
EU lacks guidance on AI prohibitions, as rules start to apply
Civil society groups are concerned about the lack of European Commission guidance on banned artificial intelligence systems as the 2 February starting date for provisions of the AI Act dealing with these tools approaches.
Companies still have until mid-next year to bring their policies in line with most of the provisions of the EU's AI Act, but the ban on AI systems such as social scoring, profiling and facial recognition systems will kick in earlier.
The Commission's AI Office unit responsible fordealing with the issue said it would develop guidelines to help providers with compliance by early 2025, following a consultation on prohibited practices it carried out last November.
However, those documents have not yet been published. A spokesperson for the institution told Euronews that the aim is to publish the guidelines 'in time for the entry into application of these provisions on 2 February'.
Ella Jakubowska, head of policy, at advocacy group EDRi said that there are 'significant gaps and many open questions around the AI Office'.
'It is really worrying that interpretive guidelines still have not been published. We hope this will not be a harbinger of how the AI Act will be enforced in the future,' she added.
Loopholes
The AI Act foresees prohibitions for systems deemed to pose risks due to their potential negative impacts on society. However, the AI Act also foresees some exceptions where the public interest outweighs the potential risk, such as in law enforcement cases.
Caterina Rodelli, EU policy analyst at global human rights organization Access Now is sceptical of these exceptions: 'If a prohibition contains exceptions, it is not a prohibition anymore.'
'The exceptions mainly benefit law enforcement and migration authorities, allowing them to use unreliable and dangerous systems such as lie-detectors, predictive policing applications, or profiling systems in migration procedures,' she said.
EDRi's Jakubowska has similar concerns, and fears that 'some companies and governments will try to exploit this to continue developing and deploying unacceptably harmful AI systems.'
The issue was heavily debated when the EU AI Act was negotiated, with lawmakers calling for strict bans on facial recognition systems.
National regulators
The AI Act will have extra-territorial scope, which means that companies that are not based in the EU can still be subject to its provisions. Businesses can be fined up to 7% of global annual turnover for breaches of the Act.
Most of the AI Act provisions will apply next year, allowing for standards and guidance to be prepared.
In the meantime, member states have until August of this year to set up their national regulators who will be tasked with overseeing the AI Act. Some countries have already started preparatory steps and tasked data protection or telecom bodies with oversight.
'[This] seems to be a bit of a patchwork, with little to nothing known in several countries about either the market surveillance authorities or the notified bodies that will oversee the rules nationally,' said Jakubowska.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
EU slaps sanctions on alleged culprits of attacks on Syria's Alawites
The European Union has lifted a wide range of sanctions on Syria but slapped new ones on people and groups it says participated in attacks on civilians during a wave of violence in the coastal region in March. The move removed most sanctions that had been imposed on the country, including on its financial system. But sanctions remain in place on individuals and organisations the EU says violated human rights or for "security grounds." That includes the extended family of former President Bashar al-Assad or the country's chemical weapons programme, according to the text of the European Council on the decision. The EU's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas had announced plans to lift the sanctions last week. She said the move was "conditional" and that sanctions could be resumed if the new government of Ahmad al-Sharaa, a former rebel commander who led the charge that ousted al-Assad in December, doesn't keep the peace. Kallas said in a statement that removing sanctions "is simply the right thing to do, at this historic time, for the EU to genuinely support Syria's recovery and a political transition that fulfils the aspirations of all Syrians." But Wednesday's decision also slapped "restrictive measures" on two people and three armed groups accused of "targeting civilians and especially the Alawite community." That referred to the religious minority to which al-Assad belongs, during violence in March on the coast and of torture and "arbitrary killings of civilians." The two people targeted by the new sanctions are Mohammad Hussein al-Jasim, leader of the Sultan Suleiman Shah Brigade and Sayf Boulad Abu Bakr, leader of the Hamza Division, both armed groups that the EU said had taken part in the attacks. The militias were also slapped with new sanctions, as was another armed group, the Sultan Murad Division. Clashes erupted after a group of al-Assad loyalists attacked security forces near the coastal city of Latakia. Rights groups reported widespread revenge killings as militants from Syria's Sunni majority, some of them officially affiliated with the new government's security forces, targeted Alawites, regardless of whether they were involved in the insurgency. Hundreds of civilians were killed in the clashes. The new government in Damascus has promised to hold perpetrators accountable, but a body formed to investigate the violence has yet to release its findings. While there have not been large-scale attacks on Alawites since March, members of the community remain fearful and say that individual incidents of kidnappings and killing continue to take place. Since seizing power, al-Sharaa's government has struggled to weld a patchwork of undisciplined former rebel factions together into a national army. The lifting of the broader sanctions on Syria comes days after the United States granted Syria sweeping exemptions from sanctions in a first step toward fulfilling President Donald Trump's pledge to lift a half-century of penalties on a country shattered by 13 years of civil war. A measure by the US State Department waived for six months a tough set of sanctions imposed by Congress in 2019. The easing of sanctions removes one of the major barriers to reconstruction of the country, which the United Nations in 2017 estimated would cost at least $250 billion (€221 billion). Some experts now say that number could reach at least $400 billion (€354 billion). The United Nations estimates that 90% of Syrians live in poverty and state-supplied electricity comes as little as two hours per day.


