Chicago City Council hearing on art display some call antisemitic gets heated
The display, titled "U.S-Israel War Machine," is part of an exhibit on puppets. A group of alderpeople want it removed.
One puppet in the exhibit depicts "Uncle Sam" with a bloody face, and a t-shirt with the image of a tank, the word "money," and the words "thank you" and a smiley face.
Another puppet depicts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holding a bomb, with blood on his hands.
The wooden bases supporting the puppets include the words "child killers."
The City Council did not vote on anything with regard to the artwork Tuesday, but they did go on for hours discussing how art pieces are selected and go into city-owned spaces.
It turned into a debate about the freedom of expression, possible antisemitism, and the use of taxpayer dollars.
The City Council Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation has sometimes been called the "fun committee." But at a meeting of just that committee on Tuesday, speakers used the words "obnoxious." Some called the demands to remove the artwork "an attack on free speech," while others described the art in question as part of a "pattern of disrespect and disregard by the Mayor's office."
Ald. Debra Silverstein (50th) spearheaded efforts to remove the display at the Cultural Center. The artwork is part of the exhibit "Potential Energy: Chicago Puppets Up Close"—which is described as a display that "challenges expectations about puppetry and inspires the public to tell their own stories."
Silverstein and her supporters feel the "U.S.-Israel War Machine" is antisemitic. The hearing Tuesday was meant to help alders understand how the piece was chosen for display.
"When art is deemed controversial, there is a process," said Clinée Hedspeth, commissioner of the Department of Cultural Affairs and Special Events. "That process did not happen."
Hedspeth explained the complainant is supposed to meet with the curator and the artist to find common ground. In this case, a wall plaque, along with a "death count," was removed and replaced for possibly displaying sensitive content that could by perceived as opinion.
Ald. Bill Conway (34th) questioned why the puppets were not also removed.
Conway:"What made you go ahead and remove that wall panel?"
Hedspeth:"It didn't identify who the creator was, and it was an opinion piece."
Another exchange had alders calling for Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez (25th) to be removed.
"Talk about the process!" Sigcho-Lopez said. "White supremacist!"
Committee Chairman Ald. Nicholas Sposato (38th) called for the dramatic back-and-forth to stop. It was extinguished.
Conway later said Sigcho-Lopez said the "white supremacist" remark was not directed personally at him.
"We talked about it behind closed doors. He apologized and said that those remarks were not directed towards me," Conway said. "I have no desire to escalate. I appreciate him doing that, and I have no desire to escalate this."
In the meeting, alders also discussed how to make outdoor festivals safer by using barriers to block cars from pedestrians. One big question is the expense.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Northport candidates discuss University Beach, need for more transparency
Even with 13 different voices raised, some in stark opposition to incumbents, one word all candidates for Northport's mayor and City Council seats could agree on: transparency. During the more than three-hour forum hosted by the League of Women Voters of Greater Tuscaloosa on Aug. 12, "transparency" was spoken about 16 times, and mentioned even more often, topped only by "beach," as in "University Beach," a word and name that cropped up two dozen times. Consensus on transparency: It needs to be greater. Some challengers in the Aug. 26 municipal election suggested, or flat-out claimed, that current officeholders seem to have been conducting city business behind closed doors, and that the incumbents have not been answerable or responsible to constituencies. Incumbents contended they could be clearer in communications, but that rules and regulations have been followed. Whether the smoke-filled-room image is mere perception, or has any basis in reality, it's a widely held view ― especially regarding the burgeoning $350 million University Beach development, and before that, a widely disliked consideration to sell the Northport Community Center, where the Aug. 12 forum was held ― that fueled the field of candidates, some newcomers to the political arena. More: Northport City Council backs University Beach for Alabama tax rebate plan As to that other word, there was no consensus on the $350 million water park, hotel, and multi-use University Beach plan, not unexpected given that was one of the issues driving creation of the Northport Political Action Committee. NPAC has endorsed candidates for mayor, and all five council seats; only one, Jamie Dykes, District 4, is an incumbent. District 5 candidate Danny Higdon is running unopposed. He appeared at the event, but since his election has already been certified, he was not included in the Q&A. More: Aug. 26 municipal election will decide Northport's next mayor NPAC's endorsements are Dale Phillips, for mayor; Turnley Smith, District 1; Zach Stone, District 2; Jaime Conger, District 