Radioactive water 'leaked into loch' from nuclear weapons base
It comes after a six-year battle to access documents which involved Scotland's information commissioner.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon opens up about self-doubt 'superpower' ahead of memoir
The investigation revealed that files compiled by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) – the environment watchdog – stated the Royal Navy failed to properly maintain a network of 1500 pipes at the Coulport armaments depot.
Coulport holds the Royal Navy's supply of nuclear warheads for its fleet of Trident submarines, which are based at HMNB Clyde at Faslane, near Helensburgh.
Sepa said the issues at Coulport, which date back to a pipe burst in 2010, were caused by "shortfalls in maintenance".
One incident listed in the files, which took place in August 2019, resulted in the release of "unnecessary radioactive waste" in the form of low levels of tritium, which is used in nuclear warheads.
The environment watchdog insisted that its assessments found the risk to the environment from effluent discharges was "of no regulatory concern".
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said there had been "no unsafe releases of radioactive material" into the environment.
The files were released after a ruling by Scottish information commissioner David Hamilton, who oversees the country's freedom of information laws.
According to The Guardian and The Ferret, the UK Government allegedly insisted the files had to be kept secret for national security reasons.
READ MORE: Inside the Scottish demining charity working to secure a safer future for Ukrainians
However, in June Hamilton ruled that most of the files had to be released as their disclosure did not threaten national security but "reputations".
The release of the files was delayed yet again in July by another intervention from the MoD, which cited "additional national security concerns".
The files were eventually released by Sepa on August 5.
Speaking to The Ferret, the Scottish Greens said the findings of the joint investigation were "deeply concerning" and called for "full transparency and accountability" from the MoD.
Patrick Harvie MSP Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: "There are few sites as dangerous and where an accident or shoddy maintenance could have such potentially catastrophic consequences."
A spokesperson for Sepa said it recognised the public interest in the naval base and was committed to ensuring that it operate "in accordance with standards equivalent to those in environmental regulations".
All discharges from HMNB Clyde, Sepa's monitoring data, and an assessment of potential environmental and public impacts are published annually in the Radioactivity in Food and the Environment (RIFE) report.
READ MORE: David Pratt: Are Trump and Putin about to stitch up Ukraine?
"Based on these assessments the risk to the environment from effluent discharges is of no regulatory concern."
They added an "extensive replacement programme for components" had already been undertaken and the agency was satisfied that the site had made "substantial improvements" to asset management and maintenance across both Faslane and Coulport.
A MoD spokesperson said: "We place the upmost importance on our responsibilities for handling radioactive substances safely and securely.
"There have been no unsafe releases of radioactive material into the environment at any stage.
"We frequently engage with regulators who report there is no significant impact on the environment or public health and are supportive of an open reporting culture."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Celebration of Lockerbie bomber's release was 'grotesque', says Sturgeon
The Lockerbie bomber's arrival in Libya to a Saltire-waving crowd was 'grotesque' following the decision to release him from a Scottish jail, according to Nicola Sturgeon. The former First Minister opened up on her personal concerns about the release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the only person convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, and said the Cabinet was not consulted. She heavily criticised the way the decision was made by Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill without consultation from other ministers. He was freed from Greenock prison eight years into a life sentence in 2009 on compassionate grounds because of his terminal prostate cancer, and lived in Libya until his death in 2012. Ms Sturgeon said the decision 'sent shockwaves' across Scotland, the UK and much of the world and that 'had the political dynamic in Scotland been different, I have no doubt it would have brought us down'. She said: 'Had I been asked to take a decision based on my personal views, I would have decided against Megrahi's release or transfer.' While Mr MacAskill was responsible for the decision, Ms Sturgeon said it was 'inconceivable' to her that the Cabinet would not be consulted given the magnitude of what was being decided. She said Mr MacAskill's decision to visit Megrahi in jail 'astounded me' and said she first became aware of an imminent decision through a BBC news story. She said she had called Alex Salmond about the story and he implied he was 'surprised' and not in the loop because Mr MacAskill was the decision-maker - but she said she 'didn't believe him'. On Mr MacAskill's statement to parliament confirming the decision, Ms Sturgeon said: 'Kenny's intonation in making the statement made it sound like he was reading a bedtime story.' Ms Sturgeon then goes on to recount the scenes as Megrahi touched down in Tripoli, where he appeared at the door of the plane with his arm held aloft by one of Gadaffi's sons. She described how Megrahi was treated 'like a conquering war hero returning from battle', as the convicted mass murderer was greeted by a large crowd, many waving saltires as they expressed their gratutude for the decision made in Scotland. She added: 'It was grotesque.' She went on to state she could have resigned given her misgivings 'and did consider it' but opted to accept collective responsibility and rowed in behind Mr MacAskill. However, Mr MacAskill has repeatedly rubihsed the autobiography since details from it emerged, stating Ms turgeon 'is seeking to rewrite history and distorting the truth'. In 2009 Ms Sturgeon commented on the release of Megrahi, stating Mr MacAskill had 'made a brave and difficult decision'. Her comments were made after a poll showed 69 per cent of Scots believed the country's reputation was diminished in the eyes of the world because of the decision to release the bomber.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
TOM HARRIS: Frankly, I'm not buying a meek and mild Nicola Sturgeon
