
US trade war: The state of play as Trump signs order imposing new tariffs - but there are more delays
For all the threats and bluster of the US election campaign last year to the on-off implementation of trade tariffs - and more threats - since he returned to the White House in January, the president 's protectionist agenda has been haphazard.
Trading partners, export-focused firms, customs agents and even his own trade team have had a lot on their plates as deadlines were imposed - and then retracted - and the tariff numbers tinkered.
While the UK was the first country to secure a truce of sorts, described as a "deal", the vast majority of nations have failed to secure any agreement.
Deal or no deal, no country is on better trading terms with the United States than it was when Trump 2.0 began.
Here, we examine what nations and blocs are on the hook for, and the potential consequences, as Mr Trump's suspended "reciprocal" tariffs prepare to take effect. That will now not happen until 7 August.
2:49
Why was 1 August such an important date?
To understand the present day, we must first wind the clock back to early April.
Then, Mr Trump proudly showed off a board in the White House Rose Garden containing a list of countries and the tariffs they would immediately face in retaliation for the rates they impose on US-made goods. He called it "liberation day".
The tariff numbers were big and financial markets took fright.
Just days later, the president announced a 90-day pause in those rates for all countries except China, to allow for negotiations.
The initial deadline of 9 July was then extended again to 1 August. Late on 31 July, Mr Trump signed the executive order but said that the tariff rates would not kick in for seven additional days to allow for the orders to be fully communicated.
Since April, only eight countries or trading blocs have agreed "deals" to limit the reciprocal tariffs and - in some cases - sectoral tariffs already in place.
Who has agreed a deal over the past 120 days?
The UK, Japan, Indonesia, the European Union and South Korea are among the eight to be facing lower rates than had been threatened back in April.
China has not really done a deal but it is no longer facing punitive tariffs above 100%.
Its decision to retaliate against US levies prompted a truce level to be agreed between the pair, pending further talks.
There's a backlash against the EU over its deal, with many national leaders accusing the European Commission of giving in too easily. A broad 15% rate is to apply, down from the threatened 30%, while the bloc has also committed to US investment and to pay for US-produced natural gas.
1:40
Where does the UK stand?
We've already mentioned that the UK was the first to avert the worst of what was threatened.
While a 10% baseline tariff covers the vast majority of the goods we send to the US, aerospace products are exempt.
Our steel sector has not been subjected to Trump's 50% tariffs and has been facing down a 25% rate. The government announced on Thursday that it would not apply under the terms of a quota system.
UK car exports were on a 25% rate until the end of June when the deal agreed in May took that down to 10% under a similar quota arrangement that exempts the first 100,000 cars from a levy.
Who has not done a deal?
Canada is among the big names facing a 35% baseline tariff rate. That is up from 25% and covers all goods not subject to a US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that involves rules of origin.
America is its biggest export market and it has long been in Trump's sights.
Mexico, another country deeply ingrained in the US supply chain, is facing a 30% rate but has been given an extra 90 days to secure a deal.
Brazil is facing a 50% rate. For India, it's 25%.
What are the consequences?
This is where it all gets a bit woolly - for good reasons.
The trade war is unprecedented in scale, given the global nature of modern business.
It takes time for official statistics to catch up, especially when tariff rates chop and change so much.
Any duties on exports to the United States are a threat to company sales and economic growth alike - in both the US and the rest of the world. Many carmakers, for example, have refused to offer guidance on their outlooks for revenue and profits.
Barriers to business are never good but the International Monetary Fund earlier this week raised its forecast for global economic growth this year from 2.8% to 3%.
Some of that increase can be explained by the deals involving major economies, including Japan, the EU and UK.
US growth figures have been skewed by the rush to beat import tariffs.
There is an elephant in the room: inflation. Countries imposing duties on their imports force the recipient of those goods to foot the additional bill. Do the buyers swallow it or pass it on?
The latest US data contained strong evidence that tariff charges are now making their way down the country's supply chains, threatening to squeeze American consumers in the months ahead.
It's why the US central bank has been refusing demands from Mr Trump to cut interest rates. You don't slow the pace of price rises by making borrowing costs cheaper.
A prolonged period of higher inflation would not go down well with US businesses or voters. It's why financial markets have followed a recent trend known as TACO, helping stock markets remain at record levels.
The belief is that Trump always chickens out. He may have to back down if inflation takes off.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump tariffs: India has 20 days to avoid 50% levies - what are its options?
