logo
Spending review: Reeves vows to ‘renew Britain' with big rises for NHS, housing and defence

Spending review: Reeves vows to ‘renew Britain' with big rises for NHS, housing and defence

Yahooa day ago

Rachel Reeves has pledged to 'renew Britain' with a spending review prioritising health, defence and more than £100bn for long-term capital projects, despite leaving some key areas facing a tough squeeze on funding.
In a speech to the Commons setting out Labour's priorities up to the next general election, the chancellor said her investment programme would be felt in all corners of the country, while decrying austerity as a 'destructive choice'.
Announcing the government's spending review, the chancellor made a high-stakes promise to cut spending on controversial issues such as asylum hotels by the end of the parliament, which she said would save £1bn.
But the Home Office will receive a budget cut which will extend beyond the asylum savings, causing alarm from police officers and the London mayor Sadiq Khan. Others that will see spending cuts include Defra and local government, as well as the Foreign Office which will see an almost 7% cut because of the loss of much of the foreign aid budget.
'We are renewing Britain,' Reeves said. 'I know that too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it. This government's task, my task as chancellor, and the purpose of this spending review is to change that, to ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, in their jobs and on their high streets.
'The priorities of this spending review are the priorities of working people, to invest in Britain's security, in Britain's health, and to grow Britain's economy so that working people are better off.'
Reeves said total departmental budgets would grow by 2.3% a year in real terms, drawing a comparison with the 2.9% cut under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition – a retort to her critics who have accused her of a return to austerity.
'Austerity was a destructive choice for the fabric of our society, and it was a destructive choice for our economy too, choking off investment and demand,' Reeves said. 'Creating a lost decade for growth, wages and living standards that is their legacy. My choices are different. My choices are Labour choices.'
She said there would be 'tough decisions for stability', a nod to the unpopularity of the now partly reversed winter fuel allowance and welfare cuts, as well as tax rises including the increase in the national insurance rate paid by employers.
However, experts warned the chancellor could face a summer of speculation over possible further tax increases at the autumn budget, after Reeves reiterated a promise to stick to her 'ironclad' fiscal rules – despite concerns over rising government borrowing costs and a sluggish growth outlook.
'It looks increasingly likely that substantial tax increases will be needed in the autumn budget,' said Andrew Goodwin, chief UK economist at the consultancy Oxford Economics.
'Considering the plans require large efficiency savings, departments may find it hard to stick to the targets… today's spending review leaves the impression of being a stopgap, rather than a durable plan.'
In a highly political speech, Reeves attacked the Tories and Reform for opposing her changes to the fiscal rules and tax rises announced at last year's October budget, saying the investment would never have been possible under them.
'Every one of those changes was opposed by the parties opposite. So today, they can make an honest choice, and they can oppose these spending plans as they oppose every penny I raise to fund them, or they can make the same choice as Liz Truss, spend more, borrow more, with no regard for the consequences.'
The Conservative shadow chancellor said the spending rise was 'not worth the paper that it is written on' and would mean months of speculation over how it would be paid for. 'This is the spend now, tax later review, because [she] knows she will need to come back here in the autumn with yet more taxes, and a cruel summer of speculation awaits.'
