More than half of Discovery's medical aid plans saw declines in members last year
Four plans saw year-on-year declines in excess of 5% …
Two of the largest plans, Classic Comprehensive and income-limited KeyCare Plus, saw year-on-year declines of 7% and 11% respectively. Picture: Moneyweb
A full nine of the 16 core Discovery Health Medical Scheme (DHMS) medical plan options saw declines in members in 2024 from 2023. This is according to the scheme's annual report, which was released ahead of its AGM at the end of June.
Seven of its core plans saw increases, but one of these was for the new Classic Smart Comprehensive plan which was launched in 2023 (it removed its Essential Comprehensive plan in 2023).
The 16 core plans exclude any 'efficiency' discount options, such as Delta and Regional plans, which provide cover at specific networks of hospitals.
Overall, DHMS saw a net membership decrease of 1.05% in the 2024 calendar year and a net beneficiary decrease of 1.9%.
It ended the year on 1.359 million members and 2.735 million beneficiaries. Between December 2024 and January 2025, 94.89% of members did not change plans, while 2.89% were upgraded and 2.23% were downgraded.
ALSO READ: Discovery has a massive medical scheme problem
Four plans saw year-on-year declines in excess of 5%, with two of its largest plans, Classic Comprehensive and income-limited KeyCare Plus, seeing year-on-year declines of 7% and 11% respectively. Its Classic Comprehensive has seen declines in members and beneficiaries for a number of years now.
As a measure, in the Covid-19-hit 2020, it ended the year with 111 632 members on Classic Comprehensive. That means it has lost 26% of the member base on that plan in four years.
The average age of DHMS members has crept up to 37.59 (from 37). It says 'an increase of less than one year per annum is favourable as this indicates that young people are joining the Scheme'. This is a major looming problem for the scheme.
Practically, its only growth over the last decade has been from taking on the administration of restricted schemes, like Bankmed and Sasolmed.
DHMS says 'consistent with the stagnant South African economy, the medical scheme industry has also remained stagnant over the past decade, with a slight increase in membership of 0.98% in 2023 compared to 2022'.
This means that, structurally, the industry and DHMS as the largest scheme have a looming problem: members are ageing.
In the last 16 years, the average age of lives covered by DHMS has jumped from 32.3 to 37.6.
ALSO READ: Discovery Group records profit, thanks to Discovery Bank
Targeting young professionals
In an effort to address this, it launched a new Active Smart Plan with a contribution of R1 350 per month, specifically to target young professionals.
It says this is the most affordable option in the open scheme market.
Research by Discovery Health shows that 'for members aged 20-29, approximately 7% of their income goes toward medical scheme contributions, whereas for older working adults approximately 4% or lower of their monthly income goes toward medical scheme contributions'.
It estimates that 109 000 uncovered young professionals would take up medical scheme cover if there was an affordable option and where contributions amount to roughly 5% of their income.
Its Smart plans, which target young professionals (mostly) with young families, remain the fastest-growing plans across its portfolio. Classic Smart grew members by 10% last year, while Essential Smart grew by 26%. Both plans ended 2023 with around 72 000 members, making them larger (by members) than all but four other Discovery medical aid plans (excluding the income-linked KeyCare Plus plan).
ALSO READ: Higher medical aid premiums on the horizon following RAF's legal victory?
Contributions
DHMS contends that its contributions are 12.7% 'more affordable than the next seven largest open schemes across all plan categories in 2025'.
On extensive day-to-day plans, its contributions are 8.2% lower and on limited day-to-day plans, they are 16.5% lower.
It says it continues to 'provide exceptional claims cover for members'.
In 2022, DHMS paid 96% of in-hospital claims versus 91% for all other open schemes. Detailed data for 2023 has not yet been released by the Council for Medical Schemes.
Source: DHMS
DHMS notes that utilisation rates have returned to pre-Covid 19 levels. It saw a 7.48% increase in net claims.
Source: DHMS
It says 'claiming patterns are influenced by a changing burden of disease, demographics and benefit design'.
'Based on an analysis of the Scheme's claims experience, cardiovascular remains the disease episode with the highest risk spend, accounting for the highest proportion of the Scheme's overall claims cost.
'While tumours have surpassed musculoskeletal claims (which have remained proportionally consistent from 2022 to 2024), increase in the former is partially driven by benefit availability.'