India has unexpectedly become a key target in Washington's latest push to pressure Russia over the Ukraine Wednesday, Donald Trump doubled US tariffs on India to 50%, up from 25%, penalising Delhi for purchasing Russian oil - a move India called "unfair" and "unjustified". The tariffs aim to cut Russia's oil revenues and force Putin into a ceasefire. The new rate will come into effect in 21 days, so on 27 makes India the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia and places it alongside Brazil, another nation facing steep US tariffs amid tense insists its imports are driven by market factors and vital to its energy security, but the tariffs threaten to hit Indian exports and growth all of India's $86.5bn [£64.7bn] in annual goods exports to the US stand to become commercially unviable if these rates sustain. Most Indian exporters have said they can barely absorb a 10-15% rise, so a combined 50% tariff is far beyond their effective, the tariff would be similar to "a trade embargo, and will lead to a sudden stop in affected export products," Japanese brokerage firm Nomura said in a note. The US is India's top export market, making up 18% of exports and 2.2% of GDP. A 25% tariff could cut GDP by 0.2–0.4%, risking growth slipping below 6% this year. India's electronics and pharma exports remain exempt from additional tariffs for now, but the impact would be felt in India domestically "with labour-intensive exports like textiles and gems and jewelry taking the fall", Priyanka Kishore of Asia Decoded, a Singapore-based consultancy told the BBC. Rakesh Mehra of Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (Citi) called the tariffs a "huge setback" for India's textile exporters, saying they will sharply weaken competitiveness in the US tensions now escalating, experts have called Trump's decision a high-stakes gamble. India is not the only buyer of Russian oil - there are China and Turkey as well - yet Washington has chosen to target a country widely regarded as a key what changed and what could be the fallout? India's former central bank governor Urjit Patel said that India's "worst fears" have materialised with the recent announcement. "One hopes that this is short term, and that talks around a trade deal slated to make progress this month will go ahead. Otherwise, a needless trade war, whose contours are difficult to gauge at this early juncture, will likely ensue," Mr Patel wrote in a LinkedIn post. The damaging impact of the tariffs is why few expect them to last. With new rates starting 27 August, the next 20 days are critical - India's moves in this bargaining window will be closely watched by anxious key question is whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government will quietly abandon trading ties with Russia to avoid the "Russia penalty" or stand firm against the US."India's efforts to reduce its dependence on Russian military hardware and diversify its oil imports predate pressure from the Trump administration, so Delhi may be able to offer some conciliatory gestures in line with its existing foreign policy behaviour," according to Dr Chietigj Bajpaee of Chatham House. He says the relationship is in a "managed decline", losing Cold War-era strategic importance, but Russia will remain a key partner for India for the foreseeable some experts believe Trump's recent actions give India an opportunity to rethink its strategic ties. If anything the US's actions could "push India to reconsider its strategic alignment, deepening ties with Russia, China, and many other countries", says Ajay Srivastava of the the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a Delhi-based think will visit China for the regional Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit - his first since the deadly 2020 Galwan border clashes. Some suggest a revival of India-Russia-China trilateral talks may be on the immediate focus is on August trade talks, as a US team visits India. Negotiations stalled earlier over agriculture and dairy - sectors where the US demands greater access, but India holds there be concessions in areas like dairy and farming that India has been staunchly protecting or could the political cost be too high?The other big question: What's next for India's rising appeal as a China-plus-one destination for nations and firms looking to diversify their supply chains and investments?Trump's tariffs risk slowing momentum as countries like Vietnam offer lower tariffs. Experts say the impact on investor sentiment may be limited. India is still courting firms like Apple, which makes a big chunk of its phones locally, and has been largely shielded since semiconductors aren't taxed under the new tariffs. Experts will also be watching what India does to support its exporters."India's government so far has not favoured direct subsidies to exporters, but its current proposed programmes of favourable trade financing and export promotion may not be enough to tackle the impact of such a wide tariff differential," according to stakes high, trade experts say only top-level diplomacy can revive a trade deal that seemed within reach just weeks now the Indian government has put up a strong front, saying it will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests". The opposition has upped the ante with senior Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi calling Trump's 50% tariffs "economic blackmail" and "an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal".Is Modi's touted "mega partnership" with the US now his biggest foreign policy test? And will India hit back?Retaliation by India is unlikely but not impossible, says Barclays Research, because there is precedent."In 2019, India announced tariffs on 28 US products, including US apples and almonds, in response to the US tariffs on steel and aluminium. Some of these tariffs were eventually reversed in 2023, following the resolution of WTO disputes," Barclays Research said in a note. Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

Finextra
27 minutes ago
- Finextra
FCA tightens the screws on e-money firms; consumer groups say "too little, too late"
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority has finalised new rules to protect consumer's money in the event of payment firm insolvency. 0 Under the rules. customer money must be kept separate from the firm's own money so that it is available to be returned if the firm fails. The move comes after the watchdog found that payment firms that became insolvent between Q1 2018 and Q2 2023 had average shortfalls of 65% of their customers' funds. Under the new regime, e-money firms that hold more £100,000 in customer funds must undertake annual audits and all firms must begin monthly reporting on their holdings and conduct daily checks to ensure the right amount of money is being safeguarded. Matthew Long, director of payments and digital assets, FCA, says: "People rely on payment firms to help manage their financial lives. But too often, when those firms fail, their customers are left out of pocket. "'We'll be watching closely to see if firms seize the opportunity and make effective improvements that their customers rightly deserve - this will help us to determine whether any further tightening of rules is necessary." He says the the new rules will kick in after nine months in May next year, giving industry time to prepare. Consumer advocacy group the Transparency Taskforce has branded the new measures as "too little, too late" for consumers who have suffered devastating losses from payment firm failures. "The FCA is essentially admitting they've presided over a consumer protection disaster for the past seven years," says Taskforce founder Andy Agathangelou. "These aren't technical failures - these are real people losing their life savings, house purchase deposits, and emergency funds because the regulator failed to act. It's simply scandalous that it's taken this long for the FCA to acknowledge what consumer groups have been warning about. It's a lax and woefully tardy response from a regulator that has been promising to be more responsive, more proactive and more effective for years. "It seems the FCA has the capacity to watch detriment from the sidelines for far too long before eventually taking action. But even then the action taken simply doesn't go far enough. Consumers, and consumer groups just aren't being listened to; there's an asymmetry of influence over the regulator.' The group want to see swifter implementation of the rules and enforcement of universal audit requirement regardless of firm size. It is also demanding FSCs equivalent protection for all payment firm customers and an independent review of FCA's failure to protect consumers 2018-2023.


