{Dhirendra Brahmchari's Aparna Ashram land} Governor reserves bill for Prez consideration
Haryana governor Bandaru Dattatreya has reserved the Bill passed by the state assembly to take over the management and control of deceased Yoga Guru Dhirendra Brahmchari's Aparna Ashram Society in Gurugram for the consideration of the President. This means that the Bill passed by the state assembly on March 28 would need the assent of the President in terms of Article 201 of the Constitution to become a law.
This also means that the state government will have to wait longer to wrest control of the moveable and immoveable assets of the Society. The state government had during the budget session of the assembly introduced the Bill to take over the management and control of the Society in view of the two-decade long litigations between members of the Society. The impending government take-over, which stands deferred now, would have also meant that a high-valued and contentious piece of about 24 acres in Gurugram's Silokhra village (Sector 30) come under government's control. The tract was at the center of a controversy after it was sold at throwaway prices to private companies in December 2020 by the purported authorised representatives of the Society.
A May 30, 2024 move of the state government to transfer the ownership of about 24 acres of Gurugram land in government's name (vide mutation number 1949) following May 29, 2024 orders of a single bench of the Punjab and Haryana high court came to naught in July 2024 after a division bench set aside the single bench's order as well as the action taken by the state government in terms of impugned orders.
Why the Bill needs President's assent
The Aparna Institution (Taking over of management and control) Bill, 2025 deals with Article 31-A of the Constitution (saving of laws providing for acquisition of estates, etc) which provides immunity from the operation of Articles 14 (equality before law) and Article 19 (protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc) for a law enacted by a state legislature for taking over of the management of a property by the state for a limited period either in the public interest or to secure its proper management. However, the provisions of Article 31-A apply only when such an enactment by the state legislature is reserved for the consideration of the President and receives President's assent.
Charitable institutions and endowments fall in Concurrent List
Since the Bill passed by the state assembly is related to the subject of charities, charitable institutions, charitable endowments enumerated in entry 28 of the Concurrent List of the Constitution on which both the union and state government have the power to make laws, the governor has to reserve it for the consideration of the President. This is because Article 254 (2) of the Constitution mandates that where a law made by the state legislature with respect to matters enumerated in the Concurrent List contained any provision repugnant to the provisions of a law made by the Parliament then the law made by the state legislature would prevail if it has received President's assent.
The Bill proposes takeover of the management, control and possession of the property of the Society for a period of ten years and a maximum of 15 years. An administrator will be appointed to carry on the management of the institution for and on behalf of the state government.
Justification for enactment of law to take over assets
As per the justification taken by the state government for enacting a legislation to take over the management and control of the Society, the disputing groups of the Society who were involved in multiple litigations were illegally and unauthorisedly trying to sell 24 acres in Gurugram for their personal gains. 'There is every likelihood that the moveable and immoveable properties of the institution may get destroyed which will frustrate the very purpose with which the institution was created. Therefore, for the management, administration, control and regulating the activities of the institution, it is expedient in the public interest to take over the management and control to achieve the aims and objectives of the institution and to fulfil the wish and will of Yoga guru,'' said the statement of objects and reasons of the Bill outlining the rationale for taking over the control of the society.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
COVID Testing Made Compulsory For Political Leaders Before Prime Minister's Meeting
Health protocols have been strictly enforced for high-level political gatherings as RT-PCR testing becomes mandatory for ministers and party officials before meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This precautionary measure comes as India's active COVID-19 cases surpassed the 7,000 threshold, prompting enhanced safety measures at the highest levels of government. Approximately 70 Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) representatives from Delhi, including the Chief Minister, all seven Members of Parliament, and various Members of Legislative Assembly, must complete RT-PCR testing before their scheduled evening meeting with the Prime Minister at his official residence. The gathering, planned for 7:30 PM, celebrates the party's recent success in Delhi's Assembly elections, with PM Modi hosting a dinner for state party leadership. The implementation of these testing protocols reflects growing concerns about the current wave of infections across the country. According to the Union Health Ministry's Wednesday update, India recorded 306 new cases and six fatalities within a 24-hour period. The deaths were distributed across Kerala (3), Karnataka (2), and Maharashtra (1). Kerala continues to dominate infection statistics, reporting 170 new cases in a single day and maintaining the highest number of active cases nationwide, with figures exceeding 2,000. Gujarat follows with 114 fresh infections and 1,223 active cases, while Karnataka logged 100 new cases during the same timeframe. Delhi's situation shows 66 additional cases in the past day, bringing the capital's total active caseload to 757 cases. The national distribution reveals Kerala leading in active infections, followed by Gujarat, West Bengal, and Delhi forming the top tier of affected regions. In response to the escalating situation, central authorities have initiated comprehensive mock drills nationwide to evaluate hospital readiness and infrastructure capacity. States have received directives to maintain sufficient supplies of oxygen, isolation facilities, ventilators, and critical medications. Despite the rising numbers, health officials emphasize that the majority of current cases present mild symptoms and manageable severity levels. The stringent testing requirements for political meetings demonstrate the government's commitment to preventing high-level transmission while maintaining essential governance functions during this challenging period.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US DOJ urges federal court not to limit Trump's use of troops in LA