The health service was the biggest winner in terms of day-to-day spending, increasing in real terms by 3% a year – though lower than some years under the Conservatives. It will mean the health service gets £29bn extra a year.
Defence is among those with the biggest spending boost – as expected – with spending rising to 2.6% of GDP by April 2027, though that includes the intelligence agencies. It will mean £11bn for defence and £600m extra for security services.
Another key winner was Angela Rayner's housing department, where Reeves said 'social housing [had been] neglected for too many decades, but not by this Labour government'. Overnight, she had announced £39bn over the next decade. Blackpool, Preston, Sheffield and Swindon are among the towns that have already put forward bids for the cash.
The department most unhappy with its settlement is the Home Office, especially the policing budget, which chiefs have warned will mean the government will miss its manifesto commitments on recruitment and tackling crime.
Reeves said the department would get an average 2.3% increase a year in real terms over the spending review period, an increase of £2bn, but the funding is far below what police services believe will be adequate.
The chancellor also vowed there would be significant savings on asylum, with an ambitious pledge to end spending on hotels for asylum seekers by the end of the parliament, without saying how.
Reeves said there would be new funding for the department to hear cases and appeals more quickly and deport those whose claims were rejected, saying the end of the use of hotels would save taxpayers £1bn.
Education will get a cash uplift of £4.5bn in the core schools budget, as well as £2.3bn in investment to fix school classrooms, especially those with crumbling concrete. From the capital budget, there will be £2.4bn a year to continue the rebuilding of 500 schools.
Several departments have secured better-than-expected investments, including those of the environment secretary, Steve Reed, and the energy secretary, Ed Miliband. Defra will get a major funding boost for flood defences, investing £4.2bn over three years, though overall spending will be cut by 2.7%,
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has the biggest increase in capital spending at five times the average departmental growth rate. The spending review will fund manifesto commitments for £13.2bn on home insulation and the full £8.3bn for Great British Energy, which many reports had speculated would be cut.
Other major funding programmes include an already announced £14.2bn for a new nuclear power station, Sizewell C, and £2.5bn investment to develop small modular reactors. There is an additional £9.4bn for carbon capture, including Acorn in Scotland.
Major transport projects were also given additional funding, including the east-west rail link between Oxford and Cambridge, which will receive an extra £2.5bn and a further £3.5bn investment in the Transpennine route upgrade as well as the Midlands Rail Hub, the region's biggest rail improvement scheme. There will be £445m for railways in Wales over 10 years.
Reeves said she understood that the decline of high streets was a key driver of dissatisfaction in Britain, saying there too many regeneration projects had been 'held back, gathering dust in bureaucratic limbo'. There would be a new growth mission fund to expedite local projects, she announced.
The additional funding will support up to 350 communities to improve parks, youth facilities, swimming pools and libraries and to tackle graffiti and fly tipping.
Reeves also used the spending review to announce government investment in R&D and entrepreneurs, confirming R&D spending would reach £22bn a year by the end of the spending review. She will increase the investment power of the British Business Bank to £25.6bn, which she said would be directed towards helping British business scale up.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These candidates are on the ballot for Dutchess County primary elections. What to know
These candidates are on the ballot for Dutchess County primary elections. What to know