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
More than half of Discovery's medical aid plans saw declines in members last year
Four plans saw year-on-year declines in excess of 5% … Two of the largest plans, Classic Comprehensive and income-limited KeyCare Plus, saw year-on-year declines of 7% and 11% respectively. Picture: Moneyweb A full nine of the 16 core Discovery Health Medical Scheme (DHMS) medical plan options saw declines in members in 2024 from 2023. This is according to the scheme's annual report, which was released ahead of its AGM at the end of June. Seven of its core plans saw increases, but one of these was for the new Classic Smart Comprehensive plan which was launched in 2023 (it removed its Essential Comprehensive plan in 2023). The 16 core plans exclude any 'efficiency' discount options, such as Delta and Regional plans, which provide cover at specific networks of hospitals. Overall, DHMS saw a net membership decrease of 1.05% in the 2024 calendar year and a net beneficiary decrease of 1.9%. It ended the year on 1.359 million members and 2.735 million beneficiaries. Between December 2024 and January 2025, 94.89% of members did not change plans, while 2.89% were upgraded and 2.23% were downgraded. ALSO READ: Discovery has a massive medical scheme problem Four plans saw year-on-year declines in excess of 5%, with two of its largest plans, Classic Comprehensive and income-limited KeyCare Plus, seeing year-on-year declines of 7% and 11% respectively. Its Classic Comprehensive has seen declines in members and beneficiaries for a number of years now. As a measure, in the Covid-19-hit 2020, it ended the year with 111 632 members on Classic Comprehensive. That means it has lost 26% of the member base on that plan in four years. The average age of DHMS members has crept up to 37.59 (from 37). It says 'an increase of less than one year per annum is favourable as this indicates that young people are joining the Scheme'. This is a major looming problem for the scheme. Practically, its only growth over the last decade has been from taking on the administration of restricted schemes, like Bankmed and Sasolmed. DHMS says 'consistent with the stagnant South African economy, the medical scheme industry has also remained stagnant over the past decade, with a slight increase in membership of 0.98% in 2023 compared to 2022'. This means that, structurally, the industry and DHMS as the largest scheme have a looming problem: members are ageing. In the last 16 years, the average age of lives covered by DHMS has jumped from 32.3 to 37.6. ALSO READ: Discovery Group records profit, thanks to Discovery Bank Targeting young professionals In an effort to address this, it launched a new Active Smart Plan with a contribution of R1 350 per month, specifically to target young professionals. It says this is the most affordable option in the open scheme market. Research by Discovery Health shows that 'for members aged 20-29, approximately 7% of their income goes toward medical scheme contributions, whereas for older working adults approximately 4% or lower of their monthly income goes toward medical scheme contributions'. It estimates that 109 000 uncovered young professionals would take up medical scheme cover if there was an affordable option and where contributions amount to roughly 5% of their income. Its Smart plans, which target young professionals (mostly) with young families, remain the fastest-growing plans across its portfolio. Classic Smart grew members by 10% last year, while Essential Smart grew by 26%. Both plans ended 2023 with around 72 000 members, making them larger (by members) than all but four other Discovery medical aid plans (excluding the income-linked KeyCare Plus plan). ALSO READ: Higher medical aid premiums on the horizon following RAF's legal victory? Contributions DHMS contends that its contributions are 12.7% 'more affordable than the next seven largest open schemes across all plan categories in 2025'. On extensive day-to-day plans, its contributions are 8.2% lower and on limited day-to-day plans, they are 16.5% lower. It says it continues to 'provide exceptional claims cover for members'. In 2022, DHMS paid 96% of in-hospital claims versus 91% for all other open schemes. Detailed data for 2023 has not yet been released by the Council for Medical Schemes. Source: DHMS DHMS notes that utilisation rates have returned to pre-Covid 19 levels. It saw a 7.48% increase in net claims. Source: DHMS It says 'claiming patterns are influenced by a changing burden of disease, demographics and benefit design'. 'Based on an analysis of the Scheme's claims experience, cardiovascular remains the disease episode with the highest risk spend, accounting for the highest proportion of the Scheme's overall claims cost. 'While tumours have surpassed musculoskeletal claims (which have remained proportionally consistent from 2022 to 2024), increase in the former is partially driven by benefit availability.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Daily Maverick
3 days ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Scamming is a big business — be alert and make sure you're safe
The world is awash with people trying to steal your assets. Even big-name investors have been duped. Be careful out there. I am sure that whatever money you have wasn't easy to get – you and your family worked really hard for it. But have you ever noticed how so many people are trying to steal it from you? There are some days when it seems that literally everyone is out to take it. So often, there is a news report of someone who has fleeced people of their money. The latest was a News 24 report about Mark Kretzschmar, who claimed he could make money for people and who was able to run away with about R30-million. Moneyweb has done important reporting about the company Kleuterzone and its founder, former singer Anthonie Bougas. He now appears to be in Thailand, but is not paying the money owed to investors. Like so many of these cases, he makes certain claims that always amount to the same thing: someone else is responsible, not him. If you have been paying attention to this sort of thing, you will know about Banxso, which was a scam from the start. There are so many ways our society enables this. For a start, regulators find it tough to take any action, or to do it early enough to stop people from losing their money. I have some sympathy for the Financial Sector Conduct Authority here. I mean, no one will complain about losing their money until they've lost it. And by that point, it is usually too late. This means that in some cases, a group of people are giving money to someone, all at the same time, and it's only when one of them realises it's gone that they lodge a complaint. There would have to be an investigation of some kind, and only after that