
Worried about inheritance tax on your pension? Don't let a scammer take advantage
Money remaining in pension pots is going to become liable for death duties like other assets, such as property, savings and investments starting in spring 2027.
The announcement in last autumn's Budget has prompted a stream of questions from This is Money readers asking how best to avoid the raid on their retirement savings - scroll down to find some legitimate options.
The legislation and communication around how the changes will work in practice is still vague, and savers may feel unsettled and unsure about whether to continue putting money into their pensions, according to St. James's Place head of advice Claire Trott.
'Some people may even be tempted to withdraw large sums from their pension out of fear their families will be hit with an inheritance tax bill in future,' she says.
'This is particularly worrying as it can increase vulnerability to potential scams.'
Will your family have to pay inheritance tax? Check the rules on who pays below
Trott says pension firms offer protection against scams, but after people take savings out their funds become more susceptible to fraud.
'Those who withdraw funds with no real plan for what they are going to do with the money can find themselves at a higher risk too.
'They may be approached by someone offering to take care of their cash, inheritance tax free, and while this may sound appealing, it could be a scam.'
She says that before making decisions about avoiding an inheritance tax bill, you should get guidance from a trusted source - such as the free Government-backed Money Helper or Pension Wise services - or consider getting a regulated financial adviser to guide you through the upcoming changes and how to manage your estate.
Trott adds that people younger than 55 should be particularly careful about pension scams.
'If you do get approached by a company claiming to help you withdraw your pension early, chances are it will be a scam,' she warns.
You can lose your entire fund in a so-called 'pension liberation' scam, and face a hefty tax charge on top for taking money from your pension before you are 55. HMRC will pursue you for this even if all your pension money has vanished already.
'It isn't illegal to access your pension before the age of 55, but it's not recommended,' says Trott.
'Not only does it significantly increase your risk of running out of money in retirement, but those who choose to withdraw early are also subject to a tax charge.
'Early pension withdrawals are only permitted without an additional charge in two scenarios – those in ill health and those with a protected retirement age in careers such as sports or the military – and a reputable pension provider is unlikely to recommend withdrawing from your pension in any other circumstances.'
How to guard against pension fraud
Claire Trott offers the following tips to protect yourself from pension scammers.
Be wary of unsolicited calls: It's important to remember that pension cold calling is illegal in the UK. If you receive a call from an unknown caller about your pension, it's likely to be a scam, so do not share any personal information or move money out of your pension at their instruction.
Hang up or if you can get some information on them, for example their phone number and company name, report it to the Information Commissioner's Office so they can take the necessary action.
Be cautious of emails, texts, or messages on social media offering 'free pension reviews' or 'guaranteed returns' too.
Don't be rushed to take action: A tactic scammers often use is to pressure you to act quickly. Take your time to make decisions and consult with trusted advisers or family members before moving money from your pension.
Remember, a genuine adviser will give you time to consider and won't rush you into a decision.
Stay alert for red flags: The following tactics are used often used by pension scammers, so if you see any of them, be aware as it could be a scam.
- Promises of 'high or guaranteed returns' or 'overseas investments'.
- Schemes that seem too good to be true, which probably are.
- Requests to transfer your pension into a single investment, especially if you're offered cashback or an upfront bonus.
Only use trusted sources: As a rule of thumb, government-backed services like Money Helper or Pension Wise are safe sources to use for pensions advice.
It may also be worth speaking to a regulated financial adviser who can guide you through the upcoming pension changes and how to manage your estate.
How do you avoid the looming inheritance tax raid on pensions?
Many savers with larger pensions are keen to avoid the new inheritance tax levy, and there are ways to do this legitimately - though some are more sensible than others, depending on your wealth and personal circumstances.
First off, consider consider if you really are likely to have a big enough estate to pay inheritance tax, especially after you have spent down your pensions and other assets during retirement.
Check the rules in the box further below, before you start worrying about your beneficiaries paying inheritance tax after you are gone. If you have cause for concern, consider the following options.
1. If you can afford it, you can spend or gift as much of your pensions as possible, while avoiding a big income tax bill.
Recent research showed many savers with larger pensions intend to spend them by splashing out on more holidays.
Bear in mind it is better to avoid crystallising losses by making bigger pension withdrawals in market downturns.
2. Consider gifting out of surplus income, which remains inheritance tax-free providing you can afford it.
We explain how to do this and prove to the taxman you are doing it from actual surplus income.
A This is Money reader explains how he is doing this to pass his wealth to his two daughters.
3. Look into buying life insurance and putting it in trust.
This can mean your loved ones get a payout straight after your death and free of inheritance tax - but you have to set it up correctly.
Here's how to put life insurance into trust, but be aware that premiums can be high especially as you get older, and if you cancel a policy you immediately lose all the benefits of taking it out in the first place.
4. Leave more or all of your estate to your spouse, who can still benefit from estates free of inheritance tax, instead of your children to delay and minimise the eventual bill.
Wealth manager Evelyn Partners has suggested there could be a marriage boom or rise in civil partnerships among older couples as a result of the inheritance tax changes - read its six options to cut inheritance tax on pensions.