3; Dykes, District 4; and Higdon, District 5. The nonpartisan League of Women Voters does not endorse candidates, but invited all candidates to the forum. With the voting-rights group Return My Vote, the League of Women Voters surveyed each, asking pre-forum questions. Their responses can be found at More: Five Northport City Council seats up for grabs in Aug. 26 election Polls will be open from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. Aug. 26. Here are the polling sites: District 1: Northport City Hall, 3500 McFarland Blvd. District 2: New Zion Missionary Baptist Church, 1317 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. District 3: Daystar Family Church, 3975 Watermelon Road District 4: Northport Fire and Rescue Station No. 2, 5410 Alabama Highway 69 District 5: Flatwoods Baptist Church, 4520 70th Ave. For more information about the election, go to Reach Mark Hughes Cobb at To support his work, please subscribe to The Tuscaloosa News. This article originally appeared on The Tuscaloosa News: Northport candidates say one word sums up Aug. 26 municipal election Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Has a Chance To Stop Putin—But He Can't Do It Alone
Donald Trump's second-term foreign policies are turning out to be a string of disasters—alienating allies, driving India towards Russia, sowing uncertainties with whipsaw tariff changes that rattle markets, zeroing out foreign development aid, and continuing to supply an Israeli prime minister who has descended into a frenzy of revenge killing and destruction. Now Trump's latest bid to end the long war of attrition in Ukraine, parts of which Russia has occupied since the annexation of Crimea in 2014, appears only to have strengthened Vladimir Putin's hand. Before meeting the Russian president in Alaska, Trump had for weeks threatened new sanctions on Russia if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire and the start of peace talks. Instead, Putin got validation, refused to stop his total war on Ukraine's civilian infrastructure, and Trump has backed off the sanctions threat, right when Russia's economy is starting to falter. Worse, Trump now looks likely to press Ukrainian leaders to give up not just Crimea, but the country's eastern provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk, where Putin ginned up separatist movements before his February 2022 invasion. And worse still, Trump may pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to yield most of Ukraine's vital southeastern provinces on the Black Sea as well. Such an outcome would reward the greatest violations of international law in Europe since Adolf Hitler's occupation of Poland. That would be a catastrophe of epic proportions that is sure to enourage dictators worldwide. In exchange, Trump's foreign envoy Steve Witkoff is talking about a "security guarantee" that would promise Ukraine direct military intervention by the U.S., Britain, and France if Russia tries to bite off more Ukrainian lands in future. But Witkoff and Trump appear not to know that Ukraine already received such supposed protection at the end of the Cold War in exchange for giving up its nuclear weapons: Russia promised to respect Ukraine's new borders, and the U.S., U.K., France, and China promised to enforce this deal. TOPSHOT - Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump participate in a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025. TOPSHOT - Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump participate in a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025. MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images Putin proved that 1994 guarantee to be hollow, just as Hitler's meeting with Neville Chamberlain taught the "Fuhrer" that he could get away with seizing part of Czechoslovakia. So it's no wonder Putin is willing to trade another such Western "guarantee" in exchange for total triumph in Ukraine's east and southeast. In his eyes, that is a lot of something for nothing. But Trump's instincts, if naive, are not entirely wrong: a tighter economic vise could move Putin to concessions. Direct and secondary sanctions, like tariffs, can be used as effective tools of pressure under the right conditions. Trump's fundamental error lies in not realizing that these tools would be far stronger when wielded not by the U.S. alone, but by a global alliance of democracies of the kind that John McCain had the foresight to advocate in 2008. Such a league of democratic states has to be broader than Europe. It must include Asian and potentially southern hemisphere partners that are not part of NATO. While we should try to coordinate with our European partners on any new sanctions against Russia, U.S. leaders must also be realistic: the EU is not going to mount a credible challenge to Putin's mass-murdering depravity, which has violated all the most sacred principles of international law. Europe's paper tigers could have placed forces from their own nations into eastern Ukraine in January 2022 to enforce the 1994 treaty, thereby preventing the entire war. Instead they dithered, wrung their hands, and eventually imposed largely ineffective sanctions, while delaying shipments of tanks, long-range missiles, anti-missile defenses, and fighter aircraft to Ukraine. And as usual, they shamelessly waited