
The super-rich are lying to us. Time we turned the tables
The Rich List, which has just made its annual appearance, is nothing but pornography: a slavering, debased and obsequious genuflection to Mammon.
In the list, we so often see riches in the possession of those already born into unimaginable wealth, not the self-made; or hoarded by those who simply watch their inherited assets accrue vast interest, not those who create jobs or work like the rest of us.
Read more by Neil Mackay
The mere "wealthy" – the comfortable – aren't in these categories. Anyone who makes a million from nothing but their own sweat deserves respect.
The mere wealthy – those on handsome six-figure salaries – pay their taxes, go to work, and often employ others. The super-rich – the billionaire class – are an entirely different matter altogether.
Even those of the billionaire class who run businesses, are most often job destroyers not creators. How many high street stores died so Jeff Bezos could shoot his phallic rockets into space? How many federal employees did Elon Musk make redundant while he shoots his own phallic rockets into space?
When hedge fund billionaires buy Scottish companies, the first act is often redundancies. It's stream-lining for efficiencies, we're told. Lies.
It's sackings to increase the money going into billionaires' pockets and the pockets of their shareholders.
How many companies have been strip-mined in Britain – often by foreign tycoons – so shareholders can buy flash new cars for their kids, fit outdoor swimming pools, or get the yacht which guarantees entry to the new aristocracy?
Those strip-mined companies were all making money – just not enough to satisfy the super-rich. There's always more sweat to ring from plebs.
Your labour goes in, their wealth comes out. That's the equation. In Scotland, Harbour Energy will eventually axe 600 jobs in total despite issuing nearly £1 billion in shareholder dividends. But, of course, taxation is blamed.
It's rampant greed. Over the last few decades, the number of billionaires has risen in direct proportion to the decline in income for the vast swathe of ordinary people.
Where did we hear that refrain before? In the anthem of the Great Depression: 'One thing's sure and nothing's surer, the rich get rich and the poor get poorer.'
The glitter from the ever-growing mountains of billionaires' gold is blinding us. We seem unable to see the parents starving themselves so their kids can eat, while they work three part-time minimum wage jobs.
Perhaps the glow isn't glitter, though, perhaps its radiation burning a hole through our society. How can democracy be worth the word in an era of such income inequality?
The billionaire class buys democracy. We vote. That's all. Our say boils down to an X on a ballot every five years.
The billionaire-class can speak directly to power, indeed the billionaire-class tells power what to do. Political donations are price-attached.
Tom Hunter, described with a curtsey as "Scotland's first home-grown billionaire", is currently lecturing us on economics. Fundamentally, he wants lower taxes, and fantasises about some Caledonian Singapore.
'Nothing is free in Singapore, but here everything seems to be,' he claims. The poor and hungry, unable to buy clothes for their children, must hang on his every word. 'A different tack needs to be taken,' Hunter says.
The irony would choke you. Here's a man – a knight of the realm, no less – calling for our failed economic system to fail even more. Since the 1980s, the policies which made Hunter rich, made millions poor.
Of course he wants to not just keep the current economic model in place, but to entrench it even further. It worked for him. It's done nothing for the rest of us.
However, he's right on one matter: a different tack needs taken. The billionaire class must be dealt with, as they were dealt with before: first, through smashing monopolies – the same medicine robber barons tasted in the 19th century – and then through reimagined programmes like Roosevelt's New Deal and the creation of the Welfare State to rebalance the scales in the interests of the people.
To continue along the path we're on economically is to slit democracy's throat. Why wouldn't people vote for the far-right if democracy only makes them poorer?
The billionaire class is lying to you, wilfully deceiving you. They demand more of the same – in fact, an even more unequal system than exists now – because they benefit from the status quo. Evidently, billionaires will fight like hell to deepen the current system: it works for them.
Most of us are so drugged to the eyeballs on the baubles we purchase from the super-rich – their streaming TV, their social media– that we cannot see their fingers dipping into our pockets like thieves.
There's a saying now: your enemies do not arrive in small boats, they arrive in yachts and private jets. It's true.
How many high street stores died so Jeff Bezos could shoot his phallic rockets into space? (Image: Getty)
A media system owned by the billionaire class works tirelessly to blame anyone but themselves for the woes we endure. Migrants aren't hurting you, billionaires are.
When Britain's Government says it cannot invest in better services for the people, that's lies. We're the sixth-largest economy on Earth.
What the Government is actually saying is that it will not invest in better services because it won't tax the rich to the same extent that it taxes the rest of us.
Equalising dividend and capital gains tax with income tax – in other words, taxing those who loaf around doing nothing but watch their money grow, to the same extent as those of us who work – would raise £21 billion. That's just for starters.
A storm is coming. You can smell it. This system won't endure much longer. In America, the storm has already broken, dragging the nation into the maelstrom of MAGA.
