Firm linked to technology secretary awarded £10.2m in contacts
The company helped write Labour's technology policies before the general election, and has since received several contracts to overhaul IT systems across government departments.
The firm was given £3m to lead the transformation of the Post Office's IT systems, and a further £5m to help oversee reforms to local public services.
READ MORE: Call for community ownership of forests to combat corporate influence
These included a £5m contract to help oversee a government programme to reform local public services, which was awarded by the Cabinet Office.
Kyle went on to hire Emily Middleton, the Public Digital partner seconded to his office last year, in a senior civil service role shortly after the election.
She continued to be paid by Public Digital while on secondment. Middleton was also previously seconded to Labour Together, a think tank with close ties to Keir Starmer and his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney.
READ MORE: Scottish politicians unfollow Unionist group after 'bomb Holyrood' post
A Public Digital spokesman told The Times that the firm 'has a proven track record of delivering exceptional digital transformation services'.
They added: 'Our team's expertise, not political affiliations, has earned us the trust of government bodies.'
A government spokesman said: 'All contracts are awarded in line with public procurement legislation.
'Public Digital is a leading digital consultancy and a long-running supplier for government and the wider public sector, holding a number of contracts awarded under previous administrations.'
The spokesman highlighted that Public Digital had won government under the previous Tory administration.
However, a sharp increase has been seen since Labour came to power. Public Digital was given an average £2.56m a year from UK Government departments in the three years prior to July 2024.
Since July 2024, the company has been awarded £10.2m.
The Conservative Party has called for an independent investigation into the links between Public Digital and the Labour Party, with Duncan Hames, director of policy at Transparency International UK and a former MP, adding: 'This case raises serious questions about how public money is now spent under the new government.
'When a company gives senior staff to support a political party and then receives valuable government contracts after they take power, this raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour accepted £40k donations from criminal it kicked out of party
Labour has said it is returning more than £40,000 donated by a convicted criminal who the party had already expelled as a member. The donations came from businessman Abdul Sattar Shere-Mohammod, 55, known as Shere Sattar, who was convicted of actual bodily harm in 2022, and thrown out of Labour later that year. The money includes £10,300 given to the central party last June, a figure that is just below the threshold to be disclosed to the elections watchdog, the Electoral Commission, the Sunday Times reported. The revelations raise questions about Labour's procedures for accepting political donations, a hot topic in the wake of reports earlier this year that Elon Musk planned to give Nigel Farage's Reform UK party $100m. In its manifesto at the last election, Sir Keir Starmer 's party pledged to 'protect democracy by strengthening the rules around donations to political parties'. As well as the money given to the party, £15,000 was donated by Mr Mohammod to, in part, support the re-election of Portsmouth MP Stephen Morgan, the early education minister. The party said Mr Morgan was not aware of his conviction. His local party should have declared these, but blamed an 'administrative error' that it said was being 'rectified'. Mr Mohammod also gave £10,000 to the local party of Southampton MP Satvir Kaur and £5,000 to Amanda Martin, another Portsmouth MP. Both declared the money in their parliamentary register of interests. The paper said the donations to Mr Morgan and his local party only emerged when a reporter contacted Mr Mohammod. Asked about his conviction this week, Mr Mohammod said he had been present during a violent confrontation after his son's bike had been stolen. He said he had tried to prevent a 'bad situation' but that his sons had gotten into a fight. He denied personally assaulting the victim. Labour told the paper the £10,300 donation to the party was below the £11,180 limit set by the Electoral Commission, meaning it didn't need to be declared. In a statement, the commission said: 'Donations that have been reported late by parties and accounting units are considered in line with our enforcement policy. We can confirm we are currently considering this matter.' Labour said that because Morgan's crowdfunding page said that donations would also support other campaigns in Portsmouth, it could not be considered a direct donation to him and did not need to be declared in his register of interests. It added that the donations would be submitted to the Electoral Commission in the party's next quarterly return. A spokesman said: 'These donations were made to Portsmouth Labour Party. Action has since been taken to return them.' They also said that Ms Kaur returned her donation last year, Martin was in the process of doing so, while the national party did so on Thursday after being contacted by the paper.
