Water level plummets in Iraq's largest dam
Amnesty urges Iraq's parliament to reject controversial free speech bill
Iraqi parliament to vote on controversial protest bill
Iraq arrests accused Anfal executioner
Kirkuk court hands suspended sentence to Kurdish villager over disputed land
A+ A-
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Water levels in Mosul Dam in northern Iraq's Nineveh province have dropped significantly, largely blamed on a dry winter and reduced releases from upstream Turkey.
'While Mosul Dam has the capacity to hold 11 billion cubic meters of water, currently only two billion cubic meters of water remain in it,' Ahmed Dubardani, a member of the Nineveh Provincial Council's agriculture and water committee, told Rudaw on Saturday.
Dubardani warned that the lack of water at the dam will have 'negative consequences for the entire country.'
'The reduced water releases from Turkey is the main reason. Turkey should be releasing 600 cubic meters per second of Tigris River water, but it is only releasing 100 cubic meters per second,' Dubardani explained.
Iraq is facing a severe water shortage because of reduced precipitation, higher temperatures, mismanagement, and upstream dams in neighbouring countries. It ranks among the most vulnerable countries in the world to the effects of climate change, according to the United Nations.
Iraq does not have a comprehensive water-sharing agreement with Turkey and Iran and this, combined with a drier winter this year, has made the situation more critical.
In early July, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' al-Sudani ordered the monitoring of water flows from Turkey, after a meeting between parliament speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
According to an Iraqi parliament statement at the time, Erdogan approved Mashhadani's 'request to release 420 cubic meters of water per second daily."
But Dubardani said that the decision has not been implemented.
'We have not seen this decision implemented practically. The amount of water release is small and nothing significant has changed,' he said.
According to Dubardani, the problem has been exacerbated by poor management.
'The management of the dam's affairs is very poor. The government had previously ordered the dam's administration to release 600 cubic meters per second for the southern provinces, which created enormous pressure on the dam,' he said, calling on Baghdad to 'quickly resolve this problem.'
The World Resources Institute places Iraq among 25 countries that face extreme water stress, meaning that it is using over 80 percent of its available supply of water and is at risk of running out of water in case of any short-term drought.
Water scarcity in Iraq is also pushing families in severe drought-struck regions to the brink. In late July, migration and displaced ministry spokesperson Ali Abbas told Rudaw that over 17,000 families have migrated from the Basra, Dhi Qar, and Maysan provinces in the past decade due to 'drought, water scarcity, and desertification.'
Public pressure is also growing. Southern provinces like Basra have seen widespread protests in recent weeks over severe water shortages and pollution.
Nahro Mohammed contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rudaw Net
15 minutes ago
- Rudaw Net
Drone attacks cut Kurdistan oil output by 100,000 barrels per day
Also in Kurdistan Bahrain seeks to open representative office in Erbil: Ambassador Two dead in Halabja shooting President Barzani reaffirms Erbil's commitment to boosting ties with Berlin KDP, PUK reached 'better level' of understanding on KRG formation A+ A- Drone attacks cut Kurdistan oil output by 100,000 barrels per day ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Oil production in the Kurdistan Region has dropped by 100,000 barrels per day from the previously agreed 230,000 barrels, according to a report by Iraq's oil ministry seen by Rudaw on Tuesday, with the decline attributed to recent drone attacks that targeted the Region's energy infrastructure. Rudaw's Baghdad correspondent, Halkawt Aziz, reported that the findings were presented during an Iraqi cabinet meeting on Tuesday. The report states that 'the Kurdistan Region is currently producing 130,000 barrels of oil [per day]. Of this, 50,000 barrels are allocated for domestic consumption, while the federal government receives the remaining 80,000 barrels.' Under a recent agreement between Erbil and Baghdad, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) committed to exporting all of its oil - estimated at 230,000 barrels per day - through the State Organization for Marketing of Oil (SOMO), Iraq's national oil company. In return, Baghdad pledged to release salaries for the Region's civil servants that have been delayed for months. According to Aziz, Iraqi Oil Minister Hayyan Abdul Ghani told the cabinet that the decline in Kurdish oil output is the result of 'attacks by unmanned drones' that have severely damaged infrastructure, making it unachievable to meet the agreed upon quota. The Kurdistan Region endured nearly 20 drone attacks in July alone, including on energy infrastructure, forcing some oil fields to completely halt operations. Aziz Ahmad, deputy chief of staff to KRG Prime Minister Masrour Barzani, said in mid-July that the attacks have inflicted 200,000 barrels of oil production per day in losses. Kurdistan Region Interior Minister Rebar Ahmed revealed on Sunday that both Erbil and Baghdad know who is behind the recent drone attacks targeting the Region's oil infrastructure. 'We even know where the drones were manufactured, how they were directed, and what their targets were,' Ahmed said, adding that a joint investigative team has been formed between Erbil and Baghdad to probe the incidents. Of note, the KRG has previously accused Iraq's Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) of involvement, though Baghdad has denied the allegations. The stalled production and transfer of Kurdish oil has in turn contributed to delaying salary payments to civil servants in the Kurdistan Region, with Baghdad citing insufficient oil deliveries as the reason for withholding funds. Despite the setbacks, there are signs of progress. On Monday, the head of SOMO said the company is ready to receive any volume of oil from the Kurdistan Region, confirming the completion of 'all contractual procedures for exporting oil through the Turkish port of Ceyhan.' This statement followed a KRG announcement last week affirming its readiness to export all oil through SOMO, emphasizing its commitment to the 'mutual understanding between both sides.' Oil exports from the Kurdistan Region via the Iraq-Turkey pipeline have been suspended since March 2023, after a Paris-based arbitration court ruled in favor of Baghdad. The court found that Turkey had violated a 1973 pipeline agreement by allowing the KRG to independently export oil since 2014. The KRG, the federal government, and international oil companies operating in the Kurdistan Region have been in ongoing negotiations to establish a formula to resume Kurdish oil exports.