5. Buying an annuity is another option which Evelyn Partners explores.
Meanwhile, beware- although some people have raised the idea of siphoning pension funds into stocks and shares Isas, these are also liable for inheritance tax, and there are other pitfalls.
A financial planner from Quilter Cheviot explains how switching pensions into Isas can backfire.
How much is inheritance tax and who pays?
Inheritance tax is levied at 40 per cent on estates above a certain size.
You need to be worth £325,000 if you are single, or £650,000 jointly if you are married or in a civil partnership, for your loved ones to have to stump up inheritance tax.
A further allowance, the residence nil rate band, increases the threshold by £175,000 each - so £350,000 for a married couple - for those who leave their home to direct descendants. This creates a potential maximum joint inheritance tax-free total of £1million.
This own home allowance starts being removed once an estate reaches £2million, at a rate of £1 for every £2 above the threshold. It vanishes completely by £2.3million.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said in the Budget these thresholds will be frozen until 2030.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is Britain's sluggish economy the fault of the Labour government?
The latest economic growth numbers may have been fairly unimpressive by most historical standards, but they were rather better than recent readings and surpassed market expectations. The first estimate of the size of the UK economy showed it had expanded by 0.3 per cent in the second quarter of this year, against a rise of 0.7 per cent in the first three months. Investors had 'priced in' a minimal 0.1 per cent rise. The annual increase, ie on the same period last year, is 1.2 per cent. Is this good news or bad news? What's happening? The pattern of sluggish economic growth that has prevailed in Britain, and most of the West, since the global financial crisis of 2008, is proving to be the new normal. It's not what we had come to expect. For most of the postwar period, punctuated by stop-go cycles, average economic growth was running at 2 to 2.5 per cent a year, with some endemic inflation and structural unemployment. By the 1990s this had accelerated to something like 2.7 per cent, combined with lower inflation and unemployment. In recent years, excepting the pandemic, growth has been more like 1 to 2 per cent. This is driven by low investment and a poor productivity record, exacerbated by market loss post-Brexit. Is this what Labour promised? No. It gave the impression that the very act of electing a Labour government to replace the incompetent Conservatives would lift confidence and 'kickstart' the economy, but no firm evidence of that has emerged. Expectations have not been fulfilled. For example, the Labour manifesto stated: 'Sustained economic growth is the only route to improving the prosperity of our country and the living standards of working people. That is why it is Labour's first mission for government. It means being pro-business and pro-worker. We are the party of wealth creation.' Rachel Reeves, when she was shadow chancellor, promised 'securonomics', but little has since been heard about that either; tax rises and welfare cuts have been the main talking points. Will Labour's policies work? They may well do, but not necessarily fast enough to produce tangible results by the time of the next general election, and to rescue Labour's second term. There are many measures that should edge up growth, even if each is comparatively modest: the Brexit reset; trade deals with the US and India; making the public finances stable; reforming planning rules; expanding airports; building 1.5 million homes; green energy including nuclear power; loosening financial regulation; making room for cuts in interest rates; and some strategic investments in new sectors. Headwinds for the UK include the continuing world trade war, cuts in migration, a trend to higher debt-financing costs globally, and the prospect of more wars. The problem is that any major investment drive takes years, which means that much of the benefit in lifting the trend rate of economic growth won't be felt until the early to mid-2030s – by which time some other political party may be in power and claiming the credit. What can Labour do? Up its presentation. As with the NHS, voters need hard evidence that things are indeed improving, even if slowly, and that they are on the path to better times. That means explaining why present sacrifices have to be made, but also some vision of the rewards that will follow as a result. The party needs to boast and showcase its successes. Does it matter? The economy will always be central, which in a way is a strength for Labour given that it can't win on the 'culture war' issues. A display of determination and competence in running the public finances and the wider economy can win the confidence of the voters. Unfortunately, Reeves has made too many errors of political judgement to be confident that the public will be receptive to anything she says. But give it time, and some evidence of higher living standards and improved public services, and that can be turned around. Is the opposition capitalising on Labour's misfortunes? Not that much. The words 'Liz Truss' and 'mini-Budget' still make people – including the current shadow chancellor – wince. The memories of the Tory years in power aren't that rosy: a long spell of austerity, followed by Brexit, Partygate, splits, crises, and general 'chaos and confusion'. Labour can still rightly pin some of the blame for 'broken Britain' on 14 years of Tory rule. The electorate simply isn't yet ready to give the Tories a hearing; they've apologised for Truss, but it's not enough. Meanwhile, perhaps from frustration with the two main parties, voters are curiously susceptible to the lavish and unrealistic promises made by Nigel Farage and Reform UK. Again, this could actually turn to Labour's advantage if it concentrates on the not-too-difficult task of proving that Farage's fantastical figures don't add up. Not much sign of that yet, though. Labour's biggest problem isn't so much the economy as complacency.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
The UK tech sector is booming – but the government must do more to support it
