The Social Security crisis is coming one year earlier than we thought
The Social Security crisis is coming one year earlier than we thought
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Social Security uncertainty and policy changes are driving more people to file
With a significant rise in Social Security applications, retirees face financial decisions influenced by legislation and economic concerns in today's climate.
Scripps News
The Social Security shortfall date just moved a little bit nearer.
New federal projections, released on June 18, show that the combined Social Security trust funds will pay 100% of benefits until 2034 before becoming depleted. That date is one year earlier than the Social Security Administration reported a year ago.
'As in prior years, we found that the Social Security and Medicare programs both continue to face significant financing issues,' program trustees wrote in a summary of their 2025 annual report.
The Social Security Administration faces a funding crisis in the not-so-distant future. Trustees say the projected shortfall in retirement benefits has risen to $25.1 trillion through 2099, up from $22.6 trillion a year ago.
The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which pays benefits to retirees and their families, is projected to pay total scheduled benefits until 2033, according to the new report.
'At that time, the fund's reserves will become depleted and continuing program income will be sufficient to pay 77% of total scheduled benefits,' the report states.
The separate Disability Insurance Trust Fund is fully funded through at least 2099, the agency reports.
The combined programs, however, can pay 100% of benefits only through 2034. At that point, the program's reserves would be depleted.
New Social Security shortfall dates alarm retirement advocates
Retirement advocates sounded alarm at the findings.
The new projections "show the trust fund for Social Security is going to be depleted one year sooner than was projected last year, which means that Social Security recipients may see a 19% reduction in their Social Security income one year sooner," said Myechia Minter-Jordan, CEO of AARP, in a statement. "Congress must act to protect and strengthen the Social Security that Americans have earned and paid into throughout their working lives. More than 69 million Americans rely on Social Security today and as America's population ages, the stability of this vital program only becomes more important."
Social Security faces a shortfall because the program spends more than it takes in. In 2024, the OASI Trust Fund cost $1,327 billion to administer, but income totaled only $1,224 billion, a shortfall of $103 billion.
The notion that Social Security faces a shortfall suffuses the national conversation about preparing for retirement. Older Americans wonder if their monthly checks will go down midway through their golden years. Younger Americans have doubled down on retirement savings, partly out of fear that Social Security won't fully support them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social Security fund could run out in 8 years, trustees say. Is there hope?
Social Security's reserves could vanish in eight years, roughly on par with previous estimates, according to a new report. At that point, if no adjustments are made, the entitlement program's trust fund will be able to pay out just 77% of benefits to seniors. Medicare is in the same boat. That's the latest projection for the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, according to the 2025 Social Security and Medicare Trustees annual report released Wednesday. Is there any hope? Only if Congress gets its act together and makes some fixes, which are doable. "A huge number that lawmakers have allowed this to run out of control — but it doesn't change the fact that we have the tools we need to address this problem and turn the ship around," Emerson Sprick, an economist and associate director of the Economic Policy Program at the Bipartisan Policy Center, told Yahoo Finance. Some slightly good news: If the OASI were combined with the fund that pays out disability benefits — the Disability Insurance Trust Fund — the reserve fund would not go broke until the third quarter of 2034, three quarters sooner than reported last year, and it would shell out 81% of scheduled benefits. However, the two funds can't be combined, at least for now. The combined projection of the two funds is frequently used to indicate the overall status of the Social Security program. But the situation is worse than you think. 'Since last year's report, one law was enacted that is projected to have a substantial effect on Social Security's financial status — The Social Security Fairness Act was enacted on January 5th, 2025,' said a senior government official. Read more: What is the retirement age for Social Security, 401(k), and IRA withdrawals? This law, the Social Security Fairness Act, impacts more than 3 million Social Security recipients by increasing monthly benefits for certain types of workers, including some teachers, firefighters, and police officers in many states, federal employees covered by the Civil Service Retirement System, and people whose work had been covered by a foreign social security system. 