Rudaw Net
4 hours ago
- Rudaw Net
Lawmaker rejects US intervention in PMF bill
Also in Iraq Hezbollah censures Iraqi PM over deadly Baghdad clashes Iraq's reputation at 'risk' if PMF law passes: Former US diplomat Iraqi vows reconstruction, accountability 11 years after Yazidi genocide NGOs call for renewed focus on Yazidi justice on genocide's 11th anniversary A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - A bill aimed at further legitimizing pro-Iran armed factions has sparked controversy in Iraq. While the United States has voiced opposition to the move, a lawmaker affiliated with the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), also known as Hashd al-Shaabi, has rejected Washington's interference. "We reject American interventions, especially regarding the issuance of laws that protect our security institutions. We believe that issuing the PMF law means transferring this force to institutional work... We insist on passing this bill and call on all political forces to cooperate as a gesture of loyalty to the martyrs' blood,' Falih al-Khazali, an Iraqi lawmaker and a PMF leader, told Rudaw on Monday. Washington has expressed increasing caution about the bill that aims to regulate the PMF's structure, salaries, and retirement benefits, a politically sensitive issue given the PMF's central role in Iraq's security framework and the political influence it wields. 'Pursuing this law can put Iraq's reputation at risk both regionally and internationally,' Vincent Campos, former public diplomacy officer at the US State Department, told Rudaw on Monday. 'This law represents everything that is wrong with Iranian influence in Iraq, and everything wrong with having, essentially, an independent militia doing whatever they want.' In response to an email from Rudaw, a State Department spokesperson on Sunday asserted Washington's staunch opposition to the law, labeling it a 'deeply unhelpful step' and explaining that its passage would empower pro-Iran militias in Iraq that have attacked US forces. Jamal Kochar, a Kurdish member of the Iraqi parliament, told Rudaw on Monday that the bill seeks more legitimacy for armed factions operating outside the state control. "The US has made clear and explicit threats against passing this bill. This [bill] would grant legitimacy to groups outside the state and allocate a massive budget to them. There are several places in Iraq that even the Prime Minister [Mohammed Shia' al-Sudani] cannot visit, like Jurf al-Sakhar [near Baghdad]... Therefore, in our view, this matter is very sensitive, and the first to be harmed will be Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds,' he warned. Steven Fagin, charge d'affaires of the US embassy in Baghdad, met with the Iraqi parliament's First Deputy Speaker Muhsin al-Mandalawi on Sunday, where he 'reiterated U.S. concerns with two proposed PMC/PMF bills,' the embassy said on X. Mandalawi's office did not mention the PMF bill in its own statement, which broadly discussed bilateral cooperation and regional security. The PMF is composed of various armed factions, including groups designated as terrorist organizations by the US. Among them is Asaib Ahl al-Haq (AAH), whose leader Qais al-Khazali is a senior member of the Shiite-led Coordination Framework, a key component of Iraq's governing coalition. In March, AAH and the State of Law Coalition boycotted a parliamentary session after the PMF bill was excluded from the agenda, forcing its postponement. Halkawt Aziz contributed to this article.
Shafaq News
5 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's vague Protest Law: A tool for control or a framework for rights?