Justice Department lawyers argued that a bid by California to limit the troops to guarding federal property and personnel is illegal and called it "a crass political stunt" Bloomberg By Bob Van Voris and Madlin Mekelburg The US Justice Department urged a federal judge not to interfere with the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard and US Marines to respond to deportation protests in Los Angeles. The Trump administration deployed thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of US Marines in recent days to respond to protests in Los Angeles, over the objections of state and city officials. California is seeking a court order to limit military involvement in the protests over President Donald Trump's immigration raids. 'There is no rioters' veto to enforcement of federal law,' the US said in a filing Wednesday. 'And the president has every right under the Constitution and by statute to call forth the National Guard and Marines to quell lawless violence.' The president and California Governor Gavin Newsom have traded barbs over attempts to quell unrest in the city. Newsom said the decision to send in troops was illegal, and Trump suggested that Newsom should be arrested for his response to the protests. 'President Trump continues to violate the US Constitution and federal law by turning the military into his own personal police force against American citizens,' a spokesperson for Newsom said in a statement. The dispute is the latest flash point in a broader legal fight over the limits of president Trump's executive power. In a joint statement on Wednesday, Democratic attorneys general from 18 states including New York and Illinois said the deployment was 'unlawful, unconstitutional and undemocratic' because it was done without California's consent. A group of 19 states and the territory of Guam said in a court filing they support Trump's use of National Guard troops without California's consent, calling it 'responsible, constitutional and authorized by statute.' Among the state leaders supporting for Trump's decision is Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, who vowed to use National Guard troops if needed in protests planned for June 14 in the state. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, also a Republican, offered to deploy members of the Florida State Guard to assist efforts to respond to the California protests, but Newsom rejected his offer, according to the Orlando Sentinel. At least 400 people have been arrested in the greater Los Angeles area since the weekend amid clashes between police and demonstrators rallying in response to increasingly aggressive raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Mayor Karen Bass imposed a nighttime curfew on Tuesday in a one-square-mile section of downtown where tensions have run high during days of demonstrations. She said 23 businesses were looted the night before, many were also vandalized and the area had been covered in graffiti. Of the federalized National Guard troops, more than 2,000 have been used to protect people and buildings by conducting security patrols, staffing observation posts and securing the perimeter of federal buildings, Army Major General Niave Knell said in a declaration included in the court filing. More than 700 Marines are 'currently training in preparation to conduct similar protection operations,' she said. The case is Newsom v. Trump, 25-cv-04870, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).
India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
Chief Justice's judicial terrorism caution amid government's overreach charge
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai said that while judicial activism remains an enduring aspect of India's democracy, it must not cross the line into 'judicial terrorism.'Speaking during an informal interaction with Indian students at Trinity College, Oxford Union, Chief Justice Gavai addressed the ongoing debate surrounding the judiciary's 'intrusion' into the legislative domain."Judicial activism is bound to stay. At the same time, judicial activism should not be turned into judicial terrorism. So, at times, you try to exceed the limits and try to enter into an area where, normally, the judiciary should not enter," he said in response to a The Chief Justice's remarks come at a time when the government has accused the judiciary of overreach. Gavai clarified that the judiciary would intervene if the legislature or executive failed in their duty to safeguard fundamental rights, but that judicial review should be used sparingly."This power has to be exercised in a very limited area in very exception cases, like, say, a statute, is violative of the basic structure of the Constitution, or it is in direct conflict with any of the fundamental rights of the Constitution, or if the statute is so patently arbitrary, discriminatory," he stated. "The courts can exercise it, and the courts have done so."Gavai's comments echoed the note of caution sounded by Justice Surya Kant during his keynote address at the 'Envision India Conclave' in San Francisco earlier this week. Kant had stressed that courts must not supplant the role of the legislature or override the will of the they must act as facilitators of democratic dialogue - strengthening participatory governance, protecting the vulnerable, and ensuring rule of law prevails even in moments of political uncertainty," Kant had said. "Judicial overreach risks unsettling the delicate balance of power."Chief Justice Gavai, who is the second Dalit and first Buddhist to hold India's highest judicial office, characterised the Constitution as a "quiet revolution etched in ink." He described it as a transformative force that not only guarantees rights but actively uplifts the historically Chief Justice also urged Indian students studying at British universities to return and contribute to nation-building."The only appeal to you is that after you complete your studies, you do not remain here. Come back to India. Give your services to make our Bharat strong and one of the most important powers in the entire globe," he said. "So, Bharat needs you, respond to that need."With PTI inputs