can the FSCA say anything. But I have no time at all for the digital platforms that allow themselves to be used to market these thieves. For several months, there were videos on YouTube of SABC TV presenters supposedly talking about a new investment product. Elon Musk was another who was deep-faked. Now, YouTube e arns more than $30-billion in revenue every year. Is it too much to ask that it does some checking to see if it is taking money from a thief? And to have a proper complaints mechanism where a TV presenter who is being deep-faked can make sure her image is removed immediately? I do wonder how much revenue for YouTube is from simple scams, whether it be a lose-your-money-quick scheme, or that guy who clearly can't sleep at night because he's so worried about my belly fat. If this has happened to you, you shouldn't think it was because you were stupid. Recently, big-name investors, including Sanlam Investments and Old Mutual Alternative Investments, lost up to R700-million after being conned by a company called Enable Capital. The Public Investment Corporation lost another R100-million in the same scam. The person behind it, Reuben Oliphant, seems to have… you guessed it… disappeared. And sometimes, someone appears to have almost found a way to scam someone out of their money legally. Last week, the JSE publicly censured Iqbal Surve's AYO Technology Solutions and issued a suspended fine of R500,000. This was because AYO had withheld information from shareholders about its settlement with the PIC that involved it re-purchasing some of its shares. But it seems the people, sorry person, behind AYO will get away with it. Much of the money the PIC put into AYO through its investment was taken out in the form of dividends. Dividends that make no sense compared with what the company has actually produced. As a result, the money is gone. The PIC will never get it back and someone has clearly benefited. The real poison of this kind of thing is that it makes the scheme look almost legitimate. In a society where so few understand how markets, capital and investments work, it's easy to simply think people are rich because they were born rich – or because they stole their money from someone else. This kind of incident, where someone can literally lie to shareholders (thus possibly depriving them of money) and get away with it, will consolidate that view. Scamming is now big business. In Myanmar alone, there are thought to be around 150,000 people being held against their will in what amounts to prison camps, and forced to try to scam people online. Just think about that number for a moment. It is simply unbelievable how big this industry has become. To run prison camps for that many people requires capital. They wouldn't do it if they weren't making serious cash out of it. Can you imagine the nightmare of being a person who has been, you guessed it, scammed into going there, and finding themselves in one of these camps? I'm not qualified to tell you how to keep your money safe. But please. Please, please, please, make sure that you do. DM
The Citizen
04-06-2025
- The Citizen
KleuterZone kingpin Anthonie Bougas sequestrated
Court documents show he used large sums of investor money to bankroll personal indulgences – including gambling, international travel and luxury vehicles. Anthonie Bougas, founder and director of the now-defunct KleuterZone franchise group, was officially sequestrated by the Pretoria High Court on Tuesday (3 June). The court granted the final sequestration order following an application by Mathys Krog Attorneys, acting on behalf of the joint liquidators of KleuterZone Operations – Rikus Hartman and Susan Lapoorta. The liquidation of KleuterZone Operations was made final on Wednesday 14 May. Bougas, along with his parents, fled South Africa for Bangkok on 23 February amid the collapse of the nationwide nursery school franchise. He did not oppose the sequestration of his personal estate. ALSO READ: KleuterZone CEO provisionally sequestrated The beginning of the end Moneyweb began probing KleuterZone after being approached by concerned investors who claimed to have been promised exceptionally high returns – sometimes up to 72% – on what was portrayed as a fast-growing national chain of nursery schools. Despite repeated requests, Bougas declined to provide financial statements, and it soon became apparent that the schools did not generate the income to support the investment returns promised. Moneyweb also uncovered that share certificates were issued for companies that didn't exist or whose registration numbers didn't match. Shortly after Moneyweb began publishing its articles, the scheme began to unravel as investors failed to receive the dividends they had been promised. Evidence from ongoing liquidation proceedings points to an operation resembling a Ponzi scheme, where funds from new investors were used to pay existing ones. ALSO READ: KleuterZone's collapse: Parents of founder also facing sequestration Gambling habit Court documents submitted by the liquidators further reveal that Bougas used large sums of investor money to bankroll personal indulgences, including gambling, international travel and luxury vehicles. According to a report by Rapport, Bougas channelled nearly R80 million through a gambling account, although the total amount may still rise as further bank statements are obtained. The elaborate corporate structure of KleuterZone, which included numerous subsidiaries and trading entities, allowed Bougas – who was the sole director – to transfer money between the businesses freely, including into his own personal accounts. This setup complicated the financial oversight and masked the redirection of funds. ALSO READ: Another KleuterZone company in provisional liquidation More to come In addition to Bougas's sequestration, the Western Cape High Court provisionally granted the sequestration of the joint estate of his parents, Rensche and Anton Bougas, who are married in community of property. The application, brought by Hannes Muller and Madelein Kuilder – the provisional liquidators of KleuterZone (Pty) Ltd – alleges that the Bougas parents acted in concert with their son in attracting investor funds under false pretences. In an affidavit, the liquidators argue that Rensche Bougas played a pivotal role in marketing the KleuterZone franchise and was key to sustaining the illusion of a thriving and profitable business. Meanwhile, the liquidation process continues to unfold. So far, three companies linked to the KleuterZone group have been placed in final liquidation. Two more are expected to return to court, on 4 and 11 June respectively. The sequestration of the estate of Kobus Schoeman, KleuterZone's former CEO, is also due for court consideration later this month. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
