
Engineered Viruses Make Neurons Glow and Treat Brain Disease
This newfound diversity is not only a beautiful picture for neuroscientists—it's also key to understanding how the brain works and what goes wrong in certain brain diseases. From Parkinson's disease to schizophrenia, many brain disorders stem from specific types of brain cells.
'As long as I've been doing neuroscience, it's been a goal of researchers to have brain-cell-type-targeting tools,' says Jonathan Ting of the Allen Institute, a nonprofit research center in Seattle. Now they have them in spades. In a fleet of eight studies funded by the National Institutes of Health and published last week, scientists from 29 research institutions found and tested more than 1,000 new ways to home in on specific cell types, no matter where they are in the brain.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The technique behind these tools uses non-disease-causing viruses (called adeno-associated viruses, or AAVs) to deliver genes directly to specific neurons. This can make the cells do almost anything. Scientists can turn them off, activate them, 'light them up like a Christmas tree' with glowing proteins or deliver gene therapies right to them, says Ting, senior author of one of the new studies. The researchers have tested the technique only in nonhuman animals, but the bulk of the tools work across mammal species and would likely work in humans, too. Similar, less-targeted AAV gene therapies are already approved for treating spinal muscular atrophy and are being tested in clinical trials for Huntington's disease.
'There are a lot of good examples' of how AAVs are being used to treat brain disease, says Nikolaus McFarland, a neurologist at the University of Florida, who treats neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Huntington's. 'It's really exciting stuff.'
Viral Shuttles
Every type of brain cell is like a unique creature. Scientists have categorized the cells based on their shape, location and electrical properties—and, more generally, based on the genes they express most out of an organism's full library of DNA. By expressing certain genes, these cells carry out specific actions, such as building specialized proteins. If researchers can identify a unique snippet of genetic code that is activated just in those cells, they can use that snippet to target them.
Next, they attach this genetic snippet, called an enhancer, to an AAV that has been gutted of its viral DNA. They can fill the viral husk with specific genes to deliver to those cells. The now-filled husks enter the bloodstream like a fleet of delivery shuttles, bypassing the blood-brain barrier, but are only able to activate their genetic cargo in cells with the enhancer.
In the new studies, researchers focused on cell types in three parts of the brain: the outer layer of brain tissue called the cortex that plays a role in higher-level thinking, the striatum, which is part of the basal ganglia (a stretch of deep brain tissue) that is impacted in Huntington's and Parkinson's disease, and the spinal cord, whose motor neurons are destroyed in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The consortium of 247 scientists was funded by the NIH's Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative as a part of a larger research project called the Armamentarium for Precision Brain Cell Access. The scientists found and tested more than 1,000 enhancer AAVs, now freely available to researchers, that target specific cell types in those key brain regions.
Tweaking the Brain
Previously, these enhancer AAVs had been developed in a slow trickle by different labs, but 'now we have thousands of tools' to tweak specific cell types, says Bosiljka Tasic, director of molecular genetics at the Allen Institute and senior author of one of the new studies.
Researchers can load these AAV shuttles with all sorts of different genes to answer different questions. In some cases, even just seeing the neurons in action is cause for celebration: 'Some of them are very rare cells that you wouldn't find randomly by poking around in brain tissue,' Ting says. To observe them, researchers can introduce a gene that makes a glowing protein that lights up elusive neurons from the inside to reveal their structure and how they connect with other brain cells.
Researchers can also control how certain brain cells fire and turn their activity up or down to see how the change impacts an animal's behavior. To do this, researchers insert a gene into the target cells that creates a light-sensitive protein called an opsin; then they can shine specific wavelengths of light on the brain to make those cells fire on command. Ting's team used this technique, called optogenetics, to stimulate certain cells in the striatum of mice. When the researchers stimulated those cells on just one side of the brain, the mice began moving more on one side of their body than the other, causing them to go in circles.
These interventions are reversible and repeatable. 'That's the part that's really satisfying for neuroscientists,' Ting says. 'You can turn them off, turn them back on and then see how that affects the brain circuit.'