With each passing day, UK tech grows in importance. What was once viewed by traditionalists as marginal and voguish is now the dominant force in British business. This is why the E2Exchange, or E2E, Tech Track 100 for 2025 is so vital, showcasing the domestic firms that have forged ahead and are succeeding. In association with The Independent, E2E, the leading business networking and mentoring organisation, has published the definitive index of the 100 fastest-growing tech-focused private businesses in the UK. The list is based on their profits over the past three years and is the latest Track 100 to be produced this year. Others in the 2025 series will cover different categories, including job creation, dynamic and profits. To accompany the unveiling, Shalini Khemka, founder of E2E, assembled an online panel of UK tech stars: Jared Owen of digital shopping partner Redbrain; Mike Walters from payment platform Form3; Peter King, director of business banking for fintech bank OakNorth; data-driven and intelligence supplier Quantexa's Imam Hoque; and Dhaval Patel, CEO of Universal Partners, the foreign currency payments provider that is also sponsoring the Track 100s. We kicked off with the key question: is Britain doing enough to support tech? Hoque said he felt the government was on the right lines with R&D credits, creating a 'Silicon Valley' between Oxford and Cambridge, 'but what we and they really need to fix is the investment model for scaling-up start-ups,' he said. 'There are plenty of initiatives for start-ups but as companies grow it starts to get trickier.' Hoque believes more could be done as well, since we're longer in the EU, to buy British. He cited structural models in Canada and Australia where public pension funds are encouraged to invest in tech. 'More pressure could be applied in the UK,' he said. Walters said Britain could 'never move fast enough', since tech is constantly accelerating. Where we can score, he said, is by achieving 'greater clarity and alignment with tech in purpose and regulation and being consistent in their delivery.' There isn't one solution but a host that can combine to create a healthy outlook, he added. 'Buy it if it's British and a British spend, invest so it's funded from UK pension activities, enable regulators to understand and support tech in the UK – all those things have to happen at the same time and consistently to make a real difference.' King addressed the challenge of beginning and entering a globally crowded space. He said that his area, fintech, was one where Britain had been, and is, a world leader. That was down to government and regulators being keen to encourage and lend their backing. He agreed with Hoque that the problems arise higher up, when companies increase in size. Then traditional conservatism and aversion to risk kick in, which is when firms are forced to look outside the UK for their funding. From Redbrain, Owen was asked if the company is getting the talent it needs? 'Honest answer, probably not,' he said. 'Really exceptional people are often drawn to the global tech giants and it can be hard to compete with that.' They choose to go to them because they are playing safe and that is down to a lack of optimism. They have to be invested in and encouraged, and likewise they have to believe in what they're joining and in the longevity of remaining. Recruiting from abroad is becoming more difficult, not helped by leaving the EU, but there is a talent pool in the UK – it just needs to be made bigger and its members need to be less easily swayed by inducements from elsewhere, especially from those big global players. On one issue they and the audience were as one: that we rely on the government too much and that the best assistance tech businesses can receive is from the businesses themselves. At the end, there was some advice for would-be tech entrepreneurs: 'Dig in. Learn it and dig in,' Walters said. Owen said it was about 'creating positive tech experiences for young people, to attract them to the sector, make them grasp its potential and opportunities.' King said while the education system catches up it was up to tech businesses to foster demand, to become as attractive as possible. Patel echoed that with the final say: 'Be the role model you've always wanted to be to others.'


The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
World first driverless BUS to ferry holidaymakers between terminals at major UK airport is unveiled
HOLIDAYMAKERS will soon be ferried between terminals in the world's first driverless bus at a UK airport. The eight-seater auto shuttle will trial at Teeside International Airport from October. 2 A £1 million deal between the airport and Aurrigo International Plc will see the bus ferry passengers between terminals, while an Auto-Dolly Tug - designed to ferry cargo instead of passengers - will be trialled in January. Managing Director at Teesside International Airport, Phil Forster, said the technology would make moving bags from check-in to planes seamless. But Aurrigo's Auto-Shuttle will be tested before it carries any passengers across the tarmac. It's hoped that, if successful, the new vehicles will transform the way passengers are moved around the airport. And they could be shuttling passengers to their flights as early as 2026. Tees Valley Mayor, Ben Houchen, told the BBC: "These vehicles arriving in just a couple of months' time are a huge boost and I'm excited to see them serving holidaymakers on our year-round flights in the New Year." The futuristic vehicles come to the airport after plans were announced earlier this year to invest £2 million to build a facility that would construct and test trackless trams. The Tees Valley Combined Authority hopes the facility would allow driverless vehicles to be put to work in town centres by the end of 2027. He went on to say that the tech will likely have an impact on the whole aviation industry. Aurrigo has deployed its driverless vehicles across the world before but has never trialled them at a live airport. The firm's test will mark a world first as the driverless buses take to the tarmac. Driverless buses have previously been used in Scotland but never deployed to an airport before. The new technology allows for operating costs to be reduced with no need to pay drivers. Driverless vehicles are still relatively new and untested technology and are yet to be rolled out nationwide.