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

These candidates are on the ballot for Dutchess County primary elections. What to know

The primary elections for Dutchess County, which set the stage for who will be on the ballot in the Nov. 4 general election, are coming up soon. On June 24, seven local municipalities are holding primaries including the City of Poughkeepsie, Town of Beekman, Town of Lagrange, Town of Pawling, Town of Red Hook, Town of Rhinebeck and Town of Union Vale. This year, Conservative, Democrat, Republican and Working Families primary elections will take place in Dutchess County. Only registered voters enrolled in a party are eligible to vote in that party's election. Polls are open 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. on June 24. If you are not already registered to vote, register online at the New York State Board of Elections website, Candidates for Ward 1 Councilmember, Districts 1 and 2: Ernest J. Henry Warren G. Jones Candidates for Ward 8 Councilmember, Districts 1 and 2: Daniel L. Atonna Sakima AG. McClinton Candidates (Dutchess County District 22 legislator for all Town of Beekman Districts): Faye B. Garito Joseph Tresca Candidates: Laureen Abbatantuono Stella Maria Slattery Candidates: Anthony Coviello Brian Green Candidates (vote for two): Ezio Battaglini Kate Blake Frank M. Lemak V Gina Ragusa More: Dave's Hot Chicken is coming to Poughkeepsie: What we know Candidates: Anthony Marinaro Steven McKenna Candidates (vote for two): William Bedford Susan Condon Alfred P. Rabasco Candidates: David Anthony Mashiah Anthony Marinaro Candidates (vote for two): Susan Condon Franco Giangrasso Daniel Mosquera Candidates: Rovin Persaud Suzette Persaud Candidates (vote for two): Allyson Persaud Reese Persaud Luis Rodriguez Candidates: Catherine Giordano James Schmitt Candidates (District 4): Lauri Taylor Louis Musella Candidates (Dutchess County District 20 legislator for Town of Red Hook Districts 1, 2, 4 and 5): Troy Haley Kristofer Munn Candidates (Dutchess County District 20 legislator for Town of Rhinebeck District 1): Troy Haley Kristofer Munn Candidates (Dutchess County District 22 legislator for Town of Union Vale Districts 1 and 2): Faye B. Garito Joseph Tresca Candidates: Steven Frazier Charles Richwine The Dutchess County Board of Elections said as of 2025, voters have the option to use any poll sites in their city or town, but some poll sites have changed. If you are unsure what town you vote in, use the New York State Poll Site Search at to find your correct election district. Here's where to vote on primary election day, June 24. City of Poughkeepsie poll sites Interfaith Towers, 66 Washington St. St. John's Lutheran Church, 55 Wilbur Blvd. Town of Beekman poll sites Beekman Community Center, 31 Recreation Center Road Town Hall, 4 Main St. Beekman Elementary School, 201 Lime Ridge Road Town of LaGrange poll sites Freedom Plains Presbyterian Church, 1168 Route 55 Overlook Primary School, 11 Mapleview Road Extension Town Hall, 120 Stringham Road Town of Pawling poll sites Holmes Whaley Lake Civic Association, 239 Route 292 Lathrop Center, 2 Lakeside Drive Town of Red Hook poll sites Bertelsmann Campus Center, 30 Campus Road Mill Road Intermediate School, 9 Mill Road Red Hook High School, 103 West Market St. Town of Rhinebeck poll sites Starr Library, 68 West Market St. Town of Union Vale poll sites Fire House, 3373 Route 82 Early voting for primary elections in Dutchess County will take place June 14-22. No in-person early voting is available the day before the election on June 23, according to the Dutchess County Board of Elections. Locations for early voting include the Mid-Hudson Library Auditorium at 105 Market St. in Poughkeepsie and Red Hook Town Hall at 7340 S Broadway in Red Hook. Early voting is available at both locations from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. June 14-22. On June 17 and June 19, polling sites will be open from noon to 8 p.m. This article originally appeared on Poughkeepsie Journal: Dutchess County primary election: Candidates, where, when to vote

MPs bar doctors from raising assisted dying with children
MPs bar doctors from raising assisted dying with children

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MPs bar doctors from raising assisted dying with children