It's ' so much better and also so much more informative' than destroying whole parts of a mouse brain to see what happens, as is the case with much neuroscience research from the past century, Tasic says. 'That brain region may have a hundred different cell types,' so being able to activate and inactivate them more precisely will reveal more information about how these circuits work, she says.
New Treatments
So far, the new enhancer AAVs have been tested in mice, rats and macaques. 'We keep trying more and more species,' Ting says. 'We haven't even figured out what's the limit.'
And that brings us to humans. 'That's really the answer to the question 'Why do we care?'' he says. 'We have built strong evidence that some of these tools—maybe not all of them, but many of them—may work across species into humans and could represent the start of a new therapeutic vector development that could be used to more finely treat debilitating brain disorders.'
For these treatments, enhancer AAVs could deliver gene therapy right to the brain cells that need it. The best candidates for this technique are neurodegenerative diseases, such as ALS, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease. Researchers are currently working on AAV gene therapies for these conditions and others that target whole regions of the brain rather than specific types of brain cells. Trials of these therapies indicate that they are largely safe. 'We now have lots of good examples of AAV being used,' McFarland says. 'We have [a] good safety record for that.'
'There's a lot that we still don't understand about neurodegenerative diseases,' he adds, and these little viral shuttles will allow scientists to make those discoveries that enable new treatments. While each of these brain disorders is unique, cracking one of them might help scientists crack the others, too, McFarland says: 'I wholeheartedly believe that.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Why do I feel more awake after 7.5 hours of sleep compared to 9?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The recommended amount of sleep for healthy adults is 7-9 hours, according to the National Institutes of Health. So why then, is it possible to feel better, more alert and refreshed after 7.5 hours sleep than getting a lengthier sleep of 9 hours? Surely, more is more when it comes to sleep? Well, not always. In fact, there are a number of reasons that you might feel worse after 9 hours compared to 7.5. Here, a sleep expert shares these, as well as revealing which is the most common cause of waking up feeling groggy. And, although we know one of the key ways to ensure you're waking up feeling great is to have one of the best mattresses for your sleep needs, we'll also be sharing a few more tips to help you ensure you wake up feeling refreshed every day of the week. How much sleep do we need? "Most adults need 7–9 hours a night. That number is largely set by biology – you can't train your body to genuinely need less without it taking a toll on mood, focus, and health," says UKCP psychotherapist and sleep specialist, and author of How To Be Awake So You Can Sleep Through The Night, Heather Darwall-Smith. Sleep runs in cycles, she explains, with each lasting for about 90 minutes, although they can extend to 100 minutes. During each sleep cycle we move "through light sleep, deep (slow-wave) sleep, and REM (dreaming) sleep. Deep sleep dominates the first half of the night, REM the second. Most people go through 4–6 cycles a night. You can't change the structure of sleep much, but you can improve its quality and timing," says Darwall-Smith. Given all of this, what's happening on those occasions we feel better after a shorter sleep duration like 7.5 hours compared to a longer sleep like 9 hours? Why do we feel more awake after 7.5 hours vs 9 hours sleep? There are a variety of reasons you might feel alert after 7.5 hours sleep and groggy after 9 hours, here Darwall-Smith talks us through them. 1. Sleep inertia "If you wake during deep sleep, you're likely to feel groggy, heavy-headed, and slow – this is called sleep inertia," says Darwall-Smith. Other symptoms of sleep inertia include disorientation and decreased cognitive ability. "At 7.5 hours, you might be waking at the end of a cycle, in lighter sleep, which makes getting up feel