It's time to turn the tables. We either deal with the billionaire class in order to protect the people or we face America's terrifying storm clouds.
Neil Mackay is the Herald's Writer-at-Large. He's a multi-award winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
27 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Max Johnston hopes club success by Scottish players can boost national team
The 21-year-old right-back was part of Sturm Graz's championship-winning side, while Napoli pair Scott McTominay and Billy Gilmour, Liverpool's Andy Robertson and Celtic's Anthony Ralston have also met up with the national team for the friendlies against Iceland and Liechtenstein fresh from top-flight glory. In addition, Lewis Ferguson captained Bologna to their Coppa Italia triumph, Josh Doig helped Sassuolo to the Serie B title and Grant Hanley won League One with Birmingham. 🏴 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑡𝑡 & 𝐵𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑦 💙 @sscnapoli @ScotlandNT — Lega Serie A (@SerieA) June 4, 2025 'It's amazing to see how many trophies in so many different countries that the boys have won,' said Johnston. 'It's amazing to see Scottish players doing so well abroad and it's really encouraging for us that players are starting to win titles now and win cups, so I think that's going to be huge for us. 'As a footballer you want to be a winner, so it's great to see. That'll definitely help us.' Johnston, who moved from Motherwell to Austria two years ago, also appeared in the Champions League as he made 30 appearances for Sturm Graz in the season just finished. The campaign before that, he played 27 times as his side won the league and cup double. Johnston is thrilled with the way his move from Motherwell to the Austrian Bundesliga two years ago has panned out so far. 'It was really enjoyable for me winning the league over in Austria, it was a good season,' he said. 'I feel like I've improved definitely by getting the amount of minutes that I've managed to get over the last year or so. 'As a footballer you need to play to continue to learn, so I feel as though I've been learning and improving every week. 'The Austrian league is a great league for young players. They really try and push the younger generation and give you an opportunity to play. I've really enjoyed the experience on and off the pitch.' Johnston's progress at club level was rewarded when he made his Scotland debut as a late substitute in the Nations League play-off win away to Greece in March, and he now intends to push for more regular involvement with the national team. 'I've got a small taste for it now and it's just made me hungry for more,' he said. 'I want to try and bring what I can to the squad. I like to get forward from my position and create attacking chances, so hopefully that's what I can do for the squad.' Johnston is inspired by his father Allan, a former Hearts, Sunderland, Rangers, Middlesbrough and Kilmarnock winger who won 18 Scotland caps between 1998 and 2002. 'I'm so lucky to have grown up with someone who was involved in the game and he's been a huge help to me, him and my mum as well,' said Johnston. 'Obviously, they've been coming over to Austria and helping me out over there as well, so I'm very lucky for that.'


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
SNP minister confirms U-turn on Scottish violence reduction unit
SNP justice secretary Angela Constance has confirmed the U-turn. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have announced a U-turn on their decision to cut funding for a specialist centre aimed at tackling violent crime. Justice Secretary Angela Constance announced on Thursday funding for the Scottish Violence Reduction Unit (SVRU) would rise by 4 per cent on past levels to £1.217 million. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Knife crime rates in Edinburgh and Glasgow are on the rise. | Adobe The announcement came after The Scotsman last week exclusively revealed Scotland's national centre of expertise on violence would be hit by a budget cut of 3 per cent, in a decision that had been branded 'dangerous and irresponsible'. The SVRU had been allocated just £1,135,000 for 2025/26 - a budget cut of £35,500 - before the reversal in the Scottish Government's position. The decision follows the deaths of teenagers Amen Teklay and Kayden Moy, who both died after allegedly being stabbed in separate incidents this year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Constance said the increase in funding showed the Government's 'continued commitment' to tackling the problem of violent crime. Justice secretary Angela Constance. Picture: Lisa Ferguson Originally established in 2005 in the Strathclyde Police area, the SVRU became a national initiative the following year, with its work focusing on treating violence as a public health issue. Ms Constance said of the unit: 'They take a long-term approach to violence reduction through prevention work and working to identify, understand and address the underlying causes of violence. 'To show our continued commitment to this issue, I have announced an additional £82,000 to £1.217 million to support the work they do this year.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Constance stressed the Government's approach to tackling youth violence 'is focused on education programmes' coupled with 'effective punishment for offences, appropriate police powers and sustained school and community engagement with young people'. She also insisted: 'We have made it quite clear that no-one should every carry any weapon including knives at any time, anywhere.'

