Where US adults think the government is spending too much, according to AP-NORC polling
The polls from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research suggest that as President Donald Trump and adviser Elon Musk push for extensive cuts throughout the federal government, slashing funding for humanitarian aid and turning their attention to the Department of Education and the military, Americans may not agree with where Trump and Musk's cuts should ultimately fall.
About two-thirds of Americans say the U.S. government is spending 'too little' on Social Security and education, according to a January AP-NORC poll. Another 6 in 10, roughly, say too little money is going to assistance to the poor. A similar share say spending is too low for Medicare, the national health care insurance program for seniors, and most also say Medicaid is under-funded by the federal government. About half say border security is not receiving enough funding.
The perpetual challenge for lawmakers is that although U.S. adults mostly think the government isn't spending enough on key issues and programs, they are broadly in favor of cuts to the federal budget. AP-NORC polling from March 2023 found that 6 in 10 U.S. adults said the U.S. government was spending 'too much' overall.
Most think the US is overspending on foreign aid
Foreign aid is one area where there is broad consensus that the U.S. is overspending. The 2023 AP-NORC polling suggests that Americans tend to believe too much money is going to other countries.
Roughly 7 in 10 U.S. adults said the government was putting too much money toward 'assistance to other countries.' About 9 in 10 Republicans and just over half of Democrats agreed that the country was overspending on foreign aid at the time.
Richard Tunnell, a 33-year-old veteran living in Huntsville, Texas, said he believes the United States gets involved in other countries' problems too often. Tunnell, an independent who voted for Trump in November, is glad that Trump, a Republican, is prioritizing his 'America First' policies.
'Americans need to worry about Americans,' Tunnell said. 'There's atrocities happening on American soil just as much as there is on foreign soil. You know, if we can't clean up our own house, why the hell are we trying to clean up somebody else's house?'
At the same time, polling has shown that U.S. adults tend to overestimate the share of the federal budget that is spent on foreign aid. Surveys from KFF have found that, on average, Americans say spending on foreign aid makes up 31% of the federal budget rather than the actual answer: closer to 1% or less.
Republicans and Democrats say spending is too low for Social Security
On both sides of the political aisle, very few U.S. adults think the country is spending too much on Social Security and Medicare, according to the January AP-NORC poll. But there are bigger divides on spending for the military, border security, Medicaid and assistance to the poor.
About one-third of U.S. adults say the federal government is spending 'too much' on the military. About one-third say the military is getting 'too little' funding, and another one-third say it takes in 'about the right amount.' But most Republicans say the military is underfunded, while slightly less than half of Democrats say it's getting too much money.
Jeremy Shouse, a 38-year-old Democrat in Durham, North Carolina, said he believes government assistance programs for ordinary Americans should be as well-funded as the U.S. military is.
'I think it's really a slap in our faces as Americans,' he said, referring to the underfunding of programs like Medicaid, which he has needed to use.
'When it comes down to school, Medicaid, any type of government assistance programs, the money is just kind of not there,' he said. 'Not like it is for the military or the Army.'
Strong majorities of Democrats say the U.S. government spends 'too little' on assistance to the poor, education, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. They are divided on funding for border security — about 4 in 10 say the funding is about the right amount, while 3 in 10 say it's too high and about 3 in 10 say it's too little — and tend to say federal law enforcement agencies such as the CIA and the FBI are getting the right amount of funding.
Republicans tend to want more money for border security, Social Security and the military. About 8 in 10 Republicans say too little money is allocated to border security, and about two-thirds say that about Social Security.
___
The AP-NORC poll of 1,147 adults was conducted Jan. 9-13, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump administration weighs 10% stake in Intel via Chip Act grants, making government top shareholder
The Trump administration is discussing taking a 10% stake in Intel, according to a Bloomberg report on Tuesday, in a deal that could see the U.S. government become the chipmaker's largest stakeholder. As part of a potential deal, the government is also considering converting some or all of Intel's grants from the 2022 U.S. CHIPS and Science Act into equity in the company, the report said, citing a White House official and other people familiar with the matter. At the embattled chipmaker's current market value, a 10% stake would be worth roughly $10.4 billion. Meanwhile, Intel has been awarded about $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants, including $7.9 billion for commercial manufacturing and $3 billion for national security projects. The report noted, however, that it remains unclear if the idea has gained traction broadly within the administration or whether officials have broached the possibility with affected companies. It added that the exact size of the stake remains in flux, and it remains unclear whether the White House will actually proceed with the plan. Intel and the White House did not immediately respond to CNBC's queries regarding the report. Intel, once a dominant force in the U.S. chip industry, has fallen behind global competitors in advanced chip manufacturing. Reviving the former U.S. chip champion has become a national priority in Washington, with reports about a potential government stake in the company first circulating last week. The company has been the largest recipient of the 2022 Chips Act, passed with bipartisan support under the Biden administration, as part of efforts by Washington to revitalize U.S. leadership in semiconductor manufacturing. The bill allocated $39 billion in grants for American semiconductor manufacturing projects, with funding committed to many of the world's chipmakers such as TSMC and Samsung, as well as American chip companies such as Nvidia, Micron and GlobalFoundries. U.S. President Donald Trump, though supporting the general goals of the Chips Act, has been a vocal critic of the bill and even called for its repeal earlier this year. While republican lawmakers in Washington have been reluctant to act on that call, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in June that the administration was renegotiating some of the bill's grants. If Intel's Chip Act funds were to be converted into a potential government stake in the company, it could decrease the total amount of capital infused into the company as part of any deal by Washington. However, it would serve as the latest example of the Trump