The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Mohamed Salah challenges Uefa response to Palestinian footballer's death in Gaza
In an X post, European football association Uefa said he was 'a talent who gave hope to countless children, even in the darkest of times'. Responding to this, Egyptian star Salah said: 'Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?' Can you tell us how he died, where, and why? — Mohamed Salah (@MoSalah) August 9, 2025 Among those who praised his response was former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who replied: 'Well said Mo!' Salah, 33, who has more than 19 million X followers, previously called for the massacres in the conflict to stop and for aid to be allowed into Gaza. In a video posted on Instagram in October 2023, he said: 'It is not always easy to speak in times like this. There has been too much violence and too much heartbreak and brutality. 'The escalations in the recent weeks is unbearable to witness. All lives are sacred and must be protected. The massacres need to stop. Families are being torn apart.' The PFA said that Al-Obeid, who was married with two sons and three daughters, made 24 appearances for the national team, scoring twice. He was nicknamed the 'Palestinian Pele', the PFA said. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) has been approached for comment.
The National
39 minutes ago
- The National
Radioactive water 'leaked into loch' from nuclear weapons base
A joint investigation from The Guardian and The Ferret – also reported by the BBC – found that the material was released into Loch Long in Argyll and Bute. It comes after a six-year battle to access documents which involved Scotland's information commissioner. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon opens up about self-doubt 'superpower' ahead of memoir The investigation revealed that files compiled by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) – the environment watchdog – stated the Royal Navy failed to properly maintain a network of 1500 pipes at the Coulport armaments depot. Coulport holds the Royal Navy's supply of nuclear warheads for its fleet of Trident submarines, which are based at HMNB Clyde at Faslane, near Helensburgh. Sepa said the issues at Coulport, which date back to a pipe burst in 2010, were caused by "shortfalls in maintenance". One incident listed in the files, which took place in August 2019, resulted in the release of "unnecessary radioactive waste" in the form of low levels of tritium, which is used in nuclear warheads. The environment watchdog insisted that its assessments found the risk to the environment from effluent discharges was "of no regulatory concern". Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said there had been "no unsafe releases of radioactive material" into the environment. The files were released after a ruling by Scottish information commissioner David Hamilton, who oversees the country's freedom of information laws. According to The Guardian and The Ferret, the UK Government allegedly insisted the files had to be kept secret for national security reasons. READ MORE: Inside the Scottish demining charity working to secure a safer future for Ukrainians However, in June Hamilton ruled that most of the files had to be released as their disclosure did not threaten national security but "reputations". The release of the files was delayed yet again in July by another intervention from the MoD, which cited "additional national security concerns". The files were eventually released by Sepa on August 5. Speaking to The Ferret, the Scottish Greens said the findings of the joint investigation were "deeply concerning" and called for "full transparency and accountability" from the MoD. Patrick Harvie MSP Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: "There are few sites as dangerous and where an accident or shoddy maintenance could have such potentially catastrophic consequences." A spokesperson for Sepa said it recognised the public interest in the naval base and was committed to ensuring that it operate "in accordance with standards equivalent to those in environmental regulations". All discharges from HMNB Clyde, Sepa's monitoring data, and an assessment of potential environmental and public impacts are published annually in the Radioactivity in Food and the Environment (RIFE) report. READ MORE: David Pratt: Are Trump and Putin about to stitch up Ukraine? "Based on these assessments the risk to the environment from effluent discharges is of no regulatory concern." They added an "extensive replacement programme for components" had already been undertaken and the agency was satisfied that the site had made "substantial improvements" to asset management and maintenance across both Faslane and Coulport. A MoD spokesperson said: "We place the upmost importance on our responsibilities for handling radioactive substances safely and securely. "There have been no unsafe releases of radioactive material into the environment at any stage. "We frequently engage with regulators who report there is no significant impact on the environment or public health and are supportive of an open reporting culture."