MPs have voted to prevent health professionals such as doctors from initiating conversations with under-18s about assisted dying, as they continued scrutiny of the Terminally Ill Adults Bill. The bill would only allow those over the age of 18, and with less than six months to live, to receive medical assistance to die in England and Wales. Labour MP Meg Hillier, who tabled the amendment to the bill, had previously warned MPs to be alert to "the very real risk" of an assisted dying law being expanded to cover children and young people. Her amendment was opposed by the bill's proposer Kim Leadbeater, but approved in the House of Commons by 259 votes to 216. In a statement, a group of Labour MPs concerned about assisted dying said the result represented a "vote of no confidence in the bill and has shattered the claim that bill was the safest in the world". A backer of the bill, Conservative Neil Shastri-Hurst, had previously argued against the proposal, warning it would leave a terminally ill young person "isolated, navigating a complex and deeply personal journey through the filter of online forums, rather than in dialogue with trusted, qualified professionals". Hillier's other amendment seeking to stop health professionals from raising assisted dying with any patient was defeated by 256 votes to 230 - a majority of 26. Other changes made to the bill include a ban on advertising assisted dying services and a measure to ensure assisted deaths carried out under the bill would not be deemed unnatural and therefore not be automatically referred to a coroner. Growing number of MPs changing their mind on assisted dying How assisted dying laws across the UK could change The legislation was initially approved by MPs in November by a majority of 55 votes and has been undergoing further scrutiny. At least a dozen MPs who backed it or abstained on the bill have said they are now likely to vote against it. Supporters remain confident it will eventually clear the parliamentary hurdles and become law. Friday's debate saw MPs largely focused on how the bill would work, rather than discussing the general principle of assisted dying. There was general consensus that assisted dying advertising should be prohibited, although some MPs called for restrictions to be tightened. The amendment, tabled by Leadbeater, puts a duty on ministers to block advertising, while allowing them to make exemptions. Her fellow Labour MP Paul Waugh called for that power to be removed telling MPs "one person's advert is another person's public information campaign. "It's not impossible to imagine a secretary of state in future who passionately believes in the merits of assisted dying to authorise such a campaign." Labour MP Tony Vaughan argued that Waugh's proposal would remove "essential flexibility" allowing ministers to respond to future developments. Waugh's proposed amendment was defeated by by a majority of 21, while Leadbeater's was added to the bill. Leadbeater's amendment ensuring assisted deaths would not automatically be investigated by a coroner also got backing form MPs. Conservative Rebecca Smith had put forward an opposing amendment which would ensure assisted deaths would still be investigated by a coroner. Without that measure, she said it would be "exceptionally difficult to say whether there have been errors or instances of abuse". Disagreeing, Green MP Ellie Chowns said an assisted death under the provisions of the bill "would be the most scrutinised type of death in the country". "It makes no sense to require another legal process at the end of that when there have already been multiple layers of scrutiny," she added. At the start of the debate, MPs agreed to a previously-debated amendment on the process for replacing doctors unwilling to participate in assisted dying and another amendment which said there has to be a report from a doctor where there is concern about a proposed assisted death. Conservative frontbencher Kieran Mullan complained that the debate - "a deeply consequential and highly contentious piece of legislation" - was not getting enough time in Parliament. Health minister Stephen Kinnock replied that there had been more than 90 hours of parliamentary debate and more than 500 amendments had been considered. Liberal Democrat Christine Jardine accused some MPs of "deliberately" trying to delay the voting process. "It really looks petty and childish and could they please abstained from doing it the next time." The bill will next be debated on 20 June, when it will either fall or go to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.

Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped
Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Corbyn says police ‘picked on him to silence democratic rights' as case dropped

Police were 'picking on' Jeremy Corbyn to 'silence the democratic rights of everybody in our society', he has alleged. The former Labour leader and John McDonnell were called for interview after a pro-Palestine protest in London earlier this year. Mr McDonnell revealed in the Commons that police had dropped their investigation into the pair, but said the Metropolitan Police had originally tried to charge them because MPs were held to have 'a greater culpability'. Raising a point of order, Mr McDonnell told the Commons: 'You may be aware that (Mr Corbyn) and I were called for interview by the Metropolitan Police following our participation in a demonstration in January calling for peace and justice for the Palestinian people and an end to the genocide in Gaza. 'It was alleged that we failed to follow police restrictions on the protest. This is untrue, and at all times we followed police instructions. 'We can now report that the police have dropped the case against us and there will be no charges.' Mr McDonnell alleged that 'the Metropolitan Police informed us that our case was referred to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) because as MPs we were to be held to have, and I quote, 'a greater culpability'.' The independent MP for Hayes and Harlington, who was once Mr Corbyn's shadow chancellor, added: 'This is an unacceptable practice which flies in the face of the principle that we are all equal before the law.' Mr Corbyn, now the independent MP for Islington North, said: 'I don't intend to let it rest just there.' He told MPs: 'If there are elements in the police and possibly in the Crown Prosecution Service who want Members of Parliament to be held to a different standard of account than the general public, that removes us from the normality of law in this country. 'And I think that would be a very, very bad step indeed.' He later added: 'We have to all – all of us – have the right to take part in public protest about human rights abuse, about war, about peace, about anything else. That is what democracy is about. 'And I saw this whole effort as being a means to try and silence the democratic rights of everybody in our society by picking on us two as Members of Parliament, and I'm grateful for the decision that's been made today.' Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh said he had 'not often taken part in demos in central London' but spoke to 'show that opinion in this House of Commons is absolutely united'. 'We've always proclaimed what is very much the British way that Members of Parliament are no different from any other member of the public,' the Conservative MP for Gainsborough said. 'If they do wrong, they will be held to account, but they not be subject to some greater test of culpability just because they're Members of Parliament.' The Metropolitan Police has been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store