for the United States to take the lead against yet another assault on democracy and human rights on their own continent. About this, Trump's instincts have been correct: weakness, cowardice, and appeasement has been the EU's policy against tyranny since the 1990s—and this has weakened NATO as well. Even with the strong resolve of British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to get European members to rebuild credible offensive armed forces and do their share within the NATO alliance, it will take time for them to catch up—time that Ukraine does not have. But imagine a broader alliance that includes most of NATO and the EU, along with South Korea, Japan, Australia, the Philippines, and potentially also India. Imagine that all the governments within this new bloc collectively imposed new sanctions banning commerce of all kinds coming from Russia (including natural gas)—and combined this with 50 percent extra tariffs on goods coming from any country that trades with Russia. That would put China in danger of losing over half of its export markets unless it cut economic ties with Putin. If Trump could manage this feat, he might actually end Russia's total war on Ukraine's people, and force Putin to abandon most of the stolen territory. Trump needs to learn that a united front of many large-economy nations is far more powerful than the U.S. acting alone. Imagine how much stronger the free world would be as a result. Trump could offer to make such a new alliance into a free trade bloc with mutual economic protections, which would bring nations into an economic alliance of all democracies in the OECD. Instead, he has returned to the unilateralist strategy that failed under George W. Bush, which led McCain to his landmark proposal. Such a global democratic alliance would be the sort of institution that, like NATO, can give a real security guarantee. With inspiring leadership, it could endure the stress that enforcing a total global embargo on Russia would mean. Its allied leaders would have to explain to their peoples that we have reached a critical moment: it is now or never to break Putin's tyrannical empire. This would also require a massive new effort to supply Europe with natural gas from non-Russian sources and to supply India with oil, which would cut off Russia's main revenue stream. It would be a bit like the Berlin airlift, an act of shared sacrifice and determination to return the arc of history to its proper trajectory—towards freedom, democracy, and hope for all peoples on Earth. Then we, rather than Putin, would be "holding all the cards." John Davenport is professor of philosophy and director of peace and justice studies at Fordham University. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
US charity says halt in visas for Gazans will harm wounded kids
WASHINGTON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - U.S.-based charity HEAL Palestine and other rights groups criticized the State Department's decision to stop visitor visas for Palestinians from Gaza, saying it will harm wounded children seeking medical treatment on short-term U.S. visas. The State Department said on Saturday it was halting all visitor visas for Gazans while it conducted "a full and thorough" review, after far-right conspiracy theoristLaura Loomer said Palestinian refugees were entering the U.S. HEAL Palestine said there was no refugee resettlement program as stated by Loomer and that the group's efforts were part of a medical treatment program. It also said the program was run on donations and did not use U.S. government money. The charity sponsored and brought "severely injured children to the U.S. on temporary visas for essential medical treatment not available at home," it said in a statement. "After their treatment is complete, the children and any accompanying family members return to the Middle East." The U.S. has issued more than 3,800 B1/B2 visitor visas, which permit foreigners to seek medical treatment in the U.S., to holders of Palestinian Authority travel documents so far in 2025. That figure includes 640 visas issued in May. The Palestinian Authority issues travel documents to residents of the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza. The State Department said a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas were issued to people from Gaza in recent days but did not provide a figure. The Council on American Islamic Relations and the Palestine Children's Relief Fund condemned the decision to stop the visas. Loomer told the New York Times she spoke to Secretary of State Marco Rubio to warn about what she called a threat from "Islamic invaders." Rubio said the government was evaluating the process of granting such visas after concerns by some members of Congress regarding alleged ties to extremism. He said their offices had presented evidence of such ties but he gave no details. Gaza has been devastated by Israel's military assault, which has killed tens of thousands, caused a hunger crisis, and prompted genocide and war crimes accusations at international courts. The U.S. ally denies the accusations and says its offensive is in self-defense after an October 2023 attack in Israel by Hamas militants in which 1,200 were killed and about 250 taken hostage. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Edmund Klamann)