'Although it's not reflected in the projected year of trust fund depletion, the report shows clearly that Social Security's financial outlook has worsened over the last year, mainly due to the enactment of the act," said Sprick, the economist. The Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund will also exhaust its reserves in 2033, three years earlier than projected last year, primarily due to the change in projected expenditures. The projected shortfall for Medicare — which covers 67.6 million people: 60.3 million aged 65 and older, and 7.3 million disabled — largely stems from the rising cost of healthcare. This increase is mainly a result of higher-than-anticipated 2024 expenditures and higher projected spending for inpatient hospital and hospice services, according to the senior government official. Read more: Medicare open enrollment: How to add or adjust your coverage How broadly would these cuts be felt? The Social Security program paid nearly $1.47 trillion in benefits last year to about 68 million Americans. For about half of seniors, Social Security provides at least half of their income, and for about 1 in 4 seniors, it accounts for at least 90% of their income. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy There are plenty of factors beyond the new law that are responsible for the dwindling till and have been festering for years. Stepping back to look at the bigger picture over 75 years, the Trustees project that the Social Security trust funds face a 3.82% taxable payroll shortfall, up significantly from 3.5% last year, according to the senior official. That's a persistent problem — the share of total earnings subject to payroll tax has decreased significantly. Social Security is mostly a pay-as-you-go program. Payroll taxes collected from workers now pay out the benefits to current recipients. Part of the problem is that people are living longer and the birth rate is falling, so the ratio of workers to beneficiaries is shrinking. During 2024, an estimated 184 million people had earnings covered by Social Security and paid payroll taxes on those earnings. Total income, including interest, to the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds amounted to $1.42 trillion in 2024. Almost 91% of that revenue, or $1.29 trillion, came from payroll taxes, $55 billion from taxation of Social Security benefits, and $69 billion in interest earned on the government bonds held by the trust funds. However, much of wage growth has gone to higher earners, reducing the percentage of wages subject to Social Security tax, the official said. 'Earnings for the roughly 6% of workers above the taxable maximum level increased much more rapidly than earnings for the 94% of workers below the taxable maximum level, so that the share of total earnings subject to the payroll tax has declined." The ceiling: $176,100. That means payroll taxes will contribute a smaller percentage to Social Security's revenues. This factor is largely responsible for the worsening financial status of the trust funds compared to the projections in 1983 after the last major amendments, when the combined trust funds were projected to become depleted after 2050. Read more: When will I get my Social Security check? Payment schedule for 2025. Certainly, other issues will be tossed into the equation moving ahead. One possibility that the trustees will be watching is the impact the administration's immigration policy might have on future population growth and, subsequently, future workers paying into the Social Security system, including the number of foreign-born workers who pay into the program. 'Congress must act," AARP CEO Myechia Minter-Jordan said in a solutions exist to fix the shortfall, including ratcheting up payroll taxes, which currently fund the program at 12.4%, split evenly between employees and employers. Other proposals include raising the retirement age for younger workers or lifting the cap on the amount of a person's income that is subject to the Social Security tax. For 2025, the Social Security tax limit is $176,100. The current rate for Medicare is 1.45% for the employer and 1.45% for the employee, or 2.9% total. There is no wage cap for Medicare. And employers are responsible for withholding 0.9% additional Medicare tax on an individual's wages paid in excess of $200,000. 'Congress has always acted to avert past shortfalls, and will again. Allowing a 15-20% immediate benefit cut to go into effect would be political suicide,' said Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works. Congress has eight years, and the clock is ticking. Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist and the author of 14 books, including the forthcoming "Retirement Bites: A Gen X Guide to Securing Your Financial Future," "In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in the New World of Work" and "Never Too Old to Get Rich." Follow her on Bluesky. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Greedy restaurant slammed by internet over hidden living wage fee added to bill