It's just as well that Nicola Sturgeon believes her own hype. Because if early reaction to her less-than-frank memoirs, Frankly, is anything to go by, few others do. The individual described in the 446-page opus will seem unfamiliar to most Scots. The Nicola Sturgeon of Frankly is a nervous, frightened woman completely lacking in confidence, forever seeking the approval of others and almost permanently on the brink of tears. She spends sleepless nights fretting about whether she is good enough to do the job of a politician and she is deeply hurt when anyone says mean things about her. Back on the planet earth, however, those who have observed Ms Sturgeon from her earliest days as an SNP activist all the way through to her dominance of her party as First Minister are more familiar with the 'nippy sweetie', the fierce and unforgiving woman so obsessed with independence that she seemed rarely to allow herself even the occasional smile, except, perhaps, when political opponents humiliatingly lost their seats. But it is the meek and mild Nicola Sturgeon that appears throughout the book. The reader is invited to swallow this attempt to reinvent our former First Minister entirely as someone who only ever sought consensus and who was always loyal to friends and colleagues, until they behaved too badly to tolerate. And even then they were abandoned only with the heaviest heart. For about the first third of the book, I found myself falling for this sleight of hand, starting to feel genuine sympathy for a misunderstood leader thrust almost unwillingly into the public eye. But that's when I began to see the pattern so carefully followed by Ms Sturgeon: the unexpected displays of emotional intelligence – something she has arguably failed to exhibit in public in the last 30 years – were convincing because they were so unexpected. But seen as a whole, the book is no more than an attempt to rewrite crucial parts of Scottish political history and enable the finger of blame to be pointed at anyone but her. Those who might have been looking forward to a detailed explanation of the genuinely perplexing fall-out between Ms Sturgeon and her former friend, mentor and patron, Alex Salmond, will be disappointed. Not only does the author point the finger of blame at the late SNP leader over the leaking to the media of sensitive information regarding complaints of sexual misconduct made about him, but she dismisses as a 'witch hunt' the Holyrood committee set up to investigate the Scottish Government's handling of those complaints after it concluded she had broken the Ministerial Code. A far more, reliable, independent review concluded the opposite, and that's enough for Ms Sturgeon. And on her greatest and most controversial political defeat – her failed attempt to introduce self-ID for trans people – she energetically blames everyone else for sins of which she is herself guilty. It was ordinary, decent Scottish women who raised concerns about the impact on women's rights if men who identified as women were allowed further access to women's spaces like rape shelters and changing rooms. Yet to Ms Sturgeon, 'it is beyond argument that the trans debate has been hijacked by voices on the far right . . . like Putin, Trump and Orbán.' On one page she repeats her appalling assertion that many who campaigned against her Gender Recognition Reform Bill were 'raging homophobes' and 'racists', while on the very next she bemoans a failure of opponents to 'elevate the debate or illuminate the issues at the heart of it.' More glaring than her tendency to point the finger of blame at others is her propensity not to mention certain things at all. The scandal of her and her ministers' deleted WhatsApp messages during the Covid pandemic, for example. In the end, Frankly is a valiant, though failed, attempt to restore the reputation of an individual who promised so very much to party and country but who ultimately delivered very little. Had she been honest about her failings, perhaps Scotland could have forgiven her. But forgiveness demands repentance first, and there's precious little of that in this book.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Moscow bus passengers told to rush to bomb shelters as nuclear warning played
Terrified Russian bus passengers were played a message warning of an imminent nuclear strike by pranksters. The incident in Moscow saw people on a bus ordered to run to a bomb shelter Russia: Bus passengers told to rush for shelter over 'Ukrainian nuclear strike' Pranked Russian bus passengers were ordered to rush to bomb shelters because of a supposedly imminent nuclear strike by Ukraine. In a video, a female passenger can be seen as she heard a warning on the intercom of bus 191 to Grachevskaya station in the Russian capital of Moscow. Transport officials in the city say the alarming messages followed an operation by unknown hackers. The intercom on the bus suddenly told passengers: 'Attention, attention! Ukraine is threatening us with a nuclear bombardment!' It comes after Vladimir Putin warned of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. The message went on: 'I repeat! Attention, attention! Ukraine is threatening us with a nuclear bombardment! Everyone to the shelters! Attention! Attention! Ukraine is threatening us with a nuclear bombardment!' Ukraine does not possess any nuclear weapons. It gave them up in 1994 after agreeing to security guarantees from the US, UK, Russia, France and China. It is not known how many buses were hit but it involved services run by the Transavtoliz company which operates hundreds of services. Amid confusion and concern from the message, the authorities rushed to assure travellers there was no need to panic from the false threat. A Moscow transport spokesman said: 'Audio messages that did not correspond to reality were played in the buses. 'Currently, specialists are checking the network infrastructure and eliminating the consequences of unauthorised access.' In Ukraine this week, President Volodymyr Zelensky. Zelensky said over the weekend that Kyiv 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done,' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.' The remarks came after Trump said a peace deal would involve swapping of Ukrainian territories by both sides 'to the betterment of both.' For Zelensky, such a deal could be a disaster for his presidency and spark public outcry after more than three years of bloodshed and sacrifice by Ukrainians. Moreover, he doesn't have the authority to sign off on it, because changing Ukraine's 1991 borders runs counter to the country's constitution. 'There'll be some land swapping going on,' Trump has said, however. 'I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody. To the good, for the good of Ukraine. Good stuff, not bad stuff. Also, some bad stuff for both.' Russia currently occupies around a fifth of Ukraine including almost all of the Luhansk region and almost two-thirds of Donetsk region. Russia also partially controls more than half of the Kherson region, parts of the Zaporizhzhia region, and pockets of territory in Kharkiv and Sumy regions in northeastern Ukraine. Ukrainian forces are still active in the Kursk region inside Russia, but they barely hold any territory there, making it not as potent a bargaining chip as Kyiv's leaders had probably hoped when they launched the daring incursion across the border last year. Swapping Ukrainian controlled territory in Russia, however minuscule, will likely be the only palatable option for Kyiv in any land swapping across the border last year. Swapping Ukrainian controlled territory in Russia, however minuscule, will likely be the only palatable option for Kyiv in any land swapping scenario.