easier. At 9 hours, you might land in the middle of deep sleep, triggering inertia," she explains. Although we'll always experience sleep inertia to some extent upon waking, doing so during deep sleep means you'll experience it in a more pronounced way. 2. Circadian timing If you find that waking after 7.5 hours of sleep feels good, Darwall-Smith explains why this may be connected to your natural body clock. "Your internal body clock influences alertness. Waking in sync with your circadian rhythm (when your core body temperature is starting to rise) feels more natural," she says. Our circadian rhythm (also known as our internal body clock) regulates a whole host of our functions and processes, such as hormone release (like melatonin for sleep and cortisol for alertness), body temperature and our sleep-wake cycles. However, "if 9 hours takes you past that point, you might wake at a 'low' in your rhythm and feel sluggish," Darwall-Smith says. 3. Sleep fragmentation Sleeping for 9 hours might seem like a great way to catch up on some rest, but if your body doesn't require that much sleep, it can affect your sleep cycles and therefore, how you feel when you wake up. "If you stay in bed longer than your body needs, your last cycle(s) of sleep may be lighter and more broken," Darwall-Smith explains, adding that, "this can make you feel less refreshed, even if you technically slept longer." Is one reason more common than the others? "Sleep inertia is probably the most common culprit," Darwall-Smith says of why we might feel better after 7.5 hours sleep and sluggish after 9, providing two great visual analogies for the differences between waking up during deeper vs. lighter sleep. "Waking from deep sleep is like trying to start a car in freezing weather – you need time to warm up. Waking from light sleep is more like rolling downhill – much easier to get going," she explains. So which is better – 7.5 or 9 hours? I asked Darwall-Smith if all of this means that 7.5 hours sleep is better than 9 hours. "Not neccessarily," she says. "It's not about 'shorter vs longer' – it's about getting the right amount for your body and waking at the right point in a cycle. For some people, 9 hours genuinely works better; for others, 7.5 leaves them sharper. What matters is how you feel during the day." It's also worth keeping track of the recommended amount of sleep for your age, since the recommended 7-9 hours applies to healthy adults under 60, while children, teenagers and adults over 60 have, in general, different requirements. How can you make sure you wake up feeling refreshed? Track your patterns Sleep tracking apps can help you get a better sense of how you're sleeping through the night, giving you insights into how long you spend in each sleep stage and helping you to determine a sleep routine that gives you the amount of rest you need to feel your best in the morning. "Use a sleep diary or wearable for 1–2 weeks to see when you naturally wake feeling good. Look for patterns in bedtime, wake time, and total hours," advises Darwall-Smith. Speaking of the morning, Sleep Cycle , one of the best sleep tracking apps, even features a smart alarm clock that will do its best to wake you during lighter sleep within a 30 minute window, so you're not falling victim to the dreaded sleep inertia. Set a consistent wake time Consistency helps your circadian rhythm to function optimally, and one way to avoid issues, like sleep inertia from waking in the middle of a deep sleep stage, is to apply regularity to your wake up time. "Waking up at the same time every day keeps your circadian rhythm steady, making it more likely you'll wake from lighter sleep," explains Darwall-Smith. Let light in quickly in the morning Light plays a significant role in our sleep-wake cycles, with darkness promoting melatonin production, while exposure to bright light in the morning supresses it and increases cortisol levels. "Morning light signals your brain to stop melatonin production and raise alertness," agrees Darwall-Smith. To help you feel at your best and brightest in the morning, she suggests you, "open curtains, go outside, or use a light therapy lamp within 30 minutes of waking." One recent study also showed that getting morning sunlight can lead to better sleep efficiency and fewer nighttime awakenings.