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Independence isn't going away no matter how much Keir Starmer wishes
A GROUP of leading pro-independence campaigners have written to Keir Starmer about his diktat that there will be no second Scottish independence referendum even if Scots choose to elect a pro-independence majority of MSPs at next year's Scottish Parliament election. Writer and broadcaster Lesley Riddoch, Believe in Scotland (BiS) founder Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp and Common Weal's head of policy and research Dr Craig Dalzell are all amongst those who have signed the letter as have former BBC Scotland presenter Ken Macdonald and Dr Tim Rideout, the convener of the Scottish Currency Group. The group wrote: "So this is a statement of our intent to keep campaigning for independence, an option currently favoured by more than half the Scottish population in recent opinion polls, and for the democratic right to choose – something embedded in legislation for Northern Ireland but repeatedly denied to Scotland." The group continued: "The Labour leader may think he is simply challenging the SNP before a critical by-election this week and Scottish elections next year. But Scotland's future is not an electoral game. "By denying a second referendum regardless of the 2026 election outcome, the Prime Minister is snubbing democracy, devolution and the many Scots who once viewed his party as the best democratic option to the Conservatives at Westminster." The group added that Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK "clearly offer no democratic resolution to Scotland's constitutional impasse". The letter concludes by saying that this is "precisely why we restate our determination to keep working towards independence". Of course, Starmer will file this letter in the bin, he pays attention only to focus groups stuffed with Reform UK-leaning voters from England, but it's still useful to remind a man elected on one third of votes cast in last summer's Westminster General Election that he cannot indefinitely deny the 54% or more of Scots who want independence the right to a say on the constitutional future of their country. The issue of Scottish independence is not going to go away, no matter how much Starmer and his allies in the Scottish branch office might wish it would. Back to genocide-enabling business as usual It's just over a week since Foreign Secretary David Lammy stood up in the House of Commons and told MPs that the British Government said, "tsk, tsk," to Israel over its genocide in Gaza, and its withholding of food supplies as a tool to assist in the ethnic cleansing of the territory, although of course Lammy couldn't bring himself to utter the G-word. Lammy announced that the UK was suspending trade talks with Israel in protest over the genocide that must not be mentioned. Yet within a week of Lammy's statement, Labour peer Ian Austin, who is the UK Government's trade envoy to Israel, was seen on a visit to the country where he said he was going to "meet businesses and officials to promote trade with the UK". The UK Government insisted that despite the suspension of any new trade talks with Israel, the UK still has a trading relationship with Israel. In other words, Lammy's statement was purely performative, like telling a naughty child that you're very cross with them, but then giving them money for sweeties anyway. Only in this case the naughty child is slaughtering tens of thousands of people in a genocidal war of destruction and is openly advertising its intention to ethnically cleanse two million Palestinians and permanently remove them from their homeland. Instead of giving money for sweeties, the British Government is continuing to supply Israel with the weaponry and intelligence and logistical support it needs to complete its destruction of Gaza and render it uninhabitable. But it's back to genocide-enabling business as usual for Labour. A group of Labour MPs have visited Israel on a lobbying trip as the country's brutal assault on Gaza intensifies. The party's most prominent pro-Israel group, Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), sent a delegation of parliamentarians including chair Jon Pearce, as well as fellow Labour MPs Cat Eccles, Kevin McKenna, Peter Prinsley and Mark Sewards. The group has been accompanied by former Labour MP and House of Lords member Luciana Berger. During their trip, the group met with Israeli politicians who have insisted it is "legitimate" to withhold food aid from Palestinian civilians. These include Yair Golan, leader of Labour's sister party, the Democrats. In October 2023 Golan said: 'I think that in this battle, it is forbidden to allow a humanitarian effort. We need to say to them: listen, until the [captives] are released, from our side, you can die from starvation. It's totally legitimate." At Prime Minister's Questions today, SNP MP Brendan O'Hara confronted Starmer with the revelation that UK Government lawyers arguing in the High Court had said that 'no genocide has occurred or is occurring' in Gaza. O'Hara said: 'The Prime Minister has repeatedly told this House that it is not for him or his government to determine what is and what is not a genocide. But that position is no longer tenable because at the High Court recently, the Prime Minister instructed his lawyers to argue that in Gaza, and I quote, 'no genocide has occurred or is occurring'. 'So the truth is, his government has made a determination. The question is: does he have the courage of his convictions and will he repeat from that despatch box what he told his lawyers to argue in the High Court? That he believes that no genocide has occurred or is occurring in Gaza?" Predictably, Starmer did not address the point the SNP MP had made, and retorted with an adolescent and irrelevant gibe at the SNP's opposition to nuclear weapons. Starmer said: 'I have said that we are strongly opposed and appalled by Israel's recent actions, I've been absolutely clear in condemning them and calling them out; whether that's the expansion of military operations, settler violence or the dreadful blocking of aid, it's completely unacceptable. 'We must see a ceasefire, hostages must be released and there must be aid into Gaza. 'But he talks about peace and security, their party, as I understand it at this moment of global instability as we go into a new era, what do they want to do? They want to get rid of the nuclear deterrent, the single most important capability that we have to keep the UK safe, harming the industry and harming the country.'