
Judge In Cash Row Goes To Top Court Over Ex-Chief Justice's Impeachment Plan
Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma, who is at the centre of a controversy over the alleged recovery of a huge amount of cash at his official bungalow in New Delhi earlier this year, has challenged an in-house inquiry report by a Supreme Court-constituted committee that recommended initiation of his impeachment.
The development came days before the Monsoon session of Parliament, during which the Centre was likely to introduce the impeachment motion against the High Court judge.
In a writ petition in the top court, Mr Varma challenged the suggestion made by former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, and accused the three-member panel that was set up on the latter's order of drawing adverse conclusions without giving him a full and fair hearing, sources said.
The High Court judge also alleged that the committee failed to investigate the basic facts, especially those related to the alleged recovery of cash on March 14 that is necessary to establish his conviction. He said that even if the cash was found in the outhouse, further investigation is needed to establish ownership, authenticity and other facts, the sources added.
The cash was allegedly found following a fire at Justice Varma's Lutyens Delhi residence at around 11.35 pm on March 14, prompting the fofficials to rush to the spot and douse it. The discovery led to several steps, including a preliminary inquiry by Delhi High Court Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and taking away judicial work from Justice Varma in the Delhi High Court.
On March 24, the Supreme Court collegium recommended the repatriation of Justice Varma to his parent High Court.
Two days earlier, then CJI Khanna constituted the committee to conduct an in-house inquiry into allegations and decided to upload on the top court website the inquiry report of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya of the Delhi High Court. It included photos and videos of the alleged discovery of a huge stash of cash.
Justice Varma denounced any insinuation and said no cash was ever placed in the storeroom either by him or any of his family members.
Last month, the ex-CJI wrote to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the panel's report.
Last month, top government sources said a motion seeking Justice Varma's removal would be brought in the Monsoon session. Cross-party consensus would be crucial, given the constitutional threshold required for the removal (impeachment) of a judge, the sources added.
The Monsoon session of Parliament is scheduled to begin on July 21.
Only a handful of judges have ever faced removal proceedings in the country's history - most have resigned before the motion could be carried to conclusion.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Ghislaine Maxwell asks Supreme Court to overturn conviction, citing Epstein deal with federal authorities
Ghislaine Maxwell has petitioned the US Supreme Court to overturn her 2021 sex trafficking conviction, arguing that a non-prosecution agreement Jeffrey Epstein struck with federal authorities should have protected her from criminal charges. 'This case is about what the government promised, not what Epstein did,' her attorneys wrote in a newly filed brief, as reported by Axios. Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for grooming and abusing underage girls alongside Epstein, contends that the plea agreement reached between Epstein and the government in 2008 extended immunity to his alleged co-conspirators. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, appealed not just to the court but directly to President Donald Trump, invoking his well-known emphasis on 'deals.' 'President Trump built his legacy in part on the power of a deal—and surely he would agree that when the United States gives its word, it must stand by it,' Markus said. 'We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the President himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's crimes, especially when the government promised she would not be prosecuted.' When asked by reporters if he would consider issuing a pardon for Maxwell, Trump replied: 'Nobody's approached me with it. Nobody's asked me about it. It's in the news about that aspect of it, but right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it.' Trump has previously said he has the authority to issue such a pardon, without committing either way. Maxwell recently held closed-door meetings with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on July 24 and 25. The nature of those discussions has not been disclosed in the Supreme Court filing, but the meetings have triggered sharp criticism from Democrats. Senators Dick Durbin and Sheldon Whitehouse have demanded the Department of Justice release transcripts and recordings of the meetings, warning that Maxwell might manipulate the situation in exchange for leniency. In a letter to Blanche, the senators said: 'Given her documented record of lying and her desire to secure early release, there are serious concerns that Ms. Maxwell may provide false information or selectively withhold information, in return for a pardon or sentence commutation.' They also criticised the DOJ for not fulfilling former Attorney General Pam Bondi's promise to make the 'full Epstein files' public.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cong's can't trust own EAM, it trusts some other country: Amit Shah
NEW DELHI: Home minister Amit Shah while making his intervention in the Lok Sabha on Monday slammed the Congress for not trusting the statement of external affairs minister S Jaishankar on Operation Sindoor and instead believing the US President Donald Trump , and said that is why it is sitting in the opposition and will remain there for 20 more years. Shah intervened when the Opposition members were interrupting Jaishankar. "They (opposition) do not have faith in the minister of external affairs who has taken oath as a member of the Indian govt. They trust some other country. I know the importance of foreign (opinion) in their party, but it does not mean that they should impose this view on Parliament," said Shah.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Devendra Budhia Sent to Two-Day Police Remand After One Month; Police to Recover Mobile Phone and Identify Crime Scene.
Hisar: Devendra Budhia, 58, former president of the All-India Bishnoi Mahasabha and a controversial figure in Haryana politics, was taken into two-day police custody on Monday in connection with a rape case involving a 20-year-old woman from the Bishnoi community. The Hisar court granted the remand on a production warrant based on a petition from Bhiwani's crime branch. Budhia is accused of repeated sexual assault in Chandigarh and Jaipur. Police allege he used his influence under the pretext of helping the woman with IELTS coaching for a planned move to Australia. The state crime bureau arrested him in Jodhpur on June 29, after which he moved into judicial custody initially. The police remand will allow cops to recover the mobile phone that was used allegedly in the crime and to conduct crime scene identification. The district court, Punjab and Haryana high court, as well as the Supreme Court had rejected Budhia's earlier pleas for anticipatory bail. The FIR (first-information report), which Hisar police had filed on Jan 25, suggests that Budhia lured the woman with false promises of academic support, took her to different cities, and raped her repeatedly. She also alleged that he issued death threats to silence her. Legal twist: Remand under new law An earlier attempt by police to seek Budhia's remand on July 14 was rejected by the judicial magistrate, citing procedural limits under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which do not allow police remand after 15 days of judicial custody. However, the police challenged that decision successfully, arguing that since the FIR was registered after July 1, 2024, the case falls under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), which replaced key sections of the CrPC. The district court accepted the argument and approved the two-day custody. Budhia, who has been embroiled in past political clashes with former MP Kuldeep Bishnoi of the BJP, now faces serious criminal allegations that may test the implementation of India's newly enacted criminal justice code. Police say further action will follow pending forensic and electronic evidence recovery. Caption: Police escorting Devendra Budhia on Monday after securing his custody in Hisar for two days. MSID:: 122955175 413 |