France 24
12 hours ago
- France 24
EU sanctions Syrian militia groups over ethnic violence targeting Alawites
The European Union sanctioned on Wednesday three Syrian militia groups and two of their leaders for serious human-rights abuses over their alleged involvement in deadly ethnic violence in March. More than 1,700 people were killed in attacks mostly targeting the Alawite community, which is associated with the clan of ousted ruler Bashar al-Assad, in Syria 's coastal region in March. Brussels added the three pro-Turkish militia groups – the Sultan Sulaiman Shah Brigade, the Hamza Division and the Sultan Murad Division – to its sanctions list for their role in the killings. The groups targeted "civilians and especially the Alawite community, including by committing arbitrary killings", the EU's official journal read. Sultan Sulaiman Shah Brigade's founder Muhammad Hussein al-Jasim and Hamza Division chief Sayf Boulad Abu Bakr were also added to the sanctions list. The latter was held responsible for "serious human rights abuses in Syria, including torture and arbitrary killings of civilians". The move comes a week after EU countries gave a green light to lifting all economic sanctions on Syria in a bid to help the war-torn country recover after the ouster of Assad. The decision was officially adopted Wednesday. US President Donald Trump has also announced the lifting of sanctions on Syria, ending more than a decade of diplomatic freeze. Syria's new rulers have been clamouring for relief from the crushing international punishment imposed after Assad's crackdown on opponents spiralled into civil war. But EU diplomats had warned the 27-nation bloc intended to impose new individual sanctions on those responsible for stirring ethnic tensions. Syria's 14-year civil war killed more than half a million people and ravaged the country.


Euronews
12 hours ago
- Euronews
Kallas threatens sanctions on China over cyberattack against Czechia
The European Union is "ready to impose costs" on China in response to the cyberattack launched against the Czech Republic, High Representative Kaja Kallas has warned. "This attack is an unacceptable breach of international norms. The EU will not tolerate hostile cyber actions, and we stand in solidarity with the Czech Republic," the bloc's foreign policy chief said on Wednesday afternoon. Her comments came shortly after Prague revealed that it had identified the People's Republic of China as the state "responsible for (a) malicious cyber campaign targeting one of the unclassified networks of the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs", which the country has classified as "critical infrastructure". According to the ministry, the campaign began in 2022 and was perpetrated by the Advanced Persistent Threat Group 31 (APT31), a collective of intelligence officers and contract hackers widely suspected of gathering intelligence on behalf of Beijing. APT31 has been linked to thousands of sophisticated, hard-to-track attacks aimed at compromising government agencies, military organisations and private companies. The group is associated with the Chinese Ministry of State Security. "Such behaviour undermines the credibility of the People's Republic of China and contradicts its public declarations," the Czech Foreign Ministry said. The condemnation was echoed in a statement released by Kallas on behalf of the 27 member states, where she stressed that Brussels had been "repeatedly" raising cyberattack concerns with Beijing since at least 2021. "We call upon all states, including China, to refrain from such behaviour, to respect international law and to adhere to the UN norms and principles, including those related to critical infrastructure," Kallas said. "In this context, we reiterate that states should not allow their territory to be used for malicious cyber activities." In a subsequent press conference related to the Black Sea, the High Representative upped the ante and openly threatened to slap sanctions in retaliation. "We are determined to counter malicious behaviours in cyberspace," she told reporters in Brussels. "These threats are very serious." "We will raise them with our Chinese counterparts as well," she went on. "We definitely remain ready to impose costs for these kinds of attacks." Kallas did not specify which sort of sanctions could be introduced, simply noting they would be designed on a "case-by-case" basis as the bloc did in the past. Under EU rules, approving sanctions requires the unanimity of all member states, a threshold that is often hard to meet due to disparate views and strategies inside the room. The accusations come amid intense speculation about an impending diplomatic reset between the EU and China prompted by US President Donald Trump's disruptive policies, which have hit hard allies and adversaries alike. Although Brussels has recently softened its tone to highlight potential areas of cooperation with Beijing, multiple friction points remain unaddressed, most notably the overcapacity of low-cost industrial goods and the "no-limits" partnership established between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Last month, Kallas described China as the "key enabler" of Russia's war on Ukraine for supplying about 80% of the dual-use goods prohibited by Western allies. "Without Chinese support, Russia wouldn't be able to wage the war in the amount that they are waging it," the High Representative said. Cyberwarfare, together with foreign information manipulations and interference (FIMI), has been another long-running dispute in bilateral relations, with alarm over Beijing's forceful attempts to sway elections, spread propaganda and influence public opinion. In a statement, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said: "The malicious cyber activity targeting the Czech Republic underscores that cyberspace is contested at all times."