Shafaq News Iraq's parliament has reignited fierce public and political debate after reactivating a contentious draft law regulating peaceful protest and public assembly. The reintroduction of the proposal—formerly stalled since 2023—comes amid mounting pressure to finalize long-delayed legislation before the end of the current parliamentary session. While some lawmakers argue the draft law is essential for formalizing protest rights, critics warn that its vague language and selective revisions threaten to legitimize repression under the guise of regulation. A Narrower Scope, New Definitions Originally titled the Law on Freedom of Expression, Assembly, and Peaceful Demonstration, the current draft removes all references to "freedom of expression" and the "right to knowledge" from both its title and internal articles. Legal experts view this as a deliberate narrowing of the law's scope, excluding speech and media protections that were once central to the bill. The draft also introduces several legal definitions that were previously absent from Iraqi law—such as sit-ins, spontaneous gatherings, and strikes—granting these protest forms a degree of formal recognition. Notably, organizers are no longer required to obtain prior approval to hold a demonstration. Instead, they must notify the local administrative authority 48 hours in advance, providing details on the gathering's topic, location, timing, and names of up to three responsible individuals. Yet while this marks a procedural easing, the law still grants authorities broad discretion to object to or relocate protests for "security" or "organizational" reasons, leaving civil society groups skeptical about how these terms might be applied in practice. Prohibitions, Guarantees, and Grey Areas The revised draft prohibits demonstrators from carrying weapons—even if licensed—or bringing dangerous materials. It also bans wearing face coverings that obscure identity, as well as slogans or signs deemed offensive to 'public order' or 'morals.' These stipulations echo older legislative language that rights groups have long criticized for suppressing dissent and targeting protest movements. On the other hand, the draft offers new protections: it obliges security forces to safeguard peaceful gatherings and limits the use of force to situations where protests turn violent, in line with international standards. It also allows citizens to challenge protest bans before the Court of Appeal, which must rule within 72 hours—a step praised by some legal experts. Additionally, if demonstrators or third parties suffer damages and the perpetrator cannot be identified, the state is responsible for compensation, with the option to seek reimbursement later from the offender. The law also proposes repealing CPA Order No. 19 of 2003, a remnant of US occupation-era legislation governing assembly, and deleting Articles 220 to 222 of the Penal Code, which have historically allowed for the criminalization of protest leaders. For journalists, the draft introduces explicit guarantees allowing them to cover demonstrations freely and seek compensation for physical or material harm. A Struggle Between Liberties and Control Legal advocate Anwar al-Khafaji told Shafaq News that the law exposes an ongoing battle between two political visions: one prioritizing the protection of civil liberties, and another leaning toward increased state control. She cited Amnesty International's earlier warning that the law represents a 'serious setback' and contradicts Iraq's own constitution as well as its obligations under international human rights treaties. While the parliamentary Human Rights Committee claims to have softened some provisions—removing certain criminal penalties—al-Khafaji argued that key clauses remain problematic. These include vague definitions of terms like 'public order,' the ban on face coverings, and the continued restrictions on protest locations and timing. 'Without judicial independence, such ambiguous language can be used to suppress critical voices under the pretext of legality.' The reintroduction of the bill, she said, reflects fears among political elites of renewed mass protests in the lead-up to elections. Legal Objections: At Least 17 Flaws Identified Legal expert Ali al-Tamimi told Shafaq News that the draft contains at least 17 fundamental legal flaws, demanding a comprehensive overhaul. He emphasized that Article 38 of Iraq's constitution guarantees freedom of expression and peaceful assembly—rights that the draft, in its current form, undermines. Al-Tamimi raised concerns over the lack of clear definitions for key terms such as 'sit-in,' 'strike,' 'public order,' and 'morality.' He criticized the proposed role of the Human Rights Commission in resolving protest-related disputes, arguing that such responsibilities should lie with the judiciary to uphold the separation of powers. He also highlighted structural problems: -Notification vs. Authorization: Despite a shift toward a notification model, local authorities can still effectively block protests, undermining the supposed liberalization. -Excessive Police Discretion: Allowing the security apparatus to issue procedural guidelines risks politicizing enforcement. Al-Tamimi recommends placing this responsibility with the Council of Ministers. -Protest Timing Restrictions: The law imposes a 10:00 p.m. curfew on all public and private gatherings, including funerals, weddings, and religious events—raising concerns over cultural and social infringement. -Appeal Mechanisms and Oversight: The draft remains unclear on the appeals process and lacks independent oversight of security conduct during protests. -Database Regulation: Although the law mandates the creation of a protest activity database, it fails to address potential misuse or regulation of private sector data collection. Al-Tamimi also called for replacing custodial sentences with monetary fines and enforcing existing laws that prohibit sectarian and hate-based mobilization. Political Motives Behind the Law Political analyst Mujashaa al-Tamimi warned that the law's vague terms—particularly "public order" and "morality"—could be weaponized to stifle dissent. He argued that in the hands of dominant political parties, the law could legitimize the banning of protests critical of the government, especially as elections approach. 'The legal language is too broad,' he said. 'Without tighter safeguards, this becomes a tool to silence—not protect—citizens.' Al-Tamimi recommended a full legal rewrite in partnership with civil society groups, ensuring any protest regulation remains aligned with international legal norms and that limitations are necessary and proportionate. Hussein al-Mulla, spokesperson for the Digital Media Center (DMC), offered a more pragmatic view, acknowledging the need for legal regulation of protests but stressed that such laws must carefully balance public security with personal freedoms. 'Governments always view protests as threats,' he told Shafaq News. 'But that's exactly why robust legal safeguards are needed—to reassure both the public and the state.'