A disgruntled patron posted a receipt from a recent trip to a restaurant that charged its guests a mandatory 'living wage fee' on Instagram threads — and the internet was incensed. 4 Despite the clarification at the bottom of the receipt, the original user captioned their post: 'WTF is a living wage fee?' @ / Instagram Tipping culture has long been a point of contention for Americans, and as prices continue to rise, the practice has become an even more controversial topic. But now it seems that businesses are taking things too far by tacking on extra fees such as this one — and people aren't happy about it. 4 'It's your job,' respond many in this camp when it comes to tip-demanding employees. FornStudio – 'Price increase without having to update the menu,' claimed one reply on the post. '[This] means I'm never eating at that restaurant again,' said another. Meanwhile, another commenter proposed an entirely separate issue of debate: the pooling of tips. 'If I wanna tip a person, I wanna tip that individual, not the entire team. This is unfair to the server and to me.' However, a few lonely restaurant-goers cut the restaurant, which remained unnamed in the post — and the growing industry trend — some slack, and fired back at fellow commenters. 'Y'all have been asking for no tipping, this is what it looks like. It could reflect in drink/food prices, but then you all would say the place was too expensive. No one is trying to trick you — if they were transparent about the service fee, STFU,' one empassioned viewer responded. 4 'Consumers pay wages via prices,' one user commented, acknowledging the lack of consequence for this specific charge as opposed to increased menu prices. MargJohnsonVA – 'Just include [the fee] in the cost of the food and drinks, like the rest of the world is doing, and pay the workers properly. Sincerely, a guy from Europe,' one aggrieved commenter suggested under the post. This response was the sole sentiment that united incensed restaurant patrons on both sides of the debate. 'Mind your European business,' advised one reply, while another said: 'Hey, stay out of our insanity!' For some small, family-owned restaurants, implementing charges like this living wage fee might allow the business to stay afloat and support their employees — especially amid a cost-of-living crisis. Durham, North Carolina-based Lula & Sadie's is one spot that charges a living wage fee to combat 'rising overhead costs, slim industry profit margins and a minimum wage that won't budge,' per the family-operated restaurant's website. 'The fee is transparently listed on our menus, website and posted around the restaurant.' Though local laws vary greatly in terms of tipping and charging policies in restaurants, New York City Consumer and Worker Protection rules, state that 'restaurants cannot charge a surcharge or other fee in addition to listed food or beverage prices,' but they can 'charge a bona fide service charge, but only if the charge is conspicuously disclosed to consumers before food is ordered.' 4 With general costs rising, both businesses and consumers struggle to meet new standards. Kittiphan – Examples of 'bona fide service charges' include splitting a meal on multiple plates, minimums per person and mandatory gratuity for large dining parties. That being said, 'living wage fees' are often considered service charges, depending on how they're disclosed and absorbed by the business. 'There is no law in New York State that specifically prohibits automatic gratuities. However, it is incumbent upon any restaurant including an automatic gratuity charge to provide—in advance—clear and conspicuous notice that an automatic gratuity charge will be levied and all terms associated with the automatic charge. If consumers are not provided advanced notice, [they] may have a claim under the NYS Deceptive Acts & Practices law, ' New York State's Division of Consumer Protection told News10NBC.
USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
People are moving to this region in the US the most in 2025, new report says
Hear this story In the midst of rising home prices, changing remote work trends and even climate change, Americans are moving into new homes in large droves, but where those new homes are is constantly changing. According to the 2025 Pods Moving Trends Report, the Southeast has risen to the top of the list of places where Americans are moving, while the coastal cities in the East and West continue to see people moving out. The report draws from Pods' long-distance move records between January 2024 and March 2025. According to the report, people are beginning to turn away from "megacities" in favor of "smaller, more breathable cities and towns with lower costs of living, easier access to the outdoors, and vibrant, self-contained cultural scenes." Here's what you need to know. Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle. Where are people moving to in the US? With the Southeast becoming a popular destination for people moving, the majority of the cities rounding out the top five of Pods' list are in the same region due to their affordability and easy access to nature, according to the report. Here are the top five cities: Myrtle Beach, South Carolina/Wilmington, North Carolina Ocala, Florida Raleigh, North Carolina Greenville-Spartanburg, South Carolina Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas North Carolina and Tennessee dominate the top 20, with nine cities between them among the most popular destinations for movers. Where are most people leaving? While the Southeast is experiencing an increase in people moving in, per the Pods report, California continues to see an exodus of residents, along with the surprising addition of Florida, once seen as a move-in hotspot. Here are the top five move-out cities: Los Angeles, California Northern California (San Francisco Bay Area) South Florida (Miami metro) Long Island, New York San Diego, California Among the top 20 move-out cities this year was Tampa Bay, Florida, which was not ranked in 2024. According to Pods, the inclusion of the Florida city could be an indication that the Sunshine State could be seeing a slower population boom due to increased costs and environmental risks. Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.
