logo
Faith of citizens more in criminal justice than civil justice administration: NHRC chief

Faith of citizens more in criminal justice than civil justice administration: NHRC chief

Hindustan Times23-04-2025
New Delhi, The faith of the common man in this criminal justice system is much more than the administration of civil justice, retired Supreme Court Judge Justice V Ramasubramanian said on Wednesday.
Ramasubramanian, who is the chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission , was speaking at the launch of the country's first comprehensive criminal law database titled 'The State of the System' by Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy at the Constitution Club here, a release said.
"As a society, our psyche is tuned to convert all civil cases into criminal cases. As a lawyer, I have seen people who have lent money, who could not get their money back, they used to come to me and tell me that somehow you convert this into a criminal case, so that they get their money back.
"Therefore, despite all the pitfalls, you must admit this reality that despite all the pitfalls of the system of administration of criminal justice, the faith of the common man in this criminal justice system is much more than the administration of civil justice. They have more faith in criminal justice," the former apex court judge said.
The NHRC chairperson also spoke on the wide-ranging implications of excessive criminalisation from the three perspectives of the citizen's ease of living, the business community's compliance burden and the state's resource allocation.
During the event, a panel discussion was also held.
"The database documents every act and omission criminalised under 370 Union laws enacted over the last 174 years and spanning 45 subject areas. It aims to empower citizens, researchers and policymakers with a deeper understanding of the scope and extent of criminalisation in the country.
It highlights inconsistencies in the prescription of punishments and proposes a principled framework to guide future efforts towards decriminalisation and criminal law-making," the release said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Madras High Court orders commencement of trial
Madras High Court orders commencement of trial

The Hindu

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Madras High Court orders commencement of trial

The Madras High Court on Monday (August 11, 2025) ordered the commencement of trial in a 10-year-old defamation suit filed by former Indian cricket team captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni seeking ₹100 crore in damages from Zee Media Corporation, journalist Sudhir Chaudhary, retired Indian Police Service (IPS) officer G. Sampath Kumar, and News Nation Network for having dragged his name in to the IPL betting scam. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan also appointed an advocate commissioner to record the evidence of Mr. Dhoni on mutually convenient premises, to all the parties involved and their counsel, in Chennai. The advocate commissioner was appointed as Mr. Dhoni's personal appearance at the High Court, for the examination in chief as well as cross-examination by the defendants, might lead to chaos due to him being a celebrity. The orders were passed after senior counsel P.R. Raman submitted an affidavit sworn by Mr. Dhoni expressing his intent to proceed with the trial in the defamation suit pending since 2014. The cricketer said that he would be available for examination as well as cross-examination between October 20, 2025, and December 10, 2025, and that the venue and specific dates could be fixed on the basis of mutual convenience. 'The above request is made with the intent to avoid any undue delay (in disposal of the suit pending in the High Court for over a decade) and to support the fair, just, and speedy adjudication of the suit. I state that I shall extend my full co-operation with the Advocate Commissioner and comply with all directions issued by this honourable court regarding the trial and the recording of evidence,' the affidavit read. When Mr. Raman, assisted by advocate Sandesh Saravanan, requested the court to consider appointing a retired district judge as an advocate commissioner for recording evidence, Justice Karthikeyan said that he would pick a name from a list maintained by the High Court. He also stated that the defamation suit would be listed for hearing before the court after the completion of recording of evidence in full. The trial in the suit had got delayed for over 10 years because of multiple applications taken out by the parties seeking one relief or another. In December 2023, a Division Bench of Justices S.S. Sundar (since retired) and Sunder Mohan had convicted the retired IPS officer of criminal contempt of court and sentenced him to 15 days of simple imprisonment. However, the Supreme Court stayed the punishment in 2024. Mr. Dhoni had filed the contempt plea against the retired IPS officer for having made contumacious remarks against the Supreme Court as well as the High Court while defending the defamation suit. In July 2022, the then Advocate General R. Shunmugasundaram had granted permission to the cricketer to proceed with the contempt plea, after being satisfied that the remarks made by Mr. Kumar, in his written statement to the suit, amounted to scandalising court proceedings.

