eight minutes and she was discharged to her home in Bolton-upon-Dearne just an hour later. Yet despite complaining of stomach pain, no examination was carried out on her. ‌ ‌ Later in the evening, Val's husband, Garry, 79, called the hospital and was told she probably had trapped wind. However, feeling in 'absolute agony,' Val started vomiting. Garry called an ambulance, which took her back to the hospital. She would never return home. It wasn't until 15 days later – on October 16 – that Val was diagnosed with a perforated bowel. She developed sepsis and continued to deteriorate. She was transferred to hospice care and died on October 24. Because of Covid-19 pandemic restrictions in force at the time, many of Val's family weren't even able to give her a proper goodbye. Following her death, devastated husband Garry commissioned medical negligence lawyers at Irwin Mitchell to investigate her care. Now, a review by Royal College of Physicians has found failures in the care of 58 patients at the hospital. A total of 25 patients 'suffered some degree of harm,' including seven who died, a Hospital Trust report said. Retired builder Garry said: 'Seeing her as her life slipped away is something that will stay with us forever. We still had so many years together and I feel robbed that these were taken away from us. 'It breaks my heart to think how she needlessly suffered and the treatment she received from Rotherham Trust. Our family will never be the same without Val. ‌ 'We knew we owed it to her to get answers regarding her care but it was still devastating when the Trust admitted Val would have made a full recovery if she had received the correct care. This latest news is hard to accept. We knew there were issues with Val's care, but we never expected there to have been failings in the ERCP service on such a large scale. 'Not only has this news shocked us but it has brought back the horrible memories around what happened to Val and the pain and suffering she had to go through in her final weeks. It's hard not to think that if she had gone to another hospital for her ERCP, Val would still be alive. ‌ 'Our family continues to have concerns about whether everything is being done to ensure the safety of patients and this latest news just adds to that. Our hearts go out to the others who have been affected by failings in the ERCP service.' Rotherham Hospital suspended its ERCP service on July 2021 after concerns were raised about the standard of care. A review carried out by the Royal College of Physicians has now been made public, more than two years after it was completed. The review found that 68 out of 959 patients died or suffered complications within 30 days of an ERCP procedure at the hospital, with 58 attributed to a failure of care. The Trust said it was contacting all 68 patients or their families earlier this month to apologise and to 'outline what the external review has said about their individual care.' ‌ The report found a range of care failures including inadequate recording of informed consent, deficiencies in reports and poor radiological documentation. A lack of discussion between medical experts and decision making were also of concern. Tim Annett, a medical negligence lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, said: 'The scale and nature of the care failures identified raise serious questions about patient safety. That care concerns were identified four-year-ago and failings identified two-years-ago also raises serious questions about the Trust's transparency and clinical governance. ‌ 'While we welcome the Trust's decision to now contact affected patients and families, and its commitment to implementing the RCP's recommendations, it's vital that those impacted receive not only a full explanation but also appropriate support and redress. We urge the Trust to ensure transparency from now on and to work closely with patients, families, and legal representatives to rebuild trust and accountability.' Dr Jo Beahan, medical director at the NHS trust, said: 'We apologise unreservedly to patients and their families affected by the failures identified in the ERCP service review. The care provided to some of the patients who underwent the procedure was not at the level that we strive for. ERCP is a specialist type of endoscopy undertaken to diagnose and treat problems in the liver, gallbladder, bile ducts, and pancreas. Less than 5% of endoscopies performed in the UK are ERCP. 'It carries well-recognised risks, and patients requiring an ERCP procedure may have complex underlying health conditions which are considered life limiting such as frailty or patients who have an underlying inoperable cancer. The Trust suspended the ERCP service in July 2021 when concerns were raised. "Overall, we have reviewed over 950 ERCP procedures and the care of 68 patients has been reviewed by independent experts. The care provided to 58 of these patients was identified as not being provided to an acceptable standard, with 25 of these patients experiencing a level of harm. "The Trust has contacted the patients or their relatives whose care has been independently reviewed, including those where no harm was found. We have apologised and explained the findings of the review. We will continue to support patients and families on an individual basis to ensure they have the opportunity to understand the care they or their relative received. We are aware that this may cause concern for other patients who have been treated at the Trust." He added that anyone with concerns about their care in endoscopy can contact the Trust's Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) on or 01709 424461.

Campaigners welcome vaccine cash pledge but fear cut will see fewer lives saved
Campaigners welcome vaccine cash pledge but fear cut will see fewer lives saved

The Herald Scotland

time5 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Campaigners welcome vaccine cash pledge but fear cut will see fewer lives saved

But now the Government has announced that it will give £1.25 billion between 2026 and 2030. While some have praised the pledge, others have said that a reduction in the amount given to Gavi will lead to fewer lives being saved. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said that the money will help Gavi protect up to 500 million children from some of the world's deadliest diseases such as meningitis, cholera and measles. Announcing the funds at Gavi's global summit in Brussels, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Gavi's global impact is undeniable. Over one billion children vaccinated, over 18 million lives saved, over 250 billion dollars injected into the global economy. 'I'm immensely proud of the role the UK has played in reaching these milestones. Our ongoing partnership with Gavi will give millions of children a better start, save lives and protect us all from the spread of deadly diseases.' Commenting on the pledge, Adrian Lovett, the ONE Campaign's UK executive director, said: 'This is an important pledge from the UK to Gavi, a vital force in the fight against preventable disease. 'But despite this good news, we are seeing the harsh impact of the Prime Minister's deep cut to overall aid levels. 'The UK's contribution to Gavi could have saved almost 400,000 more lives if it had been maintained at the same level as before. And further impossible choices are looming.' Dr Philip Goodwin, chief executive for the UK Committee for Unicef, said: 'This investment shows the UK's ongoing commitment to global partnerships that protect children around the world from preventable disease. 'However, cuts to the aid budget still pose a grave threat to children. 'We urge the UK Government to maximise this Gavi commitment by also funding other critical health services that make immunisation fully effective.' Elsewhere, GSK and Bharat Biotech announced that the price of the world's first malaria vaccine for children in countries where malaria is endemic will be reduced by more than half, to less than five dollars a vaccine. The jab is expected to be rolled out in 12 endemic countries in Africa through routine immunisation programmes by the end of 2025. It comes as a new report revealed that global vaccination coverage against deadly diseases had stalled in recent decades. The new review, published in The Lancet, concludes that as a result, millions of children around the world are left vulnerable to preventable disease and death. Senior study author Dr Jonathan Mosser, from the University of Washington in the US, said: 'Routine childhood vaccinations are among the most powerful and cost-effective public health interventions available, but persistent global inequalities, challenges from the Covid pandemic, and the growth of vaccine misinformation and hesitancy have all contributed to faltering immunisation progress. 'These trends increase the risk of outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, polio and diphtheria.' In May the new aid minister, Baroness Jenny Chapman, said that the days of the British Government acting as a 'global charity' are 'over'. Her appointment followed the resignation of Anneliese Dodds, who quit as development minister in protest at the decision to cut the aid budget to fund increased defence spending.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store