administration's interest in building government-backed national champions in strategic industries. Intel has struggled to gain an advantage in the artificial intelligence boom and has yet to capture a significant customer for its manufacturing business despite spending heavily on it. Some analysts have argued that government intervention is essential for the struggling chipmaker and for the sake of U.S. national security. Others contend that Intel's problems are deeper than funding, and it is not clear how the government can help with that. Analysts have also noted that Trump may be able to sway companies to buy Intel chips or assist indirectly, through tariffs and regulation. On Tuesday, it was announced that SoftBank was investing $2 billion in Intel. According to LSEG, the investment is worth about 2% of Intel, making SoftBank the fifth-biggest shareholder. Masayoshi Son, Chairman & CEO of SoftBank Group, said: "This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role." Intel investors had initially welcomed news of the government investment, which resulted in a share rally of nearly 9% on Aug. 14. Shares of Intel fell over 3% on Monday on the Bloomberg report, but rebounded by more than 5% in overnight trading on the trading platform Robinhood following news of a Softbank investment. Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, who was appointed in March 2025, met with Trump at the White House last week, after the U.S. president had called for his ousting due to his past ties to China. After the meeting, Trump had changed his tune on the Intel chief, saying he had "an amazing story." It's unclear if a potential government stake in the company had been discussed at the time. Read the full Bloomberg story here.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas State Rep. Refuses To Leave Capitol Amid Democrat And Republican Showdown
A Texas state representative has refused to leave the state capitol amid a contentious battle between Republicans and Democrats. State Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth (D) told news outlets she was protesting the Republican House speaker's insistence that she and other Democratic lawmakers be under surveillance by state troopers ahead of Wednesday's meeting of the legislature. Related: 'I don't know how long I will be here,' Collier wrote in a statement to the Fort Worth Report on Monday. 'Instead of DPS officers looking for pedophiles, they have been assigned to follow Democratic state representatives around only to ensure their return to the Capitol on Wednesday (when the House reconvenes). I sure hope the public feels safe without those officers on beat.' Related: Collier's insistence on remaining in the state capitol, located in Austin, comes after Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) threatened to arrest Democrats who attempted to block Republicans from their racially biased redistricting efforts by leaving the state for two weeks. The redistricting effort, unsurprisingly pushed by President Donald Trump, would allow Republicans to gain an extra five congressional seats ahead of the midterm elections. After many of the Democratic lawmakers returned to the state, the Texas House of Representatives reached a quorum on Monday, meaning it had enough members present to conduct business. The end of their walkout followed California Democrats' decision to move forward with a vote in November on temporarily redrawing maps to neutralize Republican efforts to gerrymander. It also comes after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's (R) special session was canceled on Friday. Upon the Texas Democrats' return to the House on Monday, Burrows then reportedly required them to be escorted by Department of Public Safety officers until Wednesday, when the House reconvenes. 'Members who have not been present until today, for whom arrest warrants were issued, will be granted written permission to leave only after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated [Department of Public Safety] officer appointment under the rules of the house,' he said, also explaining that the officers would then 'ensure' that the members would return Wednesday morning, according to NBC News. Related: 'For those still absent, civil arrest warrants remain in force,' he added. In a statement to NBC News, Collier said she was a 'political prisoner' for not falling in line with Republican 'surveillance protocol.' 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts,' she said. Related: U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) weighed in on the matter in an online post: 'As a former Texas State Rep, let me be clear: LOCKING Rep. Nicole Collier inside the chamber is beyond outrageous. Forcing elected officials to sign 'permission slips' & take police escorts to leave? That's not procedure. That's some old Jim Crow playbook.' 'Texas Republicans have lost their damn minds,' she added. HuffPost reached out to representatives for Collier and Burrows for comment but did not immediately hear back. Related... Texas Dems Throw In The Towel Gavin Newsom Launches Plan To Offset Texas Gerrymander Texas State Rep. Isn't Backing Down From Fighting 'Overtly Racist' Redistricting Map Newsom Warns Trump California Can 'Neutralize' His Texas Redistricting EffortsSolve the daily Crossword


CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
Gold steadies ahead of Fed's Jackson Hole summit
Gold prices were little changed on Tuesday as investors awaited the Federal Reserve's annual conference this week for cues into possible rate cuts, and weighed Washington's efforts to end the war in Ukraine. Spot gold held steady at $3,331.49 per ounce as of 0201 GMT. U.S. gold futures for December delivery fell 0.1% to $3,375.40. Fed Chair Jerome Powell's remarks at the central bank's symposium on August 21-23 in Wymoing could offer clarity on the economic outlook and expectations of policy easing. "Gold is still consolidating and is really waiting for a new catalyst to break higher. I think the big event to watch is Jackson Hole and whether the Fed brings the dovish guidance or not," said Kyle Rodda, financial market analyst. Market participants currently see an 84% probability of a 25-basis-point rate cut at the Fed's next meeting, per the CME FedWatch tool. Gold typically performs well in a low-interest-rate environment and amid heightened uncertainties. Minutes from the Fed's July meeting, due for release on Wednesday, are expected to provide additional cues into its policy. On Monday, U.S. President Donald Trumptold President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that Washington would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any potential deal to end Russia's war. This assurance followed Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, which ended without an agreement. Trump described his meeting with Zelenskiy as "very good", and, in a social media post, said he had called the Russian leader and begun arranging a meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy. "In the unlikely event some sort of deal gets struck (between Ukraine and Russia), that could be a very negative surprise for the gold price," Rodda said. Elsewhere, spot silver fell 0.5% to $37.82 per ounce, platinum rose 0.1% to $1,323.76 and palladium lost 0.9% to $1,112.34.