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Chris Cuomo trolled for falling for AOC deepfake video about Sydney Sweeney
NewsNation host Chris Cuomo is being trolled on social media after falling for a deepfake video purporting to show New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez discussing the Sydney Sweeney jeans furore on the House floor. Cuomo posted an Instagram video on his X account on Wednesday – believing it to be real, having apparently not noticed its watermark admitting that the clip was 'parody 100% made with AI ' – that showed 'AOC' arguing that Sweeney's new American Eagle commercial, in which she declares that she has 'great jeans', a pun on 'genes,' is racist. Accompanying the post, the anchor wrote in a fever of righteous indignation: 'Nothing about hamas or people burning jews cars. But sweeney jeans ad? Deserved time on floor of congress? What happd to this party? Fight for small business …not for small culture wars.' In addition to the watermark and the fact that Congress is not in session, Cuomo was also not skeptical of the language used by 'AOC' in the video. 'Sydney Sweeney looks like an Aryan goddess, and the American Eagle jeans campaign is blatant Nazi propaganda,' the AI Ocasio-Cortez tells Congress. 'I mean, f***. Watching that sultry little temptress squeeze into a Canadian tuxedo three sizes too small with her bouncy little funbags on the screen staring at you, piercing through the core of your soul with those ocean-blue eyes that could resurrect the Fuhrer from his grave in Argentina, is something that should alarm every American citizen because in America, beauty is not defined by whiteness. 'Oh no, it is defined by the number of victim groups of which you are a member, skinny, attractive, blonde-haired, blue-eyed cisgender women descended from the slave daddy oppressors of this nation. And any man who [masturbates] while thinking about a woman like this probably hates Black people, probably hates gay people, and they certainly hate the diversity of our great nation.' The fake representative concludes her rousing address by declaring: 'So I say, instead of simping for the Sidneys, we should be celebrating the Shaniquas. Instead of worshipping the hot, straight blonde, what about the obese alpha? People with blue hair. They need love too. And to all the haters who say companies that go woke go broke, I'd rather be poor than a f*****g Nazi.' One of the first to call out the credulous Cuomo over the blunder was the real Ocasio-Cortez, who told him: 'This is a deepfake dude. Please use your critical thinking skills. At this point, you're just reposting Facebook memes and calling it journalism.' The journalist took down the post in question and responded: 'You are correct… that was a deepfake (but it really does sound like you). Thank you for correcting. But now to the central claim: show me you calling on hamas to surrender or addressing the bombing of a car in st louis belonging to the idf american soldier?…dude?' Ocasio-Cortez replied in withering style: 'You seem to struggle with knowing how to write an apology. Do you need help? Maybe you should call someone.' The anchor later addressed the controversy on his show, admitting his mistake while also doubling down on his attack on the congresswoman for supposedly ignoring issues in the Middle East and underachieving as a legislator. The attempted pivot did not shield him from further criticism, with Piers Morgan posting: 'Oh dear Chris Cuomo – perhaps spend less time bitching about me and more time trying to spot obvious fakes.' Tim Miller of The Bulwark commented: 'It doesn't augur well for our societal AI future if a professional news anchor gets tricked by a video that has a '100% parody' watermark.' Mike Isaacs, tech reporter for The New York Times, said the incident provided an ample demonstration of why he is 'increasingly convinced we need to administer the equivalent of drivers license tests for access to the internet every five years, forever.' Cuomo was not the only person taken in by the deepfake. Some commentators responding to the original video likewise assumed it was real and accused Ocasio-Cortez of being 'jealous' of Sweeney's beauty.