‘Ranveer Allahabadia kuch bhi bol dete hai': Ashish Chanchalani on India's Got Latent row, says police came to him first as Samay Raina, Apoorva Mukhija couldn't be found
‘Ranveer Allahabadia kuch bhi bol dete hai': Ashish Chanchalani on India's Got Latent row, says police came to him first as Samay Raina, Apoorva Mukhija couldn't be found

Indian Express

time11 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Ranveer Allahabadia kuch bhi bol dete hai': Ashish Chanchalani on India's Got Latent row, says police came to him first as Samay Raina, Apoorva Mukhija couldn't be found

Samay Raina found himself at the centre of a major controversy after YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia's inappropriate remark on India's Got Latent went viral, sparking widespread outrage and leading to multiple FIRs. In a recent interaction, Ashish Chanchlani, who was a panelist on the infamous episode, opened up about the aftermath of the controversy and revealed how he became the first person the police approached, as the other panelists were either out of town or could not be located. Speaking to Faridoon Shahryar about that tumultuous period, Ashish recalled, 'So many things happened, those two months were turmoil and it was like this for everyone who was on the show. At that time, Samay was in Vancouver, they were not able to find Apoorva and she was scared also, Ranveer (Ranveer Allahbadia) also vanished, so only I was left in Bandra and the police knew where I live, so they came to me first and I had to record my statements with the police.' Ashish expressed his frustration while reflecting on how serious the matter was. 'It might have been a clickbait, a reel for many people, but to be in front of the police and the government officials, it's very serious,' he said. When asked why he was questioned despite not making any controversial remarks, he explained, 'People will say that you didn't do anything on the show, but when you sit in front of the police and every word that you say is converted into a transcript then you realise how careful you have to be. I didn't even say anything on the show. I just laughed in one part of the show, and even that was taken into account.' He further revealed that the authorities scrutinised every reaction, including his laughter, which he had to justify in detail. 'I had to explain to them why I laughed because there were some inside jokes going on with Samay and also, I was laughing at Ranveer's stupidity, not at the comment that he made.' Addressing Ranveer's controversial remark that triggered the outrage, Ashish said, 'I know Ranveer from last seven years. I know that he says anything in fun and games.' He added, 'It was difficult for me, but it was very difficult for Samay, Apoorva and others.' Following the controversy, all episodes of India's Got Latent were removed from YouTube. The Supreme Court, in a recent order, even banned Allahbadia from posting content on social media, before later revoking the ban.

‘Try To Stop Removal & Face Action': Supreme Court's Stern Message For Dog Lovers & Animal Activists
‘Try To Stop Removal & Face Action': Supreme Court's Stern Message For Dog Lovers & Animal Activists

News18

time21 minutes ago

  • News18

‘Try To Stop Removal & Face Action': Supreme Court's Stern Message For Dog Lovers & Animal Activists

The SC on stray dog menace: 'Will these animal activists be able to bring back children who have fallen prey to rabies? We need to make streets absolutely free of stray dogs." The Supreme Court, while hearing a suo motu case against stray dogs attacking childre n, said that strict action would be taken against any individual or organisation coming in the way of picking up stray dogs by authorities. A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan said as of now, dog shelters should be created to accommodate around 5,000 stray dogs and sufficient personnel should be deployed there to sterilise and immunise the canines. It said the stray dogs be kept at dog shelters and not be released on streets, colonies and public places. the bench remarked, further stating that it would not permit the adoption of stray dogs. The top court had on July 28 taken suo motu cognisance of a media report of dog bite incident leading to rabies in Delhi. Infants, children, aged should not fall prey to rabies: SC 'We need to pick up round up with whatever means to ensure dog free locality and that's how children and aged will feel safe. Have you seen the classic 'Good, Bad and the Ugly' – when you want to shoot, shoot don't talk. It's not the time to talk but act," the SC said. 'Infants and young children, not at any cost, should fall prey of rabies. The action should inspire confidence that they can move freely without fear of being bitten by stray dogs. No sentiments should be involved." Create helpline within a week: SC The SC also directed the authorities to create a helpline within a week so that all dog bite cases are reported immediately. 'Create helpline within one week so that all cases of dog bites and rabies are reported. Action should be taken within four hours to pick up dog after complaint is received and any action of individual or organisation coming in the way will be taken with stern action. The said dog will be sterilised and shall not be released," the SC said. Set up dog shelters within eight weeks: SC 'Civic authorities in the Delhi-NCR region have been directed to make dog shelters and report about creation of infrastructure within eight weeks. It must have sufficient personnel for sterilised, dogs who would be detained there and not released in public places. It will be monitored by CCTV to monitor that no dogs are taken out," the SC said. 'We are issuing these directions keeping larger public interest in mind," the bench said. With Agency Inputs tags : stray dog menace supreme court view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 11, 2025, 14:16 IST News india 'Try To Stop Removal & Face Action': Supreme Court's Stern Message For Dog Lovers & Animal Activists Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store