CNN
2 days ago
- CNN
NIH director lays out agency's research and funding priorities in new strategy statement
LGBTQ issuesFacebookTweetLink Follow The director of the US National Institutes of Health outlined on Friday a 'unified strategy' to align the agency's priorities and funding, a move he said was meant to offer clarification following sweeping changes at the agency, including massive budget cuts, grant cancellations and plans for reorganization. In Friday's statement, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya emphasized the need for transparency with the taxpaying American public and an intent to 'honor their trust.' He identified key priorities for the NIH, including chronic disease and nutrition – as per an executive order 'on Gold-Standard Science and the Make America Healthy Again Commission Report' – as well as artificial intelligence, alternative testing models and real-world data platforms. He also noted that the agency is dedicated to supporting research that pursues 'innovative, and sometimes controversial, questions.' NIH funding decisions will reflect these priorities and other 'core principles,' the statement said. 'As stewards of taxpayer funds, NIH must deliver results that matter to the public,' Bhattacharya wrote. 'Through this strategy, we will better leverage the synergistic missions of each NIH Institute and Center to fund the most meritorious science, address urgent health needs, and sustain a robust biomedical research workforce.' More details were shared on certain agency priorities with an intent to 'clarify specific issues that currently require additional guidance,' the statement said, including autism, nutrition, HIV/AIDS, research on racial disparities, transgender care and more. In April, a policy note from the NIH said the agency can pull medical research funding from universities with diversity and inclusion programs. Friday's statement noted that the NIH was 'shifting to solution-oriented approaches in health disparities research.' 'In contrast to research that considers race or ethnicity when scientifically justified […] research based on ideologies that promote differential treatment of people based on race or ethnicity, rely on poorly defined concepts or on unfalsifiable theories, does not follow the principles of gold-standard science,' the statement read. NIH also intends to prioritize research focused on what it called 'more promising avenues of research' for the the health of transgender youth than studies involving treatments such as puberty suppression, hormone therapy or surgery. 'Research that aims to identify and treat the harms these therapies and procedures have potentially caused to minors diagnosed with gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder, or gender incongruence, and how to best address the needs of these individuals so that they may live long, healthy lives is more promising,' the statement said. Multiple priorities emphasize a preference for domestic research, including a new system to manage projects with funding for foreign research institutions and a blueprint for domestic training programs. NIH will also prioritize research that can be replicated or reproduced. 'We are exploring various mechanisms to support scientists focused on replication work, to publish negative findings, and to elevate replication research,' the statement read.


CNN
2 days ago
- CNN
NIH director lays out agency's research and funding priorities in new strategy statement
The director of the US National Institutes of Health outlined on Friday a 'unified strategy' to align the agency's priorities and funding, a move he said was meant to offer clarification following sweeping changes at the agency, including massive budget cuts, grant cancellations and plans for reorganization. In Friday's statement, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya emphasized the need for transparency with the taxpaying American public and an intent to 'honor their trust.' He identified key priorities for the NIH, including chronic disease and nutrition – as per an executive order 'on Gold-Standard Science and the Make America Healthy Again Commission Report' – as well as artificial intelligence, alternative testing models and real-world data platforms. He also noted that the agency is dedicated to supporting research that pursues 'innovative, and sometimes controversial, questions.' NIH funding decisions will reflect these priorities and other 'core principles,' the statement said. 'As stewards of taxpayer funds, NIH must deliver results that matter to the public,' Bhattacharya wrote. 'Through this strategy, we will better leverage the synergistic missions of each NIH Institute and Center to fund the most meritorious science, address urgent health needs, and sustain a robust biomedical research workforce.' More details were shared on certain agency priorities with an intent to 'clarify specific issues that currently require additional guidance,' the statement said, including autism, nutrition, HIV/AIDS, research on racial disparities, transgender care and more. In April, a policy note from the NIH said the agency can pull medical research funding from universities with diversity and inclusion programs. Friday's statement noted that the NIH was 'shifting to solution-oriented approaches in health disparities research.' 'In contrast to research that considers race or ethnicity when scientifically justified […] research based on ideologies that promote differential treatment of people based on race or ethnicity, rely on poorly defined concepts or on unfalsifiable theories, does not follow the principles of gold-standard science,' the statement read. NIH also intends to prioritize research focused on what it called 'more promising avenues of research' for the the health of transgender youth than studies involving treatments such as puberty suppression, hormone therapy or surgery. 'Research that aims to identify and treat the harms these therapies and procedures have potentially caused to minors diagnosed with gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder, or gender incongruence, and how to best address the needs of these individuals so that they may live long, healthy lives is more promising,' the statement said. Multiple priorities emphasize a preference for domestic research, including a new system to manage projects with funding for foreign research institutions and a blueprint for domestic training programs. NIH will also prioritize research that can be replicated or reproduced. 'We are exploring various mechanisms to support scientists focused on replication work, to publish negative findings, and to elevate replication research,' the statement read.